| ||
Home | Site Index | Heithinn Idea Contest | | ||
Grimm's TM - Chap. 15 Chapter 15
I had thought at one time that Hercules might stand for Sahsnôt,
Seaxneát, whom the formula of renunciation exalts by the side of Thunar
and Wôdan; I thought so on the strength of 'Hercules Saxanus,' whose surname
might be explained by saxum = sahs. But the inscriptions in which we meet with
this Hercules Saxanus extend beyond the bounds of Germany, and belong rather
to the Roman religion. Our Sahsnôt has with more justice been assigned
to Zio (p. 203), with whom Hercules cannot be connected. I now think the claims
of Irmin are better founded: as Hercules was Jupiter's son, Irmin seems to have
been Wôdan's; and he must have been the subject of the battle-songs (ituri
in proelia canunt), even of those which Tacitus understood of Arminius (canitur
adhuc); though they would have suited Mars too, p. 207 (see Suppl.). It is a harder matter to form an opinion about the 'Ulysses':
Ceterum et Ulixem quidam opinantur longo illo et fabuloso errore in hunc oceanum
delatum adisse Germaniae terras, Asciburgiumque, quod in ripa Rheni situm hodieque
incolitur, ab illo constitutum nominatumque; aram quin etiam Ulixi consecratam,
adjecto Laertae patris nomine, eodem loco olim repertam; Tac. Germ. 3. In Odysseus
people have seen Oðinn, in Asciburg Asburg; but if Wôden stood for
the god Mercury, it cannot here mean the hero, still less can Askiburg be traced
to the âses, a purely Norse form, which in these regions would have been
anses. When Tacitus makes Ulixes the founder of Asciburg, nothing is simpler
than to suppose him to have been Isco, Escio, Asko (p. 350); and if it was Isco
that set the Romans thinking of Ul-ixes, how it helps to establish the sc in
Iscaevones! Mannus the father of Isco may have suggested Laertes, inasmuch as
laoj people, and laoj
stone, are mixed up in the creation of the first man (the origo gentis) out
of stone or rock (see ch. XIX); in the same way Asco grew up out of the tree
(ash), and oruj and petrh
stand together in the mythus not without meaning. As liut from liotau, laoj
seems to come from the same root as laoj, laaj.
(41) The interpretatio Romana went more upon analogies of sense than
of sound; so, in dealing with Castor and Pollux, I will not take them for the
brothers Hadu and Phol = Baldr (see Suppl.). These Gemini, however, are the
very hardest to interpret; the passage about them was given on p. 66, and an
attempt was made to show that alx referred to the place where the godlike twins
were worshipped: I confess it does not satisfy me. Our antiquity has plenty
of hero brothers to show, but no twins with a name like Alci, if this plural
of Alcus is the true form. It occurs to me, that one of Oðin's names is
Iâlkr (Sæm. 46b 47b), and jolk in the Vermland dialect means a boy.
(42) This comes more home to us
than the Samogitic Algir (angelus est summorum deorum, Lasicz, p. 47), towards
which the dictionaries offer nothing but alga, reward. Utterly untrustworthy
is any comparison with the Slav deities Lel and Polel, themselves as yet unsupported
by authority (see Suppl.) (43) From the above specimens in Tacitus we may conclude that all the
Teutonic races had a pretty fully developed Heroolgy; and if our ancient stores
of native literature had been still accessible to us, we might have gained a
much closer insight into its nature and its connextion as a whole. As it is,
we are thrown upon dry genealogies, dating from many centuries after, and touching
only certain races, namely the Goths, Langobards, Burgundians, but above all,
the Anglo-Saxons and Scandinavians. We may learn from them the connextion of
the later kings with the ancient gods and heroes, but not the living details
of their myths. Yet we could be content, if even such pedigrees had also been
preserved of the Franks and other nations of continental Germany. The Anglo-Saxon genealogoies seem the most important, and the
Appendix gives them in full [but see above, p. 165]. All the families branch
out from Wôden, as most of the Greek do from Zeus; it was a proud feeling
to have one's root in the highest of all gods. Prominent among his sons are
Saxneát and Bldg, who were themselves accounted divine; but
several other names can claim a place among the earliest heroes, e.g., Sigegeát
and Wôdelgeát (44)
(both akin to the Gothic Gâuts), Freáwine, Wuscfreá, Sfugel,
Westerfalcna; and many are fallen dim to us. Câsere, which in other AS.
writings is used for cyning, (45)
seems to be a mere appellative, and to have acquired the character of a proper
name after the analogy of the Roman cæsar (?). All these genealogies give
us barely the names of the god's sons and grandsons, never those of their mothers
or grandmothers; and the legend, which ought like the Greek ones to give life
to the relationship, is the very thing we miss. Some of the Norse traditions gain in value, by being taken with
the genealogies. The Völsûngasaga sets out with Oðin's being
the father of Sigi, but all particulars of the relationship are withheld; Rerir
the son of Sigi is in the immediate keeping of the highest gods, and so on.
Another time, on the contrary, we are informed, Sn. 84-86, how Oðinn under
the name of Bölverkr (OHG. Palowurcho?) became servant to the giant Baugi,
in order to get at the divine drink, which the giant's brother Suttûngr
kept, guarded by his daughter Gunnlöð; between her and the god took
place sundry passages of love, dimly hinted at by Sæmund also 12b 23ªb
24ª, but we are nowhere told what heroes were begotten in the three nights
that Oðinn passed with the giant's daughter. Gunnlöð belongs to
the race of giants, not of men, which is also the case with Gerðr whom Freyr
wooed, and perhaps with others, who are not reckoned among the âsynjor.
The Greeks also held that from the union of gods with titans' daughters might
spring a hero, or even a god (like Týr, p. 208).--Only Saxo, p. 66, and
no other authority, tells us of a Norwegian king and hero 'Frogerus, ut quidam
ferunt, Othino patre natus,' to whom the gods gave to be invicinble in fight,
unless his adversary could grasp the dust from under his feet, (46)
which the Danish king Frotho by fraud contrived to do. Can this Froger be the
AS. Freoðegâr, Freðegâr in the Wessex genealogy, who had
Brond for father, Bældæg for grandfather, Wôden for great-
grandfather? The ON. table of lineage seems to mix up Frioðegar with Froði,
his adversary. (47) According to
the Formâli of the Edda, p. 15, and the Yngl. saga c. 9, Norway traced
her eldest line of kings to Sæmîngr, the son of Oðinn by Skaði,
previously the wife of Niörðr; some write Semîngr, which means
pacificator, and would lead to Frîðgeir again. Skaði was daughter
to the iötunn Thiassi, and the Sigurðardrâpa (-killing) calls
Sigurðr Laðaiarl 'afsprîngr Thiassa,' (Th. progenies).---The Herrauðssaga
cap. 1 makes Hrîngr spring from Gauti, and him from Oðinn: this Gautr
or Gauti (conf. Ing and Ingo, Irmin and Irmino), Goth. Gáuts, OHG. Kôz,
AS. Geát, whether surname, son or ancestor of Oðinn, cannot belie
his divinity (conf. p. 367); and his son Godwulf too, confounded by some with
Folcwalda (p. 165, last table), looks mythical. It is from Gáuts that
the Gáutôs (Kûzâ, Gautoi) professed to be descended,
these being other than the Guþans (Tac. Gothones, Gotqoi),
but related to them nevertheless, for the Gothic genealogy starts with the same
Gáuts at the head of it.---Again, Sigrlami is called Oðin's son,
Fornald. sög. 1, 413. But who can 'Bous (gen. Boi), Othini ex Rinda filius'
be in Saxo Gram. 46? Possibly Biar, Biaf, Beav = Beowulf, to whom we are coming
(see Suppl.). (48) 41. "Ulixes = Loki, Sn. 78. For Laertes, whose name Pott 1, 222 explains as protector of the people, conf. Ptolemy's Lakibourgtion." Extr. from Suppl., vol. iii. Back 42. Almqvist, Svensk språklära, Stockh. 1840, p. 385ª. Back 43. In Lith. lele is pupa, akies lele pupilla, leilas butterfly. Back 44. OHG. Wuotilgôz (Zeitschr. f. d. alt. 1, 577), conf. wüeteln above, p. 132. and Wodel- beer, p. 156 (see Suppl.). Back 45. In Boëth. 38, 1 Agamemnon is styled câsere, and Ulysses cyning [in the Pref., Rædgot, Ealleric, Theodric are cyningas, the emperor always câsere]; in a doc. in Kemble 2, 304 Eádred is 'cyning and câsere'. Back 46. A token of victory? as the vanquished had to present such dust (RA. 111-2). Back 47. The AS. name Frôdheri stands yet farther away (Beda 2, 9 §113). Back 48. Saxo 122 mentions one hero begotten by Thôrr: Haldanus Biarggrammus
apud Sueones magni Thor filius existimatur. And I know of no other but this
one. Back << Previous Page Next Page >>
© 2004-2007 Northvegr. Most of the material on this site is in the public domain. However, many people have worked very hard to bring these texts to you so if you do use the work, we would appreciate it if you could give credit to both the Northvegr site and to the individuals who worked to bring you these texts. A small number of texts are copyrighted and cannot be used without the author's permission. Any text that is copyrighted will have a clear notation of such on the main index page for that text. Inquiries can be sent to info@northvegr.org. Northvegr™ and the Northvegr symbol are trademarks and service marks of the Northvegr Foundation. |
|