| ||
Home | Site Index | Heithinn Idea Contest | | ||
A History of the Vikings Chapter 1
1. A. W. Brøgger, Ertog og Øre, Oslo, 1921, especially chap. I. 55 eastern Europe; in much smaller numbers the denarii have also occurred in the Scandinavian mainland and in Denmark. (1) But it is not the Roman influence upon the Goths that matters here, nor even the fact, and it is of greater importance, that in their new homes these people came into contact with the enfeebled civilization of the Greek colonies on the Black Sea coast. For the event of chief interest is that the Goths lived side by side in south Russia with the Sarmatians, a group of oriental nomads of Iranian stock and akin to the inhabitants of northern Persia. These Sarmatians, who were earlier immigrants into south Russia than the Goths, had wrested their lands from the Scythians who had preceded them in this movement westwards, and who were likewise, it is now believed, Iranians. From them the Sarmatians had acquired a distinctive art, peculiar as regards the representation of animal forms and as regards the style of jewellery affected, both this animal form and this jewellery being derived from the arts of the Persians, the Assyrians, and the Egyptians. The Goths, soon after their arrival on the Black Sea, acquired from the Sarmatians a taste for their gay multi-coloured personal ornaments (2) : in fact, this jewellery, distinguished by flashy mosaics of semi-precious stones set in cells, and the bold use of large gems, is sometimes called 'Gothic', the reason being that as a result of its adoption by the Goths it was destined to become a widespread and notable fashion throughout barbarian Europe. There is, then, the possibility of a quasi-oriental influence acting upon Scandinavia by way of the Weichsel trade-route and through the agency of the Goths. Such an influence can, in fact, be detected in the ready adoption of the 'Gothic' polychrome jewellery, for this seems to have reached the north directly from the Goths by way of the Weichsel route, rather than from Hungary at a later period after the Gothic invasion of the Empire. An effect of such an influence upon small personal ornaments of this kind may seem, indeed, to be unimportant, but actually it is of considerable interest because viking art itself is thought by some to owe not a little to orientalizing tastes. With the polychrome jewellery another innovation was transmitted from the new Gothic territories back to the north, 1. For the denarius-hoards in northern Europe and Russia, see T. J. Arne and O. Almgren in Oldtide, VII (1918), pp. 207-212. 2. On this subject see the magnificent pioneer-study by Professor Rostovtzeff, Iranians and Greeks in South Russia, Oxford, 1922, especially chap. VIII. 56 namely the brooch with the 'returned foot'. This was either invented by the Goths, or an adaptation by them of the provincial Roman or Greek brooches they saw in use, and once introduced into northern Europe it was there copied and developed to an extraordinary extent, being, in fact, the prototype of a long and important series of Teutonic brooches. (1) More important among the outside contributions to northern civilization in this period is the introduction of the art of writing. The Runic alphabet, or furtharc as it is commonly called, (2) was at first used merely for the scratching of an owner's or artist's name on small personal belongings or for memorial inscriptions of the simplest kind, but it is of high antiquity and seems to have been employed in Scandinavia as early as the middle of the third century A.D. The question of its origin has been the subject of elaborate and sustained discussion, but the verdict of Dr. Carl Marstrander, who has studied the problem with a thoroughness that must Fig. 11 (Opens New Window) 1. For the origin of the brooch with the 'returned foot', see Bernhard Salin , Die aligermanische Thierornamenlik, Stockholm, 1904, chap. I. 2. Because the first letters of the Runic system are not a, b, but f, u, r, th, a, r, c. 3. The word erilar is found in five early Runic inscriptions in the north. It is likely that many of the oldest inscriptions here are the work of travellers rather than of the native population. 57 Russia and he finds the closest affinities to the Runic characters not in the Greek alphabet, but in Celto-Latin alphabets of the Alpine regions. These last he believes to be based on north Etruscan and Latin systems, and it is the Marcomanni, he contends, situated on the borders of the Romano-Celtic world and already a powerful and important people in the first century, who must have turned them into runes and passed them on to their still unlettered brethren of the north. (1) No influx of new people in significant numbers altered the character of the population of the north in the Roman Iron Age, and in an archaeological sketch it is sufficient to remark upon the cultural renaissance that took place in this period and that is plainly to be ascribed to an indirect knowledge of Roman civilization. At the same time there is evidence of an unrest disturbing the dwellers in the north, as illustrated by the emigration of the Goths, and at the end of the Roman period, as counterpart to these outward movements, there seems to have been a considerable infiltration of continental Germans, men, that is, of an allied culture and of the same 1. Dr. C. J. S. Marstrander notable paper, Om runene og runenavnenes oprindelso (with French summary) will be found in Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap, 1 (1928), p. 85. It should be compared with the work of Holger Pedersen (Aarb., 1923, PP. 37-82; French trans. Mem. Soc. Ant. du Nord, Copenhagen, 1920-4, P-88 ff.), who advocates a Latin origin for Runes through the medium of Gaulish instruction and likewise suggests the Rhine borderlands as the place of invention; in company with Dr. Marstrander he remarks upon certain analogies between the Runic and Ogam systems and thinks that both the Germans and the British Celts derived their alphabets from a common Gaulish source. The leading exponent of the theory of a Latin origin was Ludwig Wimmer (Aarb., 1874, p. I ff.; German version, Die Runenschrift, Berlin, 1887), and the theory until recently widely held of a Greek origin, with the inclusion of a few Latin letters, has been propounded by Otto von Friesen (Om runskriftens härkomst, Uppsala, 1904), and cf. the same author's article in Hoops, Reallexikon der Germ. Alt., IV, 1918-19, s.v. Runenschrift, and his Rö-stenen i Bohuslän och runorna i Norden under folkvandringstiden, Uppsala Univ. Årsskrift, 1924, and by S. Bugge (Norges Indskrifter indtil Reformationen, Afd. I, Oslo, 1905-13). The reader should also note a paper by Sigurd Agrell (Arkiv f. Nordisk Filologi, XLIII, 1927, p. 97). who admits the influence of Greek cursives but is of the opinion that the furtharc is really a reflection of Mithraic symbolism and magic, and that it was evolved in the second century by German soldiers serving in the Roman army; on this subject see also the important studies of Magnus Olsen, e.g. in Rev. de l'hist. des religions, XCVI (1927) and Edda, 1916, and of Magnus Hammarström, Studier i nordish Filologi H. Pipping, XX (Helsingfors, 1929), I, who emphasizes the Celtic influence on the development of the furtharc. For a short discussion of recent theories and a criticism of Marstrander's views see H. Shetelig, Bergens Museums Årbok, 1930, hist.-ant. r., I. << Previous Page Next Page >> © 2004-2007 Northvegr. Most of the material on this site is in the public domain. However, many people have worked very hard to bring these texts to you so if you do use the work, we would appreciate it if you could give credit to both the Northvegr site and to the individuals who worked to bring you these texts. A small number of texts are copyrighted and cannot be used without the author's permission. Any text that is copyrighted will have a clear notation of such on the main index page for that text. Inquiries can be sent to info@northvegr.org. Northvegr™ and the Northvegr symbol are trademarks and service marks of the Northvegr Foundation. |
|