| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home | Site Index | Heithinn Idea Contest | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Guthones
The Ethnology of the Goths. It is of great importance for any Lithuanian scholars to delve
into the past of the Gothic people, because there are mighty good evidences
indicating that the vanished Gothic nation was closely akin to the Lithuano-Prussian
nation. Guttones, otherwise named Guddae, Goths, Gottheudi, Getae, Getvi,
Gytae, ---belonged to the Aestian race (R. G. Latham, The Germania of Tacitus,
Notes on Section XLV, p. 166-171). The Gothic nation branched itself into several tribes, namely:
Austrogudae (Amali), Balthi (Baltgudae, Visigoths, or Thervingi), Heruli, Gepidae,
Rugians, Brenti, Varni, etc. The history of the powerful Goths is interesting and amazing:
interesting, because in a short time they succeded in dominating half of the
European continent and demolishing the Roman Empire; amazing, because those
blue-eyed, fair-complexioned, athletic, mead-drinking "barbarians"
were not at all barbarous. Goths, for their valor, endurance, perseverance,
firmness, justice, mercy, and decency in family life, were admired by the highly
civilized Romans. Whenever the Goths were victorious over the Roman army, Roman
inhabitants rejoiced as if it were their salvation. And indeed it was less troublesome
and better for the Romans to live under the Gothic dominion than under the tyranny
of their own rulers. Queer enough, that such a mighty nation, risen to such a height
of greatness, vanished altogether, leaving behind them neither important literature,
nor any treasures of art, nor any relics of their culture. Consequently, the
origin of the Goths is puzzling to the ethnologists; and the Gothic history
is a true complex. Certain German and Scandinavian scholars endeavored to claim
the Goths, depending on the tales of Jornandes and Wulfila's (the Germanized
Greek) Bible. But there are many prominent scientists that do not agree with
Grimm's, Mullenhof's, Lembke's, Niebuhr's, Zeuss's inferences, and are skeptical
concerning the "Teutonic" origin of the Goths. And why should there
be no doubts, if nobody ever called the Germans "GOTHI", and even
lately nobody calls them so? The Poles, the Russians, the Czechs and all other
Slavonic people call Germans "niemcy"; the Lithuanians call Germans
"vokie
iai"; the Frenchmen call them "l'Allemands"; the
English people call them "Germans"; even the Germans call themselves
"Deutsche". That the Gothic nation was the nearest kindred to the Lithuanian
nation, is proven by the following facts:--- 1. THE GEOGRAPHIC PROOF. The original geographic area of the Gothic people coincides with the present Lithuanian territory.
This, when translated into English, means: "The less significant
people abide in Sarmatia, near the mouth of the Vistula river. Beyond the Venedi
are Guthones. Then the Finns. Then the Boulanes (= Poles). Beyond them are the
Frugundians. Then the Avarens, near the head of the Vistula river". Here
we notice, that Ptolomaeus enumerated different nations starting from north
southward. Hence his statement "beyond the Venedi, are Guthones" is
correct. Venedi were the ancient people living near Vindau, in Latvia; and the
Guthones living alongside Venedi surely could be no other people but the inhabitants
of old Lithuania. (b) Tacitus (ca. A.D. 100), the prominent Roman historian, in his treatise de situ, moribus et populis Germaniae c. XLIII. writes:Meaning: "Beyond the Lygians reign the Gothones, who are more united (mobilized) than other Germanic tribes, yet are enjoying greater freedom. Near by the Ocean live Rugians (1), and Livonians (2):" Tacitus' statement "trans Lygios" (= beyond the Poles)
is remarkably precise, and he chose to enumerate the nations from the south
northwards. If Tacitus wrote that "trans Lygios" the Gothones live
and near by the Ocean there are the Rugians and the Livonians, neighbors of
the Courlanders, ---then it is evident that the Goths lived within Lithuanian
territory. (c) Pytheas, who lived ca. 320 before the Christian era, according to Plinius' statement in his HIST. NATUR. I. XXXVII, c. 2. has recorded the following information about the Goths: "Pytheas credidit Guttonibus Germaniae genti, accoli Aestuarium oceani, MENTO NOMON nomine, spatio stadiorum sex millium. Ab hoc die navigatione insulam abesse Abalum. Illo vero fluctibus advehi et esse concreti maris purgamentum. Incolas pro ligno ad eo uti, proximique Teutonis vendere". This, when translated into English, means: "Pytheas believed that the Guttones were of German race, living by the Aestuarian sea (Baltic sea), at the mouth of the river named NOMON, at the stretch of 6,000 stadii. Sailing a day from here there is Abalum island. Here indeed the waves cast out the amber and this is a petrified manure of the sea. The natives burn it instead of wood, and sell it to the neighboring Teutons." From the statements of Pytheas we get quite definite information,
namely:--- that the native land of the Goths was by the Aestuarian sea (by the
Baltic sea), exactly where the Aestians (Aestii = Lithuanian ancestors) lived.
The same author is still more definite when he points out that they lived nowhere
else but at the mouth of NEMON river. Plinius copying down what is written in
Pytheas' manuscripts, and fearing lest he might mislead his readers, copied
down the name exactly as it was written in Greek, namely "MENTO NOMON".
And in the original Greek manuscript would be Men to Nouon.
Hence the word "MENTO" equals the Greek men to which means "MOUTH
of the RIVER"; --- and the word "NOMON" means "NEMON"
(= Niemen). Compare with § (a) Ptolomaeus' expression men
ton Ouistoulan, in which men ton means "the
mouth of the river".
From Widsid's poem we can't surmise anything else, because here
he plainly relates that the native land of "Hreš-Gotum", and "Hraeda
here" was situated on the shores of Vistula river, east from Angles. I
am not the only one who firmly believes that the Hreš-Gotum really were the
Prusso-Lithuanians. Many other famous scholars stated that Hreš-Gota was the
ancient name for the Lithuanian people. For instance, one of the most prominent
of England's ethnologists and philologists, Dr. R. G. Latham, in his book "The
Germania of Tacitus, Epilogomena XLIX, c. 5" says:--- "In the name
Reudingi, the Reud--- may, possibly, be the Hreš--- in Hreš-Gotans. Now the
Hret-Gotan were Lithuanians". 1. Rugii means the Rugian people that lived in ancient times in the vicinity of Riga. Historians believe that the city of Riga was named after "Rugai" (Rugii). Vadakaris (Odovakar), the king of the Heruli was also the ruler of the Rugii. [Back] 2. Lemovii is another name for the Livonians, who were neighbors to the Curi (Courlanders). Duisburg mentions Terra Lamotina. Pomponius Sabinus (A.D. 1480) also mentioned about the Laemonii in his writings. [Back]
© 2004-2007 Northvegr. Most of the material on this site is in the public domain. However, many people have worked very hard to bring these texts to you so if you do use the work, we would appreciate it if you could give credit to both the Northvegr site and to the individuals who worked to bring you these texts. A small number of texts are copyrighted and cannot be used without the author's permission. Any text that is copyrighted will have a clear notation of such on the main index page for that text. Inquiries can be sent to info@northvegr.org. Northvegr™ and the Northvegr symbol are trademarks and service marks of the Northvegr Foundation. |
|