| ||
Home | Site Index | Heithinn Idea Contest | | ||
Loki: Friend of Othinn
| Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Although Rooth presents some interesting information the
lack of any evidence other than some folks sayings does not, in my opinion,
give any convincing connection between the spider and Loki. The only possible
evidence she gives is the possibility of the net, which Loki is said to have
invented, as being a representation of the spider's web. But like most of the
evidence she gives it is a bit of a stretch and in the end she only shows that
the Locke was used as Loki's name but in the absence of any other correlative
evidence this really seems to me to be stretching it a bit to then connect the
spider to Loki because, as she admits, there are many other names used for the
spider than Locke. Ultimately Rooth's assertions about Loki are faulty and in
my opinion off the mark for a two reasons. First there is absolutely no correlative
evidence in the lore that even remotely connects Loki to the spider. It would
be different if there were some shred of evidence in the lore to back up the
already meager evidence from the folklore but there is none. Second her supposition
depends on not being originally a member of the Aesir and that he was anthropomorphized
from the spider. She states that since Loki is always mentioned with different
gods shows that he was a later addition is very unconvincing as he is mentioned
with those gods more than a few times (i.e. Othinn and Thorr). As Loki is so
central to most of the major stories in the lore that he was a later addition
or anthropomorphization extremely unlikely. Likewise his early mention in poems
like Haustlong and others also work against this theory. So in the end, although
Rooth presents some interesting ideas she is unconvincing. It is interesting
though that she does present information that does further support Loki's connection
with fire, even though that was not her purpose. The last thing I would like to examine is the possible connection
between the triad of Othinn, Loki and Hoenir and Othinn, Lothurr and Hoenir.
It is thought by some that Loki and Lothurr are two names for the same reason
because of the similarities in the names. There are some that dispute this and
indeed it is a matter which there is no real certainty on. But it is very interesting
to note that there is no other mention of Lothurr in the lore other than as
traveling companions of Othinn and Hoenir. So what we know of Lothurr is simply
that he traveld with Othinn and Hoenir. Furtherly, in my mind, points to the
possibility of Lothurr and Loki being the same person is the fact that the same
two people, Othinn and Hoenir are mentioned as traveling with Loki as well as
Lothurr. Simek states that it is possible that the name of Loki is short for
either Lopt or Lothurr. If we allow that Lothurr and Loki are possibly the same
person then we must accept that Loki took a role in the quickening of the progenitors
of our people for it was the triad of Othinn, Lothurr and Hoenir who each give
a gift to the first man and woman of our people, Askr and Embla. I will admit
that this connection is tenuous at best so I will leave it to the reader to
decide for him or herself. No matter where a person comes down as to what Loki's role is
in the Northern Lore, I think it is safe to say that his role is enigmatic in
way that he would possibly be pleased with. I believe that I have shown at least
the possibility that he was in early lore before the coming of Christianity,
more a mischievous figure whose actions ultimately brought the Aesir great benefit
although at first they may have seemed negative in nature. But that is indeed
the way of Loki, taking disaster and making something beneficial from it. It
is likely in my opinion that as the Christian conversion got under way that
Loki's character gradually began to be blackened by Christian scribes with an
agenda until we come to Snorri and Lokasenna and Loki's demonization. I think
also that Loki's binding and his involvement in Baldr's murder could have been
late additions. I likewise think that when one takes into account the evidence
from Folklore that Loki's connection with fire is a real possibility. I have
always thought the nature of fire as an apt representative of Loki's nature,
that is just as apt to be helpful or cause problems. So no matter what the reader's own opinions on Loki are,
I hope that I have increased their knowledge of this most enigmatic of the Aesir
and have given the reader a few things to consider about Loki. Whether or not
the reader would agree with me and call Loki, a friend of the Aesir or if they
would call him enemy of the Aesir, there is one thing that cannot be denied
and that is that the Lore, and indeed, the Aesir, would not be the same without
Loki. Learn more about the Northern Way on Northvegr Forums or join the Northvegr Félag Mailing List. © 2004-2007 Northvegr. Most of the material on this site is in the public domain. However, many people have worked very hard to bring these texts to you so if you do use the work, we would appreciate it if you could give credit to both the Northvegr site and to the individuals who worked to bring you these texts. A small number of texts are copyrighted and cannot be used without the author's permission. Any text that is copyrighted will have a clear notation of such on the main index page for that text. Inquiries can be sent to info@northvegr.org. Northvegr™ and the Northvegr symbol are trademarks and service marks of the Northvegr Foundation. |
|