ANNOTATED GLOSSARY
T. E. Bearden 1997, slightly
updated Dec. 2000
Latest editing and additions: 1st February, 2001
Foreword
This is an informal glossary originally prepared in 1997 for Gary
Hawkins to use on his web site, and informal definitions and discussions were
rather quickly jotted down in 1997. We
have been able to do a little updating now in Dec. 2000. Careful crafting and polishing for greater
rigor would require much more time than I am able to spare, but perhaps the glossary
can be helpful anyway.
We put in the gist of it, as we see it, and usually an annotation
or commentary to explain it. We tried to put in sufficient explanations and a
few references, so that the reader can see for himself or herself that physics,
mathematics, and even logic itself are not quite as cut and dried as is often
presented!
The only thing we absolutely insist on, that differs from the
normal physics and engineering approach, is that any true definition must be an
identity statement a priori. In this
view, since no equation is an identity, then no equation is a definition;
regardless of those "equations" universally advanced in physics as
"definitions." All an equation states is that the magnitude of the somethings on the right
is equal to the magnitude of the
somethings on the left. It does not at all define
any of the somethings on either right or left!
I've completed as much as I have time for now, and made some additions
and corrections to the 1997 version. As
time permits, we will try to add some more in the future . I hope these hasty
comments are helpful, and any errors in them are my own and not due to Gary
Hawkins or to Tony Craddock!
Tom Bearden, Dec. 2000
MATH AND SINGLE CHARACTER
ABBREVIATIONS
f The
electrostatic scalar potential, in units of joule per collecting coulomb.
Ñ The
mathematical operator 'del'.
Ñf The gradient
of the function f , mathematically.
In EM theory, use of the del operator produces an electric
field E given by E = - Ñf . An
electrical field is also generated by the time rate of change of the magnetic
vector potential A, where it is
given by E = - dA/dt.
Note that we have used that fact to assist us in producing the
motionless electromagnetic generator (MEG), with COP = 16 as of this writing.
fq Joules of
energy collected by a charge of q coulombs in an electrostatic scalar potential
having a
reaction cross section of f.
Since the collected energy is also usually the energy that
can then be dissipated as work, this expression often yields the work performed
in the circuit by the energy the surface charges collected from that part of
the S-flow in contact with the
conductors and components.
df /dt Time rate of change of the scalar
potential.
Also one form of displacement current.
dE/dt Time rate of change of the E-field.
Also one form of displacement current.
dp/dt Time rate of change of momentum, which
is a force F acting upon the system.
A force is defined as a time rate of change of momentum, or
F = dp/dt.
dP/dt Time rate of change of polarization.
Polarization displacement current.
dq/dt Time rate of change of charge,
otherwise known as "current".
Represents the normal current flow i of charges in a
conductor, i.e., i = dq/dt.
dq/dt-Isolated Load Loop A special current loop containing the
load,
...where i = dq/dt in that "load loop" is
isolated from the current i = dq/dt in the source loop containing the power
source, and the two loops are also field-coupling isolated. A transformer, e.g., does isolate the actual
current in the secondary from the current in the primary, but the field
coupling from primary to secondary and from secondary back to primary result in
the enforcement of COP = 1.0 as the maximum performance possible (in a perfect,
lossless standard transformer). In a
real standard transformer with some losses, COP<1.0.
The notion is that, even though current cannot pass from
the source loop to the load loop and there is no direct field coupling, energy
density flow S = E´H can pass. This is in
fact the definition of what we call bridging,
if in addition to current isolation the rigid back-field coupling is broken
between energy dissipation (power) in the source loop and energy dissipation
(power) in the load loop. In that fashion, overunity operation of the load can
readily be achieved.
E Electric Field.
Defined in older classical electromagnetics (CEM) as a force field, by E º
F/q. However, this only defines the entity after an interaction with
mass. In short, it defines the E-field
as an effect existing only in matter.
In the early days of electrodynamics, Maxwell and the other
"founding fathers" assumed a material ether filling all space. Hence any field in space was indeed such an
"effect" field existing in mass.
Maxwell died in 1879 of stomach cancer. In the 1880s, the Michelson-Morley experiments falsified the luminiferous
(material) ether as a material medium.
Hence the accepted use of the E
= F/q type of "effect"
electrical field as the electric field in space was also destroyed, but the
equations were never changed to eliminate this error in the foundations of
CEM. Instead, electrodynamicists more
or less announced one day that, "Since there is no (material) ether, we
are not using one!"
There is some rationalization mathematically for such an
approach, if the limiting process is used for the interaction of the
"causal field" in vacuum with the charged mass q, as q is allowed to
approach zero. However, from a
foundations view, it is still the interaction of the field in space with
charged mass that is being described in the limit, and therefore it is still
the "effect" entity rather than the "cause" entity.
This serious foundations problem is still unresolved in much of CEM theory and modeling to this day. The standard by which other EM texts are measured is J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edition, Wiley, New York, 1975. In several places, Jackson opts for this avoidance of the use of the " effect" field for the "cause" field: quoting p. 28: "...the thing that eventually gets measured is a force..." "At the moment, the electric field can be defined as the force per unit charge acting at a given point. It is a vector function of position, denoted by E." Quoting p. 249: "Most classical electrodynamicists continue to adhere to the notion that the EM force field exists as such in the vacuum, but do admit that physically measurable quantities such as force somehow involve the product of charge and field."
The problem is further increased by use of this flawed definition of E-field to "define" the electrostatic scalar potential (Jackson, p. 34) by the equation E = -Ñf. First, no equation is a definition; it merely equates the magnitude of the entities on the left of the = sign to the magnitude of the entities on the right of the = sign. It has nothing at all to say about the definition or nature of any of the entities, but is merely a comparison of relative magnitudes. Any definition, a priori, must be expressed by an identity sign. In all of classical electrodynamics, there is no available proper definition of (x) in the identity E º (x). Indeed, there is no such identity available for force F. To quote Feynman: "…in dealing with force the tacit assumption is always made that the force is equal to zero unless some physical body is present… One of the most important characteristics of force is that it has a material origin, and this is not just a definition. … If you insist upon a precise definition of force, you will never get it!" Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 12-2.
In the Sachs unified field theory, O(3) electrodynamics as
spearheaded by Evans is an important subset.
Hence in that approach there is a solution to the problem of defining
force and field. The EM fields (E, B,
etc.) when in spacetime, are in fact curvatures of spacetime identically. When these ST curvatures interact with a
charged mass, the effects of the interactions are the well-known force-fields
in matter, which Maxwell started with in the 1860s. So in this way, the definition problem can be rigorously
resolved.
jf The Slepian
vector, representing the time rate of energy density dissipation in the current
loop
containing the jf.
This does not at all represent the energy flow in space and
along the outside of the circuit, which may be very, very much greater, on the
order of 1013 times as great.
It does match the Poynting energy flow component that enters the
circuit.
Mq or mq The mass of a charge q.
Instead of just using "q" and assuming it to be
unitary, we must include the fact that charge is a system of two coupled
components: (i) the mass mq of the charge q, and (ii) the virtual
photon flux exchange (i.e., fq) of the charge q
with the surrounding active vacuum. In particle physics it is already
well-known that there is no symmetry of a mass system anyway, unless the
vacuum's exchange with the mass is included. So the expression mqfq captures the vacuum-mass exchange. By continuing to assume
that charge is unitary, physics inadvertently holds to the hoary old notion of
the luminiferous ether (thin material ether) that permeates all of space.
Maxwell and other electrical physicists of his time believed in a material
ether, and Maxwell embedded that notion in EM theory. Inexplicably it has not
been rooted out of the equations to this day, even though the notion of the
material ether (not the ether per se!) was destroyed by the Michelson-Morley
experiment over 100 years ago. Foundations physicists continue to point out
such terrible defects in physics—and continue to be ignored. We quote Mario
Bunge, "A mathematical theory of the dimensions and units of physical
quantities," in Problems in the
Foundations of Physics, edited by Mario Bunge, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and
New York, 1971, p. 7: "The question 'What are dimensions?' is seen to be
ill conceived, for there are two concepts of dimension, namely those of
dimension function and dimension value. The correct question is: 'What are []
and d?' " {Note: [] is dimension function, and d is dimension value.} Bunge is clearly discriminating between the
function associated with the dimension, and the magnitude associated with it
Quoting Bunge, ibid.,
p. 8: "The concept of a unit is one of those scientific notions that has
remained obscure for want of a theory and excess of a coarse philosophy. Indeed
we know how to manipulate units but we do not seem to know what kind of
mathematical object they are. As a consequence units are sometimes confused
with dimensions, at other times with standards, and they are often introduced
in relation to measurement rather than to concept formulation."
And quoting Mario Bunge, Foundations of Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1967, p. 176: "Different
theories of CED [Classical Electrodynamics] are called for, both for charged
particles that can to a first approximation be regarded as electromagnetically
structureless (e.g., the electron and the m -meson) and for extended
systems with a charge distribution and spin (e.g., the proton). If fairly
satisfactory classical theories were available they could guide the
construction of the corresponding quantum theories. But no such theories are in
sight partly because it is not usually acknowledged that electrodynamics, both
classical and quantal, are in a sad state."
Again, Bunge, ibid.,
p. 182: "...the best modern physicist is the one who acknowledges that
neither classical nor quantum physics are cut and dried, both being full of
holes and in need of a vigorous overhauling not only to better cover their own
domains but also to join smoothly so as to produce a coherent picture of the
various levels of physical reality."
c The speed of light in ambient vacuum.
To discuss the speed of light, we point out that the vacuum
is highly energetic, as has been shown in modern physics. Since the vacuum has an energy density, it
can be modeled as a "potential" and particularly as a scalar EM
potential for EM purposes. Contrary to
convention, we recognize that the local energy density of the ambient vacuum
potential can vary, including seasonally within and close to the solar system,
etc. The average energy density of the
vacuum in space far from charged masses such as stars and planets may be
assumed as a "standard vacuum potential", and if this potential is
equated with the notion of "flat spacetime", then an increase in this
vacuum potential is an increase in the local energy density of spacetime, and
hence represents a curvature of the standard flat spacetime.
In fact the interplanetary radar probes' "ranges"
do show precisely such variation in the speed of light, with weekly and monthly
and seasonal variations, etc. In order to comply with the nearly universal
assumption in physics with respect to the constancy of c, the scientific staffs
averaged the readings over the entire month. This zeroed out the variations,
upheld the notion that space is a fixed type of thing, and that the speed of
light in it is also a rigidly fixed constant.
It does not agree with the actual measured speed of light from day to day.
The Russians have known and openly printed for about a
century that the speed of light in a hard vacuum in deep space, far removed
from solar and planetary masses, is a little slower than the speed of light in
a hard vacuum near the Earth or any other large charged mass. The huge
collection of charged particles in the earth have tiny separations, so that
looking at the Earth as a collection of tiny dipoles, one sees a collection of
enormous 4-symmetry energy flows from the time domain to the 3-space domain
(and vice versa for the time-reversed portions). The increased intensity of
this 4-symmetry energy flux in the vicinity of a massive planet or sun changes the
local energy density of the vacuum itself, increasing it in that vicinity.
Without elaboration, we will also point out that the Earth
and its dynamics structures the local spacetime and the spacetime out to some
distance. So do all other planets, stars,
etc. By whatever manner we model the
cosmos as having been created or initiated, the dynamics and structuring of all
the phenomena occurring in the universe is further impressed in the infolded electrodynamics inside the
vacuum potential.
The "laws of nature" in one sense represent the
most general results of the reactions of this internally structured
"common standard spacetime" or "standard vacuum potential"
with the various physical systems, devices, and measuring instruments utilized
in our experiments, etc. If one
deterministically alters the structuring
of the local spacetime, one can have a system which will function there
in a certain marvelous manner, but will not function that way elsewhere. Some decades ago, I participated in
experiments by Golden which over a period of some five years did condition
(dimension) the local vacuum potential.
The result was an engine which consistently exhibited COP = 1.67 at that
location, but when moved several hundred miles exhibited COP<1.0. Frank and
I were made aware of this "vacuum conditioning" effect by Prof.
William Tiller, who had himself conducted experiments exhibiting just such an
effect over several years.
EM waves in vacuum are actually longitudinal (sound-type) waves, but we do not belabor the point
since everything out there in the normal literature uses the transverse EM wave
model for the EM wave in space. Also,
the transverse wave is indeed what is detected in the interacting electron gas
in our measurement instruments—whose Drude electrons are restrained to simple
drift velocity longitudinally down the conductor, but are spinning and are free
to precess like gyros. So our
instruments detect the Drude electron precessions at right angles to the incoming
disturbing longitudinal force field, which means that they do indeed measure a
transverse wave. However, these are
actually the electron precession waves in the detector, and not the actual EM waves in space. See my paper, "Giant Negentropy from
the Common Dipole", Journal of New
Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23 for a discussion of how all EM energy
comes from the time domain, via the broken 3-symmetry of the source charge or
source dipole, and is emitted in 3-space in all directions as longitudinal EM
waves. This is based on rigorous demonstration
by E.T. Whittaker, "On the Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical
Physics," Math. Ann., Vol. 57,
1903, p. 333-355 that the scalar potential is a harmonic set of phase conjugate
longitudinal EM wave pairs. We merely
applied the Whittaker decomposition to the scalar potential of a source dipole
or of a source charge, and the rigorous
proof that EM waves in space are longitudinal directly emerges.
Just as sound speeds up, say, in steel as a denser medium
than air, the EM "sound waves" in the ambient vacuum potential speed
up when that vacuum potential's flux density is increased. Consequently light
does move a little faster in a hard vacuum on Earth than it does in deep space,
because the vacuum itself has higher energy density near the earth than in deep
space. The comings and goings and orbitings of planets and the solar mass, etc.
do affect the local energy density of the vacuum between the planets, and hence
the speed of light through that interplanetary space.
So the interplanetary radar does show the periodic
variations of the local energy density of vacuum that are induced by these
factors. For a critical paper on this, see Bryan G. Wallace, "The Unified
Quantum Electrodynamic Ether," Foundations
of Physics, 3(3), Sept. 1973, p. 381-388. His discussion of the
interplanetary radar measurements of Venus, which did not fit relativity, are
particularly interesting, with respect to his finding that the data were simply
"averaged" to eliminate the variations and hence the diurnal, lunar,
and synodic periodic components actually measured in the variations of the
speed of light. See particularly Bryan G. Wallace, "The great speed of
light in space cover-up." Scientific
Ethics, 1(1), Feb. 1985. p. 2-3; — "Radar Testing of the Relative
Velocity of Light in Space," Spectrosc.
Lett. Vol. 2, 1969. p. 361.
Rigorously, the field is "defined" in
electrodynamics as the effect of an interaction of the force-free entity
(4-spatial!) existing prior to the interaction, with a 3-dimensional static
charge. This means that the field as
originally defined is an effect and
not a cause. To then use it as the cause is a grave non
sequitur.
This confusion of cause and effect is widespread in
physics. It was probably initiated by the hoary old assumption several hundred
years ago that a separate force acts upon a separate mass, which is false. In fact mass is a component of force, since
F º d/dt(mv) = m(dv/dt + v(dm/dt). As can
be seen, in both expanded terms there exists a mass term. To skirt the issue, electrodynamicists have
simply found a neat statement that "in massfree space the field continues
to exist, but the force is zero."
We point out that m = 0 makes the momentum vanish, and so F vanishes, and in the definition of E = F/q also vanishes because the numerator F becomes zero. Therefore that E-field vanishes.
Feynman and Wheeler pointed out that the field as it is defined does not and cannot
exist in massless space. Only the
"potential" for the field exists there, in case some charged mass is
brought in to interact with that entity that does exist there. That is accurate, since spacetime is totally
a potential and any "change" in spacetime is a change in that
potential a priori. In the Sachs-Evans unified field theory,
this problem is resolved because the fundamental field is defined as a
spacetime curvature (change in spacetime, hence change in the ST potential)
rather than E = F/q.
In empty space there are always myriads upon myriads of
interfering fields and potentials, from charges all over the universe, via
Puthoff's cosmological feedback principle [see
H. E. Puthoff, "Source of Vacuum Electromagnetic Zero-point Energy," Physical Review A, 40(9), Nov. 1, 1989,
p. 4857-4862.] Thus any EM wave traveling through space is always involved in
enormously active interferometry. This alone results in violent momentary
variations in the speed of that wave, even from 0.01 c to 100.00 c. For a paper
showing this kind of "galloping" travel of an EM wave, see William G.
Harter, John Evans, Roberto Vega, and Sanford Wilson, "Galloping waves and
their relativistic properties," American
Journal of Physics, 53(7), July 1985, p. 671-679. While the average speed
of the wave is c(g ), where g is the local energy density of
the vacuum, the instantaneous speeds of the wave vary violently from instant to
instant.
In special relativity, "velocity" merely is a
rotation angle of the moving frame from the fixed laboratory observer's
frame. The speed "c" merely
represents a full right-angle turn away, toward the time-dimension (since other
than the 3 spatial dimensions that is the only other dimension available to
turn toward). In higher dimensional
space, there are many other "higher" dimensions toward which further
rotation can be accomplished. Hence
rotating in n-space is not limited to a single orthogonal turn, and therefore
velocities are not limited to speed c.
However, each orthogonal rotation also subtracts one spatial dimension
of the rotated object from the observer's 3-space. One rotation would be speed
c, two departing rotations would be speed c2, three would give c3,
etc. At three orthorotations, to the
lab observer the rotated object is now purely an internal structure inside his
time dimension, very similar to a mental object (mind is time-like, not
spacelike). The nature of mind and its
operations has a rather unexpected connection with matter, when one considers
such orthorotations in hyperspace.
The point is, the speed c
is not an "iron dictum" of nature, nor is it an "unchangeable
constant"! Nature herself
routinely violates that notion. As an
example, de Broglie waves from any mass always move at v>c, and easily as
v>>c. EM "surface"
waves—so-called transverse oscillations or upheavals and depressions in the
magnitude (energy density; actually the reaction
cross section) of the local ambient vacuum potential), move at a discretized average speed c(g ).
The longitudinal component, if freed from the transverse component, can move
much faster because it is a sort of "tunneling" movement. In actual
quantum tunneling experiments, e.g., music (Mozart's 40th symphony) has been
transmitted through quantum mechanical tunneling between two separated points
at speed v>4c. Fogal is likely to eventually place a superluminal
communication system on the commercial market.
We discuss superluminal communication elsewhere in this glossary.
C Capacitance.
Essentially, the charge per unit potential.
For an isolated conductor, C = Q/V and C is expressed in
farads. A farad is one coulomb per
volt.
A lower case c represents the speed of light in ambient
vacuum.
E The electric field.
Essentially, E =F/q, but that is not really a definition.
Conventionally, the units of electric field are considered
to be force per unit electric charge; i.e., force per coulomb. Note that the E-field even in this "classical definition" does not
actually exist at a point unless there is a unit point charge (a point coulomb
of charged mass) located at the point.
Hence contrary to classical electrodynamics, communications theory, and
whatnot, no electric force field (and no magnetic force field either) exists in
the vacuum, at least of the kind prescribed by Maxwell's equations and by the
Heaviside-Hertz reduction of Maxwell's equations. Since Maxwell assumed it,
these equations and models all still erroneously assume a material ether
filling the vacuum, in which case there would
be matter and charges, and there would then
be force-fields in the vacuum. We refer
the interested reader to discussions by Feynman and by Wheeler. Quoting: "One of the most important characteristics of force is that it has a
material origin, and this is not just a definition. Y If you insist upon a precise
definition of force, you will never get it!
" [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, Lectures
on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 12-2.]
Even worse, note that E
= F/q defines not the magnitude of
the field in space, but has to do with the divergence of energy from the field
around a unit point static charge there in space, as well as the pattern of the
diverged energy density. Actually, what
is used as "the electric field" itself is the reaction cross section of the field, for a unit point static
coulomb of charge. That is at best a
function of the "field density" or "field intensity" of the
actual electrical field in spacetime, and the direction and pattern of change
of that field density due to the intercepting and diverting charge.
The field problem is resolved in the forefronts of
electrodynamics by making the field a topological function. It is resolved in the Sachs-Evans O(3)
electrodynamics (as a subset of Sachs' unified field theory) by making the
field a function of the curvature of spacetime.
See also the discussion under c, above.
H Magnetic field strength.
B The B-field (loosely), or magnetic flux density (more
properly).
Conventionally, this is thought to be defined, analogously
to E, by the force it exerts. The
force exerted on a point charge moving in the magnetic field B is at right angles to the velocity
vector of the charge and also at right angles to B. Actually, the H-field
was originally named the magnetic field
and the B-field was named the magnetic induction (and is still
sometimes called that.) This is an annoyance because it is B which involves the force, and hence B should be named the
magnetic field. Other writers have noted this discrepancy, and Sommerfeld
called H the magnetic
excitation—which correctly describes its role—rather than calling it the
magnetic field. As the reader can see, lots of things in electrical physics are
still very untidy! There are also different ways to approach
the EM modeling problem. In
Kaluza-Klein unified field theory, all electromagnetics is modeled in the 5th
dimension, which is wrapped around each and every point in our normal
3-dimensional space.
For practical use, a far better approach is the O(3) symmetry
electrodynamics spearheaded by Myron Evans, which is also an important subset
of Mendel Sachs' unified field theory.
In the Sachs-Evans unified theory, electromagnetics has become general
relativity and general relativity has become electromagnetics. Further, very powerful general relativity
can now be directly engineered with this O(3) electrodynamics, as it further
develops. We refer the reader to
"The New Maxwell Electrodynamic Equations: New Tools for New
Technologies. A Collection of 60 Papers
from the Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study," Special Issue
of Journal of New Energy, 4(3),
Winter 1999, 335 p. Also, particularly
see Contemporary Optics and
Electrodynamics, edited by Myron W. Evans, a special topical issue of I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (series
editors), Advances in Chemical Physics,
Wiley, 2001 (in publication). Evans
gives a very long and detailed presentation, "O(3) Electrodynamics",
in that publication, and also gives the paper "The Link Between the Sachs
and O(3) Theories of Electrodynamics".
Q A quantity of electrical charge. Note that this statement does not define charge q itself.
We have tentatively proposed to redefine charge q as q º mqfq. The term fq captures the vacuum's violent virtual energy interaction
with the mass mq of the charge, which is presently missing in
classical EM theory and is an exceeding great flaw of omission. Further, fq may be decomposed into a harmonic series of phase
conjugate wavepairs, as shown by Whittaker, 1903, ibid. [In O(3)
electrodynamics, the internal structuring is dramatically extended, so that one
can get at the "inner electrodynamics" necessary to explain such
things as homeopathy, chi, ki, prana, etc.
To those scientists pooh-poohing such things as
acupuncture, we point out that acupuncture in a dramatic case can allow a
person without anesthetic to undergo a major operation with chest cavity
opened, while the patient remains alert, conscious, and talking. President Nixon's physician on Nixon's trip
to China witnessed such an actual operation, as well as other things. Nothing in our vaunted Western medical
science can equal that, nor can any of our medical schools, nor can our
National Academy of Science or our National Science Foundation. In short, acupuncture alone demonstrates how
woefully inadequate our medical science actually is.
Also, acupuncture works on animals as well, so it does not
involve hypnosis or deep suggestion. In
science, we must believe the repeatable experiment, not our dogma at the
moment. Yet the entire U.S. medical
research community has no higher symmetry EM investigation of how acupuncture
works, or of the infolded electrodynamics shown by Whittaker's decomposition of
the scalar potential in 1903. Hence our
scientists totally miss the vast electrodynamics of the internal structuring of potential and charge with vacuum engines
(spacetime curvature engines). As a
result, the entire U.S. scientific and intelligence communities were totally
unable to comprehend nearly five decades of Russian induction of health changes
and diseases in personnel in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, using weak EM
radiation. Internal structuring of the
activity producing what is called "charge"—including its internal
structuring and engines—can be modeled and in theory directly engineered in the
new Sachs-Evans approach.]
As shown in my paper, "Giant Negentropy from the
Common Dipole," Journal of New
Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23, the broken 3-symmetry energy
flow of any charge and any dipole allows a more fundamental 4-symmetry energy
flow solution for the century-old problem of
explaining the actual source of the EM energy that pours out of the source
charge in all directions in 3-space.
The 4-symmetry in EM energy flow explains its nature as longitudinal EM
waves, with the charge's absorbed energy being received from the time domain (complex plane), transduced into
3-space, and emitted in 3-space. The source of all EM energy at any point in
3-space is the time domain!
It has been known for decades in particle physics that
there exists no equilibrium in mass systems, unless the interaction of the
vacuum with the masses is included. It
has also been known that every charge and every dipole is a broken 3-symmetry
in the fierce vacuum energy exchange with the charge or dipole. Yet the vacuum interaction—and specifically
the source charge's and the source dipole's broken symmetry in it—are not even
included in classical EM as yet. That
this known total glitch in modern EM theory has not been previously corrected,
when the particle physicists of every university physics department of note
already know it is necessary, is inexplicable!
Here we must regretfully point out finger at our orthodox scientific
establishment, and particularly at our National Science Foundation and our National Academy of Science. These institutions are not even working on,
nor are they aware of, nor do they even care about, the most fundamental
science problems of our time. Bigger
accelerators, yes. Windmills, yes. EM energy from the vacuum and electrical
power systems which use it without destroying the source dipole, no. The greatest of all electrodynamics—the
infolded longitudinal EM wave dynamics inside all EM fields, potentials, and
waves—no. The correction of the dozens
of major flaws and non sequiturs in classical electromagnetics, no. The understanding of the longitudinal EM
wave interferometer weapons and quantum potential weapons already arrayed against
us, no. The development of EM healing
based on the Priore approach, which would totally revolutionize medical therapy
and handle attacks on our cities by weapons of mass destruction, no.
We have a scientific mindset problem of epochal
magnitude. And that costs the U.S.
taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars spent on the "status quo"
or "business as usual" scientific endeavors that are far inferior to
what can be done.
S Entropy. A quantity
which measures the extent to which the energy of a system is available
to do work.
Since in one sense energy is a function of ordering, then
fundamentally, entropy refers to
increasing disorder, which means increasing disruption of the ordering in our
collected energy. Unfortunately,
entropy is one of those concepts in physics for which there are several
differing major views. We avoid all
discussion of "information" etc., and prefer to deal only with the
energy and time aspects. For our work
in energy from the vacuum, we take the very simple view that an entropic process is like a
positive resistor: As forward observer time passes, the entropic process
continually disorders or "loses"—from further controlled conversion
of energy form—the collected energy in the system. We regard a negentropic
process as like a negative resistor: as forward observer time passes,
the negentropic process receives energy
in a form unusable to us, transforms, it, and outputs it in a form that is
usable. Quoting Ilya Prigogine,
Irreversibility as a symmetry-breaking process," Nature, Vol. 246,
1973, p. 70: "Entropy Ycannot in general be expressed in terms of observables such
as temperature and density. This is
only possible in the neighbourhood of equilibriumY It is only then that both entropy and entropy production acquire
a macroscopic meaning."
So basically, the notion of entropy will apply when we have a system in equilibrium or very near equilibrium. For open systems in substantial disequilibrium, the entropy cannot even be computed, and the classical equilibrium thermodynamics with its infamous second law does not apply. On the other hand, the loading of disequilibrium (negentropic) EM systems is a very nonlinear affair. Some direct indications of this were in the Russian work in the 1930s which produced overunity and self-powering EM generators, in several physics institute. [E.g., see L. I. Mandelstam and N. D. Papaleksi., "On the parametric excitation of electric oscillations," Zhurnal Teknicheskoy Fiziki, 4(1), 1934, p. 5-29. English translation, Feb. 1968, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, CA, performed for NASA]. The U.S. researcher G. Obolensky also has done appreciable important experimental investigation of the nonlinear load effects for negentropic systems.
S Poynting energy density flow. Not the overall or total energy flow by any means, but
just that component of it
that is intercepted, diverged,
collected, and used, where S is
given
by S = E´H.
The energy flow theory is rather thoroughly fouled, and has
been since the 1880s when the flow of energy through space was proposed by both
Heaviside and Poynting, independently and essentially simultaneously.
Since both E and
H are defined not as fields per se,
but as the reaction cross section of the fields with a unit charge, the S does
not refer to "energy flow" per se, but to the intercepted component
of the overall energy flow.
Poynting only considered the energy flow component around a
circuit that strikes the circuit's
surface charges and gets diverged into the conductors to power the
electrons. Heaviside, on the other
hand, also considered the startlingly enormous additional EM energy flow
filling all space around the circuit's conductors, generally parallel to the
conductors but missing them.
This huge Heaviside component is still there around every
electrical circuit, but almost entirely ignored and unaccounted. It misses the circuit, passes on off into
space, and is lost in most circuits.
Yet it is trillions of times larger in magnitude than the very tiny
Poynting component which actually gets intercepted, "caught" and used
by the circuit to power its loads and losses.
Since no one could explain where on earth such an enormous
nondiverged Heaviside component pouring out of the power source terminals could
possibly come from, Lorentz—reasoning that, since the nondiverged energy flow
did not do anything, it was "physically insignificant" (Lorentz'
term)—then just integrated the energy flow vector around a little closed
surface assumed around every volume element of interest. This efficiently discards the Heaviside
nondiverged component from all
accountability, leaving only the Poynting energy flow component vector
accounted. Of course the Poynting
energy flow will agree with the energy measured in the circuit, since we
actually measure energy dissipation, and the energy that dissipates from the
circuit must have first entered it.
Electrodynamicists today just continue to use Lorentz's integration of
the energy flow vector around an assumed closed surface surrounding any volume
element of interest. Thus, sadly our
electrical power system engineers unwittingly waste trillions of times more EM
energy actually produced from the vacuum by the source dipoles in their
generators, than what the feeble powerline is able to intercept and utilize.
We have nominated the vast unaccounted Heaviside energy
flow accompanying every field and charge interaction as the source of the extra
gravity known to be present in the arms of the spiral galaxies and holding them
together. See my paper, "Dark
Matter or Dark Energy?", Journal
of New Energy, 4(4), Spring 2000, p. 4-11.
Informally we have also nominated this dark Heaviside energy which fills
all space, as associated with the "quintessence" energy that is
responsible for the recently discovered antigravitational acceleration of the
universe. In this view the giant
negentropy process associated with charge (see my "Giant Negentropy of the
Common Dipole" paper, ibid.) is
ongoing in all the stars, galaxies, planets, nebulae, and other astronomical
entities. The ordinary energy we
measure in all these processes is gravitational; hence for symmetry and energy
conservation, the primary longitudinal EM wave energy from the time domain that
furnishes the energy to all these spatially energetic processes represents an
increasing curvature of spacetime in the time domain as we travel outward from
any origin point. This is an
antigravitational force, in this concept, which is cumulative as a function of
radial distance from the origin point.
Hence we see the distant parts of the universe as accelerating the
expansion of the universe. At present
this is of course an hypothesis, and must be further validated by laboratory
experiment and further theoretical work in a unified field theory
electrodynamics such as the Sachs-Evans O(3) symmetry electrodynamics.
S-flow is actually comprised of an organized, structured
flow of virtual photons or antiphotons and itself is not observable. Its
interaction with charged particles (electrical charges and magnetic poles),
however, is observable by the amount of energy
collected upon (diverged around) the charge or pole (formation of a
local potential), and formation of a translation force upon the charge or pole.
Again, the "E"
and the "H" in the
expression "E´H" are not really the "electrical field" and
"magnetic field" in space, but only their reaction cross sections at each point in space, should a little unit point static coulomb
be placed at that point to divert some of the E-field flow around it, or a little unit point static magnetic
charge be placed at that point to divert some of the H-field flow around it. So
even the Poynting energy flow S = E´H has been interpreted in terms of its reaction cross
sections.
It is worth noting that electrodynamicists today are still politely debating EM energy flow and the energy flow vector. As an example, a polite "debate" of this subject has been ongoing for over 30 years in American Journal of Physics alone. A particularly significant statement of the problem is given by Jones: "It is possible to introduce the Poynting vector S, defined by S = E´H, and regard it as the intensity of energy flow at a point. This procedure is open to criticism since we could add to S any vector whose divergence is zero without affecting [the basic integration procedure's result]." [D.S. Jones, The Theory of Electromagnetism, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1964, p. 52.] In short, here Jones is stating that an enormous nondiverged energy flow may accompany the Poynting flow component, and it will not be accounted for by S = E´H. After presenting the various elements required to solve the energy flow problem, Jones bows out with the statement: ""It does not seem likely that an expression satisfying all these conditions will be simple… …fortunately, we are rarely concerned with the energy flow at a point. In most applications we need the rate at which energy is crossing a closed surface." [Jones, ibid., p. 53.] Panofsky and Phillips warn against over-attachment to the Poynting vector: "Paradoxical results may be obtained if one tries to identify the Poynting vector with the energy flow per unit area at any point." [Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky and Melba Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, 1962, third printing 1969, p. 180.
We point out, however, that for gravitational effects of
energy flows in space, one must account the total energy flow per unit area at and surrounding any point, and
therefore one must restore the unaccounted enormous Heaviside nondiverged EM
energy flow component as well as the accounted tiny little Poynting diverged
energy flow component.
Dt An increment
(little piece of) time.
In special relativity, time can be considered a piece of
spatial length compressed by the factor c, so that L = ct, where L is in
meters, t is in seconds, and c is the speed of light. Time can also be considered as spatial EM energy compressed by
the factor c2. To comprehend
time and time rate of flow, one must first realize that a priori no observable
exists or persists in time. The
observable is a 3-spatial snapshot made at one instant in time, so that
"time stopped" momentarily.
The observable is thus a frozen snapshot of the 3-spatial intersection
of an ongoing 4-space interaction. At
the very next instant, that snapshot no longer exists. Hence for a mass (or any other observable)
to "propagate in time", there must be a process whereby Dt is continually added to the observable (such as to mass
m, converting it to masstime mt for a short duration) and then subtracted
again, leaving behind another frozen 3-space snapshot of the
"observable" that has seemingly now endured for that little Dt period, with respect to the observer. As we explain in several papers, the sum
total of the photon interactions with a mass m may be taken as the generator
that produces (1) the flow of the mass m through time, by changing from m to mt
to m to mt… continually, and (2) a substructuring of internal "time-flow
components". In short, any
time-flow ascertained in the macroworld or the microworld by the observer, has
an enormously rich internal dynamics and structuring. Again, in higher symmetry electrodynamics such as O(3), the
internal structuring of the photon, EM field, EM wave, and EM potential can be
modeled and eventually even directly engineered.
DE An increment
(little piece of) energy.
The photon is considered to be (unit-wise) composed of (DE)(Dt).
However, in our view (as we explain in energy, energy collection, and energy
dissipation) energy does not occur in "little fixed chunks" at all. One
only has "little chunks" of energy when one is collecting energy in an ongoing process. In electromagnetics,
the "collection" of energy is actually the ongoing collecting of energy from an energy flow deviating around
an intercepting charge. It is a dynamic, ongoing process whereby a collector
such as a charged particle intercepts and interacts with (undergoes virtual
photon flux exchange with) an impinging energy density flow S= E´H. In an equilibrium
(static) condition, the deviated flow remains very like a persistent,
unchanging whirlpool in a river, and so is said to have a "static
magnitude". If that Poynting flow is removed, then there is no excess
collecting going on and the "magnitude of the deviated energy flow"
is zero. EM energy
collection/collecting is always like a rock in a high wind. As long as the wind
is blowing on the rock, air is deviated to flow around the rock. The rock has a force field on and of it, and
wishes to move. It also has "excess collected energy", and a gradient
in this "excess collected energy" determined by the wind flow
direction. When the wind ceases to blow, the rock goes back to being just a
rock, and forgets it had all that excess wind energy collecting and any desire
to move.
TERMS AND
PHRASES
ABEL, NIELS HENRIK (1802-1829)
Norwegian mathematician who in 1824 proved that the general
equation of fifth degree cannot be solved algebraically. He also left an important paper on
transcendental functions which was published posthumously.
ABELIAN GROUP
A group obeying the commutative law of algebra for every
pair of elements a and b under an operation , so that a*b = b*a. As an
example, the set of integers is an infinite abelian group under the multiplication
operation.
ACTION AT A DISTANCE
An action (effect) occurring in a local system, for which
no separate local 3-space cause exists, but for which a causal correlation
exists between a distant cause and the local effect.
To the local 3-space observer, the effect is baffling. In
electromagnetics, action at a distance can be considered a higher topology
phenomena, occurring through hyperspace or through subspace, or through
"multiply connected spacetime." Particularly note that "time"
is multiply connected; i.e., every spatial point in 3-space (in the entire
universe) exists at the same moment in time, which means that electrodynamic
action through the time domain can be used to eliminate the spatial distance
between any two 3-space points. Action
at a distance is absolutely required by quantum mechanics, and experiments
establish its truth. Such action was implicitly included in Maxwell's
quaternion theory, but was unknowingly discarded by Heaviside, Hertz, and Gibbs
when they formulated a much more restricted vector interpretation of Maxwell's
theory, after Maxwell's death. Bohm's
hidden variable interpretation of quantum mechanics uses the quantum potential,
which is a multiply-connected entity producing instantaneous action at a
distance. In ordinary electrodynamics,
the common scalar potential in the Coulomb gauge has instantaneous velocity,
and it appears everywhere in space, wherever it will occupy, all at once in that gauge.
Time is also a set of energy flows in the time domain
(complex plane) rather than in 3-space.
Time is also multiply connected, since a priori every 3-space point in
the universe exists at and in a single moment of time. Since time is dynamic and structured with
special energy flows, it seems possible to use this feature to establish energy
flow during one specific moment to a desired subset of 3-space points,
regardless of where in the universe those points are located. Hence the development of
"time-energy" technology allows action at a distance via manipulating
the multiple connectivity of time and its internal structure (internal
time-like energy flows).
AD HOC MODEL
A model used and fitted for a specific purpose or area.
Tentative formulation, not intended toward general
application and not yet firm because there is still not a comprehensive, tested
demonstration of the "fit" of the model to the complex
phenomenology. Nonetheless, an ad hoc
model can be quite useful in a given area, so long as it sufficiently fits the
experimental data in that area and makes sufficiently accurate predictions in
the area.
ADVANCED FIELD
An electromagnetic field that is a solution of the
classical Maxwell equations, which is positioned on the future light-cone of
spacetime.
We believe much of the problem with the "advanced
solution" is a problem of interpretation.
We would urge the re-interpretation not in terms of
"time-travel" where the wave continues in observer forward time while
the rest of the universe is assumed to retrogress to a previous state, but in
terms of time-reversal of that wave only.
In that case, the rest of the universe stays sane and continues to move
in observer forward time, and the wave itself just moves in forward time in a
path-reversed manner, back along a previous "stimulus wave" (the
retarded wave that moved forward in time normally).
ADVANCED POTENTIAL
An electromagnetic potential that is a solution of the
classical Maxwell equations, which is positioned on the future light-cone of
spacetime.
Presently this potential has not yet been given a physical interpretation. See remarks above.
ADVANCED WAVE
An electromagnetic wave that is a solution of the classical
Maxwell equations, and which is positioned on the future light-cone of
spacetime.
See remarks above.
AFFINE CONNECTION
In mathematics: "A connection on a manifold, whose
form is unchanged under affine changes of parameter along curves, e.g., when
the original parameter t of a curve g (t) is replaced by t =
as + b." Dictionary of Science and
Technology, Academic Press, Christopher Morris (Ed.), 1992.
Ugh! We'll let the mathematicians take it from there.
AFFINE TRANSFORMATION
"Transformation on a linear space to itself which can
be expressed as the sum of a linear transformation and a fixed vector.
The affine transformations form a group. In the plane, the
group is six-dimensional, consisting of translations, rotations, stretchings
and shrinkings, reflections, simple elongations and compressions, and simple
shear transformations, as well as compositions of these."
Dictionary of
Science and Technology, 1992, ibid.
AHARONOV, YAKIR
Renowned Israeli quantum physicist and former student of
David Bohm.
Co-discoverer of the Aharonov-Bohm
effect: Even when the electromagnetic force fields reduce to zero in a
charged particle system, the potentials may still exist and interfere to cause
real physical effects. Together with Bohm, Aharonov authored a fundamental
paper in 1959 which pointed out the primary importance of the potentials rather than the force fields.
Indeed, the force fields are only made in
and of the charged particle system itself, by interference there of
potentials, and do not exist as such in the vacuum. The forcefields are thus not
primary electromagnetic causes at all, but are secondary effects due to the interference of potentials in a
particular charged particle system. [See Aharonov-Bohm
Effect] In his three volumes of physics, Feynman pointed out that the
forcefields do not exist as such in
the vacuum, and that only the potential
for the forcefields exists in vacuum. The primary causative agents for
electromagnetics are thus the potentials. This has been proven both
theoretically and experimentally in quantum mechanics, but still does not
appear in present classical electromagnetic theory taught in universities—which
terribly confuses cause waves and effect waves in wave-charge interactions.
AHARONOV-BOHM EFFECT
Phenomenon theoretically pointed out in 1959 by Yakir
Aharonov and David Bohm whereby interfering electromagnetic potentials can
produce effects on charged particle systems, even at a distance and in the
absence of the electromagnetic force fields.
See Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, "Significance of
Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory," Physical Review,
Second Series, 115(3), 1959, p. 485-491.
For an overview and extensive bibliography, see S. Olariu and I. Iovitzu
Popescu, "The Quantum Effects of Electromagnetic Fluxes," Reviews
of Modern Physics, 57(2), Apr. 1985, p. 339-436.
Chambers experimentally demonstrated the Aharonov-Bohm
effect one year later. When
E- and B-fields are zero in a region, their potentials still may exist and
thus be stable and persistent. Being gradient-free, a force-free potential is
not changing; no bleed-in or bleed-off of its magnitude or of its internal structure is occurring. Interference of the
potentials produces real electromagnetic effects (energy) in the interference
zone, even at a great distance, without transmission of "field energy"
per se through the intervening 3-space. [Rigorously, the potential's EM energy
can be considered to be hyperspatially
transmitted, or subspatially
transmitted (tunneled) via the Whittaker internal EM biwave mechanism. See
discussions under action at a distance.]
In 1897-8 Stoney showed (in Philosophical Magazine) by physical reasoning that all the
disturbances of the ether arising from sources of certain kinds can be resolved
into trains of plane waves. This was extended and the general and special equations
written by E.T. Whittaker in 1903 in Mathematische
Annalen. In 1904 (delivered orally in 1903) Whittaker's second paper
dealing with the subject was published in the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, and showed that
scalar EM potential interferometry is in fact what generates the classical EM
force fields.
The two Whittaker papers may be interpreted to show a
startling arrangement in a potential or EM wave. (1) any EM field or wave in a
particular 3-space is due to two interfering scalar potential functions in that
space. So we may replace any EM field
or wave with two scalar potential functions, a priori. (2) But each of the scalar potentials onto
which the functions are applied, is decomposable into the Whittaker 1903
longitudinal EM wavepairs, where the output waves are in 3-space and the input
waves are time-like and come from the complex plane. This provides a hidden "infolded LW electrodynamics"
inside, and composing, all EM fields and waves. Further, the decomposition is recursive, so each of the first
tier infolded EM waves can be decomposed again into a second tier of biwaves,
etc. Thus the most primary
electrodynamics of all is the nested infolded longitudinal EM wave structuring
of all present EM waves, potentials, and fields. The internal LW waves also form rigorous curvature of ST patterns
(templates) and thus engines. By
engineering the structure and dynamics of the internal EM, one can engineer
mass—including the atomic nuclei, quarks, and gluons—as one wishes, once the
technology is sufficiently developed.
In the West, this entire area has been ignored, but it has been highly
weaponized by the KGB in Russia.
AIAS
Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study.
Unusual "think tank" comprised of fellows and
fellow emeriti in various places in the world, who cooperate in advanced
electromagnetics studies via E-mail.
Led by Dr. Myron W. Evans, a theorist of note, the institute has been
forging ahead with the production of O(3) symmetry electrodynamics,
particularly as an important subset of Mendel Sachs' unified field theory. Dozens of AIAS group-authored papers have
been published in various leading journals such as Foundations of Physics,
Physica Scripta etc. More than 90 AIAS
papers are carried on a restricted Department of Energy website for reference
by DoE scientists. The work is
particularly significant in working out how EM energy flows in both the
3-spatial and time domains, and how EM energy can be and is extracted from the
active vacuum. More than a dozen
of the later AIAS papers are carried on
a DoE public website,
http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/papersbooks.html. Also, about two dozen AIAS papers have
either been approved for publication in journals, or are in the review
process. The present author is a Fellow
Emeritus of the AIAS, and is kindly tolerated as a conceptualist by these
advanced theoreticians.
AIDS
Acquired
Immunological Deficiency Syndrome.
A
condition of acquired immunological deficiency associated with infection of the
cells of the immune systems with the retrovirus HTLV-III. It is usually recognized by testing positive
to HIV infection, and eventually by physical deterioration and by development
of one or more life-threatening opportunistic infections such as pneumonia, or
of Kaposi's sarcoma.
AIKIDO
A
Japanese martial art whose modern form is a synthesis of many schools of
jujitsu and the zen art of meditation in motion.
It
is the way (DO) of entering and turning (AI) the opponents vital energy
(KI). The present author is a retired
sandan (third degree black belt) in Yoseikan aikido. He is retired because of debilitating injuries suffered in other
fields and accidents, and as a busted-up old dog of 70 has no business bouncing
hard off the mats with all those vigorous young fellows. His extra 50 pounds also no longer enhance
his athletic ability. We did write a
book, privately held but never published, on Aikido and dealing with the
principles of unarmed combat.
Interestingly, we simply went into the deep unconscious in meditation
(and perhaps a little beyond, depending on one's viewpoint) to uncover the
unsuspected principles. To list them,
we went through the alphabet four times.
Many of these principles have never appeared in any text on martial arts
or military combat. The task was placed
on me by my sensei and required seven years to complete. Perhaps one of these days we will formally
publish the book.
ALGEBRAS
The various types of mathematics in which the theoretical
models for physics and other sciences are embedded.
Some important algebras utilized in physics are the vector
algebra, tensor algebra, quaternion algebra, Grassman algebra, Pauli algebra,
Clifford algebra, etc. There are many
others. The complexity of the symmetry
and of the topology varies significantly between these algebras. Thus, an electrodynamics model in a lower
topology algebra such as vectors or tensors will not reveal or permit nearly so
great a set of electrodynamic functions and operations as will electrodynamics
embedded in a higher topology algebra such as quaternion algebra or Clifford
algebra.
As an example, it has been shown by Barrett that the
operation of many of Nikola Tesla's patented circuits cannot be understood if
analyzed in vector or tensor electrodynamics.
The circuits will reveal totally new functions when analyzed in
quaternion electrodynamics. That paper
is T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit
(OSC) Theory," Annales de la
Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41
ALLOPATHIC MEDICINE
A
medical system which combats disease by using remedies which produce effects
different from those produced by the disease treated.
Reliance
is primarily upon drugs, pain relievers, and treatment of symptoms as well as
use of agents to "kill" the microbial organisms regarded as the cause
of the diseases. Surgery is used as a
major adjunct. From time to time, other
practices formerly frowned upon or even legally prosecuted are recognized as
effective and legitimate, and are then brought in under the aegis of organized
allopathic medicine. Physical therapy
is such a formally prosecuted modality that was eventually adopted; hypnosis is
another. The problems with organized
allopathy is that (1) it tends to be monopolistic, (2) it uses the state's
power to enforce its credo, (3) it controls both the bulk of the medical
scientific literature and the flow of research funds from both government and
private sources, (4) it does not adequately police its doctors and technicians,
(5) it does not sufficiently accent preventative medicine or "whole human
being" treatment, and (6) it engages in conspiracies to destroy competing
systems of medicine (as in the case of chiropractic). (7) On the other hand, it has made remarkable advances in
preventing killer diseases by vaccination, treating them by antibiotics, and in
eradicating or controlling many of the former great killer diseases such as
smallpox, diphtheria, and bubonic plague.
It has been far less successful in treating and reversing debilitation,
cancer, arteriosclerosis, etc. Just
now, most of its major weapons against the former dread diseases are beginning
to fail. The disease organisms are
rapidly changing into new, more virulent forms that are resistant or even
immune to the present "successful" treatments. Even in orthodox medical publications, it is
now beginning to be recognizing that allopathic medicine is starting to fail,
and that we are again entering a period of great, uncontrollable killer
pandemics.
ALLOPATHY
Another
name for allopathic medicine and allopathic medical therapy.
AMBIENT VACUUM
The average active vacuum, in space, removed from large
collections of charge and mass.
AMBIENT VACUUM POTENTIAL
The average standard vacuum
(spacetime) considered as a potential having structure and dynamics on a myriad
levels.
Anything that is composed of virtual
particle flux is a potential. Another way of looking at the vacuum is to
realize that, having an energy density, then a priori it is a potential or may be modeled as such.
Hence the ambient vacuum can be decomposed
via the Whittaker method into an internal set of infolded EM longitudinal waves
of very special nature. Further, our
work on the broken 3-symmetry energy flow involved in any potential or
dipolarity shows the more fundamental 4-symmetry energy flow between the time
domain and 3-space. This 4-symmetry
energy flow is also highly structured and dynamic.
Whittaker's work shows that,
contrary to present assumptions in quantum physics, a particular potential has
its virtual particle flux formed into a beautiful bidirectional wave structure.
The apparent disorder at any local point in the local vacuum potential is due
to the constant arrival of myriads of potentials, from charged particles all
over the universe. The violent interference and re-interference of these
potentials results in the creation of violently changing virtual photons—or in
terms of waves, violently changing EM waves and fields. In other words, the
statistical disorder of the vacuum is actually composed of continually and rapidly changing perfect order. [Here
we have confronted 3-law Aristotelian logic with its missing 4th law, because at the limit opposites are identical!] The continual violent
interferometry results in the zero-point EM fluctuations of vacuum. Each EM
fluctuation is completely deterministic, as shown in Puthoff's cosmological
feedback mechanism. However, the macroscopic observer has no knowledge of the
cause or of the arrival, and of the myriads of interferences that produced the
final EM field fluctuation. Hence although the zero-point fluctuations of
vacuum are completely deterministic one-by-one, the observer has no information on their causality. Hence
to the observer these fluctuations are completely statistical and seemingly without local order. However, because of
their hidden determinism, these fluctuations are chaotic rather than
random—contrary to the Gibbs' thermodynamics statistics assumed and adopted by
quantum mechanics. That statistics should be changed to an "already
chaotic" statistics containing hidden Whittaker order. This would appear
to be the real solution to the recognized major QM problem of the missing
chaos.
Since their changes and appearances
are completely in one-to-one correspondence to all distant features of the
macroscopically ordered universe, then their integration yields macroscopic
order. Further, as can be seen, Mach's principle—so near and dear to the heart
of Einstein—arises directly from the foregoing discussion. In such fashion,
integration of statistical (but chaotic, and with hidden order) quantum changes
results in the familiar, ordered macroscopic world. This removes the great
error in QM: that heretofore it has failed to predict the ordered macroscopic
universe we observe and inhabit.
ANALOGUE
Part that is analogous
(representative or modeled).
At root, an analogue of something is
a second something that functions in similar fashion to the first something.
ANAEROBE
An
organism that lives, is active, and occurs in the absence of free oxygen. Particularly applicable to one-celled organisms
that do so.
ANAEROBE, FACULTATIVE
An
organism that can live either as an aerobe or as an anaerobe. Particularly applicable to one-celled
organisms possessing that capability.
ANAEROBE, OBLIGATORY
An
organism that is restricted to being anaerobic; i.e., it cannot utilize oxygen
from the atmosphere.
ANAEROBIC
Characteristic
of an organism of living, active, or occurring in the absence of free oxygen.
ANGULAR MOMENTUM
The
momentum or "leverage" of the momentum of a moving body, with respect
to an axis or reference point.
Angular
momentum as the same units as action; that is, it is energy multiplied by time,
or momentum multiplied by length. In
terms of particles, it is also known as spin.
ANOMALOUS EM JAMMING MECHANISM
In
a dense signal environment, an unusual mechanism whereby EM energy from the
skin of an aerial vehicle is directed laser-like into the internal circuitry.
The density of the signals impinging upon the skin are such that the probability of multiple photon interaction increases. Also, on a nonlinearity in/on the skin, the multiplex of signals creates a scalar EM potential. Decomposition of this potential into Whittaker waves provides hidden "pump" waves upon the nonlinearity, which therefore acts as a pumped phase conjugate mirror (PPCM). EM fields and signals from the internal operating circuits in the vehicle provide "signal waves" to the internal skin and to the nonlinearity PPCMs on the skin. Amplified phase conjugate replica (PCR) waves are generated by the PPCMs, where in each PCR wave the energy may be the total of the external signal density pump waves upon the initiating PPCM. The result is that the skin becomes a "collector" of energy from all the impinging external signals, and focuses much of this collected external energy into laser-like beams inside the vehicle which penetrate directly back to the circuit element that originated the particular signal field/wave to the inner skin. The result is spurious jamming throughout the vehicle, directly in its operating circuits, in a manner not described in normal ECM theory. Also, the same effect occurs in a human body when exposed to such a dense signal environment (threshold about 200,000 signals per square meter per second, and particularly active above 500,000 signals per square meter per second. I.e., in such an EM "smog" environment, the anomalous jamming mechanism is able to progressively conduct the energy impinging upon the skin deep into the body and throughout it, including into the bone marrow. This effect is not described at all in the standard dosimetry literature and experimental approaches for examining the effects of EM fields and radiations upon biological systems. By rigorous frequency band control of radiations and communications, most equipment can be operated in an appreciably dense environment such as appears on the modern environment, because the equipment is essentially "narrow band." The human, however, is a very wide-band receiver, and in such dense environments—even at very weak signal levels—the human system will eventually undergo cumulative damage. This is one of the major mechanisms involved in long term deleterious biological effects of EM radiation environments, but this effect on living systems has not been investigated in the laboratory by present EM bioeffects researchers.
In
the U.S. air attack on Libya in 1986, the anomalous jamming mechanism
interfered with the aircraft, controls, and missiles because frequency
discipline was not rigorously enforced.
In the Gulf War, rigid frequency discipline was enforced, with the
result that the electronic systems operated normally. However, the troops exposed to that environment (which varied
from place to place) were affected by the mechanism, which added a bit to the
previous cumulative damage to their immune systems, etc.
ANTIBODY
A
body substance produced in response to a specific antigen (protein or
carbohydrate or other substance, such as a toxin or enzyme, capable of
stimulating an immune response).
The
antibody counteracts the effects of the antigen, by neutralizing toxins,
agglutinating bacteria or cells, precipitating soluble antigens, etc.
ANTI-ELECTRON
The
time-reversed electron, or positron. Under
time reversal, electric charge reverses in sign.
Paul A.M. Dirac, in his "A Theory of Electrons and Protons," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A126, 1930, p. 360 introduced the negative energy electron sea (now called the "Dirac sea") with negative energy electron holes treated as the positive electron. He attempted to identify these holes with protons, but that was later refuted. The positron, discovered about a year after Dirac's paper, was later connected with this anti-electron.
Note
that Dirac himself was not adamant that all
negative energy state holes in the Dirac sea were filled with electrons, but
just that almost all of them
were. Modern researchers have tended to
extend this to state that all the
holes are filled, normally. That is
sufficient in forward time situations.
But it does not necessarily hold in a time-reversed situation, in a
time-reversed zone, or in a tempic back emf.
ANTIGRAVITY
An
effect whereby normal masses repulse
one another rather than attract one
another
Antigravity
may also be considered as time-reversed
gravitation. It may also be
considered as gravitation between two
negative masses.
ANTIMATTER
Matter
consisting of atoms which are composed of antielectrons (positrons),
antiprotons, antineutrons.
Also loosely refers to the antiparticle corresponding to a particle—the antiparticle may be regarded as the particle traveling backward in time, or "phase conjugated", or "time-reversed.
ANTIPARTICLE
A counterpart to an ordinary fundamental particle, having identical mass lifetime and spin, but with charge and magnetic moment reversed in algebraic sign.
Note that when the charge is reversed, parity and time are also reversed. Thus, properly, the antiparticle is the phase conjugation of the particle, or just conjugate particle for short. In effect an antiparticle is the particle traveling backward in observer time rather than forward in observer time.
ANTIPHASED
180 degrees out of phase
(contrary-wise in timing).
ANTIPHOTON
A time-reversed photon.
Presently, the photon is considered
its own antiparticle, so that photon and antiphoton are one and the same. In the
new approach, that is not quite true. First, one considers that a photon—as is
well known—has the units of angular momentum. Thus it is made of "energy
multiplied by time." We consider that the time-forward photon (i.e. a
normal photon), is made of (+DE)(+Dt). Usually physicists have largely neglected the fact that
a photon carries an increment of time
as well as an increment of energy! In our approach the antiphoton, being a time-reversed entity, must be composed
differently. We have tentatively considered the antiphoton to be comprised of (DE)(- Dt). It will probably initially
be necessary to take into account the fact that Minkowski geometry treats the T
dimension as imaginary rather than simple arithmetic. We haven't had the
lengthy time to work all of that out; perhaps one of the better theoreticians
or one of the sharp young graduate students will do that and save us the
trouble.
At any rate, the requirement is
that—in a coupled photon-antiphoton pair (a graviton)—the energies of photon
and antiphoton must add spatially, while electromagnetically
the translation forces (actually translation impulses) of photon and antiphoton
must cancel or thwart each other. One insists on a strong interpretation of the
distortion correction theorem in phase conjugate optics. In other words, we
consider the "wave" as composed of photons, while the
"antiwave" (phase conjugate replica) emitted by a phase conjugate
mirror is composed of antiphotons. And we consider that the distortion
correction theorem must apply to the wave's photons, so that the antiphotons
are precisely superposing (coupling) and then decoupling as the wave and
antiwave pass through each other in perfect spatial superposition. We feel that
this "totally in phase spatially but totally antiphased temporally"
concept is important. It is well-known,
e.g., that in certain cases protons—the very building blocks of matter
itself—can pass right through other protons, as shown in certain colliding beam
experiments if their relative spins are properly arranged.
ANTISIGNAL
The phase conjugate of a signal. The time reversal of that signal or its
twin. The phase conjugate replica
signal/wave emitted by a phase conjugate mirror material in response to an
incident signal/wave.
ANTI-STOKES EMISSION
Radiation emitted from an
intensely scattering medium that is of greater intensity than the input
radiation.
In other words, the medium gives off
more energy than we have to put into it. This has been known since the 1930s
and proven experimentally, but no really complete explanation has been
forthcoming. The conventional
explanation is that some of the kinetic energy of the medium is furnished to
cause additional emission. In that
case, anti-Stokes emission would lower the kinetic energy of the emitting
medium. Note that this is not
necessarily true at all in Letokhov's negative absorption (excess emission) of
the medium, where in that case the excess energy in the emissions is said to
come directly from energy absorbed from the active vacuum.
ANTI-STOKES RADIATION
The radiation coming from an
anti-Stokes emission process from an intensely scattering medium, where more
energy flux is emitted than is input by the experimenter-operator.
In the past, there has just been
"arm-waving" that the excess energy must come from the internal
energy of the molecules. There seems to be no explanation at all of where the
excess energy of the molecules must continue to come from! Tacit silence on
this "apparent" violation of energy conservation is held. But see Letokhov's negative absorption of the medium discussions in the literature.
We quote from H. C. Dake and Jack
DeMent. (1941) Fluorescent Light and Its
Applications, Chemical Publishing Company, Inc., Brooklyn, New York, 1941.
p. 51-52: "When a phosphor or other
luminescent substance emits light, it gives in most cases an emission according
to Stokes' Law. This law states that the wavelength of the fluorescent
(emitted) light is always greater than the wavelength of the exciting
radiation. It was first observed in 1852 in the memoir "On the Change of
Refrangibility of Light," by Sir G. G. Stokes. In terms of energy the
relationship states that e em < e ab. While Stokes' Law holds for the
majority of cases, it does not hold in certain instances. In some cases the
wave length is the same for both the absorbed and the emitted radiation. That
is, the efficiency appears to be perfect or unity. This is known as resonance
radiation. In other cases Stokes' Law does not hold where the energy emitted is
greater than the energy absorbed. This is known as Anti-Stokes emission. In
1935 Prileshajewa showed that there is an energy difference as much as 1.1 v
between the exciting light and the fluorescence of aniline vapor. This added
energy is attributed to additions from the internal energy of the molecule."
There is no real problem of
identifying the source of the excess energy, once one realizes that (i) every
dipole is a broken symmetry in the vacuum exchange with the end charges of the
dipole, and thus extracts virtual energy from the vacuum, integrates and orders
it, and outputs it as EM energy density flow.
One then adds multiretroreflection and multiple passes of the EM energy
flow, so that charges that intercept and collect energy from the reciprocating
flow can multiply connect from the same energy flow (on a given pass, only a
tiny, tiny fraction—nominally about 10-13—of the energy
flow is intercepted and interacted with by the collecting particle). Thus
multiple collections from the same EM energy flow can be accomplished, if the
flow is iteratively rerouted (as by retroreflection or phase conjugate
reflection) back across the collecting charges again and again.
In this fashion additional energy is
collected in the collected volume, which increases the local collected energy
density in that volume. In turn this increases the local potential of that
volume. In turn that increases the
energy flow from that potential acting as a dipole, because it increases the
dipole strength and consequently the magnitude of the dipole's broken symmetry
in its vacuum flux exchange.
The inefficiency of the process
increases nonlinearly with increasing local potential, and faster than the
buildup of local energy density occurs from multipass multicollection. When the
inefficiency curve reaches the increasing broken symmetry energy extraction
curve, then a point of equilibrium is reached. At that equilibrium point, the
rate of energy diffusing out of the multipass region and escaping from the
periphery of the system is equal to the rate of extraction of energy from the
vacuum and flowing it out into as Poynting S-flow
into the multicollection region and collecting it.
So we have described an open
thermodynamic system, where there are two inputs of energy flow: (i) that by
the operator-experimenter, and (ii) that from the vacuum via the dipolar broken
symmetries. At equilibrium condition the total input energy rate is equal to
the total energy escaping rate, and the conservation of energy law is
rigorously upheld. However, this is an open thermodynamic system far from equilibrium,
and so rigorously the nonlinear thermodynamics of such systems applies, rather
than the normal equilibrium thermodynamics. As is well-known, the coefficient
of performance for such open systems in disequilibrium, may permissibly be
overunity, even greatly overunity.
Properly utilized, the overunity
anti-Stokes or Letokhov emission can be made very large—such as COP »1200 in Patterson's
adaptation. The process and its overunity certification already exist in the
hard science literature, being known and experimentally demonstrated for at
least three decades.
ANTIWAVE
The time-reversal (phase
conjugation) of a reference wave.
A phase conjugate replica wave is a
time-reversed replica of its referent wave. Hence it is the antiwave of the
referent wave.
A-POTENTIAL
Vector magnetic potential.
The A-potential is a real entity more primary than the
magnetic field B, and not a
mathematical convenience as was originally thought—as detailed in the second
volume of Feynman's three volumes of physics. Indeed, it may be separated from
the magnetic field, as reported by Feynman, and used for instrumentation
effects in the manner patented by Gelinas. When separated from magnetic field,
it is often referred to as the "curl-free vector potential," since the
B-field is modeled as being created
from the A-field by curling it. In
other words, B is defined as the
curl of the magnetic vector potential, if we use B º Ñ´A. Hence
"separating" magnetic field from A-potential
simply is a sort of "parallel branching" of the energy density flow
of the A-potential. It is like branching the voltage on a feeder
line conductor in an electric circuit into two parallel conductors. The feeder potential splits into two, so
that each branch has the same potential.
Actually the vast energy flow in the feeder line only has a small
component which strikes the surface charges, diverting the energy into the
conductor and potentializing the Drude electrons. In branching into two conductors, the giant flow branches also,
but is so great that the surface charges in each of the two branches still
intercept essentially the same amount of energy, diverging it into the
conductor. Hence each conductor
exhibits the same potential as the feeder conductor
The same thing happens when one "splits" or
branches the A-potential in similar
fashion. The diverted and separated B-field branch will exhibit "equal
energy density" flow (i.e., in the form of magnetic flux density flow) and
yet the original A-potential path
through space will still have the same previous energy flow density magnitude,
just without curl (without magnetic field).
Any good toroid or very long solenoid already performs such
separation, and hence energy density flow doubling. If properly used—as in the motionless electromagnetic generator
(MEG)—this effect can be used to provide a generator with COP>1.0. At this writing, the present MEG exhibits
COP = 16, and is a patent-pending system.
The well-known Aharonov-Bohm effect, e.g., also uses this
separation of the curl of the
A-potential, leaving an uncurled A-potential whose changes will and do
interact with electrons.
The curl-free vector potential is particularly interesting because
(1) it is a unique and independent field of nature, (2) its curl produces a
magnetic field, (3) its time derivative produces an electric field, (4) its
magnitude does not fall off inversely as the distance squared, but only
inversely as the distance, and its time derivative dA/dt = B E. Hence, as in the MEG,
one can extract energy both from the curl-free A-potential and the curled
A-potential (magnetic field B), increasing the available energy
collected in the circuit to greater than what the operator input to it. This is simply a physical process of
regauging, wherein electrodynamicists already routinely assume (and apply) the
fact that the potential energy of any EM system can be freely changed at will,
by regauging. In the real world, of
course, we may have to pay a little switching energy, but we are free to
regauge (by this "splitting the potential into equal parallel paths, and
by other methods), at will and at any time and place. The MEG just takes advantage of one major method for free regauging,
in order to violate the Lorentz symmetry condition (violate symmetry in the
system's energy exchange with its active vacuum environment). It thereby is legitimately permitted to
exhibit COP>1.0 and output more energy than one inputs, because the regauging
transforms it into an open dissipative system far from thermodynamic
equilibrium in its active environmental energy exchange.
ARISTOTELIAN LOGIC
The conventional three laws of logic, unconsciously fitted to the physical reality created by the single photon interaction. The three laws are: (1) a thing is identical to itself, (2) a thing is not identical to something else, and (3) either one has a given thing or something that is not that thing. Mathematically these are written as (1) A A, (2) A Ã, and (3) A Ã. Aristotelian logic applies only to single observation at a time (monocular observation, a single observer). When multiple simultaneous observation (multiocular observation, multiple observers) are considered, the three laws may be violated. In that case a fourth law, A Ã is added. This law may be seen to be the exact negation of all the first three. An application rule (which may itself be called a fifth law) is also added, and states that either the first three laws are explicit and the fourth is implicit, or the first three are implicit and the fourth is explicit. Further, the fourth law is the law of the paradox: Something that is found to be true in nature, but violates one or more of Aristotle's three laws, is known as a logical paradox. In the higher logic, it simply violates the case where the three Aristotelian laws are explicit and the fourth law is implicit. Instead, the three Aristotelian laws are now implicit and the fourth law has become explicit. All boundaries exhibit this effect.
It is highly recommended that the
interested reader familiarize himself or herself with Morris Kline, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, Oxford
University Press, New York, 1980. Kline
deals directly with the fact that mathematics is not a body of unshakable
truths about the physical world, and mathematical reasoning is not exact and
fallible.
ARISTOTLE
A great Greek philosopher who
lived from 384-322 B.C.
Aristotle is famous for his three
laws of logic: (1) a thing is identical to itself, (2) a thing is not identical
to something else, and (3) either one has the thing considered or one has
something else.
Heraclitus pointed out that
Aristotle's laws prohibited any change, and yet changes were ubiquitous. In short, for a thing to change, it had to
change into something else, so Heraclitus pointed out. So how could a thing be both itself and
something else simultaneously? How could it be not itself while being
itself? The problem has not been solved
by the logicians and philosophers to this day, because it has no solution in
Aristotelian 3-law logic. So
Heraclitus, believe it or not, concluded that all change was an illusion.
ATHERIOSCLEROSIS
Basically, clogging of the arteries, which may be due to deposits onto the artery walls or by thickening and growth of the artery walls themselves, or a combination. It is a chronic (slowly progressing) disease where the artery walls become progressively thickened and hardened and the artery becomes less elastic.
It
has been found that the common cytomegalovirus (one of the herpes viruses)
plays a key role in the development of the disease. Initial deposits irritate and injure the arterial walls, and the
herpes 6 virus infects the site, partially nullifying the control of excess
grown of the arterial muscle tissue.
This deposit and concomitant stimulation of some excess muscle growth
occurs repeated, so that the muscle tissue grows abnormally over an extended
period of time. For this reason, when
an operation is performed to forcibly reduce the deposits inside the artery,
the resulting injuries to the arterial wall tissues leads to the herpes 6
infection and stimulation of excess muscle growth. It has been found, e.g., that after angioplasty the process is
often engendered, so that within a year or two the artery is narrowed again,
but this time by abnormal growth of smooth muscle tissue. The Prioré team demonstrated positive and
total remission of arteriosclerosis in laboratory animals by means of
nonionizing EM irradiation to produce an amplified "antiengine",
which "time reversed" or dedifferentiated the stricken cells and the
stricken areas back to a previous state.
ARTIFICIAL POTENTIAL
A scalar potential which is
composed of, or partially contains, an artificially assembled bidirectional
wave set.
See E. T. Whittaker, "On the
Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics," Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903,
p. 333-355 for proof that a "scalar potential" is actually a harmonic
set of hidden bidirectional EM phase
conjugate longitudinal wavepairs. Each wavepair consists of a wave and its
antiwave (true time-reversed replica wave).
If the external observer could see
the detected (effect) waves in a
hidden wavepair, he would see the "wave" going in one direction and
the antiwave passing precisely through it in the other direction. However, prior to detection, the phase
conjugate wave exists entirely in the complex plane and hence in the time domain
(in -ict). So the interpretation of
Whittaker's 1903 paper, in terms of cause and effect waves, is that the phase
conjugate half set is incoming from the time domain to each and every point in
the dipolarity or potential, and the "real 3-space half set" is being
radiated in every direction in 3-space from that point. See my paper, "Giant
Negentropy….".
In addition to Whittaker's sum set
of biwaves, Ziolkowski added the product set in the mid-1980s. E.g., see
Richard W. Ziolkowski, "Exact solutions of the wave equation with complex
source locations," Journal of
Mathematical Physics, 26(4), April 1985, p. 861-863; Rod Donnelly and
Richard Ziolkowski, "A method for constructing solutions of homogeneous
partial differential equations: localized waves," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A., Vol. 437, 1992, p.
673-692. Particularly see I.M. Besieris, A.M. Shaarawi, and R. W. Ziolkowski,
"A bidirectional travelling plane wave representation of exact solutions
of the scalar wave equation," Journal
of Mathematical Physics, 30(6), 1989, p. 1254-1269.
However, these deal only with the
effects waves after detection.
Another way of defining an
artificial potential is: A potential
formed by or containing a subset formed by, deliberately summing nonzero force
field vectors to a zero vector resultant. [Note that electrodynamicists
routinely discard vector systems that sum to a zero resultant; not realizing
that in doing so, they are discarding vacuum engines and a vastly extended
electrogravitational dynamics!] The vector zero system of infolded nonzero
vectors has a deterministic, internal stress pattern that is macroscopic. The
type of potential made by the zero summation depends upon the type of force
vectors summed. For example, summing electric field vectors to zero produces an
electrostatic scalar potential; summing magnetic field vectors to zero produces
a magnetostatic scalar potential of vacuum.
All potentials represents local
warps or curvatures in vacuum/spacetime, and all artificial potentials contain
internal, deterministic templates of nested internal spacetime curvatures.
Curvature of spacetime interacts directly upon mass and physical systems
embedded in it. Thus these deterministic, internested local spacetime
curvatures of the artificial potential represent vacuum engines, or spacetime
engines, and the artificial potential is said to be a dimensioned or activated
potential. Any system exposed to and placed in such a vacuum spacetime engine,
will have these hidden vacuum flux asymmetries interacting upon each and every
part of it, down to and including the nuclei, the nucleons, and the quarks in
the nucleons.
ASYMMETRICAL REGAUGING
Change of either the scalar
potential f or the vector potential A,
but not both, so that a single excess force and a single change of system
energy occurs in the system.
This violates the assumed Lorentz
condition, and thus excess energy can enter the system, and an excess
"free" force appears which can (if the system is adroitly designed)
then translate to perform work upon the system to increase its (e.g. kinetic)
energy, exhausting the excess regauging energy in the process and restoring
symmetry.
In conventional EM theory, Maxwell's
equations in potential formulation are in terms of two potentials, f (the
scalar potential) and A (the vector
potential). When Heaviside retranslated Maxwell's quaternion set of 20
equations in 20 unknowns, he transformed it (in potential form) into two
equations where main variables f and A
are not separated. Electrodynamicists, who until recently considered the
potentials as not even real, but just mathematical figments and conveniences,
then simply arbitrarily changed both f and A
just precisely so that the extra
force appearing in the system by the change of f was countered by an equal and
opposite extra force also appearing in the system by the change of A. This type of symmetrical (no net force) regauging is known as the Lorentz condition.
Each asymmetrical (produces a nonzero excess net force) potential change
(each half of the two asymmetrical regaugings that comprise the symmetrical
regauging) also altered the overall energy of the system. However, in the
symmetrical regauging that total energy change is "bottled up" as
increased stress in the system, because no net translation force is available
to be translated and use the energy change to produce excess "free
work."
The Lorentz condition assumes that
the designer will not allow the
equilibrium of the system to be broken! In that case, of course, ordinary
equilibrium thermodynamics applies, and the system cannot produce COP>1.0.
Prior to this Lorentz condition assumption and its absolutely arbitrary
regauging, Maxwell's equations do include asymmetrical regauging and therefore
open EM systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium; precisely those which
violate the Lorentz condition (symmetric regauging) assumption. In short, the unregauged equations do
include COP>1.0 electrodynamic circuits and systems.
Unknowingly the electrodynamicists arbitrarily discarded the entire
Maxwellian class of overunity EM engines and circuits—which class incorporates
making a change in one potential(s) such that the Lorentz condition does not
hold.
ASYMMETRY
Lack
of symmetry, or "broken symmetry" in a general sense.
ASYMMETRY OF THE DIPOLE
Any dipole or dipolarity is a
broken 3-symmetry in its fierce exchange of EM energy with the active
vacuum. This means that it continuously
receives and absorbs copious virtual energy from the seething vacuum flux, and
that not all this absorbed energy is reradiated back to the vacuum in virtual
form. Instead, some of it is integrated
into observable form and re-radiated in all directions as usable, real 3-space
EM energy.
This is standard, well-known
particle physics, although it appears to be totally missing from classical
electrodynamics and it is not considered at all by electrical power system
designers and analysts!
Every electric charge is a broken
symmetry in the virtual particle flux exchange between the quantum mechanical
(energetic) vacuum and the mass of that electric charge. The dipole is two
different such asymmetries. As is well-known in particle physics (not in
classical EM theory!) each such broken symmetry must "gate" out some
of the vacuum energy. In short, the charge asymmetry "extracts" some
vacuum energy from its normal "energetic exchange" with the vacuum
flux, and puts it out in some form we call "observable" (capable of
being measured; specifically, of being intercepted by electric charges so as to
produce a force field across the charge and translate it).
Well, an electrical charge produces
a flow of energy density which we may represent conventionally as S = E´H (when collected and measured
on assumed unit point charges), which we—a little bit mistakenly— call
"observable." [Actually, until the energy flow interacts with that
assumed unit point charge, it is an organized flow of virtual entities] After interaction it is real observable EM
energy in 3-space. The spinning electron has its own magnetic moment and its
own E-field. Since (in one form) also
E = - Ñf , an extracted and formed S = E´H is output by the
charge asymmetry. This output energy flow also produces the assumed f evidenced by the charge interaction, since f as used represents the reaction cross section of the
potential. Note that all these entities
S, E, H, and f are defined in
electrodynamics only as their own interaction cross section with a unit point
charge containing mass.
In classical electrodynamics (formed
long before the notion of charged particles, atoms, and EM energy flow!) it is
just recognized that "charge is the source of a potential." Actually
charge gates the energy flow from the vacuum flux, receiving the energy from
the time domain by its asymmetry, transduces the energy into 3-space energy,
and outputs it as real EM energy pouring out in 3-space in all directions. That energy-flow contains and carries the
energy that will interact with charge to form the E-field, the H-field
(spin field), and f.
Also, in particle physics and gauge
theory it is well-known that no mass
system can be in equilibrium anyway, unless the vacuum-to-mass interaction is
incorporated! After CEM was formed, much later the atom was discovered and
the electron was discovered. Much later then, particle physics and quantum
mechanics came along. CEM theory has never been altered to include the
necessary vacuum interaction, although it has been known for decades that CEM
is totally in error in this respect.
Here one poses a question to the
sharp young graduate students: Why does every university continue to teach a
seriously flawed classical electrodynamics which does not include the
vacuum/mass interaction, when the physics department at the same university
knows full well that it must or no EM system can be in equilibrium? Why is not
such a fundamental and universal
issue strongly raised and intensively discussed by our large, tax-exempt
scientific organizations at their annual symposia? Why do not the National
Science Foundation and the National Academy of Science demand that serious work
be done at all speed, to correct such known scientific deficiencies in the
classical EM theory? What happened to
science as the search for physical truth, and replaced it with "status
quo" models or—in some cases—even dogma?
It is an inexplicable mystery to me, and one to which I do not know the
answer.
AUTOIMMUNE DISORDER
A
disease or disorder relating to or caused by the antibodies or T-cells that
attack foreign molecules, cells, or tissues of their host organism.
A
flagrant autoimmune disease example is AIDS, Acquired Immunological Deficiency
Syndrome. The AIDS virus successfully
hides from the antibodies, so that they cannot perform their proper function,
and it infects the T-cells and negates their function. However, there are other examples other than
AIDS: e.g., rheumatism and osteoarthritis.
BACK EMF
The counter-electromotive force,
usually between the end charges of the source dipole for an EM circuit.
When the electrons in the circuit
are forced against the emf—as when the charges from the ground reference of the
circuit are forced back up through the emf of the source dipole—then work is
done upon the source dipole to scatter the charges and destroy the dipole. Removing the dipole removes its receipt of
vacuum energy via its broken 3-symmetry, transduction of that energy, and
output of it along the circuit and in space around the circuit as the energy
flow that powers the circuit (with part missing the circuit and being just
wasted).
Since this removes the power from
the circuit, then additional energy must be input to the source to perform work
on the internal charges and restore that source dipole again.
There are actually two emfs in a
circuit, not one. There is a 3-space
emf and also an entirely unrecognized tempic emf. In either case, under proper circumstances there can be a
back-emf or either one or both. See
discussion under electromotive force,
back. See also tempic back emf (to be added).
BALL LIGHTNING
Rare form of lightning where an incandescent, slow-moving globe forms. The globe often moves erratically, explodes, and may set fire to objects it touches.
Ball
lightning may be due to scalar electromagnetic interferometry which can produce
a controlled pattern of electromagnetic energy at a distance, or it may be due
to the formation of a special localized spacetime curvature engine.
BARE ELECTRON
The
true electron without its partial shielding of virtual positrons that are
attracted around it.
BARRETT, TERENCE W.
Noted modern electrodynamicist
and consultant who works in SU(2)´SU(2) gauge symmetry extended electrodynamics, and was also
one of the pioneers of ultrawideband radar.
BECKER, ROBERT O.
Medical doctor, medical research
scientist, and Nobel Nominee, noted for
his early-on efforts—particularly in the 1960s through the 1980s, in the
effects of EM fields on biological systems, studies of evoked or partially
evoked limb regeneration in certain species, electrical stimulation of bone
fractures to stimulate healing and reveal the mechanism involved, and the
cellular regeneration system of the body as opposed to the immune system.
Becker particularly recognized that
the cellular regenerative system was a special electrical system having unique
functions. He even succeeded in
diagramming this system as far as it is revealed by ordinary U(1)
electrodynamics. Becker demonstrated
partial limb regeneration in salamanders, etc. and in some other species, with
electrical stimulation. In his
EM-stimulated bone fracture healing, Becker showed a startling result: First the red blood cells entering the
fracture area shucked their hemoglobin and grew a nucleus, thus
"dedifferentiating" (biological term) or "time-reversing"
(physics term) back to an earlier state.
Then this modified cell redifferentiated (biological term) or
"fast-forwarded in time" (physics term) into the type of cell that
makes cartilage. Then this newly
modified cell further redifferentiated into the type of cell that makes bone,
and was deposited in the fracture site.
The continuing deposits of these cells from the ongoing process evoked
in red blood cells healed the fracture with new bone growth. Whereupon the action stopped.
Becker also was one of the first
qualified scientists who testified in court on the deleterious effects of power
line radiation. He thereby incurred the
enmity of very powerful interests, so that his research funds were pulled and
eventually he was forced to retire at an early age.
He was nominated for the Nobel Prize
multiple times, and his epochal work did finally focus at least some attention
of the medical research community on the regenerative system as opposed to the
immune system which heals nothing.
Becker's profound work was of tremendous
influence on me as I struggled to decipher the active mechanism in his
experiments, the Prioré team's experiments in France, the Russian microwave
radiation of U.S. Embassy personnel in Moscow, Kaznacheyev's experiments
demonstrating transmission of cellular disease and disorder electromagnetically
into target cells environmentally isolated except for contact by light from the
sender cells having such disease or disorder, and the body's own regenerative
system. After some 14 years struggle
with the problem, I finally did break the mechanism(s) involved in all those
things. But it was only possible
because of the magnificent work by Becker and Prioré, the reported work by
Kaznacheyev, and gradual exposure to higher symmetry electrodynamics. The work was crude at first, but eventually
progressed (by 1998, e.g.) to include the port-hole concept, transduction of EM
wave polarization types, the engine and engine template concepts, and unified
field theory. Since then it has become
clear that the proper electrodynamics to model such things is the higher
symmetry O(3) electrodynamics pioneered by Evans, and now revealed to be an
important subset of Sachs' unified field theory.
Becker is therefore one of my heroes
whose magnificent work and long perseverance against strong scientific
suppression I greatly admire. Most of
Becker's detractors were or are in fact employed in positions either directly
or indirectly funded by the electrical power industry. I believe that, had Becker had access to
O(3) electrodynamics and Sachs' theory, he would have personally impelled the
entire medical field to a marvelous and extraordinarily advanced EM medical
therapy.
See Robert O. Becker and Andrew A. Marino, Electromagnetism and Life, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1982; Nice summary of EM bioeffects (orthodox) ; also on http://www.ortho.lsumc.edu/Faculty/Marino/EL/ELPub.html.
See also R. O. Becker, "The neural semiconduction control system and its interaction with applied electrical current and magnetic fields," Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Radiology, Vol. 105, 1966, p. 1753-1759, Excerpta Medica Foundation; Amsterdam; — "The direct current field: A primitive control and communication system related to growth processes," Proceed. XVI Internat. Congr. Zoology, Washington, D.C., Vol. 3, 1963, p. 179-183; — “The control system governing bone growth in response to mechanical stress,” J. Ark. Med. Soc., Vol. 62, 1966, p. 404; — "A technique for producing regenerative healing in humans," Frontier Perspectives, 1(2), Fall/Winter 1990, p. 1-2; — with Charles H. Bachman and Howard Friedman, The direct current system: A link between the environment and the organism," New York State Journal of Medicine, Vol. 62, April 15, 1962, p. 1169-1176; — and D. G. Murray, “A method for producing cellular dedifferentiation by means of very small electrical currents,” Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Vol. 29, 1967, p. 606-615; — and Joseph A. Spadaro, "Electrical stimulation of partial limb regeneration in mammals," Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, Second Series, 48(4), May 1972, p. 627-64; — and Carlton F. Hazlewood, Abraham R. Liboff, and Jan Walleczek, Electromagnetic Applications In Medicine," NIH-OAM Electromagnetics Panel Report, Jan. 15, 1993.
See particularly Robert O. Becker, "The significance of bioelectric potentials." Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, Vol. 1, 1974, p. 187-199. This is probably the paper by Becker that provides a really good overview of the control system. A block diagram of the proposed system is given by Becker on p. 191.
Becker
also has authored several popular-oriented books filled with excellent
information. These include Robert O.
Becker, M.D. and Gary Selden, The Body
Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow and
Co., New York, 1985; and Robert O. Becker, Cross
Currents: The Perils of Electropollution; The Promise of Electromedicine,
Jeremy P. Tarcher, Los Angeles, 1990.
BEDINI, JOHN
Noted audio engineer, overunity
energy researcher, and inventor of the renowned Bedini amplifiers well-known to
audiophiles, the BASE process for holographic sound, and a process for cleaning
the harshness from digital audio disks.
Bedini has invented a variety of
COP>1.0 processes, motors, generators, etc.
Particularly he has developed a process whereby, in a battery-powered
circuit, he adroitly back-pulses the battery in a recharging direction while
the battery is powering the load, causing a pile-up of electrons on the surface
of the battery plates that is a sharply increased scalar potential opposing the
onrushing very massive lead ions in the battery in discharging mode. The result is that the potential's electron
pile-up increases dramatically due to the ions' far greater inertia than that
of the electrons. The result is a high
potential (perhaps 40 volts) upon the surface of the battery,
overpotentializing both the incoming lead ions between the plates and the
electrons in the external circuit in powering mode. In this phase, energy flows from the vacuum onto both the ions
and the external circuit electrons, adding significant energy to the powering
of the external circuit for the same ion current inside the battery.
As the ions slow and stop, Bedini's
back-pulse trailing edge causes a very sharp cutoff, thus invoking Lenz's law
and resulting in the surface potential on the plates increasing to well over
100 volts. This further
overpotentializes the external circuit electrons in powering mode, dissipating
much more energy in the external circuit to power the loads. As the ions finally stop and reverse, their
relatively sluggish re-acceleration in charging mode and their
overpotentialization still results in excess energy being delivered to the
external circuit. Then as the
overpotentialized ions accelerate in charging mode, the external circuit is
still in powering mode until the drain-off of the severe electron pile-up on
the surface of the battery plates.
This is one of several modes of
operation used by Bedini in his overunity battery powered circuits, which keep
their batteries recharged while powering their loads.
By separating the other closed
current loop between external electron currents and the ion currents between
the battery plates, and then dephasing these currents, Bedini breaks the usual
dissipation symmetry enforced in a closed loop circuit where all charge
carriers have the same m/q ratio. In
Bedini's circuits, the m/q charge ratios dramatically differ between the ion current
section between the plates and the electron currents between the outside of the
plates and through the external circuit.
Also, by providing a much greater potential between the two circuit halves, The potential extends in both
directions—internally back over the ions, and externally in the circuit over
the external Drude electrons powering the circuit loads and losses. He provides a true negative resistor on the
surface of the plates, which extracts energy from the vacuum (via its broken
3-symmetry as a dipolarity) from the time domain, transduces it into real EM
energy, and overpotentializes (regauges) the potential energy of both the
internal ion currents and the external electron currents.
The Bedini process is therefore a
legitimate COP>1.0 system, and in his self-powering embodiments the system
will run indefinitely without external energy input by the operator, use of
fuel, etc. He has converted the system
to an open system far from thermodynamic equilibrium in its violent energy
exchange with the active vacuum, and thus the system is permitted to exhibit
both COP>1.0 and self-powering as well.
For an expanded explanation of the
Bedini negative resistor process in batteries, see T. E. Bearden,
"Bedini's Method for Forming Negative Resistors in Batteries," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer
2000, p. 24-38.
BEING
Pure
essence, existence.
Again,
something which in actuality resists Aristotelian definition unless preliminary
assumptions are made. Generally used in
one of two senses: (1) persistence, as in "he is (he continually
exists)," or (2) identity, as in "he is the man ('he' and 'the man'
are the same thing)."
BIDIRECTIONAL EM WAVES
EM waves running antiparallel to
each other through a given point or region of space.
Suppose we run a normal EM wave into
a phase conjugating mirror (PCM) with a gain of 1. By ordinary phase conjugate
optics, the mirror then emits a backwards-traveling phase conjugate replica
wave (PCR wave). According to the so-called "distortion correction
theorem," that backwards traveling wave will travel backwards (as seen by
the external observer) back over the exact route taken by the previous wave,
and it will reappear in space precisely superposed spatially with the previous
waves. If we examine the impulse (density) fields (i.e., Edt), then the
forward-time wave contains Edt while the backward time wave contains E(-dt), which is just -Edt. So electromagnetically—as far as producing a net translation force on
a charge—the E-fields seem to cancel, although they are still there and their
energy is still there. Instead of translation, the two produce stress.
One thus (simple case) will have a
strange kind of standing wave wherein the local energy density of the vacuum
varies (e.g., sinusoidally) as a function of distance, but a charged particle
placed in it will not be translated! Rigorously, that is a gravitational standing wave. Since change in local energy density
is also a curvature of spacetime, that is also a standing sinusoidal wave of
the local curvature of spacetime. This is where electromagnetics and
gravitation actually meet, and where electromagnetics can be utilized to
produce gravitational waves. (Much more complex waves can be produced; this is
just the simplest example).
BIDIRECTIONAL FIELD FLOWS
E-fields (and B-fields) being
propagated in a pair of opposite waves traveling "through" each other
in opposite directions,
...where the two may be "locked
together" as a wave and its antiwave; i.e., as a "Whittaker biwave
pair". Note that Whittaker
bidirectional EM wavepairs are not to be confused with the pairing of the wave
and reflection wave on a transmission line.
BIDIRECTIONAL GATING
Gating (of energy flow, e.g.) in
both directions simultaneously.
BIDIRECTIONAL TRAVELING PLANE WAVE
A wave and its antiwave, where each
wave is moving in an opposite direction (standard assumption in phase conjugate
physics).
In short, to the external observer
the waves seem to be "moving through" each other; one from left to
right, and the other from right to left; or one radially outward and the other
radially inward. All scalar potentials were shown by Stoney and Whittaker to be
comprised of a harmonic series of such "bidirectional traveling wave
pairs." However, the
interpretation of the phase conjugate waves was after detection, so that the
detected "effect" wave existed in 3-space. Prior to detection, the phase conjugate half-set of the Whittaker
decomposition of the scalar potential is convergent from and in the time domain
(complex plane).
BIOELECTROMAGNETICS (BEM)
Presently, the scientific study of interactions between living organisms and electromagnetic fields, forces, energies, currents, and charges. The range of interactions studied ranges from atomic and molecular, through intracellular, to the whole organism.
Electromagnetic fields studied in BEM include those of endogenous origin (from within the organism) and exogenous origin (from outside the organism). Sources of exogenous fields include: the earth and sun, electrical equipment (power lines, radio transmitters, etc.), clinical treatment devices (e.g., TENS), and other organisms. The electromagnetic fields of greatest interest in BEM are generally classified as nonionizing (i.e., lacking sufficient energy to directly dislodge electrons from molecules or atoms.) BEM is a scientific discipline emerging on the boundaries between physics and biology. As in other sciences, progress in BEM is made by testing falsifiable hypotheses against valid measured data obtained in repeatable experiments.
Our
new viewpoint seeks to dramatically enlarge the scope of this definition, to
include not only the presently-recognized external (outfolded)
electromagnetics, but also the internal (infolded, inside the scalar EM
potential) electromagnetics, and also to utilize a unified field theory where
EM is GR and vice versa.
BIOENERGETICS
That branch of Russian (KGB)
energetics which is targeted against the living body, its cells and tissues,
and its EM fields and potentials (biofields and biopotentials).
BIOGENESIS
Generation of living organisms
from other living organisms; also, the theory or philosophy that living
organisms develop only from other living organisms.
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
Warfare against living humans,
livestock, crops, etc. using pathogenic micro-organisms or biocides to create diseases and death, or
using dimensioned electromagnetic potentials, fields, and waves to kindle
cellular damage, disease, and death in the same targeted populations.
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE, ELECTROMAGNETIC
The use of dimensioned
electromagnetic potentials, fields, and waves to induce cellular damage,
disease, and death in targeted living populations.
The decades of Russian microwave
radiation of personnel in the former U.S. Embassy in Moscow is an example,
where only field-free potentials were dimensioned with the disease or
health-change patterns (the engines).
This science was developed in Russia as an outgrowth of the thousands of
Kaznacheyev experiments demonstrating that any cellular disease and damage
pattern could be induced from diseased
or damaged cells into environmentally isolated cell cultures, purely by
specialized EM radiation from the damaged or "transmitting" cells
into the targeted cells.
The Chinese also used such
dimensioned radiation to induce cancer in almost all GRU operatives stationed
in China at the time of the major disagreement between China and Russia. In his book, Stanislov Lunev
and Ira Winkler, Through the Eyes of the Enemy: Russia's Highest Ranking
Military Defector Reveals Why Russia Is More Dangerous Than Ever, Regnery,
Washington, D.C., 1998, p. 160, Lunev reveals it this way:"…I was not the only person who was stationed in Beijing to come
down with cancer… Almost all of the GRU officers stationed in China with me
have been diagnosed with cancer. People
assigned to the embassy had told me that they were picking up high levels of
radiation from the apartment building around the embassy compound. Whether it was a form of high-tech
monitoring or a conscious effort to harm our health, it seems to have been
successful. So much so that in 1992 the
GRU was asked to investigate the high rate of cancer among embassy
officials. The findings, however, have
never been made public; in part, no doubt, because of the rapprochement between
Russia and China." In short,
the Chinese did exactly to the Russian GRU what the Russians were doing to the
Americans.
BIOPHOTON
A
quantum of angular momentum, each
containing "a piece of energy welded to a piece of time, with no seam in
the middle," emitted by biomolecules in living organisms. The difference between a biophoton and a
normal photon is that the "infolded EM structuring" (ST curvature
engine sets) carried by the biophoton carries the dynamics and templates of the
living cell or tissue or body emitting the radiation.
As presently known, biophoton emission is associated with processes such as mitosis (cell division) and with mechanisms such as soliton vibrations of DNA and other alpha-helix proteins [Popp et. al., 1984; Popp et. al., 1992]. An organism's biophoton field may represent a highly-structured innate organizing field capable of encoding or transmitting information over macroscopic distances.
Kaznacheyev, e.g., showed that almost any cellular disease or damage condition can be induced from the diseased control cells to separated and environmentally isolated target cells initially normal, if (1) the visible spectrum of radiation is blocked from the targeted cells, and (2) the two groups of cells are optically connected below and above the optical spectrum, in the infrared and in the ultraviolet.
The
new viewpoint seeks to dramatically extend the scope of this definition. Considering the wave aspects of the photon
frequency, the infolded oscillating EM energy in the photon may be decomposed
into two oscillating potentials [Whittaker, 1904]. In each of these potentials, there exists a magnificent infolded
structure [Whittaker, 1903] of internal bidirectional EM wave pairs, to include
the sum set [Whittaker] and the product set [Ziolkowski]. Thus the photon carries internal information,
which is also referred to as the "information content of the
field." Since the product set
represents modulations, the basic infolded structure has signal
characteristics. Mind, thought, and
long term memory exist inside the personal quantum potential, which may further
be regarded as consisting of coupling and uncoupling photon/antiphoton
pairs—i.e., hidden gravitons. In the
new viewpoint, the biophoton is the carrier of biogravitons, and also
biograviton lattices. This information
forms vacuum engines which can cumulate over a period of time to breach the
quantum threshold and outfold, producing real change in cells, as shown by the
Kaznacheyev cytopathogenic mirror effect experiments.
BIOQUANTUM POTENTIAL
A quantum potential connected to and of a living body, where the inner EM structuring and dynamics of the quantum potential are in correspondence with the inner EM structuring of the normal EM fields, potentials, and waves in the body, and also are in correspondence with the time-polarized EM structuring and dynamics of the mind and its operations.
The
biopotential provides the volition and intent exhibited by the biological body,
breaching the quantum threshold and producing direct psychokinetic change (by
the mind-body coupling mechanism) that is the "input signal" to the
servomechanisms of the body,. from the smallest to the largest. In this biopotential, the
Stoney-Whittaker-Ziolkowski decomposition provides the information structure
and vacuum engines that are the mind, thought, long term memory, etc. A living biological system may be defined as
a physical system of otherwise inert matter (the body) and of mind, coupled to
each other through a bioquantum potential.
BLOCKING
In the charge-barrier
semiconductor functioning, stopping or partially stopping the flow of current
in a circuit, or between two points, without stopping the Poynting S-flow.
In ordinary usage, "stopping
the progress of."
BOHM, DAVID
World renowned physicist and
originator of the hidden variable theory interpretation of quantum
mechanics. See David J. Bohm, "A Suggested Interpretation of the
Quantum Theory in Terms of 'Hidden' Variables, I and II." Physical
Review, 85(2), Jan. 15, 1952, p. 166-179 (Part I); 180-193 (Part II).
Together with his student Aharonov,
he co-authored a fundamental paper on the Aharonov-Bohm effect wherein
interfering electromagnetic potentials can produce effects on charged particle
systems, even at a distance and in the absence of the electromagnetic force
fields.
BOHM'S HIDDEN VARIABLE THEORY (HVT)
A major interpretation of quantum
mechanics, formulated by David Bohm and published in Physical Review in 1952.
See David J. Bohm, "A Suggested
Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of 'Hidden' Variables, I and
II," Physical Review, 85(2),
Jan. 15, 1952, p. 166-179 (Part I); 180-193 (Part II). Bohm's theory makes all
the correct predictions and also eliminates many problems in quantum mechanics,
such as the "measurement problem" and the—now alarming—problem of the
missing chaos (i.e., the missing "hidden order.").
Ironically, the prevailing
Copenhagen interpretation of the QM theory predicts that the organized
macroscopic world does not exist, while Bohm's theory predicts it. [Question to
the sharp young graduate student: How can one defend a scientific model which
predicts that he himself does not exist? If one keeps one's sense of humor, it
would seem that this has to be the greatest scientific faux pas of all time!] It may be that one unconscious reason that
most physicists still oppose HVT is that it
implies that physical reality can in fact be deterministically engineered.
Most physicists would seem to fervently wish physical reality to stay
"solid as a brick," with fixed "laws of nature," which can
be leisurely discovered and then utilized comfortably, predictably, and sanely.
The advent of HVT (which is just a matter of time; for decades the Russians
have highly weaponized the HVT area!) dramatically alters our perception of
"fixed physical reality" into that of an "engineerable,
changeable" physical reality! I tentatively believe that the terrible
psychological implications of such a potential development is something that
most scientists do not wish to cope with—we simply do not have the Gestalt for
it. On the other hand, the Russian national psychology is such that they do
have the Gestalt for it. The Russian energetics—which I have long referred to
loosely as scalar electromagnetics—basically utilizes the infolded ordering
inside the potential to create "direct patterns of vacuum flux", hence
vacuum engines. And it also utilizes
the quantum potential, including internally structuring the QP, to enable
instantaneous action-at-a-distance in multiple simultaneous locations and
nodes, with stupendous and automatic energy amplification.
By deterministically
"patterning" the internal structuring of the scalar potential, one
can directly form such vacuum engines. Whittaker showed in 1904 that any EM
field pattern whatsoever can be expressed as two scalar potentials, rather than
the common f and A representation.
This means that any EM wave is simply the "interference" (between the
hidden biwave structures) of two scalar potentials, even at a distance. By
properly structuring an EM signal (i.e., structuring the two potentials into
which it can be decomposed), the resulting EM signal—appearing normal on the
surface—nonetheless now transports special vacuum engines deliberately designed
to perform some particular internal task in mass systems, electronic systems,
or humans when it strikes a target at a distance. I refer to this
"internal structuring" of the Stoney/Whittaker/Ziolkowski internal
biwaves and their products, as dimensioning
of the potential(s), and hence of the EM carrier wave. The Russians call it the
information content of the field; but
our own scientists tend to erroneously interpret that phrase as ordinary
spectral analysis. In other words, they erroneously continue to regard EM vacuum engines as if they were ordinary
EM signals.
BOHREN
EXPERIMENT
Revealing experiment by Bohren,
replicated by Paul and Fischer, which shows that a given charge when in
particle resonance absorbs more energy from a field or potential then the same
charge does in "static" position.
By conventional outlook, this
provides a guaranteed COP>1.0 process.
Bohren demonstrated absorbing 18 times more energy with the charge in
particle resonance than with the static charge. This is a direct experiment proving the Heaviside dark energy
component of EM energy flow, whether in field form or in potential form.
See Craig F. Bohren, "How can a particle absorb more
than the light incident on it"?", American Journal of Physics, 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 323-327. See independent confirmation of Bohren's
work by H. Paul and R. Fischer, ibid.,
p. 327. Other pertinent references are
V. S. Letokhov, "Laser Maxwell's Demon," Contemporary Physics, 36(4), 1995, p. 235-243; — "Generation
of Light by a scattering medium with negative resonance absorption," Soviet Physics JETP, 26(4), Apr. 1968,
p. 835-839; — "Double Gamma and optical resonance," Physics Letters A, Vol. 43, 1973, p.
179-180; — "Stimulated emission of an ensemble of scattering particles
with negative absorption," ZhETF
Plasma, 5(8), Apr. 15, 1967, p. 262-265.
Also see R. Pappalardo and A. Lempicki, "Brillouin and Rayleigh Scattering
in Aprotic Laser Solutions Containing Neodymium," Journal of Applied Physics, Apr. 1992, p. 1699-1708
BRIDGE
A component or process which
passes EM energy between two isolated circuits, but does not pass dq/dt between
them, and which breaks the normal rigidly field-locked power dissipations in
the two circuits.
Space itself would appear to be one
such bridge.
BRIDGING FUNCTION
The function of passing EM energy
flow between two isolated circuits, but not passing dq/dt between them, while
simultaneously breaking any normal rigidly field-locked power dissipations in
the two circuits.
BROKEN SYMMETRY
The fundamental meaning is a
condition in which two parts of some configuration or shape on opposite sides
of some divisor or condition or boundary, are not similar but differ.
In vacuum energy physics, we are
very interested in the fact that any charge and any dipole represents a broken
symmetry in its fierce energy exchange with the vacuum. This implies that something virtual has
become observable; i.e., part of the virtual EM energy absorbed from the vacuum
by the charge or by the dipole is changed into observable form and re-emitted
as real, observable EM energy.
Any observable implies a broken
symmetry. Non-observables imply
symmetry, and vice versa. Each symmetry
also can be represented by a conservation rule or law. Physicists have uncovered many kinds of
symmetry in physics; and in the 1950s they also discovered broken symmetry.
BROMWICH, THOMAS JOHN l'ANSON
Brilliant
English mathematician, 1875-1929, who made significant contributions to the
mathematics of electromagnetism—particularly to superpotential theory—before
his passion for overwork led to development of a mental disorder and eventual
suicide.
Bromwich originated a method for solving the source-free
Maxwell equations in 1899, publishing it in 1919. This approach formed the basis for his seminal paper on
scattering of plane EM waves by spheres.
He did excellent original work on infinite series and made contributions
to quadratic and bilinear forms. He
also placed Heaviside's operator calculus on a rigorous basis by treating the
operators as contour integrals.
Unfortunately Bromwich worked so intensively, in such painstaking
detail, and at such length that his physical health was affected. He developed a mental disorder and
eventually ended his own life in suicide.
For a summary of Bromwich's life and achievements, see G.
H. Hardy, "Thomas John Bromwich," J. London Math. Soc. 5 (1930), 209-220; — "Obituary of
Thomas John Bromwich," Proc. Roy.
Soc. London A 129 (1930), i -
x. For an exposition of Bromwich's
equations-solving work, see J. D. Zund and J. M. Wilkes, "Bromwich's
method for solving the source-free Maxwell equations," Tensor (NS) 55 (2) (1994), 192-196.
BROWN, G. SPENCER
Noted author and creator of the laws of form, a new form of logic that dramatically extends Aristotelian logic.
Essentially
Brown added complex numbers to logic, rather than just staying with simple
2-dimensional plane figures for postulate derivation. Electrical circuits— designed by Brown's logic—do function and do
work. When computer software is
designed by Brown's logic, it is then possible to mathematically prove whether
or not the end result possesses any defects (bugs). In the future software—particularly the larger systems—may well
be designed by Brown's logic. G.
Spencer Brown, Laws of Form, Julian
Press, New York, 1972. With a dramatic advance in logic itself, Brown has
succeeded in formulating a true calculus of form. Note: There is now a second edition of the book.
BULK GRADIENT CHANGE
Simply a change in the amplitude
of the entire potential,
… (i.e., to every internal biwave
pair comprising it) at some point or in some region of space, as compared to
changing the amplitude of only one or a few of the internal biwave pairs of the
potential, without changing all the rest.
BYPASS RESISTOR
In electrical theory, a resistor
to pass current by (in parallel to) some other component.
If other effects such as use of the
overpotential, pumped phase conjugate reflection, quantum wells, quantum
tunneling, and charge blocking are added, the function of the bypass resistor
becomes extremely complicated.
CANCER
Conventional
definition: A malignant tumor of potentially unlimited growth that expands
locally by invasion and systemically by metastasis.
Growths
are further characterized by the type of tissue in which they occur, and their
actions. Of particular interest are neoplasm,
tumor, carcinoma, and sarcoma. Malignant disorders
tend to produce deterioration, infiltrate, metastasize, and terminate
fatally. A neoplasm is simply any new growth of tissue that serves no useful
function. A tumor is an abnormal mass of tissue that (1) is not inflammatory,
(2) arises from preexisting cells, and (3) serves no useful purpose. A carcinoma is a malignant tumor of epithelial (covering membraneous tissue
of a free surface) origin. A sarcoma is a malignant neoplasm that
arises in mesodermal tissue
(connective tissue, bone, cartilage, or striated muscle) and that spreads by
(1) extension into neighboring tissue or (2) by way of the bloodstream, or (3)
both.
New
definition of cancer: A
centrally-commanded, final, desperate, "first-step dedifferentiation"
adaptive attempt by stressed, affected cells experiencing sustained oxygen
shortage (hypoxia) to reverse their cellular evolution and return to the
anaerobic stage of their primeval cellular ancestry. Thus a cancer cell is a severely stressed hypoxic cell that has
been "ordered" by the master cellular control system (MCCS) to
dedifferentiate back to a more primeval form in which it needed little
or no oxygen. It is the last desperate
attempt by the body to insure the affected cells' survival when all other means
available to the MCCS to provide the necessary oxygen have been exhausted and
have failed. The "order"
differs from normal signal theory in that it consists of a
Stoney/Whittaker/Ziolkowski template inside the personal quantum potential
of the organism. Thus the
"order" actually consists of a vacuum engine, so that the
spacetime in which the affected cell exists is acted upon by structured,
energetic hidden variable fingers to directly alter it. The "signal order" is in fact a
set of hidden vector forces in spacetime itself, created directly in and on the
affected cell(s), in every part, in every atom. The cure for the cancerous cell, once formed, is simply to cause
the MCCS to generate the "counter-order" reversing the original
dedifferentiating action. This can be
readily accomplished by establishing hidden multifrequency pump waves in the
quantum potential on the cancerous cell, on all its parts, so that they act as
pumped phase conjugate mirrors. Since
they already exist in the altered "cancer" spacetime template/signal,
the pumping causes a phase conjugate replica of the precise cancer state
to be created in and on the cell and its parts. [In fact this is a general therapeutic mechanism, and it can be
applied to reverse almost any conceivable cellular damage or disorder.] This counter-order is a new and amplified
vacuum engine that acts upon the cell to redifferentiate it back to a normal
cell. If an abnormal number of cells
results, the body's normal processes then recognize the excess cells and
destroys them.
CANCER HOTSPOT
An area or locality or location where cancer recurs repeatedly, more than the normal deviation expected statistically. In such case, one is dealing with a hidden cause or carcinogen.
Human
systems exposed to such a hotspot experience cellular changes (hypoxia) which
eventually result in the master cellular control system (MCCS) issuing a
dedifferentiation order to the affected cells to regress back to a primeval
anaerobic form. The first step is
dissociation from central (MCCS) control of cellular growth, resulting in a
cell that now grows and divides unrestrained by the normal body. The real question in the hotspot is,
"What is the unknown agent inducing the hypoxia condition, and what is the
mechanism by means of which it induces it?" Epidemology will point out a hotspot, but is usually incapable of
resolving the primary causative agent or its active mechanism since it can only
show correlation.
CAPACITOR AS A TRANSMISSION LINE
A
capacitor can be theoretically treated as a special type of transmission line,
a fact which is apparently known to transmission line theorists but not to many
engineers and physicists not specializing in transmission lines.
CARCINOGEN
A
substance or agent (such as a chemical or a spacetime curvature engine) capable
of inducing a cancer.
In
the new theory, the primary carcinogen is an actual order (a vacuum engine)
issued by the master cellular control system (MCCS), reverting
(dedifferentiating) the affected cell to a primal anaerobic form. Usually what are normally regarded as
carcinogens are also causes of cellular conditions wherein the cell becomes
very hypoxic, so much so that the MCCS exhausts all other alternative
corrective means and as a last desperate measure orders the cell to change to a
form that requires little or no oxygen.
The "exhausting of other measures" may be very rapid, as when
the cell has been affected and damaged by powerful carcinogens, or it may
require decades to occur, as when the cell is subjected to long-term mild
hypoxia, such as from electromagnetic smog.
CARRIER WAVE
A
fundamental wave which is modulated by another wave or other waves, and hence
"carries" the other waveform(s).
By stripping off the carrier in a demodulator, the carried waveform(s)
emerges.
Hence
it is a continuous frequency wave which can be modulated by an
information-bearing signal.
CASIMIR EFFECT
The attraction of two conducting
parallel plates in space, placed very close together, due to their influence on
the active vacuum and on the vacuum's interaction with the plates.
CASIMIR, HENDRIK BRUGT GERHARD (1909-2000)
Noted scientist who in 1948
predicted that two parallel conducting plates, placed very near each other in a
vacuum, would experience an attractive force due to their influence on the
electromagnetic vacuum.
See H. B. G.
Casimir, “On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates,” presented
at a meeting of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences on 29 May,
1948. Published in the same year in Proceeding. Koninklijke Nederlandse
Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, vol. 51(7), 1948, p.
793-796. For a beautiful modern
experiment confirming the force, see S.K. Lamoreaux, “Demonstration of the
Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6mm range,” Physical
Review Letters, 78(1), Jan. 6, 1997, p. 5-8.
The force was experimentally
detected some 10 years later.
CAUSAL
SYSTEM ROBOTS (CSRs)
Massless 4-space
"engine" systems (therefore in the causal domain only, hence the
name) formed of longitudinal EM waves and their dynamics, which are therefore
sets of spacetime curvatures and their deterministic dynamics (engines) which
function as individual robots.
This is a totally new kind of
system leading to a totally new kind of warfare, developed over some decades
and deployed by the KGB in 1999.
Matter is composed mostly of empty
space filled with EM waves, fields, and potentials. Those "fillers" themselves are just bundles of
longitudinal EM waves and their impressed dynamics. Hence all matter, the vacuum, and all conventional EM potentials,
fields, and waves—being filled with vast sets of longitudinal EM waves—are vast
superhighways for longitudinal EM waves to travel on or in. The CSRs, being totally LW and LW dynamics
in nature, thus are free to travel right through EM radiations from power
lines, phone lines, TV stations, radio stations, etc. They easily penetrate any matter, including right through a
mountain. Any function of a normal EM
system can be performed—at least in theory—by such robots. This includes longitudinal EM wave
interferometry, which forms external EM fields and waves, of whatever pattern
or form desired. Further, these CSRs
are actual functioning systems, and if communications functions are designed
in, one can communicate with them at a distance, using longitudinal EM wave
communication, right through the intervening earth and ocean, etc.
For some time, extensive
underground facilities—hundreds—have been building in the former Soviet Union,
and this massive buildup continued unabated after the Russian economy collapsed
and the Berlin Wall came down. This
tremendous expenditure, when the Russian economy was crippled, shows the
strategic significance of these facilities.
Further, apparently our satellites have not seen any missiles, normal
weapons or munitions, etc. associated with that vast complex. In short, it is suspected that we don't have
the foggiest notion of what it is.
Indeed, those facilities will already have sent some CSRs into those
very satellites, to insure that we do not find out what is going on, and
perhaps to "spy on the spy satellites".
We think these terribly important
facilities are the KGB-controlled facilities for developing and producing the
CSRs, and contain a vast longitudinal EM wave command and control set of
facilities as well. In short, this is
the strategic arsenal, development, and control for building sets of various
type CSRs in huge numbers—a vast new army of robots with unprecedented
capabilities, under the command and control of a human "strategic
force" operations command of very large size.
Developing and debugging one CSR
would be a formidable and lengthy task.
Once a single one is developed, making a million copies is simple. Just take a normal CD-ROM, e.g., and record
something on it. Send in a working CSR
robot to "reside inside" the infolded EM interior of the recorded
informational electromagnetic pattern on the CD-ROM. Then simply copy that CE-ROM magnetically, as many times as is
desired. Each copy contains a copy of
the original signal that was recorded, including the exact infolded
electromagnetic structuring inside that signal. Voila! One has as many
new duplicate CSRs of that exact type, as one wishes, for a few pennies each.
One can see the implications. In all those underground facilities, there
are many development laboratories, production laboratories, and command and
control facilities and "storage facilities" for the robots. Those hundreds of facilities are in fact a
great new strategic weapon system and all its development labs and production
facilities, as well as its tactical control and command and control systems,
its "troops", its "equipment", and its commanders and
operators.
Well, then one can deploy and
"utilize" such a strategic armada just as one would use any other
great strategic army. One
"deploys" one's forces against the enemy. In this case, one just sends the armada (individually
controlled!) right through the "LW superhighways" of matter itself,
right into the strategic territory and very heart of the targeted nation. One deploys the robots everywhere—e.g.,
inside the electronics in nuclear warheads, inside the control systems for the
nuclear submarines and nuclear bombers, inside the satellites, inside the
fighter aircraft electronics, inside the fighting ships, inside the main battle
tanks and major weapons carriers, inside the signals on the hard drives of
computers, etc. One sends them right
through the "inside" of the targeted nation's power grid electrical
energy signals, through the TV stations' emitted signals, etc. The Pentagon and Cheyenne Mountain are duck
soup, as is the stock exchange and other civilian systems vital to continued
functioning of the infrastructure. So
is everywhere else, even the deepest vault and "special security"
facility.
In short, the vast electronic
command and control activities of an otherwise "modern" superpower
provide great, convenient, easy superhighways for full strategic deployment to
be completed by millions of weapons systems (CSRs) into everything of value in
the targeted nation or nations. This
completely solves the usual weapons delivery problem; delivery is made in
advance of D-Day.
Such a vast CSR armada was
deployed throughout the Western world, and particularly in the United States,
just before the end of 1999. Yes, this
was to be the KGB's great millennium gift to America—a really enormous Y2K problem
that would stun and disable the entire nation, its armed forces, its electronic
systems in its major weapons, and its command and control centers in one great
TOT (time on target) assault. The major
electrical power systems of the nation would have been disabled, as would have
been the major communications systems.
Using LW interferometry, the robots would have wreaked havoc on the
nation. They would have disabled the
electronics of every major C4I computer of importance, every major fighter aircraft,
every major fighting ship, every nuclear submarine, every ICBM, every nuclear
powerplant, etc. The attacking force
was in its deployment and employment sites in the targets themselves. Everything was in place and cocked and ready
to fire. To test whether we knew what
was going on, the KGB even had one or more robots temporarily produce
hacker-type operations and signals "emerging" in some U.S. command
and control center computers, and deliberately let our fellows discover this
"hacker attack" was coming from the Russian Academy of Science. Then the CSR simply stopped its LW
interferometry, which caused the "normal hacker electronic" signals
to just vanish and never reappear.
Little wonder that our counter-type fellows were totally unable to find
any trace of it, or where it was residing.
They have no technology for such.
Well, happily those early-model
CSRs are easy to root out and destroy, if one has quite advanced LW
technology. Visualize these beasts as
existing in a special sort of "internal sky" or "infolded
atmosphere" inside matter.
Strategic range LW "radars" can just sweep through this
"internal atmosphere" inside matter, etc., detecting and tracking
those CSR beasts analogous to how normal radar detects and tracks
aircraft. The difference is that the
strategic LW can also use a bit of LWI pulse to instantly snap those CSRs like
popping bugs, completely jamming their operations or even "erasing"
them once their characteristics are observed.
That very new kind of vast
strategic warfare occurred right at the end of 1999, all through the United
States—the Pentagon, our strategic weapon systems, the works. The friendly little nation rooted out and
destroyed all those "on site" CSRs just prior to the attack being
launched.
A full-up strategic war, of
previously unknown kind, was fought all over the U.S. and our own system guys
apparently didn't know it. It didn't
even surface. Didn't make a whimper.
That hostile CSR armada consisted
of first generation systems. These systems did not have defensive
countermeasures. The systems were
depending on total surprise, but were found out (that is another story that
would make a great movie if one could live to film it) and then were destroyed
in short order.
CSR development has ushered in a
totally new kind of strategic, operational, and tactical warfare. The delivery of all the weapon systems
"into the target" is accomplished long before the advent of
hostilities. The second generation
CSRs, once built, will be even more sophisticated. These will almost certainly be on line soon. They will likely also possess
countermeasures.
An eerie new chapter in the annals
of warfare has been initiated, and the world will never be the same again. Once the CSRs have sufficient defensive
countermeasures such as stealth means and coordination with countering, rapid
response LWIs to target and destroy the hostile "LW radars" seeking
them, etc., the next world-wide strategic CSR war will be neither so simple nor
so bloodless.
NOTE: Contrast this CSR discussion
to the discussion of nanotechnology
and nanobots. Just as nanobots are
natural developments which teams skilled in nanotechnology would produce, so
CSRs are natural developments which teams skilled in longitudinal EM wave
technology—and in the "infolded" electrodynamics inside all EM
fields, potentials, and waves—would produce.
For decades (since the 1950s) the KGB has been developing and using
longitudinal EM wave interferometers (LWIs) which beam right through the "inner
highways" inside the fields and waves inside matter, thus allowing very
large LWIs which beam right through the intervening earth and ocean, and can
"focus" under the ocean or within the earth as well as out of
it. With such background, the CSRs were
just as natural a development for them as the nanobots are for conventional
Western nanotechnology scientists.
CAUSALITY
The
relationship between "cause" and "effect". The basic notion in a causal system is that
the system's response to an input signal is not dependent upon future input
values.
Thus
the notion of causality involves a precise time ordering of ordinary inert
interactions, where the cause was never input from a future time. Macroscopic (observable) causality may be
and is violated by the interaction of hidden subquantal (virtual state)
variables.
CEREBRAL HEMISPHERE
Each
half of the cerebrum, i.e., each half of the enlarged anterior or upper part of
the vertebrate brain.
The
two cerebral hemispheres may function as a longitudinal EM wave interferometer
or a time-polarized (scalar) EM interferometer to sense distant scenes (even
distant in time), or produce EM energy and signals at a distance, since the
body, brain, and nervous system does produce longitudinal EM waves and scalar
EM waves. For proof of scalar EM wave
interferometry in O(3) electrodynamics, see M.W. Evans, P.K. Anastasovski, T.E.
Bearden et al., "On Whittaker's Representation of the Electromagnetic
Entity in Vacuo, Part V: The Production of Transverse Fields and Energy by
Scalar Interferometry," Journal of
New Energy, 4(3), Special Issue, Winter 1999, p. 76-78.
CHANGING THE PAST
Every
intentional inception upon ordinary inert causality prior to collapse of the
wave function represents a slight alteration or change in direction, departing
minutely from pure causality. From a
causal viewpoint, each human inception minutely changes the causal past, as
well as the future.
Experimental
proof that the causal past can be changed is provided by the delayed choice
two-slit experiment. E.g., see C.W.
Rietdijk, "Another proof that the future can influence the
present." Foundations of Physics, 11(9/10), 1981, p. 783-790. Particularly see Wheeler, John Archibald
Wheeler, "The 'past' and the 'delayed-choice' double-slit
experiment," in A.R. Marlow [Ed], Mathematical
Foundations of Quantum Theory, Loyola University, New Orleans, Louisiana,
June 2-4, 1977; Academic Press, New York, 1978, p. 9-48.
CHAOS
In dissipative dynamical systems,
the dynamical evolution that is aperiodic and highly dependent upon initial
conditions of the system.
The trajectories of the system move
on a strange attractor, which is a fractal subspace of the phase space.
The term suggests the ordinary
meaning of random and unpredictable disorder, but there exists intrinsic
determinism and at least partial embedded ordering. The mathematical equations describing chaotic behavior are very
nonlinear and so complex that at the present time they cannot be computed or
predicted. Even simple systems,
including simple electromagnetic systems, can exhibit unpredictable chaotic
behavior. The science of chaotic
dynamics is still in its infancy, having begun moving once the modern computers
became economical and pervasive.
CHARGE, ELECTRICAL (Q)
Electrical charge q is defined as
q º mqfq, to first order.
As can be seen, the actual
"charge" action associated with the mass is due totally to fq, and to the broken symmetry of fq in the vacuum flux exchange with mq. The charge q can be further broken down into
a set of composite dipoles if the gathering of a virtual charge screen in the
vacuum, surrounding the mass of the "bare charge" inside the
gathering, is included. At first order, fq can be expressed
(particle view) as a change in the local vacuum virtual photon flux (VPF), due
to the VPF exchange between vacuum and mq. The fq component is actually the "electrical charge"
and massless of itself.
However, see my paper, "Giant
Negentropy of the Common Dipole," Journal
of New Energy, 5(1) Summer 2000, p. 11-23.
We include the isolated charge by treating it as a system of multiple
composite dipoles. We also explain the
previously unrecognized 4-symmetry EM energy flow ongoing, where incoming
longitudinal EM waves are being received, transduced into real longitudinal EM
waves in 3-space, with the latter being emitted in all directions in 3-space.
A charged particle of mass is thus a
little energy flow generator. It is a broken 3-symmetry in the local VPF, and
therefore has an "observable" energy flow output, extracted and gated
from the asymmetry in the VPF. This "observable" energy flow outputs
the well-known energy flow S in
classical EM, though CEM does not recognize or include this vacuum interaction,
the broken 3-symmetry of the dipole, and the steady input of EM energy to the
dipole in the form of EM energy from the time domain (complex plane).
Instead, classical EM just assumes
that the "charge" q is the source of a potential. When originally
formed as a concept, q was just a "quantity of electric fluid," like
a "cubic centimeter of fluid," etc. The atom and the electron had not
yet been discovered.
CHARGE CARRIERS
Anything—usually fundamental
particles, ions, etc.—which consists of or contains charges and can move.
It can be an electron, a collection
of electrons fixed in a moving dielectric, ions, atoms, molecules, etc.
The moving charge (i.e., the current
dq/dt) with an energy flow streaming onto it and on beyond, carries its
interaction with that energy-flow right along with it in the current
i = dq/dt. This is what the charge's "excess collected energy"
consists of, and this is how the collected/collecting
energy in the circuit is transported to the collected-energy dissipation sites (loads and losses).
CHARGE, GRAVITATIONAL
To be added
CHARGE, MAGNETIC
Essentially, the magnetic scalar
potential, or monopole.
In an uncurved spacetime, the magnetic
charge must always occur in dipolar pairs, where each is equal and opposite the
other. In a curved spacetime, a free net monopolar magnetic charge may and
does exist. In classical
electrodynamics, the assumption of a locally flat spacetime is ubiquitous
though not prominently emphasized.
Hence most electrical engineers are unaware that monopoles can indeed be
made, but only if one uses a process to curve local spacetime.
CHARGE-PARITY-TIME (CPT) THEOREM
The theorem states that all known quantum field theories
obey CPT symmetry.
C is charge conjugation, which changes the quantum number of
every particle into its antiparticle. P
is the reflection operation known as parity
which turn an object into its mirror image and rotates it 180 degrees
about an axis perpendicular to the mirror, T is time reversal. Any violation of time-reversal symmetry is
always accompanied by a violation of CP symmetry and vice versa.
Electrodynamics and the strong interaction preserve CP
symmetry to great accuracy. Weak
interactions do not conserve CP symmetry.
T symmetry violation has been shown at CERN, the European particle
physics laboratory in Geneva, Switzerland.
CHARGE TRAPPING (Also
"Pinning")
Holding charges
"pinned" or "trapped" by a barrier or force, so that they
do not flow as
i = dq/dt.
CHARGE-BARRIER
A process or component or
function—particularly in a semiconductor such as the Fogal semiconductor—which
blocks the movement of charges q as current dq/dt.
CHARGE-BLOCKING ASYMMETRIC QUANTUM
WELLS
A quantum well which has more
charge-blocking action in one direction than the other, and is thus
"asymmetric" in its function.
It may also be dynamic, so that it
changes in its degree (and/or its direction) of action as a function of time.
CLASSICAL AND QUANTAL ELECTRODYNAMICS
Classical EM (CEM) theory is
simply classical electrodynamics (CED).
Classical EM does not break the
fields into "quanta" (a quantum is a standard-sized piece of action
(angular momentum)]. Instead, CEM considers the fields as continuously varying
in magnitude from zero to infinite magnitude (at least in theory).
Quantal Electrodynamics is known as
quantum electrodynamics (QED). These are standard terms for standard
disciplines. QED considers the fields
to be composed of quanta called "photons". Hence there is an underlying region called the "virtual
state" whose denizens are "smaller in magnitude" than the
quantum. Heisenberg uncertainty
applies, since the quantum of action is not quantized energy, but quantized
(energy x time). In short, it is a
function of both the magnitude of the energy and its duration of
persistence. Hence a field or photon of
any amount of energy may form temporarily, so long as it does not endure
sufficiently long in observer time to reach quantum size and breach the quantum
threshold.
In this view, then, "empty
space" is not empty at all, but is a seething cauldron of these
"energetic bubbles" continually appearing and disappearing, with the
entire spectrum of frequencies and energies.
This is in fact the "new ether". If we consider only the field portion of the bubbling virtual
photons appearing and disappearing, this leads to a vacuum that consists of EM
field fluctuations, again of essentially the entire frequency spectrum and
energy spectrum.
However, how we attempt to tie
either of these "energetic vacuum" EM views to general relativity
(GR) is then a problem. The cause of
the problem, however, is largely ignored in physics. In CED, e.g., one models EM energy moving through a flat space. This is a non sequitur, since the presence of
any change of the energy density of space a priori is a curvature of
spacetime. Hence rigorously EM energy
can only propagate through a curved spacetime.
Indeed, when this correction is made, the EM wave becomes an oscillating
curvature of spacetime. This is the
approach worked out by Mendel Sachs, extending Einstein's work. The higher symmetry O(3) electrodynamics
spearheaded by Evans turns out to be an important subset of Sach's umbrella
unified field theory. Hence EM has
become GR, and for the first time in history, O(3) electrodynamics provides the
approach that will allow direct engineering of general relativity on the lab
bench, in working devices, etc.
CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETICS (CEM)
"Ordinary" electromagnetics,
of the kind used in ordinary EM circuits, which fundamentally consists of the
modified Maxwell's equations.
Classical EM consists of Maxwell's
equations and the various changes and additions that have since been made. CEM does not break the fields into
"quanta" (a quantum is a standard-sized piece of action (angular
momentum)]. Instead, CEM considers the fields as continuously varying in
magnitude from zero to infinite magnitude (at least in theory).
Primarily refers to Maxwellian
electrodynamics as reinterpreted by Heaviside, Gibbs, Hertz, and a few
others. Unfortunately these
reinterpretations of Maxwell's theory also greatly reduced its topology, and
therefore reduced the area of natural electrodynamic phenomena that the
resulting equations describe.
Significantly more advanced
"classical" electrodynamics emerges when one goes back to the
quaternion algebra electrodynamics of Maxwell, or to the more advanced Clifford
algebra electrodynamics. The higher
symmetry electrodynamics models such as O(3) symmetry EM developed by Evans and
others, are capable of modeling a great deal more physical phenomena than the
very limited standard U(1) electrodynamics largely in vogue in science.
CLASSICAL EM THEORY
Classical electrodynamics theory,
begun by Maxwell, with his seminal paper orally presented in 1864 and published
in 1865.
Essentially Maxwell's
electrodynamics at root basis, with the background supporting classical
theory. Today many variations have been
made, particularly with the basic symmetry of the theoretical equations. See discussion above under classical electromagnetics.
CLIFFORD ALGEBRA
A special higher topology algebra
founded by Clifford, which includes as subsets many other algebras of lower
topology.
CLOSED SYSTEM
A system that does not
communicate with its environment, and does not exchange energy or matter
between system and environment.
An ideal model where dynamically and
energetically the system is considered to be "isolated" as if nothing
else existed. In short, consider the
system as if it were in some "magic box" and nothing outside the box
can ever enter the box or affect the system inside the box, and nothing in the
system can ever leave the box or affect anything outside the box.
One performs a non sequitur whenever
proclaiming treatment of a system as a "closed system", and of course
good scientists are aware of this. This is particularly true in electrical
power systems. Here one is indeed
allowed to input energy into the system to excite or potentialize it. That of course assumes that the system was
"opened" long enough to take on excess energy! Then as the system operates, losses and
dissipations occur, in which case energy is considered to "escape"
from the system permanently. In other
words, the system was also continually "opened" so that energy could
escape.
There is really no such thing as a
truely closed system in the universe,
since every system is embedded in the active vacuum and is an open system in an
energy exchange with the vacuum. If
that exchange is symmetrical, then the system is in equilibrium with respect to
the vacuum exchange. In that case, the
system may be treated as if it were a closed system for a limited number of
purposes. In classical electrodynamics
(CED), the Lorentz regauging of the Maxwell-Heaviside equations further reduced
them to describe only Maxwellian systems in such equilibrium with the active
environment. Consequently, the
interaction between the external vacuum and the system is not included in the
CED model. Obviously a broken equilibrium in that actual
physical interaction is also not included in the CED model.
An electrical power system is
already permitted to violate the Lorentz condition when it
(1) receives additional EM energy to "energize" or
"potentialize" or "excite" or "regauge" it, and
(2) whenever energy escapes from the system in the loads and losses (which
escapes of energy are "de-energizing", "depotentializing",
"dissipating", or "regauging" actions.
Hence the Lorentz condition greatly
simplifies the Maxwell-Heaviside equations and makes them much easier to
solve. However, when enforced by the system itself with regard to the system's
excitation and de-excitation (dissipation) functions—i.e., when those functions are "symmetrical" (equal and
opposite)—it also arbitrarily discards all those Maxwellian systems capable
of the five "magical" functions of an open disequilibrium
system: (1) self-ordering, (2)
self-oscillation or self-rotation, (3) output of more energy than the operator
inputs (the excess energy is input by the active environment, (4) powering
itself and its load (all the energy is input by the active environment, and (5)
exhibiting negentropy.
It follows, however, that physical
electrical power systems must therefore have some feature which self-imposes
the Lorentz condition, at least during the phase when the system's excitation
energy is discharged in the loads and losses.
The standard closed current loop system, where every electron
progressing through the external circuit's loads and losses must be forcibly
rammed back up through the source dipole in the power source, is indeed what
enforces the Lorentz condition with respect to excitation and dissipation, and arbitrarily prevents the system from
achieving COP>1.0.
In a battery-powered system, the
otherwise closed current loop is broken into two quite different circuits: (1)
the electron current circuit between the outer surface of the plates and the
external loads and losses, and (2) the ion current in the electrolyte between
the inner surface of the plates. Since
the ions (e.g., in a lead-acid battery) in the "inner" ion current
may have a m/q ratio very much greater than that of the electrons in the
"outer" electron current, clever timing of pulsed signals to the
plates may be used to form a phase difference—including even a phase angle of
180°—between the two currents.
It can be shown that this forms a high potential on the plates which
acts as a negative resistor, extracting EM energy from the vacuum and
recharging the battery while simultaneously powering the external circuit. This is the Bedini process, and with
Bedini's permission an explanation of that process has been published by
Bearden ["Bedini's
Method For Forming Negative Resistors In Batteries," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 24-38.] Note that Bedini's process in fact
repeatedly removes the Lorentz regauging condition, and therefore the system is
rigorously permitted to achieve not only COP>1.0 but also self-powering of
itself and its loads and losses.
COLD EXPLOSION
The
sudden extraction of EM heat energy from a distant intersection zone (IZ) of
the crossing beams of a scalar potential interferometer, which transmits in the
sharply pulsed mode, while the electrical grounding of the transmitters are
negatively biased with respect to the potential in the distant IZ.
COLD FUSION
An ad hoc term applied to the
transmutations at low energy achieved in electrolyte experiments, particularly
when using specially prepared palladium electrodes, and particularly when deuterium
is present in the electrolyte.
COMPOSITE DIPOLE
Dipole formed as one part of an
isolated, observable "charged particle", consisting of a differential
element of that observable charge on one end and a momentary clustering virtual
charge of opposite sign.
In quantum electrodynamics, it is
well-known that virtual charges of opposite signs cluster in the immediate
vacuum around any "isolated" observable charge. By applying the composite dipole concept,
this author was able to treat the isolated charge as a set of composite
dipoles. By then applying Whittaker's
decomposition of the scalar potential between the ends of each of these
composite dipoles, the "source charge" was a set of broken
3-symmetries in the vacuum flux, and thus a set of 4-symmetries in that flux
exchange. This meant that the EM energy
continuously output in all directions by the source charge was actually
continuously received by the source charge (as a set of composite dipoles) from
the time-domain, and 4-conservation of EM energy flow rigorously was upheld.
This allowed a solution to what has
been called the most formidable problem in both classical and quantum
electrodynamics: the problem of the association of the source charge and its
associated fields and potentials along with the energy contained by them and
continuously pouring from the charge without any 3-space energy input.
CONCOMITANT
Occurring or existing together.
CONGLOMERATE HIERARCHY OF THE PHOTONS
Every photon remains perfectly
ordered! A conglomerate (group) of photons, however, may be arranged in almost
an infinite variety of orderings, groupings, directions, etc.—which we refer to
as templates and as hierarchies (group orderings) of photons.
In a pure energy flow (energy
transport), the "herd" of photons is organized along the flow
direction. Regardless of how one scatters or "disorders" this
patterning of the "herd" or "hierarchical ordering" of
photons, not one single bit of the underlying energy and individual photon
ordering is lost. So when one "uses" energy (e.g., scatters the
hierarchical ordering of a photon herd from a resistor as heat), one does not
lose any energy at all, but simply has "scrambled" the hierarchical
ordering of the photons into a new herd configuration (which may be varying
every which way!). The point here is the real meaning of the fundamental
conservation of energy law: Energy can
neither be created nor destroyed!
When we "use" one joule of
energy to perform one joule of work (say, in a single-pass, scattering), we
still have exactly that one joule of energy left, but just in different form
(different direction, type, collection or not collected, etc.) It can still do another single pass joule of
work, then another, then another, and so on. If we plan things right, we can
use a single joule of work to perform many joules of work, contrary to what we
were so strongly taught in the "single-pass,
single collection, single dissipation" examples given to us in
university as the "law" of God and electrodynamics.
Note that the conventional
work-energy theorem assumes single pass, single collection, and single
dissipation of a joule of energy to perform a single joule of work. The point
is, that is not a limitation of nature,
but a limitation of a single process! Nature regularly uses a joule of energy
to do multiple joules of work, because after one dissipates or scatters the
energy the first time, it's still there and later will be intercepted to do
some more work.
Anti-Stokes emission, the Patterson
Power Cell, Lawandy's lasing without population inversion, and some gas-filled
tubes with anti-Stokes emission are examples of known, validated overunity
processes (processes with coefficient of performance greater than unity). These
all use multipass, multicollection, multi-dissipation in iterated manner, to
increase dipole asymmetry and therefore produce excess extraction of energy
from the vacuum. Patterson's unit, e.g., has been independently measured by
universities at efficiencies of some 1200 or so. This absolutely does not
violate the laws of physics nor the nonequilibrium thermodynamics of open
systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium.
CONSCIOUS MIND
The serial processing mind which
we normally associate erroneously as ourself. Other to be added.
Mind is time-like, not
space-like.
CONSCIOUS MIND (PSYCHOENERGETICS VIEW)
The serial-processing mind which
one normally associates erroneously as oneself.
Mind is time-like, not space-like. Hence it is not directly observable, a
priori, since all observation is 3-spatial.
However, if we consider that changes in 3-space produce spacetime
curvatures and thereby also produce slight changes in the time domain, then
iterative coherent spatial changes eventually will produce a change in the
time-domain. Consequently, the
time-like mind will have a continuing stream of such small but processable
time-energy changes from coherent 3-spatial phenomena in its body and the
macroscopic (coherent) universe. To
sense the 3-space body as "self" while simultaneously sensing other
3-space physical changes as "non-self", the conscious mind must
compare the various received time-like projection signals against its
"time-like orders" issued.
That set of received time-signals that matches or closely matches the
conscious mind's issued order signals, thus yields the sense of the body
behavioral changes as (1) self, and (2) body responses to its orders. The time delay between issuance of the
mind's orders and the receipt of the correlated time-like responses from its
body, provides the sense of self-persistence or independent being.
The mind couples to the body via a
similar spacetime curvature mechanism.
When the mind issues "orders", they are in the time-like realm
but are changes, hence small spacetime curvatures. They therefore involve very small 3-spatial changes (projections)
into the 3-space body. Since the mind
orders are coherent, this small iterative set of 3-space changes will integrate
coherently, yielding real quantum changes in the body and nervous system (e.g.,
the brain).
This coupling mechanism is profound. The steady stream of integrated time-like
projections arising in the mind due to the physical world outside one's body,
does not compare or match the mind's memory of its orders. Hence that allows the sensing of the
"external world" as "nonself". The sense of that external world as "existing" or
"being" is provided by the time delay in the comparison process, from
"mind signals issued" to "physical signals received". The metric yardstick standard for this
comparison time, so to speak, is provided by the time in the identified
"self-loop" with the physical body.
In other words, the mind uses that length of time to differentiate those
time signals which coherently integrate but do not match its issued order
signals, from those time-signals which coherently integrate in the same time
loop interval and do match its issued ordered signals.
In this manner, we resolve all the
great previously unresolved philosophical questions of the nature of
consciousness, nation of being, nature of self, nature of nonself, perception
of the physical world, perception of body as self, perception of other bodies
as non-self, etc. At least we resolve
these issues from a testable physics approach, so that we can see that now a
unified physics (and a technology) of mind and matter is at last in view. Since O(3) electrodynamics has been shown to
be an important subset of Sachs' unified field theory, then O(3)
electrodynamics—or SU(2)´SU(2), which is homomorphic with O(3)—can be used to
develop the direct engineering of mind, the mind-matter interaction, and mind
functions of the living biological system.
It is my considered opinion (with
much evidence) that the Russian branch of energetics,
known as psychoenergetics,
uses a unified field theory and a higher symmetry electrodynamics to achieve
that type of direct engineering already, but for weapons use rather than
beneficial use for humanity.
As examples, we strongly suggest
that the deaths of U.S. Captains Button, Svoboda, and Hess all involved KGB
testing of long-range strategic psychoenergetics weapons over the United
States, on those targeted personnel.
This should not be surprising at all; the KGB has tested longitudinal EM
wave interferometer weapons over the U.S. since 1967, and continues to do so
today. They tested bioenergetics EM
weapons against U.S. Embassy personnel in Moscow for several decades. Kills of U.S. aircraft and missiles have
been performed at various times, including kill of the Arrow DC-8 at Gander,
Newfoundland in Dec. 1985, kill of a Titan ICBM fired from Vandenberg AFB in
the spring of 1986, kill of the U.S. space shuttle Challenger in the spring of
1986, continuing weather engineering over the U.S. and elsewhere, etc.
That novel electromagnetic weapons
have indeed been developed and are being tested world-wide, was confirmed by
Defense Secretary Cohen in 1997 as follows:
"Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts." [Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn. Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.].
We
specifically call attention to the fact that the Secretary did not speak the
words enclosed in square brackets. This
is not limited just to terrorists or
counterterrorism.
There appears to be no
insurmountable difficulties in developing psychoenergetic technology using the
approach outlined above. Certainly it
is not as formidable a task as has been hot fusion.
The incident involving Captain
Button, e.g., was to demonstrate control of an individual performing complex technical
tasks for a period of at least one hour.
The test against Captain Svoboda was to demonstrate how simply human
kill can be achieved in combat troops, merely by introducing selected changes
in the mental functioning of the targeted individuals. As Svoboda was climbing her A-10 out of a
successful low-level ordnance drop at night on a ground target, her sense of up
and down was instantly reversed.
Instantly perceiving she was diving instead of climbing—although actually climbing out perfectly—she
"corrected" immediately and dove headlong into the ground, perishing
in the resulting explosion of her aircraft.
In the case of Capt. Hess, the test
demonstrated that rather complete mental control can be almost instantly
asserted, and even the responses of the autonomic nervous system can be
overridden. So Captain Hess, out for a
morning jog, simply went aside, sat down, and stabbed himself repeatedly,
including multiple times right through the heart. Had one seen the incident, he would have simply continued
stabbing himself very calmly, without emotion or reflex action from his
autonomic nervous system, until physical failure of his body.
As can be seen, it is of the utmost
importance that this nation understand psychoenergetics weapons of such nature,
and develop effective defenses against them.
The next great strategic battlefield may be as much a "virtual
reality" battle as it is a "real physical world" combat. The war can be quickly lost in either arena.
We also point out that the
psychoenergetics weaponry readily is adapted to use in more advanced
longitudinal EM wave interferometers, which readily penetrate the Earth and the
ocean. Hence deeply buried strategic
command and control centers are vulnerable to psychoenergetics warfare, as are
the crewmen of our nuclear submarines, ICBMs, aircraft carriers, division and
army command centers, national command centers, strategic bomber pilots, etc.
Indeed, one of the major incentives
for developing such psychoenergetics weapons as was demonstrated in controlling
Captain Button, was to seize and control the entire on-site manning crews of
the defensive quantum potential weapons preventing launch of full strategic
warfare. By having the QP systems
"stood down for maintenance" by their own crews, the major strategic
retaliation and "dead man fuzing" would have been removed and
countered. Then powerfully striking the
QP sites with LWIs would have destroyed them, and left the sites themselves
radioactively emitting longitudinal EM waves, thus preventing reoccupation in
case the QP weaponry survived. The
counter to that scheme was to place the friendly QP weapon sites on
"insane" command and control.
In that mode, instead of human decision being made to launch, every so
often (say, every two hours) the computer automatically initiates the launch
sequence. During that sequence, if the
crew is still alive and functional, codes can be punched in and the computer
cancels the launch initiation. It then
repeats the sequence two hours later.
If no coded cancellation order is punched in, for whatever reason, the
launch sequence completes and the QP weapons fire. In that case, much of Russia disappears from the face of the
earth.
Eerily, just about the time that
Secretary Cohen was making his quoted statement in April 1997, the KGB was
being notified by the friendly little nation of the change to insane command
and control. This forced the abortion
of a great strategic attack upon the West, scheduled to occur on May 1, 1997.
We are strongly stressing that
psychoenergetics is not parapsychology and it is not just an idle theory of
academics. Instead, it is already
potently used in some very powerful and deployed weapon systems that could well
decide the course of the next world war, almost at a moment's notice.
See also discussion under energy.
CONSCIOUSNESS
Refers
to a living being's awareness of its sensations, feelings, thoughts, and the
world around it.
The new approach uses a coupling
mechanism between the time-like mind and the body of a living creature. The nature of this coupling mechanism then
generates the mechanism by which self-awareness is produced, awareness of
non-self is produced, and the sense of existing in the external world but
differing from it is produced.
CONTINUOUS MODE
For
a longitudinal EM wave interferometer, a continuous mode of operation where
power is fed continually to the transmitters, and the two longitudinal EM wave
patterns or beams are continuously transmitted.
CONVENTIONAL SCALAR POTENTIAL
A scalar potential formed without
use of artificially added substructuring of its internal biwaves and their
products.
In other words, one in which it is
assumed that its virtual particle flux has no ordering, but is just a
randomized flux. This assumption (e.g., of quantum mechanics indirectly) is incompatible
by the Whittaker demonstration that (i) a scalar potential is a harmonic set of
"bidirectional" EM phase conjugate wave pairs, and thus not a scalar
entity at all, and (ii) perfect ordering of its wave components exists inside
the scalar potential.
One must carefully distinguish what
each of these internal "phase conjugate EM longitudinal wavepairs"
actually represents. Prior to
interaction with detecting charges, the potential is a 4-potential existing in
spacetime (4-space). The time domain,
of course, is represented by ict, and in that expression only "t" is
a variable. Hence the
"incoming" phase conjugate longitudinal EM waves in the imaginary
plane are actually longitudinal EM waves in the time dimension. These waves converge upon the dipolarity
represented by the "scalar potential" or any "piece" of
it. The dipolarity represents the
interaction of charges; specifically, a dipole. This reaction—by the spin of the charges—transduces the incoming
EM energy from the time-dimension into 3-space, and emits it from the charges
as real EM longitudinal EM energy radiating out from the dipolarity in all
directions in 3-space.
The phase conjugate half-set of the
Whittaker waves, prior to their
interaction with charge, are not waves in 3-space, but are waves of LW
EM energy coming in from the imaginary plane and thus from the time
domain. The charges of the dipolarity
spin 720°, being 360º in the complex plane and then 360º in real
3-space. So the charges absorb the EM
LW energy impinging on them from the time domain, during their 360º rotation in
the complex plane. When they enter real
3-space for the rest of their spin, the already-excited charges dissipate their
excitation energy in all directions as they spin their 3609º in 3-space. That is what the Whittaker decomposition
actually shows, but it has been ignored for almost a century.
In short, the broken 3-symmetry of
the dipolarity—well-known in particle physics for nearly a half-century, but
never incorporated into CED—allows nature to jump to a higher, more fundamental
4-symmetry in the energy flow. Energy
is being conserved in 4-space, but not in 3-space. Further, there is a special new energy flow symmetry involved:
one-way in the time domain and the other way in the 3-space domain. Note that energy is not conserved in
3-space! There is no law of nature requiring the extra requirement that, in
addition to conservation in 4-space, the energy must also be conserved in
3-space! So when the dipole breaks
that extra requirement, only the basic 4-conservation applies. In that case, nature very happily gives you
what might be called a white hole in astrophysics terms: energy will pour in to
the dipolarity unceasingly from the time-dimension, and will pour out in
3-space unceasingly, so long as that dipolarity persists.
By considering the virtual charges
of opposite sign that cluster in the vacuum around any "isolated
observable charge", one may represent a single charge (as an electron or
proton) as a set of composite dipoles, where each dipole consists of a virtual
charge (while it exists) and a differential element of the observable
charge. So the charge becomes a set of
composite dipoles, each with Whittaker decomposition of the scalar potential
between its ends.
Hence we have solved the long-vexing
problem that Semiz called "the greatest unsolved problem in
electrodynamics": the problem of the source charge (or source dipole) and
its associated fields and potentials and the enormous EM energy continually
pouring out of any charge or dipole in all directions in 3-space.
When the arbitrarily discarded giant
Heaviside nondiverged energy flow component is also accounted, this leads to
the giant negentropy of the dipole, as shown in my paper, "Giant
Negentropy from the Common Dipole".
We have also proposed this "dark Heaviside energy" as the
unaccounted source of the excess gravity known to be present in spiral galaxies
and holding together their arms. The
dark energy yields at least 90% of the total gravity involved, and the
additional 10% or so can be accounted for my known gravitational sources.
It appears that these new
discoveries can also be utilized to show that "quintessence" is also
caused by COP>1.0 processes in the universe, and the excess production of
negative "giant dark energy flows".
If so, then this also would account for the recently discovered fact
that the universe has an excess of negative gravitation, so that it is not only
expanding but is accelerating in that expansion. At this time, the present author is still attempting to tie up
the loose ends involved in showing that quintessence also is created as a
result of functions of the giant negentropy process.
In the Whittaker biwave pairs, If
one then insists that these hidden EM waves are comprised of hidden photons,
then it follows that the photons exist as continually coupling and uncoupling
photon/antiphoton pairs, or continually forming and unforming gravitons as the wave and antiwave
continually pass through each other.
It is a little more complicated than
that, since Maxwell actually omitted half the EM energy in the EM wave in
space, and also in the circuit—as do electrodynamicists to this day. For gravitons, one really must come to grips
with this error and correct it. This
will be added later in this glossary.
(To be Added).
COOPER PAIR
A dynamic pairing of electrons in
superconductivity theory.
In this pair, if the energy state
with wave number s and spin ½ is occupied by an electron, then so is the
state with wave number - s and spin - ½.
COP (COEFFICIENT OF PERFORMANCE)
Ratio of energy out, divided by
that portion of the total energy input that is input by the operator or
experimenter.
The COP is thus a measure of
"efficiency of using the operator or experimenter's input energy" to
produce—or direct the production of—useful work. Note that he can direct the
use of his own input energy, as almost all our present systems do. Better yet,
he can also direct (gate or "switch") the use of some external free
flow of energy from the environment into the system, so that he gets lots more
work out of the system than he has to put in himself. Only a few of our
systems—such as solar cells, sails on sailboats, waterwheels to power mills,
and windmills—are such Maxwell's demons (open systems) where the output exceeds
the operator's input of energy.
We sharply contrast the term
"COP" to the term "efficiency". The efficiency (overall) of a system is how much useful energy
output (usually as work, or can be converted to work at will) the system
produces for the total amount of energy that is input (both by the operator and
by the external environment). Even a
highly inefficient system may nonetheless have a COP>1.0, if the operator
inputs less energy than the system outputs.
We urge the reader to thoroughly
understand the difference between energy-use "efficiency" of a system
and coefficient of performance of the system.
Many scientists, engineers, and especially free-energy researchers are
confused on the precise difference in these terms.
CORPUS CALLOSUM
The
thick nerve cable that links together the two cerebral hemispheres (which are
separate brains) in each vertebrate (including human) brain.
In
each of the two cerebral hemispheres, there is a separate mind and personality
(given that the other is separated).
However, a brain has a unique characteristic: Anything that arises
directly inside it is automatically assumed to be self-originated, since the
brain-tuner can differentiate no separation or "separate source" for
the signal/thought arising directly upon its "internal screen". This allows integration of the two
brains/minds/personalities into one. That is, when one brain half prepares and
sends a message, that message is also routed across the corpus callosum into
the other brain half, arising internally upon the second brain's
"display." The second brain half therefore thinks that it itself
originated the signal or message.
COSMOLOGICAL FEEDBACK PRINCIPLE
Puthoff's self-regenerating cosmological feedback cycle for the source of the vacuum EM ZPE.
One may assume the existence of EM zero-point energy (ZPE) by fiat as part of the boundary conditions of the universe, or conceive of its generation by the quantum-fluctuation motion of charged particles that constitute matter. Puthoff calculated the latter possibility, assuming that the ZPE spectrum (field distribution) drives particle motion, and that the particle motion in turn generates the ZPE spectrum. This provides a self-regenerating cosmological feedback cycle, which in fact is consistent with the general relativity assumption that curvature of spacetime affects mass energy, and mass energy changes affect the curvature of spacetime.
The result of Puthoff's calculation is the appropriate frequency-cubed spectral distribution of the correct order of magnitude. His result is thus consistent with, and indicates, a dynamic-generation process for the ZPE fields.
In
general this is also consistent with the Sachs' unified field theory approach,
and with the Evans O(3) important subset of it.
COURRIER, ROBERT
Noted French scientist who
collaborated with Antoine Prioré in his revolutionary healing experiments on
laboratory animals using longitudinal EM waves from plasma tubes.
Courrier was the head of the Biology
Section of the French Academy and also the perpetual secretary at the
time. He personally presented the
astounding results of the Prioré work, showing cures of terminal tumors, to the
assembled French Academy, creating a furor.
CROSSTALK
In
ordinary science, the transfer of energy or signal from one channel to another,
by cross modulation or cross coupling between the channels.
In
the new approach, the term "crosstalk" can be used in an additional
sense where it refers to virtual energy exchange between orthogonal universes
or frames—that is, between different 3- or 4-dimensional slices of an
infinite-dimensional universe.
CURL CONCEPTS OF FIELDS
Refers to concepts of fields as
the curl of some vector potential;
E.g., the magnitude of the B-field is equal to the curl of the A-potential, given by B = Ñ´A. More exactly, the B-field is identically a curled A-potential, by B º Ñ´A, but only that
portion of Ñ´A that is diverged around
or collected by an intercepting unit point static charge.
Note that we are accenting that no
equation is a definition. So texts
stating that the first equation with an equals sign "defines" the
magnetic vector potential A, are in
error. If we state that B º Ñ´A, then we are defining the B-field as a curled form of the magnetic vector potential, which it
is.
The reader must be aware that the
field concept itself in CEM is flawed, being "defined" as the effect
existing after an interaction by a 4-space entity with a 3-space mass, and
hence
3-spatial and an "effect", and yet then used as if it were the
4-space "cause" entity that propagates in 4-space to interact. In short, the field concept is thoroughly
confused in the texts and papers in the literature (and has been confused for
more than a century) as not only the cause but the result of the interaction of
the cause with some recipient. This problem
has been highlighted by many physicists, including Feynman, Wheeler, etc.
This "confusion of the cause
with the effect" is widespread in physics, and is the single greatest
foundations error which hampers the progress of physics. Another example is the false notion that a
"separate force" acts upon a "separate mass", when in fact
mass is a component of force by the definition F º d/dt(mv). That such simple and obvious errors have
been propagated by so many hundreds of thousands of scientists for so many
decades is perplexing. Indeed, the
errors simply continue to be used. Note
that Nobelist Feynman and the great John Wheeler pointed out that the
"field" as defined in CEM does not and cannot exist in
spacetime! Instead, Feynman pointed out
that only the potential for the field exists in spacetime, in case some charged
mass is brought in to interact with it and thereby
produce the field as an effect.
Indeed, no observable persists, for
it "exists" only as a momentary 3-space frozen snapshot or slice of a
4-space dynamic interaction. Here
again, most physicists do not realize that observables such as mass m do not
and cannot persist other that at the instantaneous frozen moment of the
snapshot.
CURL-FREE MAGNETIC VECTOR POTENTIAL
A field-free magnetic vector
potential without curl, hence with no B-field.
Toroids and long solenoids have the
characteristic of separating the B-field
(curled potential) and holding it inside.
However, drawing energy from any potential whose "source charge or
source dipole" is not destroyed, simply results in the full value of the
potential being replenished from the vacuum, via the 4-symmetry energy flow
mechanism in the presence of the broken 3-symmetry of the dipole. Hence one may easily "double" the
potential energy density at will, and this is a special form of gauge freedom,
where the potential energy of any electromagnetic system can be altered freely
and at will. We strongly accent that,
contrary to what is in the EM textbook, gauge freedom rigorously allows the direct
and free amplification of potential energy of the EM system at will. That this principle, incorporated in gauge
field theory, has been known so long and still not used in the design,
production, and use of COP>1.0 electrical power systems is quite inexplicable.
In the motionless electromagnetic
generator, we used a special core material to extract the curled potential (B-field) from a permanent magnet's
vector potential A, so that A is replenished in uncurled form
directly from the vacuum via the giant negentropy process.
To achieve COP>1.0, we then
simultaneously interacted both the uncurled A-potential energy external to the output coil, and the internal
curled A-potential energy (B-field energy) internal to the core
through the coil, with the coil. By
pulsing, the Lenz law effect is also invoked as yet another momentary regauging
and potential energy increase, so that an additional energy gain is achieved.
The well-known Aharonov-Bohm effect
proves that the uncurled A-potential
can indeed be separated from the B-field
in like manner, and the A-potential
does interact with electrons since dA/dt
= - E.
Thus the MEG achieves COP>1.0
permissibly, because it is an open system freely receiving excess energy from
the active vacuum environment, via the vacuum's replenishment of the magnetic
vector potential of the permanent magnet dipole as fast as energy is drawn from
it. The MEG also violates the usual
closed current loop's self-imposition of Lorentz symmetrical regauging when
discharging its excitation energy (its free excess regauging potential energy),
because the "source dipole" (the permanent magnetic dipole) is not
destroyed.
CURVED SPACETIME (externally,
internally)
A four-dimensional geometry used
in general relativity, where the curvature is determined by the distribution of
mass-energy.
In the new, more extended approach,
any change in the spatial energy density of spacetime or any change in the
time-energy density of it, or a combination of changes in both. The difference is that in the new approach
time is also treated as a special form of energy. Specifically, time may be regarded as spatial EM energy
compressed by a factor of c2.
CYBORG (An acronym for cybernetic organism).
(Noun):
A single integrated system consisting of a living system energetically or
functionally linked to mechanical or electromagnetic devices and/or systems
performing some vital functions.
(Verb):
Link, in the sense of forming such a system.
In
the new approach, a living biological system may thus be considered a cyborg of
its time-like mindworld (mindframe) to its 3-spatial body (laboratory
tuner). The "cyborging" is
provided by the personal quantum potential and by the mind-body coupling
mechanism. Due to the giant negentropy
mechanism of any dipolarity, any scalar potential as a dipolarity is a cyborg
between observable reality and virtual state (time-like) reality, i.e., between
3-space and the time-domain.
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS
Any of several members of the herpesvirus
family that cause infected cells to enlarge and/or to form cytoplasmic (the
protoplasm of a cell, external to the nuclear membrane) inclusions in
leukocytes (white blood cells), particularly in their nuclei.
Cytomegalovirus makes a protein that
appears to disable the p53 protein. As
a result, smooth muscle cells in blood vessels can proliferate until they
impede blood flow.
CYTOPATHOGEN
Literally, a pathogen (disease
causing organism—or extended, mechanism—) that affects cells and generates
damage in them.
CYTOPATHOGENIC
Damaging, harmful, or destructive
for cells.
CYTOPATHOGENIC EFFECT
The generation of damage,
disease, death, or other symptoms at the cellular level in cells that are
exposed to or subjected to a pathogen.
CYTOPATHOGENIC MIRROR EFFECT
Distant EM pathogenic effect
noted by Kaznacheyev in thousands of military experiments, where cellular
death, disease, and damage forms are shown to be transmitted from one cell
culture in the dark (absence of visible light) where the changes are induced,
to another similar targeted cell culture in the dark that is environmentally
shielded from the first except for light transmission in the infrared and in
the ultraviolet. After exposure begins,
after a time delay (say, 2 hours or more), the cells in the targeted cell culture
will begin to exhibit the same symptoms as the culture having the induced
damage. Eventually, in most cases the
targeted cells will develop the same damage, disease condition, or death. The effects vary with the time of day etc.
The necessity for photon connection
from IR to UV is shown by contrasting a thin quartz window allowing the light
transmission with a thin window glass window.
The quartz is open from the IR to the UV, and will pass that entire
spectrum. With the visible light
absent, the IR and UV biophotons emitted by the damaged cell culture will pass
through the quartz window into the targeted cell culture. After the time delay, the targeted cell
culture starts developing the condition.
Use of a thin window glass window,
however, prevents the effect. Normal
window glass is opaque in the IR and in the UV, and so it blocks the
transmission of the IR and UV biophotons.
The UV is a harmonic of the IR,
arranged properly. An unusual effect
exists when two sine waves one the first harmonic of the other, are
simultaneously transmitted into an isotropic nonlinear medium, such as
water. On each sine wave, the peak
travels faster in the water than off-peak parts of the wave does. Hence the wave peaks overshoot its middle,
the wave collapses, breaks up, etc.
Both the waves of the transmitted harmonic set do that. However, if one pretends that one
transmitted the difference frequency between them, and not the waves
themselves, a strange phenomenon results.
Regardless of the breakup of the primary harmonic set, the difference
frequency travels through the water as if it were a real frequency in a linear
medium. This effect has been proven and
is used in underwater sonar equipment.
For example, see Owen Flynn, "Parametric arrays: A new concept for sonar," Electronic Warfare Magazine, June 1977, p. 107-112. Any two sine-wave frequencies as simultaneous drivers combine to produce a sine-wave difference frequency propagating in water, essentially without sidebands or reverberations. Its pattern has a main lobe approximately equal to that of the high frequency drive, but devoid of sidelobes. The level of the propagating difference frequency is proportional to both the product of the two fundamental drive levels and to the square of the desired value of difference frequency.
Living cells contain a great
percentage of water. Hence the effect
should apply to those targeted cells, under the conditions stated.
From general relativity, we know
that any pattern and dynamics of mass-energy, such as in a cell and all its
parts and dynamics, directly interacts with local spacetime to curve it, and
any set of curvatures of spacetime interact with any conglomerate of
mass-energy and its parts and dynamics.
The set of precise curvatures and their dynamics we call an engine. In a mass embedded in a local region of
spacetime containing an engine, the engine will interact with the mass-energy
to change it if the mass-energy and its dynamics do not "fit" the
engine and its dynamics.
In a diseased, damaged, or dead
cell, the mass-energy of that cell and its "template" (form and
dynamics) differs from its template while the cell was living and normal. Let us now see what happens when that dead
cell emits a biophoton.
A photon emitted from a dielectric
such as a damaged cell, is not emitted just from one spot. Every part of the dielectric participates in
the emission of that photon. (See
"porthole concept", to be added).
Further, each emitted photon contains in its scalar potential and its
magnetic vector potential, the exact longitudinal EM waveset that constitutes
the vacuum engine of the damaged cell that emitted it. When a cell absorbs a photon, it absorbs
that vacuum engine carried by the photon also.
If it absorbs a stream of photons of harmonic interval, the difference
frequency constitutes in terms of a wave, traveling through the cell water as
if in a linear medium, and transporting that vacuum engine to every part of the
absorbing cell dielectric.
So the biophotons emitted from
Kaznacheyev's damaged, diseased, or dying cells sent biophotons containing the
exact spacetime curvature engines and dynamics of their precise condition
(template). Further, a harmonic interval of such radiation is transmitted into
the targeted cells, and absorbed. The
mixing of the two absorptions eventually is sufficient to establish the
harmonic interval, thus with a clear EM signal difference that travels through
the cell's water and to every tiniest part of it. This "difference frequency clear signal" also contains
the pure vacuum engines of the template of the changes in the diseased, dying,
or damaged emitting cells.
The result is the
"kindling" (coherent integration) of the template in the absorbing
cell's local spacetime in which it is embedded. As that spacetime engine grows, it differs from the resident
engine of the absorbing cell. That
difference is itself an engine, and it operates steadily upon that absorbing
cell to alter its engine and then its physical condition and state.
As the new engine continues to
interact, the physical cell is gradually changed into an equilibrium condition
in its mutual interaction with its local spacetime engine. That occurs after the absorbing cell has
developed the same disease, damage, or dying condition as the transmitting
cells.
This is the secret of the
Kaznacheyev experiments. The
Kaznacheyev work was allowed to be released in the open literature to stimulate
the U.S. scientific and intelligence communities and see whether or not the
scientists and analysts had applied a unified field theory and higher symmetry
electrodynamics to the EM bioeffects problem.
The totally casual reception of the Kaznacheyev experiments in the West,
with no interest or interaction from the stimulated communities, assured the
KGB conclusively that the West was still in kindergarten in its knowledge of EM
bioeffects, and particularly had little or no knowledge in the field of EM
biological warfare.
Kaznacheyev referred to the effect
as the "cytopathogenic mirror" effect, for the pathogenic effects
from the emitting damaged cells being "mirrored' in the targeted cells.
See Vlail Kaznacheyev and L. P. Mikhailova, Ultraweak Radiation in Intercellular Interactions, [in Russian], Novosibirsk, 1981. An English exposition of much of the Kaznacheyev work is given in Vlail Kaznacheyev, "Electromagnetic Bioinformation in Intercellular Interactions," Psi Research, 1(1), Mar. 1982, p. 47-76. See also Vlail Kaznacheyev, "Apparent information transfer between two groups of cells," Psychoenergetic Systems, 1(1), Dec. 1974; Vlail Kaznacheyev et al., "Distant intercellular interactions in a system of two tissue cultures," Psychoenergetic Systems, 1(3), Mar. 1976, p. 141-142. In the same issue, see "A Comment" by William A. McGarey, p. 143; "A Comment" by Arthur C. Hastings, p. 143-144.
Seven or eight nations now have
longitudinal EM wave interferometer weapons, capable of beaming right through
the earth and ocean to the other side of the planet. At least two of these nations—Russia and China—are capable of
adding engine structures to these interferometers, and sweeping a targeted
population area to generate that specific disease condition in that
target. A sophisticated use would be to
have agents (such as terrorist teams already in the United States and with
biological agents in hand) release a small quantity of smallpox in the area
previously targeted. The LWIs have
swept the entire area continuously for a period, slowly kindling (especially at
night) the exact form of the disease within the bodies of the populace. A curious thing happens if the level of
kindling of the smallpox state has been kept just beneath the observable state,
within what is sometimes called the "shadow state" (just barely
virtual). A smallpox pandemic will
explode in that populace with a ferocity never seen in modern times, and at an
unparalleled rate. This is further
exacerbated by "spreading the immune system" prior to the attack
(term and discussion to be added), which seriously weakens the immune system's
ability to resist any single pathogenic attack.
There are hardly any supplies of
smallpox vaccine left that are viable.
Even where there are, the Russian laboratories developed strains of
smallpox resistant to the normal vaccine, and after the collapse of the Russian
economy and the former Soviet state, these strains were sold on the black
market to the highest bidder. Further,
most of the Soviet scientists employed in those secret biowar facilities wound
up employed in several other nations, most hostile to the United States.
The point is this: Such a strike
could in fact kill up to 2 billion people worldwide. Further, the entire affair would appear to be just a chance
breakout of smallpox, and its spread through a nonresistant world populace.
When modern biological warfare is
actually analyzed in detail, the "bang for the buck" is greater than
it is for nuclear weapons. Further, a
rogue or hostile nation can take its time in advance and develop quantities of
smallpox vaccine (for the very strain it will use), then initiate such a
clandestine campaign after it has vaccinated its own populace, armed forces,
and agents. Guess who survives after
such an attack.
CYTOTOXIC
Toxic (acts as a poison or toxin) to
cells.
A toxin
is a colloidal proteinaceous poisonous substance that is a specific product of
the metabolic activities of a living organism.
The toxin is usually very unstable, and is notably toxic when introduced
into the tissues.
DARK ENERGY
The Heaviside nondiverged energy
flow component, surrounding every field/charge and potential/charge reaction
but unaccounted in present electromagnetic theory after being arbitrarily
discarded by Lorentz.
DATUM
Consideration, or data
considered, or information considered, or action considered, or result
considered.
DEATH
The
disintegration of the personal quantum potential's connection to the physical
body's atomic nuclei by loss of the mind-body connection mechanism.
Simply
put, separation of the quantum potential containing the time-like mind-frame
from the body. Loss of the preferential
tuning of a physical body to its mindworld.
This causes loss of the preferential consciousness loop or life channel,
resulting in "death" (reversion to inert matter) of the body. Actually the quantum potential and the
mind-frame remains, so the being is
unchanging and indestructible, hence consists of all changes and destructions
simultaneously, with none separated individually. Life and death thus are two sides of the same coin, and the coin
is immutable, regardless of which side is exposed.
DE BROGLIE WAVE
A matter wave, conceived by Louis
de Broglie.
The quantum mechanics wave
associated with a particle of matter, which can give rise to interference
effects. An orbital electron in an atom is associated with a standing de
Broglie wave on a Bohr orbit. De Broglie waves always move faster than the
speed of light, the speed being given by c2/v, where c is the
velocity of light in vacuum and v is the velocity of the particle of mass. De
Broglie wave velocities thus vary from the speed of light to infinite speed
(everywhere at once). In his speech accepting the Nobel Prize, de Broglie
emphasized that, since these waves produce real physical effects, they are real
and must not be regarded simply as mathematical conveniences.
DEBYE, PETER
Dutch-born American physical
chemist and Nobelist, 1884-1966, who performed important and fundamental
studies in bipole moments and diffractions of X-rays and electrons in gases.
DEDIFFERENTIATION, CELLULAR
The reversion of a cell or cellular
structure to a more primitive or generalized condition.
Dedifferentiation is often preliminary to
a major change in the cell or cellular structure. It can also be a reversion of the cell to a previous—even primeval—cell form. The important point is that
dedifferentiation returns the cell to a previous (past) cellular state. Reversion of a cancer cell, e.g., would
cause the cell to return to a normal cell, since that is the nature of its
"cellular past." It is
vitally important that Becker has demonstrated that cells can be differentiated
(moved forward to a future state) or dedifferentiated (moved backward to a
previous state) electrically, by very weak DC currents (picoamperes). He was nominated for a Nobel Prize for this
epochal work.
Actual electromagnetic redifferentiation
of terminal tumors in laboratory animals was repeatedly demonstrated by Prioré
et al in the late 60s and early 70s and reported in the peer-reviewed French
medical journals, as was reversion of depressed immune systems, cures of
infectious diseases, and curing of arteriosclerosis. It is inexplicable that this positively demonstrated cure of
cancer—which could also cure infectious diseases and probably can be developed
to cure AIDS—was suppressed in the mid-70s
and has not been vigorously pursued by present establishment medical science.
DEGENERATE SEMICONDUCTOR
A semiconductor whose
conductivity approaches that of a metal.
DELGADO, JOSE M. R.
Noted Spanish neurophysiologist
well-known for his research on brain behavioral mechanisms and their control by
electrical stimulation; who implanted electrodes in the brains of animals and
humans and demonstrated that their responses (both behavioral and emotional)
were specific and depended upon the specific localized part of the brain that
was stimulated.
A TV tape made by Delgado showed a
spectacular demonstration where he stopped a charging bull in mid-stride. With a small hand-held radio transmitter, he
transmitted a radio signal to a receiver implanted in the head of the
bull. This dramatic demonstration
caused a world-wide sensation.
The significance of his work is given
by Becker: "Delgado discovered the exact parts of the brain in which
electrical stimulation produced fear, anxiety, pleasure, euphoria, or rage in
human subjects. He found that certain
sites produced major personality alterations.
For example, stimulation of one such site could cause very proper,
reserved young ladies to become flirtatious and sexually aggressive. Other sites inhibited maternal or aggressive
behavior. In short, Delgado was able to
profoundly alter human behavior through electrical stimulation of discrete
areas of the brain." … electrodes
were implanted in the pleasure centers of rats' brains. The animals were provided with two levers to
press. One of these delivered food, and
the other produced electrical stimulation of the pleasure center. Invariably, the rats chose to press the
lever that stimulated the pleasure center, even to the extent that they died of starvation."
(Becker, Cross Currents, p.
221-222).
It is known based on a rare OMNI
interview that Delgado progressed to detailed study and experimentation for the
behavioral and emotional effects in monkeys of specific magnetic field
frequencies on monkeys. These
successful experiments involved electrical currents produced in the brain but
hundreds of times lower in intensity than those required for direct electrode
stimulation. Since then, some
information has been cautiously released from Western military studies showing
that microwave pulses can couple to the central nervous system and produce
stimulation and behavior alteration similar to Delgado's released experimental
results.
Comment: The ultimate and most refined techniques in the field of
electromagnetic control of human behavior, volition, emotion, etc. is provided
by Russian psychoenergetics, the military version of which is totally under KGB
control. This work has progressed far
beyond what Delgado and Becker were discussion so long ago. The use of the infolded longitudinal EM
waves and "engines"—once the technology is developed—allows direct
engineering of conscious and unconscious mind, memory including short term and
long term, perception, awareness, etc.
The additional advantage of using EM longitudinal waves is that mass is
largely a very thin dispersion of particles, with (relatively speaking) very
large distances between them, somewhat like the solar system but on different
scale. This "inner space" is
filled with EM waves, potentials, and fields—all of which decompose into sets
of longitudinal EM waves and their impressed dynamics. Thus the earth and ocean are readily
penetrated by longitudinal EM wave beams, and the Russians (KGB) has developed
such LW interferometers since the mid 1950s.
However, by LW interferometry where the patterns and dynamics of the
carried LWs are engineered, any desired mapping pattern of precise EM signals,
frequencies, phases, and magnitudes can be reproduced in distant interference
zones, reaching right through the ocean.
These interferometers could localize the distant interferometry into a
6-inch diameter volume as early as 1985, so from that time forward it gradually
became possible to perform all of Delgado's "inserted electrode" EM
stimulus in a single selected human brain from the opposite side of the
earth. So approximately 1985 is when I
would estimate the beginning of the "golden age" (ugh!) of distant
psychoenergetics was initiated.
By 1997, this development would be
into at least third generation weapons, just being deployed or just having been
deployed, considering an somewhat accelerated weapons development program where
6 years is one generation. By 1997,
very complex individual behavioral and perceptual control should have just
arrived in on-site deployed strategic weapons systems. See discussion under conscious mind.
Some selected useful references are:
J.M.R. Delgado et al., Journal of
Anatomy, vol. 134, 1982, p. 533 reports that developmental defects occur in
chick embryos exposed to various ELF frequencies. See also J.M.R. Delgado, Physical
Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society, Vol. 41, World
Perspectives, Harper & Row, New York, 1969.
DEMODULATION
From a carrier containing a
modulated signal, recovering the signal that was used to modulate it.
DENSE SIGNAL ENVIRONMENT
For our purposes, when the number
of weak EM signals crossing one square meter per second reaches 200,000.
At 500,000 important nonlinear
optical type effects of significance—particularly long term cumulative
effects—begin to occur in the exposed biological organism.
DEPARTING ORTHOROTATIONS
In space of dimensions greater
than four, the rotating of an object or entity away from its line of motion, in
the direction of a dimension at right angles to the line of travel in the
observer's three-space, by some number of additional 90° rotations.
The Lorentz transform in special
relativity, e.g., is just a formula for this kind of rotation. What we call "velocity" is
actually a measure of rotation. In
4-space, any object in 3-space can only rotate "out" of 3-space in
one direction: toward the time-axis. As
the object rotates toward that time-axis, we see the object as having a
velocity in 3-space, and its "length along the line of motion" as
having diminished. When the object
rotates the full 90°, its "length along the line of motion" has been
converted to "time" rather than length. Hence it has zero length along the line of motion and is moving
at c, the speed of light in ambient space.
It is also no longer material, but is a sort of flat plane surface
moving at speed c in a direction perpendicular to the plane.
In that 4-space model, it is
impossible for anything to move faster than light speed. So Einstein's postulate dealing with the
fact that it is impossible to translate mass, signals, etc. faster than light
speed has a built-in assumption that only one orthogonal departing rotation can
be made from 3-space. That postulate
need not apply at all if more than one departing orthorotation is
permitted—which of course requires a space of 5 dimensions or greater.
The notion is that, if we allow a
spacetime of greater than four dimensions, by continuing to rotate ever more
orthoturns in a departing direction away from the original line of travel, the
rotated object loses one observable dimension for every orthorotation. Hence
with three "departing" orthorotations it becomes a "nonobservable
point" to the normal observer, but one that would be moving at speed c3. A single orthorotation would make the
3-dimensional object a two-dimensional plane moving at speed c.
No matter how many rotations are
made in a departing manner, the object is still connected to the time dimension
common to all dimensions (assuming only a single time dimension for
simplicity). So it exists in an
orthorotated space, but in the same time.
To the physical observer in 3-space, it thus appears to be a
"time-like" or "mental" object only. Nonetheless, by affecting the density and
structuring of the time domain, it can have an effect on a 3-spatial
object. We discuss that mechanism under
the subjects of the mind-to-body coupling mechanism and the body-to-mind coupling
mechanism. Further, with the
Sachs-Evans unified field theory approach, the time-domain can be directly
engineered. This means that both
"inert" or physical reality and time-like or "mental"
reality can be directly engineered by novel electrodynamic means.
In short, a photon is just a
particle (such as an electron) that is orthorotated once (toward the time
axis). In photon emission, a little bit of the mass-energy turns into
orthorotated photon energy. In photon
absorption, the absorbed photon energy turns back into mass-energy.
The higher dimensional
orthorotational concept was originally formed to allow a physical modeling
grasp on a "mental" object as compared to a "physical"
object, and to have a connection mechanism between the two. Such an approach can be used to model both
mind and matter, their interaction, etc.
The present author has used it to solve the old philosophical problem of
"intent", of how the perception of self is attained, how the external
world is perceived separate from self, etc.
A model for both living and nonliving states does emerge.
This or a very similar approach has
been used by the Russian's highly classified weapon science called energetics. That third branch of energetics is called psychoenergetics and it is the physics
of directly engineering mind states, mind operations, memory, etc. by extended
electrodynamic means. We have
previously detailed much of this work privately, but with some detailed openly
in a few papers. E.g., see T. E.
Bearden, "Mind Control and EM Wave Polarization
Transductions, Part I", Explore,
9(2), 1999, p. 59; Part II, Explore,
9(3), 1999, p. 61; Part III, Explore,
9(4,5), 1999, p. 100-108.
DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE
When two waves or wavesets from
two different sources superpose to produce a combined waveset that has a lower
intensity than the sum of the intensities of the two original waves.
DETERMINISTIC PATTERN OR TEMPLATE
The exact arrangement, by plan
and deterministic action, of a group of entities.
E.g., of the photons in a "herd"
or "group" of them. Or a set of spacetime curvatures, into a dynamic
structure called a "spacetime curvature engine"—or "engine"
for short. Or by the virtual photons in
the vacuum flux, or a deterministic set of changes to that vacuum flux (the
vacuum flux that is called the "vacuum potential." I have called this
function—of a deterministic patterning or templating of the virtual flux
(particle view) of the potential—dimensioning
the potential.
DIELECTRIC
Literally, "against electric
(current),"
...originally coined to mean
"opposes the flow or conduct of electric fluid."
In today's language, a dielectric is
a non-conducting material used to oppose or prevent the flow of electric
charges. Even empty vacuum exhibits some dielectric resistance. "Dielectric"
is also used to refer to a nonconducting material (often used between the metal
plates of a capacitor or elsewhere) which can (i) sustain a change in potential
across a distance (i.e., an E-field),
and (ii) serve as an insulator. Space itself is a dielectric, or at least it is
said to exhibit certain dielectric qualities.
DIFFERENTIATION, CELLULAR
(1) specialization of body parts or
organs in the evolutionary process.
(2) modification of different
parts of the body to perform particular functions. (3) modification of the cells forming these body parts or organs
so as to perform the necessary cellular functions required to support the
functioning of the body part or organ.
DIFFRACTION
The bending of light at the edge of an
opaque object.
Usually diffraction introduces undesired
distortion and is a problem. However,
it can be useful and desirable—for example, in a diffraction grating.
DIMENSION
A certain primary geometrical
physical attribute, such as length, used to describe the separational
relationships of physical phenomena.
The degree of that separation is
known as "length", "time", etc. By "geometrical" we mean that the "dimension"
is considered to "exist" in either the presence or absence of the
observable physical phenomenon; however, by understood agreement the dimension
itself is not directly observable. It can be inferred ("measured"),
however, by comparative operations of simple devices such as clocks and meter
sticks, and its simplistic definition is usually given as "that which has
measurable magnitude." Prescribed measuring procedures are used to assign
magnitudes to these inferred dimensions, using specific scales.
Actually, "dimension" just
means "fundamental quantity of separation" and "geometry"
in the most general sense. The number of dimensions taken in advanced physics
usually represents a somewhat arbitrary choice for good modeling fit. In modern
Kaluza-Klein theory, for example, it becomes necessary to accept some 10 or 11
dimensions in the usual particle physics case. General relativity has
incorporated the interaction of the abstract geometry (spacetime) with
mass. Until Sachs' extension of
Einstein's work into a unified field theory and Evans' incorporation of O(3)
electrodynamics as an important subset of Sachs' unified theory, general
relativity has largely remained a nonexperimental discipline, at least in the
laboratory. With the new Sachs-Evans
approach, however, GR becomes substantially engineerable by novel
electromagnetic means, including in the laboratory and in devices.
DIMENSIONING
This is an artificial term I
sometimes use to mean "forming an exact pattern or 'template',
particularly of nested curvatures of spacetime, where the pattern/template may
also be dynamic. It involves the internal
structuring of the "dimensioned" entity.
The use of the term
"dimensioning" makes sense in unified field theory, but is awkward in
normal EM theory which erroneously considers that EM energy propagates in an
uncurved spacetime. The mere presence
of a change in local spatial energy, created by the wave energy itself when
present in that local region, curves the local spacetime. Hence the EM wave rigorously travels in
curved spacetime, and in fact identically is a propagating, oscillating curvature
of spacetime.
Dimensioning also implies a
deliberate form or structure (with dynamics) created in the virtual photon flux
of the vacuum or of the virtual photon flux comprising a scalar potential, or
in the infolded longitudinal wave EM inside all EM potentials, fields, and
waves. It implies an associated set of
spacetime curvatures and their dynamics.
The latter are referred to as "engines", "vacuum
engines", "spacetime curvature engines", etc.
Dimensioning potentials or signals
or carrier waves also involves adding hidden vacuum engines to them. I chose the descriptive term dimensioning because adding such
templates (hidden vacuum engine structures) is equivalent to increasing the EM
topology by adding dimensions. Since an EM wave or field or vector potential
can be decomposed into two scalar potentials, then by "dimensioning"
one or both of the scalar potentials one can "infold" the desired
hidden structures or patterns (vacuum engines) inside an EM carrier wave, EM
field, or vector potential. So I called this dimensioning those entities. Internally structuring the two scalar
potentials via arrays of EM LW emitters, and then applying the necessary
dynamics (modulations), is primarily the manner in which dimensioning can be
directly engineered. When dimensioning
is present, two identical EM waves as seen on the oscilloscope may have
dramatically differing internal structures (dimensioning), and hence the two
will produce drastically differing effects when they interact with the same or
similar objects. This of course is the
mechanism involved in the Kaznacheyev experiments and in the decades-long
microwave radiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, where health changes and
diseases were electromagnetically induced in personnel in field-free (stable
and nonchanging potentials) areas.
Russian energetics refers to what we
are calling "dimensioning" simply as adding the information content of the field. A very skilled disinformation program (actually, a strategic
deception program) has been used to deceive the West into believing the phrase
refers to ordinary spectral analysis.
It doesn't. The importance of
the dimensioning concept is that one has not formed mere "signals,"
instead, one has formed vacuum engines.
If a receiving object receives a signal, it may or may not act upon that
"signal information." If it
receives a vacuum engine, however,
the engine (structured local spacetime flux) directly acts upon it to make the
requisite change. Further, the energy
for the interaction's working upon the exposed object or system is furnished
continually from the curved spacetime set and their dynamics. The receiving
object has absolutely no choice in that action occurring to it, and the action
can occur from the gluons and quarks inside the charges in the nuclei, to the
lattice structures, to the system dynamics, to the elements so as to transmute
them, etc.
Note that when a dimensioned EM
field or potential is absorbed by an object, that object also has internal EM
fields and potentials which have substructures (usually rather random). However, the internal structure of the
absorbed dimensioned entity and the internal structures of the EM fields,
potentials, and waves do mix in a direct diffusion process. Hence with continued irradiation, the target
can be "charged up" with the desired internal dimensioning
structure. This is how the microwave
irradiation of the U.S. Embassy accomplished disease induction, using signals
with the desired disease dimensioning impressed in their structures,
particularly in the potentials. In the
Gulf War Disease, a much more sophisticated use of this mechanism was made,
using a quantum potential as the carrier.
All the effects (including the body fluid transmission, the EM fields of
the body transmitting and kindling some of the effects in children in proximity
to a dimensioned veteran parent, can be explained.
The use of dimensioned EM fields,
waves, and potentials—and the use of dimensioned quantum potentials in Bohm's
hidden variable theory—allows an entirely new science of EM biological warfare,
far more threatening and lethal than the more primitive physical pathogenic
kind. It is also possible to use the
techniques for revolutionary healing, as unwittingly shown by Prioré and the
scientists working with him, and also as shown by Becker et al.
The
only way in which the action of a vacuum engine (dimensioned carrier entity)
can be resisted is to create and simultaneously introduce the exact antiengine
for it.
Once the action has been completed
in the receiving object and it has been changed, the only way it usually can be
undone is to form a precise antiengine for that action, amplify the antiengine,
and let the antiengine act upon the object for a sufficient time to "time
reverse it back to its previous physical state and condition". The Prioré mechanism utilized that method
for reversing the cellular damage due to cancer and infectious diseases, and to
restore suppressed immune systems. The
same mechanism, if re-developed, could also be used to reverse aging in living
human patients.
The engine and antiengine processes
can also be applied by structuring the "time-charging" or
"time-excitation charging" of the particles of mass in a body. The "port-hole" concept even
allows ordinary EM radiation to be used to forcibly transduce the input
ordinary EM into the extraordinary EM and thereby forcibly accomplish the
necessary time-charging actions for
disease and body deterioration reversal.
See discussions under "port hole concept" and
"time-charging".
DIPOLE
In the simplest case, two
separated charges of (usually equal and) opposite sign.
As a general definition, a localized positive charge or charge distribution, and a localized negative charge or charge distribution, such that the net charge summation is zero, but wherein the positive and negative charge distributions do not superpose. We point out, however, that in regular physics electrical charge has no proper definition. Try looking it up in several physics dictionaries! Then check our proposed definition of electrical charge. As is well-known in particle physics, a dipole is a broken symmetry in the virtual photon flux of the vacuum. By definition of broken symmetry, this means that some of the virtual energy flux continuously absorbed from the seething vacuum by the charges of the dipole, is not re--radiated as virtual energy. Instead, it is integrated coherently and re-radiated in 3-space as real emitted EM energy. The dipole is therefore a true "negative resistor" since it receives EM energy in unusable form, and re-emits it in usable form. In classical EM theory, the problem of how every charge and dipole can continuously emit EM energy to form all the associated fields and potentials and their energy, is an unsolved problem—sometimes called the most pressing problem in electrodynamics, both classical and quantal. For the solution and a discussion, see my paper "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23.
Because
of the broken 3-symmetry of the dipole, the EM energy flow is not conserved in
three dimensions (symmetry represents a conservation law, and broken symmetry
represents the violation of that conservation law—in this case, violation of
conservation of 3-space EM energy flow).
Instead, EM energy flow is conserved in 4-dimensions, and the hidden
inflow of EM energy to the dipole is
actually from the complex plane (time domain).
Thus all EM energy is actually received from the time-domain, and so the
importance can be seen of the internal structuring of time-flow and of
longitudinal EM waves in the time domain.
Such time-domain energy flows appear naturally in O(3) electrodynamics;
see M. W. Evans and T. E. Bearden,
"The Most General form of the Vector Potential in Electrodynamics," Optik (in review).
DIRAC, PAUL A. M.
Noted English physicist, 1902-1984,
who shared the Nobel Prize for developing wave mechanics and predicting the
existence of the positron.
DIRAC SEA
Considering the vacuum as
containing—amongst other things— a "sea" of an infinite negative
energy conditions or states ("holes") for electrons, almost all of
which are filled with electrons.
In
Dirac electron theory, the relativistic wave equation for the electron has four
components, which correspond to two spin orientations and two energy
conditions: positive and negative. Thus
the vacuum possesses a "sea" of negative energy conditions for
electrons. These are called
"holes" and are considered to ordinarily be filled or mostly filled
with electrons which have fallen into these negative energy states. The Dirac sea thus is this vacuum sea of
negative energy electrons. In forward
time, if energy is added, electrons can be lifted from this sea. If spacetime is locally curved, additional
holes may be created so that normal positive energy electrons fall in and
disappear, creating the appearance of an "electrical energy
sink." If the curvature is in the
opposite direction, electrons may be lifted from the Dirac sea by the
curvature, thus producing a flow of electrons and creating the appearance of an
"electrical energy source."
DISCRETIZED
Occurring in a finite size, fixed
as a function of one or more variables.
So long as the same value(s) of the
variable(s) are selected, the discretized entity is always the same size.
However, if the value(s) of the determining variables are changed, the value of
the discretized quantity may change so that it is not a whole number multiple
of the former entity. Compare this to a quantized entity, where the values of
the variable(s) are held to those wherein the entity will always be a multiple
of an entity of fixed size.
DISEQUILIBRIUM
Broken equilibrium, which in turn
involves breaking appropriate conservation laws.
DISSOCIATION
Separation
of ideas from their affects or feelings, resulting in independent functioning
of these components of a person's mental processes.
Simply
put, fragmentation of the mind and personality. Severe dissociation is the definition of insanity.
DISTORTION CORRECTION THEOREM
"If a scalar wave E1(r)
propagates from left to right through an arbitrary but lossless dielectric
medium, and if we generate in some region of space [say near z = 0] its phase
conjugate replica E2(r), then E2 will propagate backward from right to left
through the dielectric medium, remaining everywhere the phase conjugate of
E1."
Quoted from Amnon Yariv, Optical Electronics, 3rd Edn., Holt,
Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1985, p. 500-501.
What is missing from the distortion
correction theorem is hidden in the phrase "if
we generate in some region of space … its phase conjugate replica..". Since electrodynamicists and optical
physicists have been unaware that all EM energy at any point in space comes
from the time domain to that point, then the actual phase conjugate wave in the
imaginary plane (from the time domain) is not utilized as the phase conjugate
replica. Instead, the interaction of
that wave with charges, which actually produces the force-field wave in space,
is assumed. In short, one is looking at
the "effect" wave, not the "cause" wave. However, since time is not an observable
even in theory, it is this "effect" wave in 3-space that will be
measured by our instruments.
Note also that the distortion
correction theorem says nothing about longitudinal EM waves in the time
domain. Interestingly, in nonlinear
optical pumping, it appears that the 3-space energy of the pumping 3-space
waves is transformed into the time domain by the pumping, and thence flows from
the time domain into the 3-space domain to form the progression of the
time-reversed replica wave in 3-space.
It is apparent that much more work
should be done upon the foundations of phase conjugate optics, in a higher
symmetry electrodynamics model such as O(3) electrodynamics and particularly in
the unified field theory as in the Sachs-Evans combined approach.
DNA (DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID)
Nucleic acid that constitutes the
genetic material of cellular organisms and also certain viruses.
DRUDE, PAUL
Important German physicist,
1863-1906, who formulated the theory of the free electron gas inside
conductors, using it to formulate a theory of metallic resistance.
DRUDE ELECTRON GAS
The "free" electrons
that have broken loose from their atoms in a conductor, and are thus free to
"wander around" and "migrate"—or flow as current when
exposed to an emf.
Also called the electron gas, or
Drude electron gas. Named after the German physicist Paul Drude who died in
1906, who formulated Drude's theory of metallic resistance based on EM theory
and his own theory of electrons. See P.
Drude, Ann. Physik, Vol. 1, p. 566; Vol. 3, 1900, p. 370,
869 for the original Drude papers.
DUALITY PRINCIPLE
In quantum mechanics, the
principle that photons and other particles propagate like waves and interact
like particles, so that their descriptions as only waves or only particles is
inadequate.
ECM
Electronic Countermeasures.
Electromagnetic measures taken
against targeted electronics or electromagnetics operations in systems,
particularly in hostile weapon systems, command and control systems, etc. There are entire textbooks in the West that
are devoted to ECM effects, uses, effectiveness, etc. A great deal of ECM equipment is also used by any modern military
force. However, in our view what is
greatly lacking as yet in Western ECM is the deliberate design and use of novel
new kinds of ECM based on the extended higher electrodynamics such as O(3)
electrodynamics, and particularly by use of longitudinal EM waves and by use of
the infolded electrodynamics inside all EM fields, potentials, and waves. Longitudinal EM wave interferometers (LWIs),
e.g., can reach right through the earth and the ocean to emerge on the other
side of the earth. In the interference
zone (IZ), real EM "transverse wave" energy is created readily by the
interferometry. Biasing of the chassis
grounds of the distant LWI transmitters can control whether the "normal"
EM energy appearing in the target IZ is convergent (cooling) or divergent
(heating). By sharp pulsing of the LWI
transmitters, massive cold explosions or hot explosions can be created in the
IZ. Continuous LWI interferometry can
produce geometric forms of EM energy, which usually glow due to the ionization
of the atmosphere, etc. in the dense EM energy regions. Since these can also involve general
relativistic effects as well as electromagnetics effects in the U(1) CED sense,
obviously a dramatic expansion of the entire field of measures and
countermeasures is entailed.
We believe these LWI weapons may be
what was referred to by U.S. Defense Secretary Cohen as follows: "Others are engaging even in an
eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes,
volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are
plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they
can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason why we
have to intensify our efforts." Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an
April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn.
DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the
Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy,
University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.
EDGE WAVES
In
electromagnetics, waves that form parallel to a material edge.
EDISON, THOMAS ALVA
Noted American inventor,
1847-1900, whose staggering number of inventions included the storage battery,
electric light bulb, phonograph, motion pictures, and carbon microphone.
E-FIELD (ELECTRIC FIELD)
The
electric field or electric intensity E.
That field on a spinning charged mass which produces an electrical force
resulting in a linear motion of the charge.
See also discussion under c, above.
E-FIELD, MOTIONAL
In
classical EM theory, the electric field produced by moving a conductor in a
magnetic field. Often called motional inductance of the field.
In
the orthodox theory, motional inductance is deemed to be identical to the
inductance caused by a time rate of change of the magnetic field, experienced
by the moving conductor.
E-FIELD, STATIC
In orthodox theory, the electric field in the space surrounding a static charged particle, induced by the presence of the charged particle.
In classical EM, there is no notion as to the causative mechanism for this static field of and from a charge, which implicitly is assumed to just continuously create and pour out EM energy in all directions, thus grossly violating energy conservation.. Consideration of this anomaly leads to what has been called the most pressing problem in both quantal and classical electrodynamics: the question of the formation of the fields and potentials associated with the "source charge".
For a full solution to this problem, see my "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23. Also on this website.
EHRENHAFT, FELIX
Scientist
who performed numerous experiments believed to demonstrate fractional charges.
EINSTEIN, ALBERT
German
(Jewish) physicist, 1879-1955, who
emigrated to the U.S. and formed special and general relativity theory,
discovered and formed the theory of Brownian motion, recommended the development
of the atomic bomb to President Roosevelt, and profoundly affected the course
of science and the modern world.
EINSTEIN-de HAAS EFFECT
The
rotation observed in a freely hanging ferromagnet when it becomes magnetized.
It has been used in the Einstein-de Haas method to determine the gyromagnetic ratio of a ferromagnetic material by suspending a cylinder of the material from a torsion fiber and measuring the angular displacement of the cylinder when its magnetization is reversed.
EINSTEIN, PODOLSKY, AND ROSEN PARADOX
Thought
experiment in 1935 for measuring two correlated photons separated and at
distant locations, protesting that quantum mechanics requires that the
particles communicate instantly, which is a "spooky action-at-a
distance" (Einstein's phrase).
The experiment eventually was performed and it works, just as required by quantum mechanics. The paradox inspired the development of hidden-variable theories.
EINSTEIN'S POSTULATES
(1) All the laws of physics are
equally valid in all inertial frames of reference,
(2) the speed of light is the
same to every inertial observer, and
(3) the observable local effects
of a gravitational field are indistinguishable from those arising from
acceleration of the frame of reference.
The first is called the special
relativity principle, the second is called the law of light propagation, and
the third is called the equivalence principle. It is now known that postulates
(1) and (2) are not independent of each other. Note that the third postulate
implies that any local force is due to a "gravitational field"
(acceleration of the frame of reference). It also implies that gravitational
force has a mechanism, since quantum mechanics assigns a differential operator,
operating upon a potential, to create every force. By extended inference, it
can be seen that the third postulate also implies that there should exist a
method to turn any type of force (field) into gravitational force (field).
The Russian physicist Sakharov has
strongly postulated that gravitation is not even a fundamental field of
physics, of the kind used by Maxwell in his electrodynamics. Instead, in this
view G-field is always comprised of,
and made from, other fields and interactions upon them. Indeed, such has always
been implicit in general relativity, it just took Sakharov to formally propose
it. E. g., see A. D. Sakharov, "Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations in Curved
Space and the Theory of Gravitation," Soviet
Physics Doklady, Vol. 12, No. 11, 1968, p. 1040-1041 [English translation.]
Sakharov's article (in Russian) in Doklady.
Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vol. 177, 1967, p. 70-71.
Now let us do a little
"tinkering" with Einstein's postulates. For the first one, we point
out that in the new approach using dimensioning and subspaces, the notion of an
inertial frame now has acquired additional complexity! The "gross
translation" effects—which tends to be what physics ultimately focuses
upon—can remain the same, and yet vacuum engines can be buried up inside the
inertial frame to act upon a mass in non-translating ways. Everything
translation-wise can remain the same, but now matter can be transmuted and
transformed, etc., still right there in an inertial frame. So when the infolded electrodynamics inside
all fields, potentials, and waves are utilized, the notion of "inertial
frame" has acquired a higher topology and then one inertial frame may
differ very substantially from another inertial frame. This of course move one
from special relativity into full general relativity, and even there into a
slight extension. Special relativity
can remain special relativity on the surface, and yet effects occur
"within" the objects postulated to exist in this inertial frame. The
"inertial frame" concept in the postulates is now just a sort of
special "equilibrium case" of a higher topology "inertial
frame" notion.
The second postulate now stands as a
"special case" of a far more general second postulate. It actually
defines (and limits) "light" to bulk changes in the entire vacuum
potential magnitude. It only applies to light signals which are "bulk
upheaval" disturbances of the vacuum potential (spacetime). Specifically
it need not apply to the "inner EM/GR realm" of longitudinal EM waves
infolded inside the vacuum potential, other potentials, signal carriers, etc.
Superluminal communication is now included in this "hidden variable"
communication. The Fogal semiconductor is in fact capable of infolding and
outfolding EM signals, including producing the internal longitudinal EM waves,
and during their infolded state these signals are permitted to move at
superluminal velocity.
So the second postulate needs to be
restated to include the present statement as a special case. Notice that the
concepts "light" and "speed of light" have now taken on
much richer, extended meanings, since there is "outfolded" light and
"infolded" light, so to speak. Light now is not just the
"external perturbation wave" in the ambient vacuum potential medium
(in flat spacetime). Instead, it can
also be an "internal perturbation longitudinal wave" inside a
"net flat spacetime" which does not show on the "surface"
at all. Indeed, it may move in the time dimension or in 3-space. It now includes the transmission of an
extraordinary "vacuum engine" as well as the usual transmission of
just an ordinary signal.
And these infolded vacuum engines
can be visualized as very special sets of longitudinal EM waves and their
dynamics, consistent with the Whittaker decomposition. His U(1) symmetry electrodynamics
decomposition—particularly when enriched in the higher symmetry O(3) electrodynamics—applies
to the ambient vacuum as a potential (it is a potential since it has energy
density). So the "subspace"
inside spacetime, so to speak, is just a set of LWs and their dynamics, and that
subspace itself is engineerable, just as is the "bulk curvature of
spacetime" itself. Further, we may
now consider space itself is just a vast superhighway for such superluminal LWs
and their dynamics. Mass is mostly
empty space with only an occasional particle here and there and with fields,
potentials, and waves in between. Hence
huge masses such as the ocean and earth are actually superhighways for the
direct passage of longitudinal EM waves, "engines", etc. The degree of "transparency" is a
function of the degree of cleanness of the LWs.
The third postulate has also been
dramatically extended and requires revision. As presently stated, antigravity
effects do not appear to be included in present physics heretofore. The
"gravitational effects and external accelerated effects" notion in conventional
physics is still founded purely on ordinary
bulk translation. Now it need not be. For example, the system can appear to
be an ordinary system, as judged by normal "external light"
observation. Yet its internal vacuum engines can cause local violation of most
so-called "laws of nature."
The reason a "law of nature" can be violated is that one is
now able to violate the premises upon which it is postulated, and which are
required to hold if the law is to hold.
Or another way to look at it: any conservation law is the result of a
symmetry. Breaking that symmetry allows
violation of that specific conservation law.
So as we've said so many times
before, the infolded EM inside the
"conventional" EM fields, waves, and potentials—and inside the vacuum
potential and spacetime itself—dramatically changes the present theories of
electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, and general relativity. Further, for the
first time the Sachs unified field theory allows an engineering approach which simultaneously crosses, includes, and
extends all three disciplines in the required manner. The approach can be placed into good engineering models based on
the Sachs work, particularly using the O(3) electrodynamics subset spearheaded
by Evans, and the models can be tested and verified or falsified.
EINSTEIN'S GENERAL THEORY OF
RELATIVITY
Mathematical theory of
gravitation in which the gravitational force is mathematically described by a
curvature in space or spacetime.
In other words, the geometry and its
dynamics have become physical agents.
It is important to note that, in
general relativity, the curvature of spacetime acts on mass-energy, and changes
in or to mass-energy interact back upon spacetime to change its curvature.
Further, we consider that an exact
pattern of curvatures of spacetime and their dynamics exists for every mass
system and its dynamics. This is the
engine concept. The most general way to
engineer matter is not by brute force translation, but by forming spacetime
engines. Once formed, these engines act
upon any mass placed in the engine region, to eliminate the deltas existing in
that mass's resident engine and the impressed engine. The curvature of spacetime itself furnishes the energy for the
continuing action upon the mass, once we pay to form the engine. The mass can be acted upon at any level,
from its gluons and quarks to its nuclei, to its atoms, its lattice forces and
binding energy, etc. Significantly, the
Sachs theory applies to physical reality from beneath the quarks and gluons to
the entire universe, and folds in quantum mechanics, electrodynamics, and
general relativity into a single unified field theory that is (in theory)
engineerable by higher symmetry electrodynamics means.
ELECTRIC FIELD
The conventional definition is this: "1. a region in space in
which a stationary electric charge experiences a force due to its charge. 2.
the electric force per unit test charge." Dictionary of Science and Technology, ibid., p. 720. That
definition is flawed. Consider the "spatial aspects" of part 1. If an
electric field is defined as a force per unit charge, it is not a region in
massless space but is an effect of something existing in massless space and
interacting with the charged mass. The
electric field prior to interaction
is indeed related to a region in space, because it is identically a curved
spacetime region. In the Sachs
approach, general relativity and electrodynamics have become one and the
same. So prior to interaction, the field as it independently exists prior to
interaction with charge has become a curved spacetime region, and the field
is purely a spacetime curvature
effect. The interaction with mass to produce a force on and of that mass (mass
is a component of force, and there is no such thing as a massless force) is a
separate consideration from the field as it exists in space prior to
interaction. The result of this
entity's interaction with charged mass has nothing to do with what an electric field is; but with what it does to charged mass. Further, the force evidenced on a
charged particle is not due to its charge; it has that charge always, whether
or not there is a net force evidenced on it!
Part 2 is a little better. The only
problem is, it totally disagrees with the entity existing in space prior to
interaction. In other words, here it's
a "force on a charge", which is an effect occurring after the
interaction. Again, it is what the
field does or accomplishes, not what
it is. Hopefully the reader can now begin to see what terrible
difficulties await anyone who seriously attempts foundations definitions.
Feynman sums it up admirably in one of his famous statements: "Everything we know is only some kind of
approximation, therefore, things must be learned only to be unlearned again or,
more likely, corrected." An additional difficulty is that the very notion of a
separate massless force independent of the mass on which it operates, is
fictitious, yet continues to be widely used.
Recalling that any true definition is an identity and not an equation,
let us start with the definition of force:
F º d/dt(mv). As can be seen, force is a system comprised of (i) a mass
component and (ii) a nonmass component. The force is not something separate
from the mass, at all! Further, force is not even unitary. It's a system
comprised of two coupled components; the mass and a coupled (interacting)
gradient in a potential flux. Note that v involves motion through, and
interaction with, the virtual flux comprising the vacuum potential. Note that dv/dt involves a gradient in that flux
interaction with the mass. Unfortunately mechanics is still using the
medieval concept of a "separate force acting upon a separate mass."
That is wrong, unless we change the fundamental definition of force itself.
See, e.g., Robert Bruce Lindsay and Henry Margenau, Foundations of Physics, Dover Publications, New York, 1963, p. 283,
where the authors emphasize that a "field of force" at any point is
actually defined only for the case when a unit mass is present at that
point. The reason can be seen: mass is
a necessary component of force, and without mass present there cannot be a
force present.
ELECTRIC DIPOLE
See Dipole.
ELECTRODYNAMICIST
A specialist in electrodynamics,
...the physics of the relationships
between electric, magnetic, and mechanical phenomena—and especially a
specialist in electrodynamics theory.
It should be pointed out that
essentially all electrodynamicists are versed in U(1) electrodynamics, and a
much smaller number are versed in more advanced electrodynamics such as O(3)
symmetry electrodynamics, unified field theory electrodynamics, non-Abelian
electrodynamics, etc. The
electrodynamics field is actually a very vast field indeed, touching everything
in physics. Very often, when one needs
a particular electrodynamics problem solved, it calls for a special category of
electrodynamicist and not just an electrodynamicist in general. One must therefore sometimes examine the
background of the electrodynamicist making a statement or a pronouncement:
electrodynamicists after all do have differing views and differing disciplines
within the field.
ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE (EMP)
A sharp pulse of electromagnetic
radiation produced when an explosion occurs in an unsymmetrical environment,
especially at or near the earth's surface or at high altitudes.
Essentially the same as an
electromagnetic shock wave, a wave of great intensity which results when waves
with different intensities propagate with different velocities in a nonlinear
optical medium. An EMP is also produced
when two intense longitudinal scalar electrostatic potential wave patterns meet
and couple into a sudden flash of vector EM energy.
ELECTROMAGNETIC SMOG
The background of extremely weak
EM radiation that fills the normal modern environment, particularly in
developed nations.
The individual signals are too weak
to individually produce effects of any significance in biological systems. However, in a dense EM smog environment with
500,000 signals per square meter per second, the signal complex and its
nonlinearity begin to produce highly nonlinear effects in biological
systems. These effects also produce
damage that may cumulate over a long period of time, including for years. This bioeffects area has largely not been
investigated by EM bioeffects scientists.
It should be pointed out that
electric lines, telephone lines, transmission lines, etc. act as long wire
antennas to detect and propagate such very weak EM signal noise. Essentially all the radiators in the
environment—including electronics equipment, TV stations, radio stations,
factory machinery, etc.—thus produce very weak signals picked up by these long
line antennas and piped into every home, factory, neighborhood, etc.
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE (EMF)
A
difference of potential created by sources of electrical energy—i.e., by
separated charges (dipoles)—which can be utilized to drive electrical currents
through external circuits. Also, open
circuit voltage, or the limit of the potential difference between the source's
terminals as the current in the external circuit approaches zero.
Poorly named. Also quite confused in the standard theory and usage. First, emf is not a force at all. It is a difference in potential, hence it is measured in volts. Also, it is not considered an E-field, since that is a field of force. Yet it is in fact a , restricted to the direction between the two measurement points, and is considered to be an E-field in the theory!
For this reason the standard theorists say that the term is sometimes used as equivalent to a difference in potential, but that strictly speaking it should be applied only to a source of electrical energy! The problem is that conventional theorists are unaware that a potential is a bidirectional flow of energy in 3-space, where the energy enters from the time-domain (complex plane). Since they are unaware that a potential is hidden negentropic energy flow process involving broken 3-symmetry and viable 4-symmetry, the theorists are unable to consider the potential in general as a source of energy flow. Yet they are forced to consider a potential difference across the terminals of a source as "somehow a flow of energy, that generates forces upon the electrons to propel them through the circuit as current flow."
In
the new viewpoint, a resolution is achieved of these incongruities by more
accurately defining the E-field with respect to the potential as E [q]/q. It is noted that [dA/dt]q/q also produces an E-field, so
that the full definition of the E-field is as E [(+dA/dt)q]/q. However, one volt represents one joule (of excess energy) per
coulomb of charge. The energy density flow in an electric circuit is in the voltage, in
the emf, and it is not in the current per se. The electron current (drift current) carries the excess energy
that is being dissipated as work in the circuit, but in a nominal circuit the
drift current only moves a few inches per hour. Half the energy is dissipated in the external circuit and
external losses, and half is dissipated in forcing spent electrons in the
ground return line back up through the back-emf of the source, performing work
inside the source to dissipate its separation of charges. Left alone, any dipole will furnish emf
indefinitely, freely receiving the energy from the time domain (complex plane)
and outputting it in 3-space. The free
flow of EM energy will continue unabated from the undestroyed dipole,
regardless of how many external loads and losses are powered (how much energy
is collected and dissipated from the ongoing flows representing the
potential). So electrical circuits
should be developed which allow little or no electrons to be forced back up
through the dipole to dissipate its separation of charges and destroy the
dipole.
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE, BACK (BACK EMF)
Back emf is a loose term used for the counter-electromotive force.
When the source is powering a circuit or
circuit element, the term "back emf" is used to refer to the forcing
of current (electrons) back up through the source against its emf, thereby
performing work inside the source to dissipate its separation of charges (its
dipolarity). When a potential source of
electrical energy—such as a capacitor, an inductor, or a rotating machine—is
receiving energy from the source and converting it to dissipative power and
work, that "powered" device is said to develop a counter-emf. A source has a
built-in emf a priori, that is
holding its charges separated so that it is dipolar. When electron current is forced backwards through the source
through its built-in counter-emf, and backwards against its emf, work is
performed against the internal resistance of the source to dissipate its
separation of charges, thereby dissipating the source. If electron current is not allowed to flow
back up through the source against its back emf and through its built-in
counter-emf, no dissipation of the source occurs, even though energy density
(not electron current dq/dt but energy flow d/dt) is flowing from the source and can
be collected in collectors in the external circuit to store the energy
as a created local energy source. This collected energy can then be shuttled to
a separate load circuit and released, to provide a "heat pump"
cycling operation and overunity coefficient of performance.
Nikola Tesla in fact knew how to shuttle
energy in a circuit in such fashion, as Barrett's quaternion analysis of
Tesla's actual patented circuits has revealed.
[See T.W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear
Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis
de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41.]
Note that a rigorous analysis of those same circuits, using tensors or
vectors, will not show the effect.
When the original source dipole is not
dissipated because electron current is not passed back up through its back-emf
to scatter the charges, the original source dipole will continue to furnish emf
indefinitely.
The terms emf and counter-emf are
normally applied only to recognized sources of electricity. Emf is applied as the algebraic sum of the
potential differences acting in a circuit attached to a source. Back-emf (counter-emf) is applied as the
potential difference internally through the source, between its terminals. Its main application is thought to be a powered device or component in the circuit. Actually, its main application is to prevent
COP>1.0 electrical power systems from being developed and utilized.
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY (EMG)
A diagnostic application which detects
changes in electrical potentials associated with muscle contractions.
Specific electrical patterns have been
associated with specific abnormal states (e.g., denervated muscle), but the
method has not yet been systematically developed beyond this application.
ELECTRON
Stable elementary particle in all
atoms, and having a negative charge of 1.602´10-19 coulombs, spin ½, and mass of 9.11´10-31 kilograms.
ELECTRON GAS
A system of electrons with only weak interactions so that the electrons may be regarded as moving independently.
Thus,
in many ways, that collection of electrons can be treated as a gas. Also see discussion under Drude Electron Gas.
ELECTRO-OPTICS
A technology in which electrons are
focused and steered as if they were light.
Examples are the cathode ray tube (CRT) and the electron microscope.
ELECTRO-POLLUTION
Also called electromagnetic smog and electronic
smog. The conglomerate or maze of
EM fields and radiations that are produced by technologies such as electric
power transmission and radio transmission, and that can have long term
cumulative harmful effects on humans.
The new viewpoint dramatically extends
the types of fields and effects involved, and gives entirely new mechanisms for
the interaction of EM fields and radiation with biological systems, including
cumulative effects, signal-density effects, and vacuum engine effects. A mechanism for long term causation of
cancer and leukemia by electro-pollution is derivable in the new approach.
As an example, even though the myriad of
very weak EM signals comprising the electro-pollution are individually tiny,
each when interacting at a local site with the body or its cells involves a
broken 3-symmetry and thus an involvement of 4-symmetry, with corresponding
giant negentropy. Further, the
Heaviside dark energy component accompanying that local field interaction will
in turn interact with essentially all the other locations of the body. Each of these interactions involves broken
3-symmetry and involvement of 4-symmetry.
The result of the large complex of broken 4-symmetries constitutes a direct
structuring in the time domain, hence weak time-pumping and weak time-charging. Time charge excitation decays only very
slowly, emitting longitudinal EM waves inside the body as the charge decays.
Over a long period of time (sometimes
years), this "time-hash" or "time-jamming" upon the
operation of the master cellular control system, the immune system, and the
cellular regeneration system is cumulatively detrimental. In this way, effects such as leukemia,
cancer, etc. may be gradually "kindled". However, there have been no real scientific laboratory
"cause and effect" investigations of this phenomenology at all. Nonetheless, the results will and do show in
epidemiology studies, which are then attacked by orthodox scientists (many
employed directly or indirectly by the power industry, etc.) on the grounds
that no laboratory cause and effect evidence has been shown.
In short, this is one of the areas where
the lack of scientific cause and effect laboratory evidence—because such
experiments have not even been done—is improperly used to negate real
scientific work showing deleterious effects that powerful interests do not wish
shown.
ELECTRO-RETINOGRAPHY (ERG)
A diagnostic application that monitors
changes in electrical potentials across the retina to assess eye
movements.
This is almost the only method available
for noninvasive monitoring of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep.
ELECTROSTATIC COOLING
To be added
ELECTROSTATIC SCALAR POTENTIAL
A static (stationary) ordering in
the virtual photon flux of vacuum.
The word "static" is
unfortunate and should be replaced by "stationary", since the
underlying active vacuum medium is always in violent motion, and there is
nothing truly "static" in the universe. But an equilibrium condition can exist, even in violent motion,
so that a stationary entity persists.
An example is a perfect whirlpool in a river.
ELF
Extremely Low Frequency.
Used to describe EM fields whose
frequencies lie in the range from just above 0 Hz (direct current) to 300
Hz. This includes power line
frequencies (60 Hz in U.S. and 50 Hz in Europe) and frequencies used by certain
U.S. military ELF communication systems such as for submerged submarines.
EM
Electromagnetics.
EMF
Electromotive force. See discussion
under that term.
EM FIELD
Electromagnetic field. In its loose usage, it refers in a very
broad way to any field, force, or energy associated with electromagnetic
interactions, charges and currents.
Thus "EM field" includes
electrostatic fields, magnetostatic fields, electromagnetic fields (including
radiation and induction), vector-potential and scalar-potential fields, Hertz
potentials, Fitzgerald potentials, Whittaker potentials, etc.
In its precise usage, "EM
field" conventionally refers to an EM "force" field, such as the
E-field, D-field, B-field, H-field. In classical electromagnetics (CEM), as a holdover from the old
assumption of a material ether, the force fields are considered (erroneously)
to exist in mass-free space, and they are also considered to be the primary
causes of electromagnetic phenomena.
This is a non sequitur, and it involves substituting the effect for the
cause.
In the new viewpoint, the force fields do
not exist in vacuum, but only in and on and of the charged particles
themselves, where mass is present to form one component of the force. The force fields are therefore effects and
not primary causes. The primary causes
of all electromagnetic phenomena is taken to be the potentials; however, the
hidden Stoney/Whittaker/Ziolkowski internal structures of gradient-free scalar
potentials may interfere to cause potential gradients in and on charged
particle systems. This therefore
includes distance-free scalar potential interferometry and action at a
distance, as well as vacuum engines.
The new view uses Sachs' unified field
theory, and considers that the EM field in the vacuum, or an EM potential in
the vacuum, is a curvature of spacetime function. Thus the new view is a unified field theory where GR has become
EM and EM has become GR, and where EM can involve or produce gravitational,
temporal, and inertial effects as well.
EM FORCE FIELD IN THE VACUUM (A FALSE
CONCEPT)
The erroneous notion that there
exist forces in the vacuum, so that the set of forces at a set of spatial
points forms a force field.
This ignores the fact that mass is a
component of force, and the presence of a force requires the presence of a
mass. When Maxwell formed his electrodynamics theory, he and almost everyone
else believed that a thin material ether pervaded empty space. Thus there was a
"material medium" in which electromagnetic fields existed, and so it
followed that real forces existed in this material medium, from point to point.
Indeed, to the early electrodynamicists there was no point in all the universe
where mass was absent.
Heaviside, Hertz, and Gibbs reduced
Maxwell's 20 quaternion equations to the present four vector equations, but did
not change the force field in space
assumption used by Maxwell. Heaviside detested the "mystical"
potentials favored by Maxwell, and believed they were figments of one's
imagination. He regarded the forces as the primary EM causes.
Yet even while Heaviside et al. were retranslating and
topologically reducing Maxwell's theory dramatically, the Michelson-Morley
experiment in the 1880s had already destroyed the material ether on which those
same force fields were based.
Physicists, however, have continued
to use the notion of a separate force acting on a separate mass, which of
course is also a non sequitur, substituting effect for cause yet again. Hence the foundations of physics remain
fundamentally fouled.
For a succinct discussion of
potentials versus forcefields as the primary EM causes, see Y. Aharonov and D.
Bohm, "Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum
Theory," Physical Review, Second
Series, 115(3), 1959, p. 485-491.
See also Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, "Further considerations on
electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory," Physical Review, 123(4), Aug. 15, 1961, p. 1511-1524.
EM GENERATRIX
Whatever generates
electromagnetics, particularly the fields.
Time is the ultimate EM generatrix.
Whittaker showed in 1904 that the
interferometry of two scalar potentials (i.e., of their hidden multiwave
structures) can create all classical EM fields, no matter how complex, thereby
starting a branch of electrodynamics known as superpotential theory. See
E. T. Whittaker, “On an
Expression of the Electromagnetic Field Due to Electrons by Means of Two Scalar
Potential Functions,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p.
367-372. The paper was published in
1904 and orally delivered in 1903.
In 1903 Whittaker showed that any
scalar potential (e.g. between the ends of a dipole) can be decomposed into a
harmonic set of phase conjugate EM longitudinal wavepairs. The present author applied the Whittaker
decomposition to the scalar potential between the ends of a dipole, and pointed
out that the conjugate half-set may be taken as converging EM waves from the
complex plane (the time domain), while the real half-set may be taken as
diverging EM longitudinal waves emitted from the dipole in all directions in 3-space. The dipole is a known broken 3-symmetry in
the dipole's violent virtual energy exchange with the vacuum; hence this shows
that breaking 3-spatial symmetry allows nature to fall back to a more primary
4-symmetry. Hence energy flow
conservation is violated in 3-space, but is rigorously obeyed in 4-space. Further, the free flow of 3-spatial energy
from the dipole continues so long as the dipole exists.
The dipole thus is a true negative
resistor, receiving EM energy in unusable form (from the complex plane; i.e.,
the time domain), transforming it into usable energy, and outputting the usable
energy. This is also the fundamental
mechanism for extracting unlimited EM energy from the seething vacuum, taking
the energy from the time domain via the giant negentropy mechanism. See my paper, "Giant Negentropy from
the Common Dipole," ibid.
This also means that the source of
all EM 3-spatial energy is from the time domain, and is due to broken
3-symmetry. The ultimate EM generatrix
is thus time. The ability of a bit of
broken 3-symmetry (such as formation of a simple dipole) to initiate a continuing and ongoing flow of
free EM energy via the 4-symmetry between time-energy and spatial energy, means
that negentropic engineering, once we
get the hang of it, is far easier than our present entropic engineering. In
essence, we have to learn how to do electrical engineering all over again, from
a much more fundamental point of departure.
EMI (ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE)
Disturbances of electronic equipment's
operation by intrusion of extraneous EM signals from outside sources. Also, disturbances of the operation of one
or more subsystems of an electronic system by intrusion of undesired signals
from other subsystems.
EMI, ANOMALOUS
An "ad hoc" term denoting an unexpected
nonlinear optical functioning process in a dense signal environment whereby
nonlinearities on the skin of a vehicle or cover of an equipment become pumped
phase conjugate mirrors, so that they emit amplified phase conjugate replicas
(PCRs)—of signals and fields impinging upon the skin or covering and the
nonlinearity from electronic circuitry operating inside.
By the distortion correction theorem,
these amplified PCRs precisely backtrack the signal waves that impinged
upon the phase conjugate mirror from inside the vehicle or electronics, back to
the original source of the internal signal.
The result is the scavenging of energy from the dense electronic signal
environment and sharply focusing and directing it into the operating circuits
of the internal electronics. Thus
internal signals, often amplified, start sporadically appearing through the
circuits. These sporadic jamming
signals due to the anomalous EMI effect are known as EMI fireflies.
Such EMI fireflies were resoundingly
experienced in U.S. missiles and aircraft in the U.S. air attack on Libya in
1986. Although some of the anomalous
EMI effects could have been produced by the unusually dense EM signal
environment and poor hardening of circuits and electronics, it is believed that
the weak jamming was also a test being conducted of a laboratory prototype
Russian quantum potential weapon.
This weapon appears to have been finished
and deployed at the end of 1989, and then utilized against Allied forces in the
Gulf War, accounting for the Gulf War Disease.
We have previously explained why British, Canadian, and American
soldiers acquired the disease, why the native populace did not, and why the
French troops did not.
Inside the human body, the anomalous EMI
effects may be used to produce time-charging and delayed interference with the
immune system, the master cellular control system, and the cellular
regeneration system. By using
dimensioned signals, the targeted systems can be specifically and deterministically
affected as desired, for any set of disease damage types and symptomology
desired. So the technology may be used
to induce a "cocktail" mix of various infectious disease damage
types. The induced time-charging
effects—where the time-charge is dimensioned—followed by longitudinal EM wave
emissions from the time-charges as they decay in the veteran's body, can induce
the same or similar symptoms and damage in close family members exposed to the
weak but dimensioned longitudinal EM radiation. This applies not only to wives but also to family members such as
children often in close proximity to the veteran. In addition, exchange of bodily fluids from the veteran to his
spouse can directly induce the symptoms in the spouse since those fluids are
themselves still time-charged (with dimensioned time charge) and slowly
decaying.
ENDOTHERMIC EXPLOSION
An EM implosion, resulting in explosive
electrostatic cooling. The sudden,
explosive reversal of electromagnetic energy scattering in a spacetime area so
that the local EM heat energy is converted back to a negative potential. In this manner, explosive electrostatic
cooling occurs in the area.
Endothermic EM explosion occurs by pulsed
scalar Whittaker interference of two longitudinal EM wavesets beamed from
two LW EM transmitters. The distant
transmitters of the LW interferometer must have their local electrical grounds
biased well below the ambient zero potential in the distant interference zone
(IZ). Whittaker internal EM waves
radiate through subspace (the LW superhighways inside EM fields, potentials,
and waves in mass) from the transmitter to the interference zone, and also from
the interference zone back to the negatively biased transmitter/receiver,
emerging there as ordinary electromagnetic scattering energy or heat.
All normal explosions are
exothermic in nature, and ordinary electromagnetic heat energy is radiated
away. A scalar EM interferometer/howitzer, however, may produce an endothermic
explosion (an energy implosion) at a distance, explosively extracting the heat
energy at the implosion site and receiving the energy back at the transmitter
site for disposal.
The same LW interferometer can also
produce an exothermic explosion in the distant interference zone, merely by
positively biasing the electrical chassis grounds of the scalar EM potential
transmitters and pulsing the transmission.
Negative biasing of the transmitters' electrical chassis grounds and a
pulsed transmission result in an endothermic explosion in the distant interference
zone.
ENDOTHERMIC LONGITUDINAL EM WAVE
INTERFEROMETRY
Extraction of EM energy from a distant
intersection area by a scalar interferometry whose electrical grounding is
biased well below the ambient potential in the distant interference zone.
The result is a cooling of the
interference zone, and heat energy emerging at the transmitters.
ENERGETICS
The Russian term for what I have
called advanced higher-symmetry electromagnetics,
...using artificially constructed
Whittaker internal biwave structures to make activated potentials that have specific,
desired "vacuum engines", where the EM field is a curvature of
spacetime function, and thus involving a unified field theory that is
engineerable by novel electrodynamic means.
I believe that the closest Western
work approaching the Russian energetics science is the O(3) higher symmetry
electrodynamics pioneered by Evans, particularly when combined with Sachs'
unified field theory as an important subset.
The other closest Western work would seem to be the important work of
Barrett in SU(2)´SU(2) symmetry electrodynamics.
The activated potential containing
the infolded vacuum engine structures is said to have been dimensioned. These dimensioned potentials can be combined to form
EM carrier waves which contain the hidden vacuum engines. These vacuum engines,
scalar Whittaker EM interferometry, and activation of vacua and matter are used
to perform unified field engineering.
Russian energetics also adds the
formation and use of the quantum potential, enabling
(i) instantaneous action at a distance with multiple separated target nodes,
(ii) essentially limitless direct energy amplification in the assembly of
receiving nodes, without additional energy input at the initiating node, and
(iii) engineering of hidden variables inside distant targets, instantaneously,
without transmission as such through
space. The quantum potential itself can be dimensioned,
so that vacuum engines can be instantaneously transmitted into distant targets,
altering their local spacetimes to contain the desired engine(s). Note that no
intervening barrier can "impede" or "shield" a quantum
potential because it does not travel through space as such; it just appears
everywhere at once in the space where it will be.
Adding to classical EM theory,
general relativity, and quantum mechanics the internal EM energy in the scalar
EM potential will generate a superset of each discipline. These three new
supersets are unified in their common internal EM energy subset. As a bonus
mind, personality, memory, and deep biological cellular and system control are
also available, since the internal time-energy domain is used by biological
systems for these living functions. Energetics thus is an engineerable, unified
field theory of physics and metaphysics.
Russian energetics is largely still
a "secret" science, developed over the last five decades and highly
weaponized. In the Russian scheme the overall area is called energetics. It consists of three
subsets: (i) energetics, which
applies to nonliving systems, (ii) bioenergetics,
which applies to the physical bodies, cells, chemistry, genetics, etc. of
living organisms, and
(iii) psychoenergetics, which applies
directly to the minds, personalities, memories, emotions, and perceptions of
living systems. Russian energetics
research, development, weapons, and weapon sites are under the rigid control
and operation of the KGB, by whatever name it may use from time to time. The energetics weapons are not in the
regular Russian armed forces.
Energetics weapons have been tested worldwide for several decades, and
this testing has been documented elsewhere by the present author.
ENERGY
Usually erroneously defined as
the "capacity to do work".
The closest definition is: The invariance of that which is varying. Note that this is a 5-law logic definition
and not an Aristotelian definition.
Here we have a real bucket of worms.
This term is usually totally misdefined (as in the nostrum that "energy is
the capacity to work") in physics, which defines energy as the
"ability to scatter itself or change its own form" which obviously
are not identities! A common definition is given as "a quantity that
describes the capacity to do work; commonly divided into three major
classifications: kinetic (dynamic) energy, potential (static) energy, and
radiant (electromagnetic) energy. Well,
energy can be changed in form and that is work. But energy is not the "capacity to change its own
form", but is its own form, as can be seen.
Anyway, we'll have a go at a
definition perhaps a little more acceptable, though still imperfect. Then we'll discuss things a bit.
Rigorously, energy is any deterministic
or coherent structuring, either dynamic or stationary, existing in the virtual
particle flux of vacuum. While that sounds good, it is still "the invariance of that which is
varying." Ultimately, a thing is
defined in terms of its appositive.
The type
of energy depends upon the type of virtual particle(s) whose flux is
selected. E.g., electromagnetic energy
is a deterministic or coherent structuring, either dynamic or stationary, in
the virtual photon flux of
vacuum. Any trapped energy (ordering in
the vacuum virtual particle flux) is gravitational in nature, since trapped
energy is gravitational. In a mass,
e.g., it is the trapped energy that is gravitational, not the mass per se, in
the modern view. Contrast the
definition of electromagnetic energy to the definition of an electrostatic
scalar potential (ESSP): The electrostatic scalar potential is a
stationary trapped deterministic or
coherent dynamic wave-structuring of the virtual photon flux of vacuum. Thus it can be seen that the ESSP is a
special case of EM energy: the stationary trapped case. For this reason, a mass—which is an
enormous amount of statically trapped EM energy—may properly be considered as
an extremely dense EM potential, which we refer to as the mass potential.
A
potential is any trapped ordering or coherence, either static or dynamic, in
the virtual particle flux of vacuum. A
specific type of potential represents a selection of a particular virtual
particle's flux in the vacuum, and an ordering—either static or dynamic—imposed
in that flux.
However,
since the scalar potential is just the static ordering in the virtual particle
flux of vacuum, it follows that the scalar potential must contain—and in fact
be totally composed of—internal order. E. T. Whittaker showed the form of that
order in 1904. (See entry under
Whittaker, E. T.) The scalar potential
is composed of a harmonic series of pairs of antiparallel transverse
waves. The antiwave of each
wave/antiwave pair is a time reversed replica of the wave in that pair. In other words, the scalar potential is a
special type of Fourier harmonic frequency expansion, coupled with its own
phase conjugate present simultaneously.
Feynman said it bluntly: "It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge
of what energy is." [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and
Matthew Sands, Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p.
4-2.]
E.g., particularly see R. B.
Lindsay, "The concept of energy and its early historical
development." Foundations of
Physics, 1(4), 1971, p. 383-393. Lindsay investigates the concept of energy
from its early historical origin. The root of the concept is the notion of invariance in the midst of change.
Lindsay covers the concept and its evolvement (or lack thereof!) from ancient
times through the 18th century.
The real problem is that the notion
of energy implicitly involves the age-old unresolved philosophical problem of
change, posed by Heraclitus over 3,000 years ago and unresolved to this day. It cannot be solved within the realm of
3-law Aristotelian logic! One way
of posing it is something like this, after Heraclitus: "For a thing to
change, it must turn into something else. How can a thing be itself and
something else also? How can a thing have changed, and yet not have
changed?"
The problem is that Aristotelian
logic has a serious flaw of omission; it actually implicitly assumes a fourth law, which is the age-old philosopher's
nightmare that, when a thing is pursued to the limit, it invariably turns into its own opposite. So in anguish the
philosophers spoke of this nightmare as the "accursed necessity for the
identity of opposites."
I did resolve the philosophers'
nightmare some years ago, by adding a fourth law of logic to the Aristotelian
three, which completes and extends Aristotelian logic, and an application rule
which can be taken as a fifth law.
E.g., see Appendix III: "A Conditional Criterion for Identity,
Leading to a Fourth Law of Logic," in T. E. Bearden, AIDS: Biological Warfare, Tesla Book Company, Chula Vista,
California, 1988, p. 428-443. A simple proof of the fourth law is given in that
paper. For a much more elegant treatment of a higher topology logic, which is
also practical and useful beyond the limitations of Aristotelian logic, see G.
Spencer Brown, Laws of Form. Julian
Press, New York, 1972. For a proper perspective on mathematics and on
Aristotelian logic, see Morris Kline, Mathematics:
The Loss of Certainty, Oxford University Press, New York, 1980.
It may be that, since by
"identity" we mean at least the identity of "left" and
"right" different observations, considering the left and right sides
of the identity statement. If so, then
already we involve a violation of Aristotelian logic in the very notion of
"definition". In short,
ultimately we can only define a thing in terms of an appositive in the first
place. So we write an identity
statement where left and right are different sides, then state "Oh, no,
they are the same thing after all!"
Said in that manner, the problem can clearly be seen. In one sense a definition is pure Zen, where
no truth can be stated at all unless the speaker says two exactly opposing
things, and then waits for the recipient to realize the truth that has been
stated.
What this all means is that, since
"energy" (and any other definition, ultimately) involves a logical
contradiction in Aristotelian logic, we must "define" energy simultaneously in an appositive
ways: (i) in the wave view and (ii) in the particle view. However, we point out
that the notion of a "moving particle" is the notion of something
considered momentarily as fixed (i.e., the particle), but which is immediately
thereafter (in time snapshot #2) considered as moving. Notice that
"moving" is changing, and so it involves Heraclitus' problem of
change a priori. The notion of a "moving wave" is
also a similar thing; i.e., "a wave" momentarily considers the entity
as static and not changing (in time snapshot #1), and in the next moment (time
snapshot #2) considers it as moving (changing). We can only point out this
dichotomy for the reader to reflect upon and hopefully to grasp. The conscious mind is a serial processor; it
is extremely fast but still perceives snapshot by snapshot, serially. It essentially has been fitted to the single
photon interaction, as has Aristotle's three laws of logic. The problem is
in the operation of conscious perception itself, not in nature which is not
limited to just serial processing.
The unconscious mind is a massively
parallel processor, so it can have many "different slides or snapshots in
the slide projector" at the same time. So with our conscious mind's
perception (Aristotelian logic is just a model of that, using single photon interaction
as the physical observation mechanism) we see in terms of
"either-or". On the other hand, with our unconscious we can also
grasp the fact that single snapshot A can be the same thing as a totally
different snapshot B, if the rules of "decision as to identity" are
changed between snapshot A and snapshot B. Suppose that by "identity"
we mean "incapable of being discriminated between." Is a black marble
identical to a red marble, e.g.? It is
perceived so if you are color blind. It is perceived not to be identical if you
are not color blind. The point is
something that most philosophers missed or brushed aside: identity is not
absolute, but is "perceived identity". Identity is the result of a decision operation, based on multiple
perceptions, recall from memory, and comparison of two remembered
perceptions. The most simple form of
comparison is simple subtraction.
The unconscious (massively parallel)
perception can handle both snapshots simultaneously. The conscious mind only
can see a single marble at a time, so it will see one or the other. In a third time interval it will recall from
memory the first perception, compare it with the memory of the second
perception (say, by simple detailed subtraction), and then decide whether
object A is perceived to be identical to object B. The unconscious (massively
parallel processor) can handle both the marble snapshots at the same time. It
can see both the identity of the two, to a color-blind "identity decision
process" and also the nonidentity of the two, to a color-sensitive
"identity decision process." Again, nature is not limited to the
single-snapshot, serial perception process of our conscious (serial) processor!
Unfortunately, in physics and
mathematics we seem to still be thoroughly confused on this very perception
issue. Brown's work may be the first work to straighten out the area of the
topology of the logic utilized. My own independent effort was successful but
far cruder than Brown's; Brown did it elegantly. We bring all this out because
when one deeply looks into foundations and true definitions, one will directly
confront the philosopher's nightmare and one's own conscious mind will never be
able to resolve the problem. One's unconscious can resolve it, but it requires
a certain "stretching of the realization" to harmonize monocular
perception of the conscious mind with multiocular perception of the unconscious
mind.
Just as a small example, the
question of "is it a wave or a particle" once raged as a great debate
in physics, and was never resolved.
Instead, physicists just finally shook hands and agreed to quit arguing
and fighting about it, and agreed to accept that the same entity could
sometimes act as a particle, and in other cases it could act as a wave, and
that as it existed in the present, before
observation, it was somehow both a wave and a particle but we couldn't see
its true nation (in that fashion). The key, of course, is that the question was
posed in "either-or" form (Aristotelian logic form), and it cannot be
answered in that reduced logic. Instead, a higher topology logic is required.
Brown's logic answers it easily, as does my own four law superset of
Aristotelian logic (five law superset if we count the application rule as a
separate law). In the present, e.g., we have masstime and not mass. Just after
a photon is emitted, we have mass and not masstime. The latter photon emission
process consummates "observation." The point is, the true entity does
exist in zero time as a spatial entity.
It is not a spatial entity but is a spatiotemporal entity. If the
"interaction" process tears off its "time-tail," it is
converted to a "spatial entity" (frozen snapshot) and therefore seems
to be a particle. If the "interaction" process does not remove the
time-tail, it remains a spatiotemporal entity and therefore seems to be a wave.
The concept of particle is 3-spatial
concept. The concept of wave involves time also. No wave can exist and "be
a wave or wavelike" unless it has some time extension to "be
waving" in!
The physicists debating the
wave-particle duality, you see, missed the most important point that no observable exists in time or persists, a
priori. Hence rigorously no
particle exists in time.
So we define energy (particle view)
as any virtual particle flux pattern, where that definition automatically
considers a single particle in translation as well as multiple particles in
their myriad of translations. We define energy (wave view) as any wave flux,
where that automatically considers a single wave in translation as well as
multiple waves in their myriad of translations. Now note that one is going to
have to deal with, and discriminate between, energy, energy flow, energy
collection, and collected-energy dissipation.
As the reader can see, whenever one
struggles with foundations issues, the problems get very complicated. We've beat this dead horse quite enough, and
leave the further beating to the reader!
ENERGY AMPLIFYING COIL
A coil whose magnetic energy flow
input is first split into two energy flow inputs, each equal to the original
energy flow available from a magnetic source.
Both the split energy flows then interact simultaneously with the coil,
amplifying its electrical energy output compared to the conventional case where
only a single energy flow interacts with the coil.
In the motionless electromagnetic
generator (MEG), the curl of the magnetic vector potential of a permanent
magnet (i.e., its magnetic field), is extracted and held within the core
material of a special transformer, while the magnetic vector potential of the
permanent magnet is freely replenished in uncurled (field-free) magnetic vector
potential form in space around the core material. Both the full magnetic field in the core and the full uncurled
magnetic vector potential in space adjacent to the core interact with each
output coil of the transformer. Hence a
single potential energy flow is "split" into two flows each equal to
the original EM energy flow, and both the parallel flows energetically interact
with the output coil. This increases
the energy interacting with the coil by this "dual interaction", so
that the coil is said to be an "energy amplifying coil".
ENERGY COLLECTION/COLLECTING
In electromagnetics, exposure of
an interceptor/collector, e.g., a charged particle, into an impinging EM energy
flow, so that some of the flow is diverted around the intercepting
particle. We may say that the flow of
energy has been "reordered" in a stream around the diverting charge.
Energy collection is not a thing
which "has been accomplished" and finished; instead, it is an ongoing
process.
Note now that, if you perform or
consider or impose any sort of ordering at all in the energy flow/flux,
rigorously you have just implied an energy
collection/collecting process. The energy part of a photon, e.g., would
seem not to be "energy" per se. Instead, it is an energy
collection/collecting, and a time collection/collecting as well. Yet that
energy part is energy also! [Not to worry! Energy and energy-collecting,
contrasted as appositives, become identities at the extreme boundary separating
the two concepts. That boundary is the photon concept. Aristotelian logic does
not apply on the boundary, which violates the Aristotelian law of the excluded
middle.] More reasonably, a charged capacitor does not have "stored
energy" per se in it, in the sense of "so many chunks of energy
called joules". Instead, it has an
ongoing energy collection/collecting
process, where the asymmetry in the local vacuum flux exchange, of the
dipole across the capacitor plates, continually extracts and "gates"
a flow of EM energy from the capacitor dipole. That energy-flow bathes all the
trapped charges in the capacitor. The energy-flow interaction with the trapped
charges creates the
E-field and all the rest.
The diverted part of the total
energy flow, is what is calculated in the "Poynting flow" or
S-flow.
ENERGY, DISINTEGRATED
An ad hoc term for the energy of the incoherent virtual
particles in the virtual particle flux.
ENERGY DISSIPATION
Refers to the scattering or
disordering of energy.
This is somewhat of a misnomer,
broadly used in physics and somewhat erroneous.
Energy dissipation" per se does not mean that the energy is
destroyed. Instead, there is the
dissipation of the ordering (collected/collecting)
of energy in which the diversion (local ordering) process disappears. What we
call the "dissipation in space" of energy is rigorously the
dissipation of the collection/collecting in space of the energy. In short, the energy is scattered, as in a
resistive load, in all directions. But
it is still there in space, just disordered.
Recall that all EM energy at a
dipolarity comes directly from the time domain. It is the collecting process, not the energy, that is dissipated
from a point or a region. Only collected/collecting
of energy can be truly dissipated. With that understood, then dissipation of
collected energy is simply removing the "collector" from the energy
density flow impinging upon it to cause the collecting process to occur, or
removing the flow of energy impinging upon the collector so that it intercepts
and diverges some of it around itself.
So there are two ways in which this
"collected energy" dissipation can occur: (i) the collector is moved
out of the impinging energy-flow-stream, or (ii) the energy-flow-stream
impinging on the collector is reduced to zero. Note that "changing the
form" of the energy—i.e., changing the collector and the type of
collecting—involves both conditions (i) and (ii). Thus energy is dissipated
when the collector/collecting form is
changed. In the conventional, less accurate statement, work is performed when
"the form of the energy is changed." That now should be stated as
"work is performed when the collector in the energy-flow-stream is changed
to a different collector, because the first collector must be removed from the
energy-flow-stream or the energy-flow-stream must be removed from it.
In physics we also consider that
"positive" work by a body is work it does on something else, while
"negative" work is work done upon the body by something else. We
specifically emphasize that collection/collecting need not be a unitary,
one-time occurrence! The EM energy-flow impinging upon a collector roars on by
it at something like the speed of light. The entire flow is diminished by only
about 10-13 (the nominal
energy collecting fraction) as it flows onto, and on beyond a coulomb of
charge. If that departing energy-flow is then retroreflected or otherwise returned to pass back through again,
additional energy collection/collecting can and does occur from it. This can be
repeated many times, particularly in an intensely-scattering, optically active
material. Also, after the collected
fraction of energy is dissipated, we can also retroreflect the scattered energy
flow back and reuse it again. This too can be repeated many times.
So we must be careful of the present
work-energy theorem, which is a
special case and assumes only a single pass of the energy-flow in the
"collection/collection" of energy that "changes form." If
we institute additional passes, with additional "collection/collecting of
energy, then we can collect and "use" a little more energy from all
that enormous energy-flow that otherwise would escape us. If we dissipate some
of the collected energy, then also intercept the departing dissipated energy
flow and return it, we can collect some of the energy flow again and then dissipate that new collection again. And so
on.
One
can permissibly get many joules of "work" from a single joule of
energy by iterative retroreflection, iterative re-collection, and iterative dissipation,
without violating the conservation of energy law. This is one of the major secrets of overunity energy
processes. It is proven by the overunity or excess emission (Letokhov was
forced to call it "negative absorption of the medium" from an intensely
scattering, optically active medium, as in the Lawandy experiment and in his
patented process for lasing without population inversion. It is also proven by
Patterson's adaptation of anti-Stokes emission.
Let's do a gedanken (thought)
experiment, where we do not even apply the nominal 10-13
energy collection fraction. Let's just conventionally say "energy
flow," "energy collection," and "energy dissipation,"
and ignore the "collection fraction." Since we are talking
theoretically, we can have a perfect system.
So we have a closed system, which we open to input some energy into. The
system then opens in the load to dissipate all the energy back to the
environment, thereby doing work. Now suppose I passively (i.e., without any
input energy of my own, by perfect retroreflection) return all the dissipated
energy back to the input once again. We simply let it flow back in, the system
collects it again, and then dissipates it again—giving us the same amount of
work we had the first time. Then we do it again. And again. I think you get the
picture. The fact that energy can neither be created or destroyed, but only
changed, means that the "same energy" can be recycled over and over. One has to have two different actions: one
that changes the form of the energy so we get some work, and the other that
retroreflects and recovers the dissipated energy (does negative work!) so that
we can recycle it and dissipate it again. In principle, by recycling of energy
one can get many joules of work from a single joule of energy. Nature does it
every day! Every joule of energy formed at the initial "Big Bang," is
still with us. Every joule of it has on the average already performed many
joules of work since then. And as we stated, the anti-Stokes emission process
is a concrete example and demonstration that the energy recycling process can
be accomplished in physical systems, so that the systems permissibly exhibit
COP>1.0.
A most common example is the
replenishment of a potential. E.g., the
magnetic vector potential can be curled as a B-field, and that B-field
can be totally confined inside a toroid, inside a long coil, or in certain
magnetic core materials (as in the motionless electromagnetic generator or MEG
for short). The A-potential will be replenished as fast as you withdraw the
"total B-field" from
it. So outside the toroid or the long
solenoid, you will have as much
A-potential energy as you started
with, and the Aharonov-Bohm effect proves that the energy is there and will
interact with electrons. Meanwhile, in
the trapped B-field you also have
drawn off as much energy as ostensibly the A-potential
contained in the first place.
ENERGY, ELECTROMAGNETIC
Any deterministic or coherent
structuring, either dynamic or static, existing in the virtual photon or
charged particle flux of vacuum.
Note that, since a photon may also be
considered a positron-electron pair, the flux of charged virtual electrons and
positrons is included in the flux of photons.
ENERGY FLOW
The passage of energy, in any
form, in one direction or generally in one direction.
Even though this
"definition" is in error, we now just bypass the unresolved
"observables do not persist" problem and the 4th law nature of change
(e.g., motion) problem and proceed.
Note that this energy flow may be
the overall movement of an omnidirectional energy flux, or it may be the
movement of waves, or both. It may be in the kinetic energy of a moving
mass. If the flow is everywhere the
same, or even approximately the same, we often speak of the entire
"flow" as just "energy." Often energy flow is also
considered to have occurred from a region of more intense energy flux to a
region of less intense energy flux, and vice versa. In other words, energy
divergence or convergence is also considered as energy flow. As can be seen, the usage of the term "energy
flow" is not precisely defined in physics! It isn't going to be, at least
not in ordinary Aristotelian logic terms.
ENERGY FLUX
The passage of energy flow, in
any form, through a unit area, and in any direction (usually all directions).
This includes both passage in a
single direction, or passage in multiple directions at once.
ENERGY, FREE
Any environment or entity which
freely emits, furnishes, or makes available energy which can be either
collected and used as furnished or transduced into usable form and collected
and used to power loads and do useful work.
The word "free" does not
apply to costs, but rather to the source of the energy. Of course the ideal is energy that is both
free for the taking (collecting and using) and also inexpensively taken and
used.
Implicit in the notion of free EM
energy from the vacuum are five key concepts: (1) the local vacuum/spacetime itself is
filled with EM energy of generally unusable form, (2) some sort of organizing
principle is utilized in one part of the circuit or system to cohere the vacuum
energy and transduce it into usable EM form, (3) a gating mechanism is utilized
to divert the vacuum energy in transduced usable EM form from the active vacuum
to the external circuits or load parts of a device, (4) the coherent gated
extra energy available in the external circuits or load parts is intercepted by
those circuits or load parts, couples to them, and potentializes them with
extra EM energy, so that the energy is collected by the system and regauges the
system asymmetrically, and (5) the external circuits or load parts then scatter
or dissipate the coupled extra energy to produce useful work, without
destroying the organizing and gating mechanism that is extracting and
furnishing usable EM energy from the vacuum.
ENERGY SOURCE
A function or entity which
furnished energy.
Since energy cannot be created or
destroyed, there is really no such thing as a "source", though it is
a term commonly used. So called
"energy sources" actually gate energy, changing it from one form to
another. As an example, all 3-space EM
energy is gated into 3-3-space from the time-domain. To the gating entity or "source" of the 3-space EM
energy, there is an input of EM energy flow from the time domain (complex
plane). The source must be a broken
3-symmetry in energy flow, so that more
primary 4-symmetry energy flow applies.
Hence the conservation law applies to the inflow of energy from the time
dimension and the outflow of energy in 3-space.
ENGINEERING, ENTROPIC
Engineering or designing systems and
processes whose operation "spills" or wastes some energy.
Entropic systems—which are the
products of entropic engineering—thus have COP<1.0 and function in
forward-time.
ENGINEERING, NEGENTROPIC
Engineering or designing systems
and processes whose operation freely "receives" excess energy, so
that they output more energy than the operator inputs, the excess being
received from the external environment or other source.
ENTROPY
Thermodynamics term representing
a measure of a system's capacity to undergo spontaneous change. In short, a quantity which measures how
available the energy of a system is for conversion to work.
Entropy is given by dS = dQ/T, where
dS is an infinitesimal change in entropy for a system absorbing an infinitesimal
quantity of head dQ at absolute temperature T. In statistical mechanics,
entropy is a measure of the disorder in a system and is given by S = k lnP + C,
where S is the value of entropy (disorder) for a system in a given state, P is
the probability of that state's occurrence, k is a fixed constant, and C is an
arbitrary constant. Intuitively, the concept of entropy corresponds to the
concept of disorder. We specifically call attention to the fact that the
"S" used in representing entropy is not at all the S used for Poynting flow.
ENTROPY, NEGATIVE (NEGENTROPY)
In a sense, the reversal of
disorder, or reversal of entropy.
Since the normal or forward flow of
time is entropic, negentropy is intimately related with time-reversal. This can be seen crudely this way: As a
physical thing exists in time, it decays, ages, deteriorates, etc. In short, its ordering as a viable separate
thing gets more and more disrupted. If
it is then "reordered" precisely back to its original state, that is
obviously a time-reversal of that entity.
Since the production of energy is
connected to the production of more ordering, then it would seem to follow that
any negentropic process also produces more energy. Or, that production of excess energy accompanies a negentropic
process, and vice versa.
When we factor in the giant
negentropy process, it is seen that all EM spatial energy comes from the time
domain, via the broken 3-symmetry of the source charge or source dipole. Here we have a pure negentropic process. Hence we may now advance a new definition of
negentropy for electrodynamics: negentropy
is the direct and ongoing conversion of time-energy (time-structuring and
time-ordering) into 3-space EM energy.
Dipolarity (polarization) is the process initiating and producing the
negentropy. Polarization is accompanied
by ongoing negentropy so long as the polarization persists.
Another way of defining negentropy
even more rigorously—for electrodynamics—is to define it in spacetime as a broken 3-symmetry in EM energy flow with
concomitant relaxation to a more primary 4-symmetry between time-energy flow
and 3-spatial EM energy flow, where
time-energy flow is transduced into 3-spatial EM energy flow.
ENZYME
Any of various proteins or conjugated
proteins (compound of a protein and a nonprotein) produced by living cells,
that serves as a catalyst for specific biochemical reactions at body
temperatures.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
The study of the various factors
influencing the occurrence, distribution, prevention, and control of disease,
injury, and other health-related events in a defined human population.
EQUILIBRIUM
In physics, the state of a system
in which opposing forces balance each other; i.e., sum to a vector zero.
In mechanics, a system of
particles where the net force acting upon each constitutent particle is zero.
In chemistry, the state of a
solution where the forward and reverse reactions are equal and balance each
other, so that the chemical reactants and products maintain the same amounts.
EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE (PHYSICS)
One of the principles of
relativity theory. The mass of the body
determined by using the gravitational force on it to measure the mass, and the
mass of the body determined by using inertial force on it to measure the mass,
yield equal measurements for the mass.
ETHER
An extremely fine substance
theorized to exist in space in lieu of sheer emptiness.
Discussed by Tesla, Einstein,
Whittaker, and others. Originally
conceived as the luminiferous ether, a thin material fluid pervading all space.
Maxwell, e.g., believed in this material ether, and formulated his theory
accordingly. Thus he mistakenly provided forces in the vacuum, which forces
require a material vacuum. I.e., mass is a component of force; there is no
force without mass, since F º d/dt(mv). The hoary old medieval notion that a separate force acts upon a
separate mass that it affects, is completely in error, though still utilized in
mechanics! Modern field theorists know better, but correction of this massive
error in physics has not been widely accomplished.
Originally, the ether was seen as a
ghostly-thin, material, fluid medium
postulated to fill space and carry electromagnetic waves, similar to the way in
which a gas carries sound waves. Faraday and Maxwell added the assumption that
EM fields existed as material taut strings (Faraday's lines of force) with
conveniently missing endholders to provide the tension on the strings. The
Michelson-Morley experiments eliminated any such material ether, but not a
Lorentz-invariant nonmaterial ether (of which vacuum itself is one example, in
the modern view). Maxwell's equations were derived from a mechanical ether
theory. Einstein once proposed that the vacuum, complete with its
electromagnetic fields, should be called the
new ether. In our own approach
we have come full circle back to Einstein's suggestion, since the so-called
"fields" are really just curvatures of spacetime and are included in
our use of the vacuum as a giant potential comprised of virtual particle flux. The Sachs unified field theory, I believe,
is the best available, particularly when the Evans O(3) symmetry
electrodynamics is included as a special subset of it. In my own view, I regard "vacuum
potential" and "spacetime" as essentially identities. Thus both the vacuum potential and spacetime
have further internal structuring and dynamics. In relativity, this view is akin somewhat to the notion of
"subspace" used on the Star Trek series.
Today the word "ether" is
again acceptable in the literature when used in context of its modern quantum
mechanical meaning. The "ether gas"—the quantum mechanical vacuum—is
considered to be composed of virtual particles. The particles spontaneously
come into being and then vanish so quickly they cannot be individually
detected. That is, today the ether is regarded as a sort of specialized virtual
particle gas—sort of a gas of "effervescent energy bubbles", so to
speak—where the individual particles are continually being created and
annihilated at a fantastic rate.
A good reference on the modern view of the vacuum is I. J. R. Aitchison, “Nothing’s plenty: The vacuum in modern quantum field theory,” Contemporary Physics, 26(4), 1985, p. 333-391. For an O(3) treatise, see M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Derivation of the Lehnert field equations from gauge theory in vacuum: Space charge and current," Foundations Of Physics Letters, 13(2), Apr 2000, p.179-184. It is shown that the Lehnert field equations in vacuum, with concomitant space charge and current, can be derived straightforwardly from standard gauge theory applied in vacuum, using the concept of covariant derivative and Feynman's universal influence. The Lehnert and Proca field equations are shown to be inter-related through the well-known de Broglie theorem, in which the photon mass can be interpreted as finite. These ideas go some way towards addressing the inconsistency inherent, in Maxwell's famous displacement current, which has no concomitant vacuum space charge.
For technical insight into the
attributes for extracting EM energy from the vacuum, see particularly M. W.
Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et
al., "Classical electrodynamics without the Lorentz
condition: Extracting energy from the vacuum," Physica Scripta 61(5), May 2000, p.513-517. It is shown that if the Lorentz condition is
discarded, the Maxwell-Heaviside field equations become the Lehnert equations,
indicating the presence of charge density and current density in the vacuum.
The Lehnert equations are a subset of the O(3) Yang-Mills field equations. Charge
and current density in the vacuum are defined straightforwardly in terms of the
vector potential and scalar potential, and are conceptually similar to
Maxwell's displacement current, which also occurs in the classical vacuum. A
demonstration is made of the existence of a time dependent classical vacuum
polarization which appears if the Lorentz condition is discarded. Vacuum charge
and current appear phenomenologically in the Lehnert equations but
fundamentally in the O(3) Yang-Mills theory of classical electrodynamics. The
latter also allows for the possibility of the existence of vacuum topological
magnetic charge density and topological magnetic current density. Both O(3) and
Lehnert equations are superior to the Maxwell-Heaviside equations in being able
to describe phenomena not amenable to the latter. In theory, devices can be
made to extract the energy associated with vacuum charge and current. More than a dozen ways to approach
extracting EM energy from the vacuum are presented.
EVANS, MYRON W.
Noted chemical physicist, primary
developer of O(3) symmetry electrodynamics, and Director of the Alpha
Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study (AIAS).
Under Evans, the work of the AIAS
has made enormous contributions to physics and particularly to the extraction
of usable EM energy from the vacuum. In
the opinion of the present author, Evans is perhaps the single most important
scientist in the Western world in the emerging field of electrical energy from
the vacuum and in solving the world
energy crisis.
EVIL
Refers
to an act or acts perceived to be detrimental to the receiver or referent, in
the positive time stream.
Oddly, the chain of events perceived to involve "evil" to a referent in the forward time stream, would be perceived to be equally beneficial to the referent, viewed in the negative time stream. In other words, evil in general is a synthesis of the results of observed actions or acts in the forward time motion, hence it is conjugated when time flow is reversed.
This is not just an idle question. In our physical body, the photon interaction with the electron shells of the atoms in the body largely determines the observed forward movement of one's material body through time. The conscious mind, fitted to the single photon interaction, thus perceives its "existence" in such terms. Meanwhile, in the nuclei of the atoms of our material body, the charge and hence the field interactions are reversed (giving Newton's third law reactions). That of course is a time-reversed flow of events, not sensed by our conscious mind, but possibly sensed by our deep unconscious mind. The question then arises, "Do we then actually exist both forwards and backwards in time?" In terms of good and evil, if the answer is yes, then this would have profound implications to theology and to the study of human consciousness.
Theologians (and philosophers) have pondered the "nature" of good and evil for literally thousands of years, and have reached no truly firm conclusion to date. The sticking point (theologically) seems to be the puzzle of a perfect, "all good" creator who had to have created evil also (since the Creator is axiomized to have created all). To the question, "How could a perfect Creator have created—or even tolerated—evil?", theologians have yet to find a satisfactory answer. Neither could they find a satisfactory answer to the question of, "How can the Creator, being all-just, and being all-powerful, then allow any evil act to occur?" In short, why does the Creator seemingly not "police up our perceived imperfections in the creation?" In short, theologians struggled with a formidable problem of how to justify the Creator's continued tolerance of evil, even for a moment.
There is no satisfactory answer to such questions, of course, in 3-law Aristotelian logic, because they are four-law logic situations. However, since the 3-logic is incomplete, one should examine the question in 4-law logic, and also in light of one's assumptions regarding the existence of the Creator. The question is unresolvable in 3-law logic and with the assumption of a Creator traveling through time, as we perceive ourselves to do. However, if time itself is a creation, then the axiomized Creator may be more properly axiomized as existing both in and outside time, and "everywhere in time at once" as well. The unlimited Creator must even be postulated to be able to "both be and not be simultaneously; if He cannot do that little trick, He has a limit." That trick must be allowed, else the Creator has a limit and is thus imperfect. But to such an axiomized Creator "permeating time everywhere at once, from beginning to end, which shall be the "beginning" and which shall be the "end?" And if we pick a beginning and an end, what shall be the "intermediate ordering" that we pick? There is no absolute position in either space or time to the "everywhere and everywhen at once" axiomized Creator.
The problem of good and evil then becomes a similar problem to the "wave or particle" question. Good and evil are two sides of the same coin, transposed one into the other by time-reversal. With respect to finite creatures perceiving themselves moving forward in time, not existing in the future and not existing in the past, the question merely demonstrates that our perception itself is in error.
It
may be, then, that there is a solution (whether one prefers it or not!) to such
profound and ancient philosophical and theological problems in four-law or
five-law logic. However, we will leave
that question to the logicians and to the theologians to more properly decide.
EXCESS COLLECTED ENERGY
Collection by an
interceptor/collector of a greater fraction of the EM energy flow impinging
upon it, than is normal.
Any static electric or magnetic
charge, e.g., with an EM energy density flow impinging upon it, has excess
"energy collection" or "energy collecting" upon it, due to
the altered vacuum virtual photon flux that is now exchanging with it. In a
nominal electric circuit, e.g., a single "pass" of the EM energy flow
from the source dipole, along the circuit conductors and across the conduction
electrons, causes an "excess energy collection" upon the intercepting
surface charges in the conductors. This
potentializes the Drude electrons in the circuit and leads to subsequent
dissipation in the loads (and losses) of about 10-13 of the EM nondiverged
Heaviside energy flow that actually was extracted by the source dipole
from the vacuum and sent down through space surrounding the conductors of the
external circuit.
That is a single-pass energy
collection fraction for a static charge. Almost all the Heaviside energy flow
missed the circuit and passed on beyond the circuit "collectors" in
one pass-by at essentially the speed of light, on out into deep space and
beyond. On the other hand, if the already-passed EM energy flow is
retroreflected, so that it returns for another pass along the circuit, then an additional amount of the repassing
energy can be collected by those sluggish electrons. In a nominal circuit being used as an example, the electrons
travel only about 5 or 6 inches per hour longitudinally down the conductors,
restrained by the repulsion of the electrons beyond them. So multiretroreflection, multipass, multicollection can be used to provide excess energy and overunity
efficiency. This is a change to the present statement of the work-energy
theorem, which up to now has assumed single pass, single energy collection. The
well-known anti-Stokes emission from certain highly scattering, optically
active media, e.g., produces more energy radiating back out of the media than
the amount of stimulating radiation energy input into the media. This is Letokhov's "negative absorption
of the medium", which is really the excess emission from the medium due to
retroreflection and multiple re-collections.
Also, if the intercepting charge is
resonated, it sweeps out a greater geometrical cross section in the streaming
energy flow, thereby diverging more and thus "collecting" more
energy. In the Bohren experiment, e.g.,
this effect yields collection of some 18 times as much energy by the resonant
charge as the same charge collects in static mode.
EXOTHERMIC
Giving off heat, or emitting scattered EM
energy. Producing forward time energy.
FARADAY, MICHAEL
Noted English physicist and
chemist, 1791-1867, who discovered field theory and electromagnetic
induction. Faraday invented the dynamo
also and formulated his laws of electrolysis.
His work directly inspired Maxwell,
who vowed to study no other electromagnetics theory until he had captured
Faraday's work in a mathematical theory.
FIELD
In mathematics, a set with two
binary operations. In electromagnetics
in more common terms, it is a region consisting of magnitudes and/or vector
directions assigned to some active entity (spacetime itself) at each point in
the region.
Designated addition and
multiplication, satisfying the conditions that the set is a commutative group
with respect to addition, that the set with the identity of the additive group
omitted is a commutative group with respect to multiplication, and that
multiplication distributes over addition for all elements in the set.
For our purposes, in plain language
the fundamental notion is that a "field" is a sort of cleared, level
space or region (e.g., in spacetime) where things can be placed and actions can
occur amongst them, to them, on them, and of them. What the "place or
space" is, can get a bit complicated, as can what is placed there and what
actions are permitted. In short, we
view a field as an altered (curved) region in spacetime, and this special
curvature interacts with certain kinds of entities placed in that region. In return, those entities also interact back
upon the spacetime curvature to alter it.
Hence there is a dynamic two-way interaction between field and matter,
where half of this interaction (the back-interaction of charge or matter) is
missing from present classical electrodynamics.
EXOTHERMIC EXPLOSION
An explosion where ordinary heat and
electromagnetic energy are released and radiate away from the explosive
site. All normal explosions are
exothermic.
Particularly used for a pulsed
longitudinal EM wave interferometer, which in the distant interference zone
(IZ) will produce a sudden eruption of scattering EM energy from the local
spacetime curvature suddenly induced, when the interferometry transmitter
chassis grounds are biased well above the ambient potential in the distant IZ.
FERMI LIQUID
A liquid where the individual particles
or molecules comprising it are basically non-interacting, so that they can roam
freely.
In an electron gas in a conductor, e.g.,
treatment of the free conduction electrons as a gas allows a theoretical
modeling and explanation of conduction and resistance. Contrast to a Luttinger liquid, where
the electrons interact with each other and thus enable the formation of
collective phenomena.
FEYNMAN, RICHARD
Noted physicist, Nobelist, and
co-developer of quantum electrodynamics.
Feynman is particularly noted for
his refreshing three volumes of physics:
See Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton and Matthew Sands,
The Feynman Lectures on Physics,
Addison-Wesley, New York, 1963. The
book is particularly noteworthy in that it gives the student some insight into
foundations problems in physics. E.g.,
in Vol. I on p. 2-4, Feynman defines
the electric field not in terms of force per unit charge per se, but in terms of its potentiality for producing a force only
when a charge is present for the force to be developed upon.
FEYNMAN DIAGRAM
A two-dimensional diagram of particle
interactions, both in the virtual and observable levels, and both backward and
forward in time and named after Richard Feynman who first employed them.
FIBER FUSE
Effect
in fibers or fiber optic cable, whose core contains germanium, whereby heating
the cable at one spot with a small flame will launch a focused traveling heat
energy effect which melts a small hole in the core about every centimeter, and
marches down the cable at about a meter per second to the end of the cable,
destroying the optical transmission capability and ruining the cable.
Oddly,
by igniting the fiber fuse from the other end of the damaged cable, a reverse
fiber fuse effect will often march back down the cable in similar fashion
except that it fills in the melted holes in the core, restoring the
transmission capability of the cable.
If the energy required to melt all
the holes (or fill them again) is taken into account, the amount of energy
required to launch the fiber fuse is much less. This phenomenon does not appear to have an adequate technical
explanation at present.
For
an excellent description with photographs, see Ivars Peterson, “Fibers With
Flare,” Science News, 140(13), Sep.
28, 1991, p. 200-201. For technical
information and analysis, see D. P. Hand and P. St. J. Russell, “Solitary
thermal shock-waves and optical damage in optical fibers,” IEE Colloquium on ‘Non-Linear Optical Waveguides’,” IEE Digest No.
88, London, England, 1988, p. 101-103; — Soliton-like thermal shock-waves in
optical fibres: origin of periodic damage tracks," Fourteenth European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC 1988),
Sep. 11-15, 1988, Publication No. 292, 1(2), 1988, p. 111-114; — “Solitary
thermal shock waves and optical damage in optical fibers: the fiber fuse,” Optics Letters, 13(9), Sep. 1988, p.
767-769; D. P. Hand and T. A. Birks,
“Single-mode tapers as ‘fibre fuse’ damage circuit-breakers,” Electronics Letters, 25(1), Jan. 5,
1989, p. 33-34.
See
P. St. J. Russell, “Power Conservation and Field Structures in Uniform
Dielectric Gratings,” Journal of the
Optical Society of America A, 1(3), Mar. 3, 1984, p. 293-299. Russell is actually referring to apparent
violation of local conservation of energy.
This would be indicated if the vacuum-to-mass interaction is not taken
into account. Russell’s analysis
therefore supports the fact that (i) the vacuum-mass interaction is required,
(ii) the fiber fuse does utilize some of its gated vacuum energy (i.e., the
usually non-diverged portion of the Poynting flow), and (iii) the fiber fuse is
a legitimate, repeatable overunity process, although a "runaway"
process, uncontrolled, and not sustainable.
FIELD
In physics, "a region of
space marked by a physical property, as gravitational or electromagnetic force
or fluid pressure, having a determinable value at every point in the
region."
[Thanks to Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary.]
Here one must not think of "space" as emptiness, as mathematicians do,
but as a virtual particle flux, a dynamic entity, and as dynamic spacetime. A
field then is a set of entities and their relationships and operations in a
region of that kind of space, where
the entities and operations are themselves "space stuff". They are
all "virtual" in that they are not individually observable. However,
their impact upon or interaction with mass—particularly charged mass—can be and
often is observable, in that we can see some change of the mass (its direction
of travel, translation, acceleration, deceleration, rotation, generation of
current, etc.). If the entities are point-like and are naively supposed to have
magnitude only, or if we only specify their energy density magnitude at each
point, then that "marked space region" is said to be a scalar field. If the entities are
point-like but have both magnitude and direction, they are said to be a vector field.
Further the deponent saith not
because even the foundations physicists are in hot water in trying to define
the field, and if the deponent saith more he will surely deep-fry in hot oil!
FIELD, SCALAR
A field, to any point of which is
assigned a magnitude only.
FIELD, VECTOR
A field, to any point of which is
assigned both a magnitude and a direction.
FLAT (UNCURVED) SPACETIME
A vacuum/spacetime whose virtual
particle flux intensity—and therefore its local energy density—does not change
as a function of spatial position or averaged time.
That is, a flat spacetime in my view
is a quantum mechanical vacuum whose virtual particle flux and energy density
are constant in magnitude and internal constitution with respect to spatial
position and in averaged time. Note that a flat spacetime (vacuum potential)
can still contain vacuum engines, and thus still be dimensioned. In that case, contrary to normal physics, the flat
spacetime itself will still interact with an embedded object and change it,
even though it may not translate it. To perform transmutation of elements,
e.g., one is interested in just such engines and not in translating through
space the element being treated. This
dimensioning or activation of the local flat spacetime can result in an
otherwise unexpected, seeming violation of one or more laws of nature in the
dimensioned region.
FISSIONING, ACTION
The
splitting of the action quantum into two canonical variables (for example,
energy and time), only one of which can normally be completely detected or measured. ("Action" has the dimensions of
angular momentum—energy x time, momentum x length, etc.)
Fissioning
produces length, discrete bit by discrete bit, and time likewise. The physical reality of separated physical
objects is thus continually created, discrete bit by discrete bit,
monocularly. All that ever observably
exists in the "present" is a single quantum change, just
occurring. Recombining of the two canonical
action fission fragments is called "fusion." Fusion also occurs monocularly, quantum by
quantum. Rigorously, the physical world
of separated objects never exists as such except in memory recall of vast
numbers of past ordered quantum changes that occurred one by one.
FLUX
The amount of some quantity (such
as energy, particles, volume of fluid, etc.) flowing across a given area
(usually a unit area perpendicular to the flow) per unit of time.
The term flux density is now more
commonly used. Loosely, "flux" refers to the perpendicular flow
through an area, while "flux density" refers to the magnitude or
intensity (rate) of the flux. In some cases such as a flux of particles of
different velocities, the number of particles may be multiplied by the average
velocity to give an average flux density that is weighted.
FLUX DENSITY
The
amount of some quantity (such as energy, particles, volume of fluid, etc.)
flowing across a given area (usually a unit area perpendicular to the flow) per
unit of time.
FOGAL, WILLIAM (BILL)
Soon-to-be-noted researcher and
inventor of the Fogal semiconductor (two patents so far), as well as a
superluminal infolding-outfolding communication system and other remarkable
longitudinal EM wave processes.
I am happy to be a friend and
colleague of Bill Fogal.
FOGAL SEMICONDUCTOR
A
special semiconductor invented by Bill Fogal which, in its operational regime,
utilizes an integrated semiconductor, tantalum capacitor, and feedback resistor
to accomplish charge blocking (blocking of electron current flow dq/dt) while
passing displacement current d/dt
The Fogal semiconductor can also accomplish amplified phase conjugation of signals as well as infolding (translation of input transverse EM waves to output longitudinal EM waves) and outfolding (translation of received input longitudinal EM waves to output transverse EM waves). Used in communication systems, it opens the use of the unlimited "infolded" electromagnetics bandwidth. Since it may communicate using longitudinal EM waves, it is also usable for superluminal or a specialized "tunneling" communication through the "interior" of normal EM waves, potentials, and fields.
See
William J. Fogal, "High Gain, Low distortion, Faster Switching
Transistor," U.S. Patent No. 5,196,809, Mar. 23, 1993; — "High Gain,
Low Distortion, Faster Switching Transistor," U.S. Patent No. 5,430,413,
July 4, 1995, a continuation of his earlier patent.
FORCE
In mechanics, identically the
time derivative of momentum, or F º d/dt(mv).
Simply, changing of the old concept
of mass-motion. One must realize that it is not the mass in motion, but the
single undivided quantity "mass-motion" or "mass-velocity"
(momentum) that is changed. In short, F
º d/dt(mv). In present EM theory, force fields are
erroneously taken to exist in empty, massless vacuum. However, the mechanical
definition is an identity, not an equality. Thus force does not separately exist in contact with a mass,
but consists of a changing
"mass-motion." Since this force can be induced into and of the
mass-motion target at a distance, in the new approach one is confronted with
the fact that there is a more fundamental mechanism that produces force itself,
and that is a curvature of spacetime.
Distant curvatures of spacetime to
produce forces on exposed charged mass systems are also engineered by
longitudinal EM wave interferometry.
FORCE FIELD
An effect that exists as a local
vacuum virtual particle flux interaction upon and with a unit mass or unit
charge whereby a particular type of matter is affected.
The force field has two components,
one the mass and the other massless. In electrodynamics, one normally thinks
(erroneously!) of the massless component, and refers to that component alone as
"the force field." This considers the "force field" as a
separate entity, acting upon a separate "mass." Whether it is
logically correct or not, that is the prevailing way physics and
electrodynamics uses it! So in this definition, let us momentarily accept the
common incorrect usage, for convenience, while pointing out the real definition
as we need to.
For example, conventionally the EM force
fields can affect and change the state of motion of any charged particle or any
magnetic particle. In classical physics, the force fields are considered the
primary causative agents; when these fields are zero, then the motion of the
particle or system is unaffected. Consequently, conventional EM theory assumes
that all the EM phenomenology ceases once the force fields are absent. Today we
know that is not true at all, as we explain in this glossary.
FORCE-FREE PROPAGATION
Propagation of force-free disturbances
in the vacuum flux
(i.e., infolded inside the ambient
vacuum potential, or inside a constant DC voltage.) Such "infolded"
propagation is not limited to the speed of light, but may even travel in the
Coulomb gauge so that it is instantaneous. More usually, it can travel
superluminally. It may be regarded as a
special form of "tunneling", which is known (both theoretically and
experimentally) to produce superluminal propagation to the external observer. The music of Beethoven's 40th symphony, e.g.,
has been experimentally transferred between two points in a physical waveguide
by such "quantum tunneling" at over four times the speed of light in
vacuum.
We regard tunneling as moving in a
sort of "subspace", i.e., within the internal structuring of spacetime
itself. It is not limited by the speed
of light and Einstein's postulate, which we believe only applies to signals
moving in spacetime in bulk, and not to signals moving within substructuring inside that spacetime.
FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS
The concepts, operations,
assumptions, postulates, logic, definitions, and axioms of algebra systems.
FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS
The
postulates, assumptions, concepts, and definitions upon which a scientific
physics model rests. Included are the
postulates, concepts, assumptions, definitions, and operations of the
mathematics in which the scientific model is expressed, as well as the
postulates, concepts, assumptions, definitions, and operations of the physics
entities and functions assigned to the mathematical symbols.
Thus "scientific truth"—even mathematical truth (see Morris Kline's Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty—is actually a qualified truth. What is true in one model (one set of postulates, assumptions, concepts, and definitions, including those in the algebra) may not be always true when one or more of the postulates, assumptions, concepts, and definitions is/are changed, and/or when the topology of the mathematics in which the model is expressed is changed, etc.
The
major flaws in present physics models involve errors in the foundations. However, a successful physics model is
rather quickly dogmatized and often turned into a belief structure by many
scientists rather than being regarded as a tentative model. Consequently, scientists who attempt to do
serious work in foundations are generally ignored or ostracized and rather
vehemently attacked if they propose any significant changes to one of the
dogmatized models. Particularly, all
funding and "benefits" of the scientific bureaucracy are denied the heretical
foundations scientist, unless he or someone can rather quickly come forth with
an iron-tight experimental proof of the heresy. Any attempted change in foundations is usually met with ad
hominem attack, a barrage of criticism, loss of position, and denial of
research funding. Science has a long
history of just such dogmatic oppression of great scientific discoveries. To name a few (there are hundreds): The first laser paper was rejected by the
journals as being ridiculous. When
Mayer proposed conservation of energy, he was hounded and ridiculed so fiercely
that he suffered a nervous breakdown and attempted suicide. Years later, near the end of his life
conservation of energy was adopted because it greatly facilitated understanding
and calculation, and the same system now lionized him as a scientific
hero. Ovshinsky suffered personal
attack, ridicule, and charges of charlatanism in pushing amorphous
semiconductors; everyone knew that only crystalline semiconductors could work.
The situation changed when several thousand Xerox machines were observed to now
contain amorphous semiconductors which were working just fine! Louis de Broglie's matter wave hypothesis
caused consternation to his thesis advisors; but because he was Prince Louis de
Broglie, they felt obligated to send it to the great Einstein so that he would
reject it and then they could regretfully reject the thesis of the Prince. When Einstein replied that it was probably
true, they felt they had no choice but to publish it because de Broglie was a Prince of the old French aristocracy, and as
such was not to be casually trifled with.
So foundations work is fraught with the greatest peril to the
practitioner. Yet it is the most
important work in physics, and it is a continuing black mark against the
scientific establishment that they do not openly encourage and fund the most able physicists, grad students, and post-docs to
examine and revise the errors in foundations concepts and postulates. Because of the prevailing dogmatism, science
itself continually strangles the new ideas and concepts that would provide the
physics of the 22nd century now. In an
eerie turn of events, science has become in a strange way its own worst enemy,
and the strongest barrier to the advance of science.
FOUR-SPACE (4-SPACE)
The "normal" spacetime used in physics,
consisting of three spatial dimensions and one time dimension. Minkowski spacetime.
FOURTH LAW OF LOGIC
the
law that a thing and its opposite become identical on the boundary, i.e., in
multiple simultaneous observation.
Identity is merely the loss of
observational or perceptual distinction; when formerly "two"
objects are simultaneously observed by a single observer, two slides have been
shown at once in the slide projector.
It does not matter at that point what each was individually observed to
be before; now there is no observable distinction or difference. We previously showed that the law is
implicitly assumed in the three laws of Aristotelian logic anyway, and
published a simple proof of the fourth law.
Without the fourth law, Aristotelian logic "eats itself". What results in the four law logic is that
either (1) the three laws apply explicitly and the fourth implicitly, or (2)
the fourth law applies explicitly and the fourth implicitly. This application
rule itself can be taken as a fifth law of logic. The fourth law is also the law of the paradox: I.e., when
something is true but violates one or more of the Aristotelian laws, it is a
case where the fourth law applies explicitly.
The conclusions derivable from a four law logic agree generally with the
conclusions derivable from G Spencer Brown's Laws of Form.
FOUR-WAVE MIXING
A
nonlinear multiwave mixing effect when four waves mix in a highly nonlinear
situation so that wave to wave interaction occurs.
FRACTIONAL CHARGE
A
hypothetical particle having a charge less than the electron's charge. Often called a quark, where its charge is
1/3 or 2/3 the charge of the electron.
A
few years ago, Stanford University researchers found evidence of free
quarks. There is also now the
fractional Hall effect. In the 1920's
Ehrenhaft reported the discovery and production of fractional charges of all
sizes, and his experiments have been replicated by Michailov, with papers by
Michailov and Barrett.
In the new approach, when
time-energy is utilized, quarks can be freed or nearly freed rather easily in
"time-reversal zones". It
would appear that, as the new approach develops, free quarks will become a normal
event rather than one intensely sought but terribly difficult to come by
experimentally.
FRAME, LORENTZ
A
frame of reference which is not accelerated with respect to the laboratory
observer.
In
this case, the frame may be rotated (moving at a constant velocity) but it is
not rotating (the frame is not accelerated with respect to the observer, and
spacetime is not curved). In this case
special relativity applies, as do the conservation laws. If the local spacetime is curved, the frame
is accelerated and spacetime is curved.
Locally, then, general relativity applies. In this case, locally the conservation laws (energy, momentum,
charge, and spin) can be violated.
However, in ordinary general relativity, it has been tacitly assumed
that locally the curvature of spacetime is negligible. Hence locally a Lorentz frame is assumed,
and the conservation laws are assumed to apply locally also. In scalar electromagnetics, the local
spacetime is always curved and general relativity applies locally. In this case, the conservation laws need not
apply.
FRAME, REFERENCE)
A spatial, organized, measured
lattice placed in "emptiness" (space, spacetime).
Normally refers to a 3-dimensional,
spatial frame. All objects and points in the "universe" or spatial
frame are considered to simultaneously coexist at separate, measured points in
the frame. Differs from the vacuum in that, rigorously, vacuum has no existing
definite lengths and no existing definite time intervals, as these appear only
after measurement or detection, and are relative to the observer and to the interactions
ongoing as well as in the detection process itself. The "laboratory
frame" is the static reference frame of the observer or measurement. A
separate reference frame may be assumed to exist for any fixed or moving
object, or centered on any point in another frame. When a type of frame is
assumed, the entire class of physical interactions that can occur has been
restricted to an assumed set or type. In other words, given the frame, the conventional physics has been assumed.
One of the greatest restrictions of an assumed "frame" is to rule out
the consideration (existence) of other higher dimensions.
Note that, in the new unified field
theory approach, the other higher dimensions are always available and cannot be
ruled out in general, but only in some special case. Every curvature of
spacetime, and any internal additional curvature to that primary curvature,
adds a new dimension. In our view, a
spacetime may be "flat" in overall curvature, but consist of
internally structured deterministic curvatures or "engines". In this view, normal inertial frames, e.g.,
may still contain vacuum engines, which will not affect the normal bulk translation rules, but may affect
any or all of the nontranslation mechanisms, including the very laws of nature
in many cases.
FREE ENERGY
Excess energy freely received
from its external active environment by an open system that is far from
thermodynamic equilibrium in its exchange with that environment.
To use this free excess energy, it
must be collected, transported to a load or loads with minimal losses, and then
dissipated in the load(s) to power them, without any substantial portion of the
free energy being used to close the system's "gate" through which the
excess energy is input to it.
There is a separate thermodynamics for
such open systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium in their active
environmental exchange. Such a system
is permitted to exhibit five "magic" functions: it is permitted to (1) self-order, (2)
self-oscillate or self-rotate, (3) output more energy than the operator himself
inputs (the excess energy is freely received from the active environment, (4)
power itself and its load simultaneously (all the energy is freely received
from the active environment), and (5) exhibit negentropy.
The entropy of such a system cannot
even be calculated. Some useful
references are: Ilya Prigogine with D. Kondepudi, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to
Dissipative Structures, Wiley, Chichester, 1998; Ilya Prigogine, The
End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature, Free Press, New
York, 1996, 1997; G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine, Exploring Complexity, Piper, Munich, 1987; Gregoire Nicolis,
"Physics of far-from-equilibrium systems and self-organization,"
Chapter 11 in Paul Davies, Ed., The New
Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989, p. 316-347.
FREE ENERGY SYSTEM
Any open system not in
thermodynamic equilibrium, which freely receives excess energy from an external
source,
...and collects and utilizes this
free excess energy to freely power external loads, so that a permissible system
COP>1.0 is achieved, as allowed by the nonlinear thermodynamics of open
systems in disequilibrium with their environment.
Implicit in the notion of free
electromagnetic energy systems are six key concepts: (1) the local
vacuum/spacetime is known to be filled with hidden (i.e., virtual) energy in
violent motion, i.e., the local vacuum/spacetime is a violent virtual energy
flux and therefore a scalar potential, (2) a broken symmetry—i.e., some sort of
organizing and gating mechanism, such as the common dipole—in this hidden
(virtual) energy flux of the vacuum is utilized as a source, to cohere the
virtual energy and divert it as energy flow S = E´H, from the broken
symmetry initiation point onto the external circuits or load parts of a device,
(3) the coherent gated extra virtual
energy flow available in the external circuits or load parts couples to
(interacts with) the mobile charges in those circuits or load parts, so that
gradients developed in the interacting virtual flux form force fields on and of
the particle masses, driving the mobile charges along the circuit and through
current-impeding circuit components such as loads, (4) in the interaction of
the driven charges with the driving virtual energy flux, their spin and erratic
motions integrate a tiny "coupling fraction" of the driving virtual
energy into observable (i.e., macroscopic field) energy, thus creating the E-fields and B-fields, (5) the current-impeding external components or load
parts scatter or dissipate the coherence of the driven charges, and thereby
dissipate the collected energy or change the form of the collected field
energy, thereby producing useful work, and (6) little or none of the excess
collected energy in the circuit is split off and dissipated in the gate
(asymmetry component serving as the S-flow
source) to destroy the gate and thereby destroy its asymmetry in the vacuum
flux, which is what is extracting and producing the free energy flow.
FUSION, ACTION
In
the new approach, the recombining of two canonical bits of a fissioned action
quantum.
The
fusion process "cancels" the bits produced by the fission process,
and constitutes a negative spacetime operation. The physical world is thus eliminated, bit by bit, in a monocular
fusion operation that produces the "past". The "mass" of a particle is taken to be proportional
to, and identically comprised of, the absolute value of its fission and fusion
rate. When fission and fusion rates of
a particle are equal, the particle is unaccelerated; when unequal, the particle
is accelerated. Vice versa, when the
particle is unaccelerated, the fission and fusion rates are equal, and when the
particle is accelerated, the fission and fusion rates are unequal.
GAIA HYPOTHESIS
The hypothesis by Lovelock that the earth and its biosphere is a living thing, at least in some sense.
In
the new viewpoint, there exists a biospheric quantum potential which contains
an extended mind and therefore is indeed an extended lifeform—one which
includes the earth and the quantum potentia all its creatures and species. In the new sense, even so-called
"inert" matter is alive, being continually bathed by energy flow
dimensioned with lifeform templates, and therefore equally alive in all
directions and nonpreferential.
GATE
Refers to something (a component
or function) which extracts some part of a flux or flow, compacting it into a
stream, and "sending it out."
A moving board wall or gate may be
swung into a river, e.g., to divert or "gate" some of the river's
flow out into a sluice ditch and on to a waterwheel powering a mill. Similarly,
a dipole extracts some of the energy from the vacuum virtual photon flux
exchange with the end charges of the dipole, and "gates" (diverts)
the extracted portion of energy out from the ends of the dipole as energy
flows. This creates the scalar potential surrounding each charge, and also the E-fields. Even a "static"
dipole does this "gating" of vacuum energy into an energy flow.
The fundamental gate for all EM
energy in 3-space is the dipole or dipolarity.
The source of the 3-space EM energy continuously emitted by any charge
or dipole is an equal inflow of EM energy from the complex plane (from the time
domain). Thus EM energy flow is
conserved in 4 dimensions but not in 3-space.
In particle physics, it is well-known that any dipole or charge is such
a broken 3-symmetry in its fierce vacuum energy flux exchange. However, particle physics considers the
input energy to be virtual particle energy from the vacuum and therefore random
energy. Whittaker 1903 shows it is
actually from the time domain of spacetime (from the complex plane) and the
input energy flow from the vacuum is not random but precisely organized in a
harmonic set of longitudinal EM phase conjugate waves. Of course by wave-particle duality we simply
consider the two pictures to be just different and permitted models of the same
thing.
GATING EFFECT
The effect of extracting part of
a flux or flow, compacting it into a useful stream, and "sending it
out."
See gate.
GAUGE
In electromagnetism, usually
considered a possible choice for (change of) electric scalar potential and
magnetic vector potential, without any net change of force fields so that the
change satisfies Maxwell's equations.
Interestingly, gauge field theory
includes the axiom of gauge freedom. In
EM systems, this means that one is free to "regauge" or change the
potential energy of the system freely and at any time, so long as the change
results in a static stress potential energy change. In the real world, one may have to pay a little bit for
switching. But essentially physics
already assumes that one can cause his EM system to take on excess potential
energy at will, so long as it is a stress
potential energy change only.
In short, only the symmetrical regauging case has been
considered in electrodynamics. Yet
every electrical power system must first potentialize the system asymmetrically rather than
symmetrically. In the theoretically
perfect system, this asymmetrical regauging is done freely. Hence every electrical power system first
breaks gauge symmetry, in order to take on extra energy so that it can do
work. Further, the source of the
potential energy flowing into the asymmetrically regauged electrical system so
freely, comes from the source dipole's extraction of EM energy from the
time-domain (complex plane) due to its broken 3-symmetry in EM energy flow.
So the highest "gauge"
principle is that energy can be freely extracted from the vacuum, anywhere and
at any time, freely and easily, by making a dipolarity—which changes a single
potential and asymmetrically regauges the system.
It follows that one is in theory
free to "dissipate" this excess free energy in external loads to
power them. Again, in the real world
one may have to pay some switching costs, but that can be minimized by
efficient switching. However, since no
conventional electrical power system accomplishes this free powering of its
loads, it rigorously follows that the conventional system must self-enforce
symmetry in its discharge of the free potential energy achieved by the initial asymmetrical regauging.
Thus, if we believe gauge field
theory—the most modern of physics theories and in many ways the most useful—and
also believe its assumption of free asymmetrical regauging that is hidden in
its gauge freedom principle, then COP>1.0 electrical power systems are
absolutely permitted by nature and by gauge field theory where asymmetrical
regauging is deliberately used.
It follows that some feature in
electrical power systems as we presently design and build them, must be
preventing these systems from exhibiting overunity COP. And so it is. The ubiquitous closed current loop circuit results in the circuit
forcibly and symmetrically regauging itself while dissipating its excitation
energy to power its loads and losses.
This forces half the collected regauging (free) energy to be dissipated
in the external circuit's loads and losses, and half of it to be dissipated in
the source dipole to scatter the charges and destroy the dipole. This means that less than half the available
free regauging energy is used to power the load, while half is used to destroy
the entity—the source dipole—actually furnishing the free regauging energy from
the vacuum.
Hence all our present electrical
power systems are inherently free energy systems freely extracting their energy
from the vacuum, but are fiendishly designed so that they kill themselves (shut
off all free asymmetric regauging energy from the vacuum, by destroying the
source dipole) faster than they catch some of the free energy from the vacuum
to power their loads.
To restore the source dipole
requires at least as much energy dissipation as was done to destroy it. In our conventional self-destructive
systems, the generator shaft must thus be continuously powered in order to form
the magnetic field inside the generator, so that this magnetic field can then
dissipate its available energy to force the scattered charges back apart to
form an ordered source dipole.
We pay the power company to have a
giant wrestling match inside its own generators and lose. And in a sense, we do
it because our theoreticians love gauge symmetry more than they tolerate broken
gauge symmetry. So they build lovely,
symmetry-restoring electrical power systems—and monstrously mangle and destroy
the fragile biosphere in the process.
GAUGE FREEDOM
The axiom in gauge theory that
one can freely change the potentials of an EM system, so long as the net new
forces resulting from the change will sum to a zero vector resultant so that the
system remains "symmetrical" in its force-field functioning with
respect to the system prior to the change of potentials.
Gauge and gauge freedom are actually
formal restrictions of an even more important asymmetrical regauging principle:
a potential in a system can be freely
changed at any time, thus freely changing the potential energy of the system
freely and at will. Symmetrical
regauging is achieved only by multiple application of this asymmetry rule to
provide a net symmetry condition again, with a change in locked-in stress
potential energy of the system.
GAUGE SYMMETRY
Abstract mathematical symmetry of
a field, that relates to the freedom to regauge (change the value of )
potentials, without affecting the values of the field quantities.
In short, the higher principle that
the potentials can be changed freely and at will—and hence the potential
energy of the regauged system can be
changed freely and at will—is arbitrarily restricted to a very special case: Each change of potential involves the appearance
of an new free force field. This asymmetrical change can be made freely
and at will, at any time. However, the
notion of gauge symmetry restricts any set of such changes to the special case
where the new free force fields produced must sum to a net zero force field of
opposing forces. In short, it severely
restricts the freedom to change the potentials—to the special case where the
resulting change of the system's potential energy must remain a static stress
potential energy condition. Note that
this arbitrarily eliminates any overunity functioning of the regauged system in
which the altered potential(s) and altered system potential energy
exist(s). See the discussions of gauge and gauge freedom, above.
GAUGE THEORY
A field theory using a field that
has one or more gauge symmetries.
Note the accent on gauge symmetry
and the net symmetrical regauging
restriction. This restriction is a
carry-forward of the old notion that the potentials are not primary, but the
fields are primary causes of all EM phenomena.
For the overunity researcher, broken
gauge symmetry is the interesting feature which must avidly be sought in his
experimental systems. Hence he must
seek out and familiarize himself with a wide variety of broken symmetry effects and phenomenology. He must also rigorously analyze his circuits
with a keen view to where gauge symmetry can be broken, where and how gauge
symmetry is automatically restored during excitation discharge, etc. Unless the automatic self-enforcing of
symmetrical gauge transformation during excitation discharge is violated, no EM
system can produce COP>1.0. In
addition, without elaboration, the overunity researcher must also learn to
consider the time-domain functions of the circuit, and particularly the giant
negentropy of the common dipole. Unless
he understands that all EM energy comes from the vacuum and from the complex
plane via the broken 3-symmetry of a dipolarity, he cannot understand his own
circuits.
Electromagnetics was the first gauge
theory. Gauge theory is widely utilized
today, and particularly in particle physics.
In overunity power systems, the system must exhibit a broken gauge
symmetry at least twice: (1) in initially potentializing the system to freely
increase its potential energy, thus exciting the system so that it has energy
with which to do work, and (2) then discharging this free excitation energy in
the load without simultaneously destroying the source dipole providing the
continual potentializing.
The conventional COP<1.0
electrical power system restores net 3-space symmetry by continually destroying
the "free asymmetrical regauging" component: the source dipole, and
using more of the energy freely received from the vacuum via dipole asymmetry
to destroy the dipole than is used to power the load. This requires that at least as much 3-space energy be input to
the system again, to restore the dipole and thus potentialize the external
circuit, as was used to destroy the dipole.
Hence as much 3-space energy has to be input as is dissipated in all the
loads and losses, including inside the generator. For that reason, our scientists and engineers unwittingly but
deliberately design and build only COP<1.0 systems.
Without elaboration, we also accent
that spacetime curvature is always involved in an overunity EM power system,
and the tempic (time) potential of the output end of an overunity system
differs from the tempic potential of the input end, so that the gradient (the
tempic force) is directed from output to input—exactly the reversal of the case
for a COP<1.0 power system.
GAUGE TRANSFORMATION (IN
ELECTROMAGNETICS)
In EM, gauge transformation is
conventionally taken to be the addition of the gradient of some function of
space and time to the magnetic vector potential—and simultaneously the addition
of the negative of the partial derivative of the same function with respect to
time, divided by the speed of light, to the electric scalar potential.
This procedure gives different
potentials but leaves the electric and magnetic fields unchanged. It restricts gauge transformations to net symmetrical transformations. However, the increase or decrease in
potential energy of the system, due to changing the potentials, results in a
change in the stress of the system and a change in its stress energy. This is because two new antiparallel forces
are created, which change the stress of the system.
In essence, gauge symmetry then
involves the implicit assumption that a functioning system is the same
regardless of how it is stressed, and regardless of the state of its stress
energy. We point out that,
gravitationally, this is not true since any change in the local potential
energy of the system is a spacetime curvature change, hence a gravitational
change.
GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY
Einstein's
theory of gravity in which the gravitational force is represented by a
curvature in spacetime.
GIANT NEGENTROPY (OF THE DIPOLE)
The receipt from the time domain
of spacetime (the vacuum), by any dipolarity, of enormous longitudinal EM wave
energy flow, transduction of that absorbed energy from the complex plane into
real 3-space, and emission of that enormous energy flow in all directions in
3-space, automatically and indefinitely after a little energy has been expended
to separate the charges and make the dipole.
The EM waves in the input from the time domain and the output in 3-space
are perfectly ordered and correlated, which is a giant ordering of the
vacuum/spacetime and is thus a giant negentropy.
In circuits, the source dipole in
the generator or battery, once made, performs this function. Only a minuscule fraction (some 10-13) of the energy pouring out of the generator's or battery's
terminals strikes the surface charges of that attached external circuit and is
diverged into the conductors to power the Drude electrons and the circuit. All the rest is just wasted.
See my paper, "Giant Negentropy
from the Common Dipole," ibid.
GRAVITON
The quantum (smallest piece) of
the gravitational field, with spin 2.
In the quantum theory of general
relativity, the graviton is massless and has spin 2. In the new approach, a
graviton is considered to be a paired (coupled) photon and antiphoton, each of
which has spin one, so that the graviton couplet has spin 2. A scalar potential
is comprised of gravitons, not merely photons, since it can be decomposed into
a harmonic series of bidirectional wavepairs. In each wavepair, a wave and its
antiwave precisely superpose. We insist on a further strong condition: that in
the biwave, the photons comprising the wave and the antiphotons comprising the
antiwave also must obey the distortion
correction theorem. This means that the antiphotons and photons are
passing through each other in opposite directions, continually coupling into
gravitons and decoupling again.
GRAVITY
The phenomenon characterized by
the physical attraction of any two material bodies.
Actually, in modern general
relativity it is the trapped energy in the masses that produce the gravity
potentials. Ideally, the gravitational force between two masses is proportional
to the product of the masses divided by the square of the distance between
them. In the new approach, one recognizes that mass itself is defined in terms
of, and identically consists of, the time derivative of an action flux. [For a
force-free fundamental definition of mass, see T.E. Bearden, Quiton/Perceptron Physics: A Theory of Existence, Perception, and
Physical Phenomena, National Technical Information System, Report
AD-763210, 1973.] A photon flux is also an action flux. A virtual photon flux
is an action flux. So the vacuum consists of a gigantic action flux—which with
certain interactions forms mass itself. But since photons are action quanta and
photon flux is action flux, and since mass and gravitation are functions
imposed on such action flux; then mass, EM, and gravitation become different
aspects of the same thing. All of them can be electromagnetically engineered,
directly, as indeed can be the flow of time itself. By affecting the flow of
time electromagnetically, one is thus able to affect the gravitational force
between two objects electromagnetically. Antigravity, for example, can be
achieved by a mechanism that is given in this glossary. Hutchinson has
demonstrated the levitation of objects weighing up to 60 lbs., albeit
sporadically and uncontrollably. At my urgent request, Sweet performed a highly
successful antigravity experiment some years ago, reducing the weight of a
6-pound object by 90%, smoothly and controllably, in several smoothly
controlled steps. I consider that the experiment tested and validated my
approach to an engineerable mechanism for antigravity. For the results of the
test, see Floyd Sweet and T.E. Bearden, "Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics
to Tap Vacuum Energy," Proceedings
of the 26th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC '91),
Boston, Massachusetts, 1991, p. 370-375.
GROSS PARTICLE TRANSLATION
Refers to translating the entire
particle in space, rather than internally structuring the particle's potential
(massless charge).
GROSS POTENTIAL GRADIENT FIELDS
The usual gradient in a scalar
potential's gross magnitude, as in -Ñf .
GYROELECTRONS
Spinning electrons considered as
gyroscopes, so that when longitudinally perturbed they can and will laterally
precess.
Considering (in a gross first order
model) the conduction electrons in the Drude gas in a conductor as little
gyros, because they are (i) spinning on an axis, (ii) severely restrained in
their ability to move forward longitudinally down the conductor as current, and
(iii) much more free to precess laterally in the conductor. Thus when the
gyroelectrons in the receiving wire antenna, perturbed by an incoming
longitudinal EM wave in the vacuum, are longitudinally perturbed, they precess
laterally so that our instruments (which detect electron wiggles, not the incoming
vacuum EM wave) do detect "transverse waves." However, they are
detecting the transverse gyroelectron precession waves. The old
electrodynamicists, long before the electron or the atom was discovered, simply
envisioned the incoming EM wave as "waves in the thin material fluid
ether" which were "intercepted" as electric fluid waves in the
antenna. Hence since their instruments reported that the intercepted
"electric fluid" was vibrating transversely, they firmly believed (erroneously)
that this proved the ether wave to be transverse also, just as those "taut
string waves" that Maxwell and Faraday had believed in. That is the total raison d'etre behind the mistaken notion
of the transverse EM wave in the vacuum ether!
HARMONIC SERIES
Consisting of a fundamental
frequency, its first harmonic, its second harmonic, etc.
HEAVISIDE, OLIVER
Noted English self-taught
physicist and brilliant electrodynamicist, 1850-1925, who played a role in
discarding Maxwell's quaternions, and also played a role in forming vector
mathematics and formulating the vector reduction of Maxwell's theory from 20
quaternion equations in some 20 unknowns to the present 4 vector equations.
What are presently taught as
"Maxwell's equations" in university are actually Heaviside's equations.
Lorentz symmetrically regauged the
Maxwell-Heaviside equations, again greatly simplifying their mathematical
solution—and also unwittingly discarding all permissible overunity Maxwellian
systems in the process.
HEAVISIDE ENERGY FLOW COMPONENT
(1)
The
enormous nonintercepted and nondiverged energy flow component pouring out of
the terminals of the battery or generator, and missing the external circuit
entirely so that it is wasted.
(2)
The
enormous energy in the EM field, potential, or wave that misses the interaction
of the field, potential, or wave with the assumed unit point static electric
charge.
(3)
See
also discussion under Giant Negentropy.
HERACLITUS
To be added.
HERTZ, HEINRICH
Noted German physicist who
together with Heaviside and others transformed Maxwell's theory from quaternion
algebra to vector algebra, and who also produced EM waves, thus confirming
Maxwell's theory.
HIDDEN BIWAVES
Those bidirectional EM wavepairs
that comprise the scalar potential are indeed "hidden" with respect
to our normal "electron translation" (i.e., electron wiggle)
detectors and instruments.
HIDDEN VARIABLE THEORY
A class of quantum mechanical
theories which considers that the quantum state of a physical system is not a
complete specification after all. The "hidden
variables" are those additional components necessary to provide the
"complete state" of the system.
The hidden variables are those extra
components of the theorized complete state, which are not contained in the
quantum state. Bohm's hidden variables theory is the best known of all of these
theories, and makes the same predictions as does the conventional quantum
mechanics. In addition, it eliminates the terrible problem of the "missing
chaos," eliminates the quantum measurement problem, and it suggests that
quantum mechanics can be engineered if the hidden variables themselves can be
engineered. In the new approach, one goes a step further by considering hidden
EM variables infolded inside the potentials themselves, including inside the
quantum potential utilized by Bohm. The advantage of this assumption is that it
poses an engineerable interpretation,
after work by Stoney, Whittaker, and Ziolkowski. Further, the Russians have
utilized this type of EM hidden variable theory, along with the quantum
potential, to develop secret advanced weapons. The physics of this area is
called energetics.
HIERONYMUS, T. GALEN
Founder of the American version
of radionics, who patented a radionics machine and process to start the cycle
of radionics in this country.
HILBERT, DAVID
Noted German mathematician,
1862-1943, who did advanced work in geometry, theory of invariants, integral
equations, and mathematical physicist.
Noted particularly for his
development of Hilbert space.
HOLE
(ELECTRON HOLE)
An unfilled vacancy in an
ordering of electron energy levels, as in a lattice or in the Dirac Sea.
Electron energy levels have two
energy states: (1) positive energy
state, and (2) negative energy
state. The positive energy states are
associated with the positions of normal energy electrons. The negative energy states are almost all
filled, and this is the Dirac sea.
The absence of an electron from
either energy state creates a particular kind of hole. When an electron is absent from an electron
positive energy state position in a lattice, that results in an excess of
positive charge at that point vacated by the electron. Note that when an electron then refills
that hole (recombination occurs), the electron remains in a positive energy
state, does not disappear, and no
radiation occurs.
When an electron is lifted from an
electron negative energy state in the Dirac sea, that leaves behind a hole in
the negative energy state in the Dirac sea.
When an electron subsequently refills that hole, it "falls" in
and disappears, decaying to a lower energy level and emitting radiation due to
the difference in the energy levels.
The difference between holes in
the Dirac sea and holes in the electron positive energy levels in a lattice,
are very different. In short, they lead
to two quite different kinds of "hole and electron"
interactions. In the lattice
"hole-filling" (recombination), there is no excess radiation given
off and the electron does not disappear from the positive energy continuum. In the Dirac sea hole-filling, excess
radiation is given off and the electron disappears from the positive energy
continuum.
Under the influence of an electric
field, a positive energy hole in a
crystal lattice—where an electron has left and is therefore absent—will
effectively propagate through the lattice as a positive charge, but usually
much slower than the electron propagates in the opposite direction as an
electron current. The process is
actually more complex and involves continuous interaction with the electrons and
their physical distribution pattern and location. The hole current is mathematically treated as a special positive
charge current, often referred to as a positron current. In a current-carrying conductor or semiconductor,
one has a current of electrons traveling in one direction and simultaneously a
current of holes (hole positrons) traveling in the opposite direction, but
recombining.
As stated, in addition to lattice
holes, there also can exist unfilled holes in the Dirac negative energy states
comprising the vacuum, particularly when fields are present. In this case, it is a negative energy hole. A
positive energy electron that falls into a Dirac sea hole will emit energy as
it falls to that lower energy state. To
lift one of the electrons from the Dirac sea and leave a hole, energy must
therefore be added to the negative energy electron in the Dirac hole.
When fields are present, Dirac
holes may exist and may move as hole current in circuits under certain
conditions. The situation is complex;
see Felix Finster, "Definition of the Dirac Sea in the Presence of
External Fields," Adv. Theor. Math.
Phys., Vol. 2, 1998, p. 963-985.
Updated copy (version 4) is on http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9705006.
When a free electron fills a
positive energy hole in a lattice (positive electron energy state), this
effectively disposes of both the hole and the free electron which is now a bound
electron, and is called recombination. The electron does not disappear. In a material lattice, there is no energy
radiation from this, just the disappearance of the hole and the
"binding" of a free electron so that it is no longer free.
In visualizing positive hole
currents, passing the hole current though a surplus of available electrons (as
in a negative charge donor material) will result in "hole filling"
and recombinations. One may therefore
speak of disposing of unwanted hole current by recombination, and in fact this
is widely accomplished in semiconductors by controlling the doping.
HOLE CONDUCTION (LATTICE)
The movement of electron
vacancies (holes) in a lattice
continually left behind by hopping of the electrons as they break loose
from their bonded positions and move freely in an electron current.
When an electron hops out of a
lattice bond, it leaves behind a bonding gap or "hole" in the
positive electron energy state at that bond site, so that an extra positive
charge appears there at the hole. As
the electrons move in one direction in a conducting lattice, the holes move in
the opposite direction in a "positive current", but at a much slower
pace than the electron current moves.
HOLE
CURRENT (LATTICE)
See hole conduction (lattice).
HOMEOPATHY
A system of medical treatment
based on the theory that certain diseases can be cured by giving very small
doses of substances which in a healthy person would produce symptoms like those
of the disease. (Opposed to allopathy).
Homeopathy is based upon formation
and use of dimensioned potentials (particularly the potential composed of the
extremely rapid "making and breaking" hydrogen bonds in a fluid)
containing vacuum engines. Any material or solute, and therefore any molecule,
contains its own specific vacuum engine, its own charges, and its own
dimensioned potential. Dissolving the material in water, or even using a
suspension of it in water, allows the bonding potential in the water to
interact with the potential of the solute or suspension. Potentials superpose,
and they also diffuse and mix their inner structures (vacuum engines) into each
other. So the material or solute diffuses its vacuum engines into the interior
of the hydrogen bonding potential, in effect ordering and templating the
hydrogen bonding itself! Vigorous shaking of the suspension or solution assures
that all the fluid and H-bonding potential is exposed to the solute of
suspended particles, so that a thorough exchange of vacuum engines occurs. This
process in homeopathy is called potentizing.
It's actually just creating the desired internal vacuum engines in the
H-bonding potential of the water. Once that's done, there's really no further
need for the solute or the suspended particles. By repeatedly diluting the
solution to the extreme, then one can reach a point where there is a high
probability that not a single molecule of the original solute is remaining in
the fluid. Yet in each dilution, shaking can be used to insure the even spread
of the vacuum engines through the newly introduced H-bonding potential in the
newly introduced water. At the end, there exists an altered fluid whose
H-bonding potential now contains the desired vacuum engines. Drinking that
water now introduces those vacuum engines into the body fluids, bloodstream,
etc. The ingested dilute new vacuum engines will then diffuse through the
various potentials of the body, and produce altered chemical functioning of the
kind that could have been induced by the chemical or active solute material.
The advantage is that the harsh material residue of the chemical or solute is
not present in the body, as it is when allopathy is utilized.
HYPERFUNCTIONING
Functioning in hyperspace as
opposed to 4-dimensional Minkowski space.
Higher topological functioning.
HYPERSPACE
Refers to a space of more than
four dimensions, and specifically to those spatial dimensions outside the
normal three.
IDENTITY OF OPPOSITES
On the boundary, A and not-A are
identical. If all of a thing is
collected, one reaches the boundary of that thing and it turns into its own
opposite.
INERTIAL FRAME
A frame of reference in which
force-free bodies move along straight lines, and the postulates of special
relativity are valid.
In the new approach, this notion is
extended; even in an inertial frame, force-free bodies may move along straight
lines, the postulates of special relativity may remain valid, and yet the EM
hidden variable may induce other changes in the usual laws of nature due to the
action of hidden vacuum engines infolded in the dimensioned local spacetime (vacuum potential).
INFOLDED HIDDEN DYNAMICS
Refers to:
(i) Bohm's hidden variable theory
and the internal dynamics of the hidden variables/entities themselves, and
(ii) to the hidden biwave pairs
comprising a scalar potential, with the internal dynamics of those waves such
as tuning off harmonic frequency, multiplication, variation of phasing and
magnitude, etc.
Also, by Whittaker 1903 the scalar
potential can be decomposed into the bidirectional wavepair set in harmonic
series. By Whittaker 1904, each of the waves in a biwave pair can be further
decomposed into two potentials, so each pair of waves would consist of four
potentials. That is, the entire set of internal biwave pairs can be replaced by
four times as many internal "partial potentials" as was the number of
biwave pairs. Then Whittaker 1903 can be applied once again to break each one
of those scalar potentials into new biwave pairs, and so forth and so forth. So
the potential can be expressed as waves within waves within waves, or
potentials within potentials within potentials, and so on. The neat thing is
that each successive infolding (internesting) is a higher dimensional
functioning and a higher topology. So one can build (with some little pain!)
specific infolded wave patterns that will work in—say—the 7th dimension of
hyperspace, or the eighth dimension, and so on. This is why I called the
internal structuring of a potential (or the two potentials comprising an EM
wave) dimensioning the potential or
the wave. As a half-baked nuclear engineer whom the Army never let practice his
discipline, I wanted some way to directly engineer the nucleus. That has now been found. Unfortunately
it has also already been highly weaponized in secrecy by one or more foreign
nations. In other words, one can design a signal and assemble it (with some
difficulty) that will flip one quark in a nucleon in an atom. That way one can
transmute an element either into the next higher element isomer or the next
lower element isomer. Using a quantum potential to "transport" the
necessary vacuum engines, the effect can be accomplished at a great distance,
in multiple targets simultaneously, and the effect is not shieldable. "Jumps"
in nuclear transmutation can also be accomplished. The migration of electrons
to and from an atom (as in solution, e.g.) makes and negates ions continuously.
Thus continually the external potentials and the nuclear potentials
intercommunicate. This means that their vacuum engines continually diffuse. Any
dimensioning of the external potentials will be passed into the nuclear
potentials as a dimensioning action also. If certain conditioning vacuum
engines are present in the external potentials, then the slow diffusion into
the nuclear potentials begins to affect the nucleons and their interactions,
the quarks comprising the nucleons, the particles such as pions continually
exchanged between nucleons, etc. The mechanism for nuclear transmutations and
production of new species is there! I believe, e.g., and am working to more
clearly express, that the major mechanism producing the new nuclear species in
cold fusion experiments just such dimensioned potentials, involving the
inadvertent dimensioning of potentials comprised of the hydrogen bondings of
the water and other factors.
INFOLDED REAL VECTOR COMPONENTS
Well, simply take a set of real
force vectors that altogether sum to a vector zero resultant.
That "vector zero system"
is a zero with respect to forced translation
of a particle or mass. It is not an absence per se, but is the presence of
specifically hidden and "infolded" real vectors. Two elephants
pushing each other to a draw form such a "zero-translating" system.
That "zero system" is quite different from two crickets pushing
against each other to a draw! Anyone who thinks all zeros are
"absences" and who thinks all zeros are equal, is invited to try
standing between the crickets and observing how he feels, then standing between
the elephants and see how he feels. The latter might be a real bummer. So zeros
can differ! And a zero can be a presence of many real things, all still there
but "infolded" and "hidden," but just the absence of any one and only one thing. Even in
arithmetic, e.g., we are free to pull 5-3-2 right out of 0, or pull out
4-7+8-6-2+5+1+1-3-1/2-1/2 (if I got the arithmetic correct!). And so on. So we
have always used the fact that a net
zero can have a real internal composition, without detailing it exactly. We
teach our schoolchildren to do it, but fail to tell them what they are doing!
When you sum EM force fields to
zero, the fields are still there and real. You have altered the energy of the
system or volume, and also the potential energy of the system or volume. And
you have done it in specific directions, magnitudes, etc. along the
"fingers" of the infolded patterns. In short, you have made a
specific vacuum engine. Mass, fluid, nuclei, molecules, etc. exposed to that
"conditioned vacuum potential" may well undergo physical and chemical
and electrical changes. Golden once performed experiments which powerfully
conditioned the local vacuum, and all clocks and watches (mechanical,
electrical, etc.) in the local area were awry for four days.
INFOLDING
With reference to signals,
infolding means "placing the signal or modulation or change upon one or
more of the internal bidirectional wavepairs comprising the scalar potential.
Since all EM potentials ultimately
represent changes to the ambient vacuum potential, one has conditioned or
altered the vacuum itself when infolding is utilized. Infolding of EM signals,
vectors, and directions produces vacuum
engines. By Whittaker's principle and Bearden's corollary, these vacuum
engines can be designed to affect matter—including atomic nuclei, nucleons, etc.—in
any manner desired.
INFORMATION CONTENT OF THE FIELD
Russian euphemism for the
structuring of the hidden longitudinal EM waves and their dynamics, that
comprise any EM potential, field, or wave.
INFRASONIC
Below sonic.
Frequencies below what the ear can
hear. Below about 20 Hertz.
INTERFEROMETER
An instrument in which a wave is
split into two waves or beams, which after traveling over different paths are
subsequently reunited and display interference.
INTERFEROMETRY
Measurement of wavelengths of
light and very small distances and thicknesses,
...for determining indices of
refraction, and for analyzing small parts of a spectrum by means of the
interference phenomena of light.
INTERNAL SPACE
To be added.
ITERATED
Done repeatedly, like picking beans one at a time.
JOSEPHSON EFFECT
Flow of Cooper pairs
(superconducting electron pairs) across a thin dielectric separating two
superconducting electrons, in the absence of a voltage drop.
That is, the pair of electrons can
"tunnel" through a thin insulating barrier.
JOSEPHSON JUNCTION
The thin dielectric separating
two superconducting electrons, with subsequent Josephson tunneling of Cooper
pairs.
JOSEPHSON TUNNELING
See Josephson effect.
JOULE
A measure of energy.
One joule equals one watt for one
second. In physics the unit of work or energy in the MKS system, being the
amount of work done by one newton acting through a distance of one meter, equal
to 10,000,000 ergs.
JUNG, CARL GUSTOV
Noted Swiss psychiatrist and
psychologist who founded Jungian analytical psychology, formulated the
principle of synchronicity, and advanced and delineated collective unconscious
mind.
From the content of his German
patients, Jung predicted WW II two decades before it occurred.
KINDLING
Coherent integration (adding)
of similar virtual components among the vast "noise" of dissimilar
virtual components, so that the "signal-to-noise" ratio of the
integrated signal steadily increases, and the integrated "observable
signal" grows out of the background virtual state noise.
This "kindling" process
is directly analogous to coherent integration of nondiscernible radar signals
far beneath the received noise, to build and extract the real radar return
signals from targets. This sort of
process dramatically increases the "sensitivity" of the radar. Real, very tiny signals even 100 dB or more
beneath the noise level can be retrieved in such fashion by modern radars.
Similar processes can integrate
very minute signals already passed into the virtual state and presumed to be
nonexistent. Usually, however, the
difference frequency between two frequencies at least one harmonic interval
apart must be used, considering the vacuum's virtual flux state as an isotropic
nonlinear medium.
One may also hypothesize that
potentials and propagating signals may decrease with distance, but are never
truly "lost" in that they never reach a total zero. When they reach the quantum level, further
decrease in amplitude simply results in their passing into the virtual state
(subquantum level).
KIRCHHOFF'S CURRENT-LAW
At any time, the sum of the
instantaneous currents flowing into a node or point in a circuit equals the sum
of the instantaneous currents flowing out of that node or point.
KIRCHHOFF'S VOLTAGE LAW
At any time, the sum of all
voltage rises in a closed loop circuit equals the sum of all drops in that
closed loop circuit.
LAMB, WILLIS EUGENE JR.
American physicist and Nobelian
who discovered the hyperfine structure of the hydrogen spectrum, and first
measured the interaction of the vacuum energy that generates a change in the
energy levels of the hydrogen atom, according to Dirac's theory and quantum
electrodynamics.
LAMB SHIFT
A very small correction to the first excited state of the hydrogen atom due to interaction of the vacuum.
Willis
Lamb experimentally confirmed this prediction of quantum electrodynamics to
high accuracy.
LAMELLAR CURRENT
Current in thin layers.
Thin layers of current. Thin sheets
of current.
LASER
A device that generates light in
which all the photons are exactly in step and produce a coherent beam.
Laser light has one wavelength and
is more easily controlled than other kinds of light. Use of a laser to perform
interferometry is one way to create holograms; use of a laser to illuminate a
hologram is one way to read it. Originally the word "laser" was an
acronym that stood for "light amplification by stimulated emission of
radiation." Note that when TiO2 particles in suspension, with a
small amount of fluorescent dye added, are weakly illuminated by a small
coherent light source (a laser), a tremendous room-filling output of coherent
light emission occurs, by the anti-Stokes emission effect. This is lasing
without population inversion, and it is a validated and easily testable
overunity process. This is the process patented by Lawandy.
LASING WITHOUT INVERSION
The amplification of coherent
light in an intensely scattering medium, comprised of certain powdered laser crystals or suspensions of similar
material, where a variety of phenomena such as gain narrowing and amplifying
random walk of light propagating in the medium, combine to give laser emission
with diffusive feedback.
Gain tends to depend on the volume
of the medium, so that at a certain medium the gain in light amplification by
the medium exceeds the losses, and the laser action results above this critical
volume. The intensity of the light
scattering (multiply reflecting) in the medium then will increase rapidly until an "explosion" of light results
in an intense flash of coherent light in all directions from the medium volume.
If the excitation is still
present, the process will be repeated and the energy density will again exceed
the critical value, rapidly generating another intense flash of light. This process can be repeated many times,
given the presence of continued excitation.
A very interesting phenomena that
can occur is coherent backscattering.
Here the light scatters over both a forward-time path and a
time-reversed path, perhaps with each path consisting of more than 1,000
scatterings. Because of time-reversal
symmetry, the two waves (forward and backward) acquire exactly the same (though
random!) phase. So the two waves after
all this 1,000 scatterings on their paths, meet and interfere constructively in
the direction back toward the exciting light source.
In theory the mean free path can
be made shorter and shorter, so that all the light would be trapped inside the
medium. This is called Anderson
localization, and it has been reported in the literature; see D.S. Wiersma, P. Bartolini,
A. Lagendiji, and R. Righini, "Localization of light in a disordered
medium," Nature, Vol. 390,
1997, p. 671; John Sajeev, "Frozen light," ibid., p. 661-662.
This work grew out of original
work called out by Letokhov but largely ignored for more than two decades.
References: D. Wiersma and A.
Lagendijk, "Laser action in very white paint," Physics World, Jan. 1997, p. 33-37; — "Light diffusion with
gain and random lasers," Physical
Review E54, 1996, p. 4256; N.M. Lawandy et al., "Laser action in
strongly scattering media," Nature,
Vol. 368, 1994, p. 436; V.S. Letokhov, Generation of light by a scattering
medium with negative resonance absorption," Sov. Phys. JETP, Vol. 26, 1968, p. 835.
Note that we have nominated a
version of this process, together with consideration of the erroneously discarded
Heaviside nondiverged energy flow component, as the fundamental mechanism
proposed to be involved in gamma ray bursters, x-ray bursters, and in some
gamma ray and x-ray flashes associated with atmospheric phenomena on earth in
thunderstorms, etc. We also nominated
the missing Heaviside energy flow component as the agent accounting for the
excess gravity (some 90% of the total gravity) in the arms of spiral galaxies
that hole those arms intact so they do not fly apart. See T.E. Bearden, "Dark Matter or Dark Energy?",
Journal of New Energy, 4(4), Spring
2000, p. 4-11 (also available on http://www.cheniere.org);
— "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Proceedings of Congress 2000, St. Petersburg, Russia, Vol. 1, July
2000 , p. 86-98. Also published in Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer
2000, p. 11-23. Also carried on DoE
open website http://www.ott.doe.gov/papersbooks.html
and on http://www.cheniere.org.
LAW OF PHYSICS
A restriction placed upon the
physical mechanisms that can occur under certain broad assumptions as to the
background situation and environment.
Actually, in nature there are no
such rigidly fixed "laws"; these are only man's synthesis for the
behavior of large classes of systems under very general conditions. Any
"law of physics" can be violated if the conditions contained in its
assumptions are violated. Conservation laws are often touted as "laws of
physics." Actually, the conservation laws assume a closed system or one in
equilibrium, and a linear spacetime (Lorentz frame). If either or both of these
assumptions is locally violated, any or all of the conservation laws can be
violated locally, even though the overall global conservation is still upheld.
Quite simply, in that case one has opened the system (broken symmetry). In
particle physics, broken symmetry already results in violation of one or more
of the conservation laws. In leading Russian physics journals, papers are
regularly published containing unrestricted general relativity with concomitant
violation of any and all conservation laws.
LAWANDY PATENTS
Patents covering and related to
anti-Stokes emission (excess emission of energy) in strongly scattering,
optically active media such as TiO2 particles in suspension.
More energy is emitted than one must
input to stimulate the effect. It is being hailed as a new form of lasing,
without the requirement for population inversion.
LETOKHOV, V. S.
Russian pioneer in excess
emission phenomena from stimulated media.
LETOKHOV EFFECT
The excess emission (overunity
emission of energy) phenomena in strongly scattering, optically active media,
usually referred to as "negative absorption of the medium".
For an overview, see V. S. Letokhov,
“Stimulated emission of an ensemble of scattering particles with negative
absorption,” ZhETF Plasma, 5(8),
Apr. 15, 1967, p. 262-265; —“Generation
of light by a scattering medium with negative resonance absorption,” Sov. Phys. JETP, 26(4), Apr. 1968, p.
835-839; — “Laser Maxwell’s Demon,” Contemporary
Physics, 36(4), 1995, p. 235-243.
LOCALITY
Characteristic where
interactions are local in spacetime.
LOCALIZED
Confined
to a small region of a large system rather than being extended through the
system or at a distance.
LOCAL VIRTUAL PHOTON FLUX OF VACUUM
Refers to a local region of the
vacuum, which also refers to the vacuum
flux density of that region.
LONGITUDINAL COMPONENT
In EM waves, the longitudinal
component of the fields along the direction of travel,
...as opposed to the transverse
components at right angles to the direction of travel.
LONGITUDINAL E-FIELD
We may divide any electrical
field into two components, a transverse component and a longitudinal component.
Of course one or the other may be a
zero vector.
LONGITUDINAL GRADIENT
Compression wave gradients
(differences) in density or pressure,
...considered in a direction from
their origin along the direction of primary movement, vs. transverse waves,
which act perpendicular to that direction.
LONGITUDINAL INTERIOR WAVE
In conventional theory, the
electric portion of the EM wave is a transverse field oscillation, and the
longitudinal component is essentially zero.
In the new "infolded" wave
approach, there is no overall transverse gradient in the vacuum potential, but
there is an infolded longitudinal gradient which oscillates "inside the
vacuum potential." This is rather like a "pressure wave"
transmitted under water, without causing a surface wave involving physical
upheaval and fall-off of the water. In EM, by analogy the speed of the
"bulk upheaval" transverse wave is nominally c, the speed of light in
vacuum [but see discussion of galloping waves, for what really happens!]. The
speed of the pressure wave, under water, may be very much greater than c,
because it is a special "tunneling" process and it also involves the
galloping wave effect. Experimental measurement of superluminal tunneling
velocities—such as more than 4c—are already well-known in the literature.
To better visualize this
"pressure wave," consider that it is like a sort of "velocity
modulation" upon the edge of the conventionally-visualized plane wave
front of a traveling transverse wave, except now the plane itself does not move.
All the succeeding planes are "bumped" by the velocity modulation of
one plane, and so the velocity modulation propagates through (inside) the
vacuum potential as a modulated pressure wave, without transverse change of the
potential.
Now we have a very special medium!
It consists of bidirectional EM wave pairs, one passing through the other. In
such a case, it is already known that the speed of a "planar wave
front" in the superposition and resulting interference of two oppositely
moving waves can in fact greatly exceed the speed of light momentarily, then
slow dramatically below than the speed of light, etc., so long as the average
velocity is c. This is called the galloping wave effect. [E.g., see William G.
Harter et al., "Galloping waves and their relativistic properties, American Journal of Physics, 53(7),
July 1985, p. 671-679.]. Since the plane wavefront within the interior can in fact vary its velocity, we are
quite free to use this "velocity pulse modulation" effect of
wavefront speed variation, to place signal intelligence upon the planar wave
front speed variations. So we can transmit hidden pressure waves with
intelligence on them, through the interior of the vacuum potential. Further, the restriction to an average
velocity of c does not have to apply, and the planar pressure pulses can be
transmitted much faster than c. This is the basis of the work Fogal and I
are struggling with, in order to achieve superluminal communication. It is also
what we have been struggling with in an effort to come up with a communication
system that can propagate infolded signals inside the H-bonding potential of
the ocean itself, so that high-data-rate communications with deep submarines
could be utilized, at any distance, and the huge, gawky, frightfully expensive,
and environment-affecting ELF systems be done away with. We also think it
should eventually be possible to develop an underwater radar type of system,
but it's far too early at this point to try to conceptualize just exactly how
it would work.
LONGITUDINAL WAVE
A "pressure" type of
wave, similar to sound, in which the vibrations are along the direction of
travel of the wave.
Hence, a wave composed of
alternating densifications and rarefactions, where we focus upon the
longitudinal component of the changes. In the past we have used the term
"scalar waves" to imply longitudinal standing waves, such as in one
infolded Stoney-Whittaker wavepair inside the scalar potential. In classical EM
theory, the Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave of energy from a
time-varying, electrically charged source. In fact, even in the ordinary
theory, an exact solution of the problem does allow this longitudinal wave, as
shown by Keech and Corum, International
Journal of Theoretical Physics,
20(1), 1981, pp. 63-68. Conventionally, as explained elsewhere in this
glossary, the classical electromagnetic wave is modeled as a vector string
wave, comprised of transverse vibrations on implicitly assumed material taut
strings in the vacuum. In the new approach, such transverse vector force field
waves (Hertz waves) do not exist as such
in vacuum; instead, two coupled, dynamic scalar potentials exist there. The E and B fields are formed and exist as the these potentials and their
gradient coupling to spinning charged detecting mass particles.
LONGITUDINALLY
Of or in length. Running or placed or operating or changing lengthwise.
Opposed to transverse.
LORENTZ, HENDRIK ANTOON
Renowned Dutch physicist and
Nobelist, 1853-1928, who developed the Lorentz transformations and
Fitzgerald-Lorentz contraction.
He shared the Nobel Prize for
discovering the Zeeman effect.
LORENTZ INVARIANCE
An
inertial frame is independent of the velocity of the frame relative to any
other frame.
LORENTZ INVARIANCE PRINCIPLE
The principle that the laws of physics are the same
in all reference frames.
LORENTZ REGAUGING
Changing the two potentials in
the Maxwell-Heaviside equations in potential form so that the resulting
equations have the variables separated.
An unfortunate effect is that this
discards all Maxwellian systems far from equilibrium in their vacuum exchange,
hence discards all permissible Maxwellian COP>1.0 systems.
LORENTZ SYMMETRY
Referring to the symmetrical
regauging by Lorentz of Maxwell's equations.
LORENZ, LUDWIG VALENTIN
Scientist who first changed
Maxwell's equations—two years after their publication in 1865—by (effectively)
symmetrically regauging them, thereby unwittingly discarding all Maxwellian
systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium with the active vacuum.
See L. V. Lorenz, "On the identity of the vibrations of light with electrical currents," Philosophical Magazine, Vol. 34, 1867, p. 287-301. In this paper Lorenz gave essentially what today is called the Lorentz symmetrical regauging.
Comment: (gratefully received from T. Barrett) This paper gave f(t-r/c) functions. Fitzgerald said that Lorenz's functions were essentially the same as his, and Fitzgerald became a leading proponent of "retarded potentials". But it is believed that Fitzgerald was unaware of Lorenz's work until the 1880's, so he is given credit for parallel development. Some people talk of Fitzgerald-Lorenz functions. This is a regauging, but the term "gauge" (inspired by railroad gauges) was first introduced by Hermann Weyl in the 1900s. He used it for a change in length and was shot down by Einstein's theory—Weyl's theory was not relativistic. The idea resurfaced in the 1920s when quantum theory was being formulated, but this time it meant "change in phase" and not "change in length".
Comment
by T.E.B.: Thus "Lorentz" regauging of Maxwell's equations really
was first done by Lorenz in 1967.
However, not too much attention was paid to L. V. Lorenz' work (e.g., by
Fitzgerald). When H. A. Lorentz later
used symmetrical regauging (essentially Lorenz' regauging), his influence was
so great that it was adopted straightaway and has remained adopted to this day.
LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTION (LENR)
Cold fusion, or the anomalous
transmutations of elements which occur in certain electrolytes with specially
prepared palladium electrodes.
The transmutations occur even though
in conventional theory there is insufficient energy to accomplish them.
Conventional science has rather
vehemently attacked cold fusion and many of the cold fusion scientists, even
though there are now hundreds of successful experiments in multiple
laboratories throughout the world.
In our view, once the
properly-prepared palladium lattices are loaded with positive ions, the
formation of temporary, fleeting time-reversal zones in the electrolyte
temporarily reverses the law of attraction and repulsion of charges. Thus H+ ions, e.g., may attract each other
in even numbers (opposite numbers are forbidden by the Pauli exclusion
principle), so closely that each enters the strong (nuclear) force region of
the other, so that the group becomes a quasi-nucleus. Note that the gluons are partially "unglued" by the TRZ
formation, and so the preferred method of "decay" of the anomalous
TRZ state as the surrounding electrolyte ions move to negate it, is by flipping
of a quark. One D+ ion coupled to one
H+ ion, e.g., when attracted into a quasi-nucleus in a TRZ, may decay into
tritium by flipping one quark and changing one of the protons into a
neutron. Two H+ ions may decay into
deuterium (D+) by flipping one quark and turning an H+ into a neutron. Two D+ ions may simply "tighten
further" into a real nucleus as the TRZ decays, and result in an alpha
particle (helium nucleus). The TRZ
hypothesis does precisely explain the most important reactions that are
experimentally shown to occur. For more
on this hypothesis, see T. E. Bearden, "EM Corrections
Enabling a Practical Unified Field Theory with Emphasis on Time-Charging
Interactions of Longitudinal EM Waves," Explore, 8(6), 1998, p. 7-16; — ., "EM Corrections Enabling a
Practical Unified Field Theory with Emphasis on Time-Charging Interactions of
Longitudinal EM Waves," Journal of New Energy, 3(2/3), 1998, p.
12-28.
MAGNETIC DIPOLE
Paired north and south magnetic
poles of equal strength over microscopic or macroscopic distance.
MAGNETIC INDUCTION
The act of a change in magnetic
field producing an electric field at right angles, which in turn produces
electron flow.
MAGNETIC SPIN
Refers to the intrinsic angular
momentum, known as spin, of electrons, protons, and neutrons, etc.
The electrons combined in an atom or
ion have a resultant angular momentum, that is the combined intrinsic spin of
the electrons and the angular momentum due to their motion around the nucleus.
There is also a magnetic moment associated with this angular momentum (spin) whenever
it is nonzero. Therefore atoms or ions with nonzero spin are magnetic atoms or ions. This is often
loosely referred to as "magnetic spin." It is actually the magnetic
moment of nonzero spin.
MAGNETOELECTRONICS
New microelectronic components
which exploit the spin of the electron rather than its charge.
References: A Barthelemy et al., "Giant Steps with Tiny
Magnets," Physics World, Nov.
1994, p. 34-38; G. Prinz,
"Magnetoelectronics," Science,
Vol. 282, 1998, p. 1660.
MAGNETORESISTANCE
A change in electrical
resistivity in a material when a magnetic field is applied to the material.
MAGNETORESISTANCE,
COLOSSAL
A very large change in electrical resistance observed in
the manganese perovskite materials when a magnetic field is applied to
them. The effect in these materials is
the largest magnetoresistance effect known at present.
See N. A. Babushkina et al., "Metal-insulator transition induced by oxygen isotope exchange in the magnetoresistive perovskite manganites," Nature, Vol. 31, 1998, p. 159; L. I. Balcells et al., "High-field magnetoresistance at interfaces in manganese perovskites," Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 58, 1998, p. R14697; M. Blamire et. al., "Understanding and utilizing colossal magnetoresistance materials," Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A., Vol. 356, 1998, p. 1469-1712.
MAGNETOSTATIC SCALAR POTENTIAL
Roughly, the "pole
strength" differential between the two poles of a magnetic dipole.
Anyone who wishes may polish this
definition.
MASSLESS DISPLACEMENT CURRENTS
Currents without mass.
Examples in the standard theory
include df/dt, dE/dt, dP/dt, dB/dt, etc.
MATTER
Highly condensed 3-spatial
energy, compressed by the factor c2 …
and with the observation process
d/dt having been applied to the fundamental masstime entity to provide mass as
a frozen snapshot. Matter, of course,
has internal structure, order and organization, and dynamics. All matter is in a continuous energetic
exchange with its vacuum (4-spatial) environment.
MAXWELL, JAMES CLERK
Brilliant scientist who first
formulated the unified theory of electricity and magnetism.
James Clerk Maxwell was born on June
13, 1831 in Edinburgh, Scotland. In 1847 he entered the University of
Edinburgh, then transferred to Cambridge in the fall of 1850. After graduation,
he stayed on at Cambridge in a research position. He was elected a Fellow of
Trinity College and placed on the staff of college lecturers. In 1856 he
returned to Scotland, where he took up a Chair of natural Philosophy at
Marishal College, Aberdeen. In autumn, 1860 he took a new position as Chair and
Professor of Natural Philosophy and Astronomy at King's College, London (a
position he held until 1865, at which time he resigned). Maxwell was
financially independent. He was elected to the Royal Society in 1861, while at
King's College. From 1865 to 1871 he resided at his ancestral Scottish country
home, Glenlair, developing his major ideas into book form. Maxwell returned to
Cambridge in 1871, where he became the first holder of the Cavendish Chair of
Experimental Physics. There he also supervised the construction and operation
of Cavendish Laboratory. His treatise on electromagnetism appeared in 1873. He
held his position at Cambridge until he died on Nov. 5, 1879 at age 48, of a
form of stomach cancer—the same ailment that had killed his mother when he was
a child. [Thanks to Encyclopaedia
Britannica!]
MAXWELL (UNIT)
Unit of magnetic flux, in the cgs
system.
MAXWELL'S ELECTRODYNAMICS
Maxwell's electrodynamics is
Maxwell's equations.
MAXWELLIAN SYSTEM
Any physical or electromagnetic
system whose electrodynamic operations obey James Clerk Maxwell's
electrodynamics model.
The term is usually applied with
respect to those systems which obey a highly reduced subset of Maxwell's after
the Lorentz regauging of the Maxwell-Heaviside equations. This subset is now
inappropriately referred to as "Maxwell's equations". This is unfortunate. As a result, today many scientists and most
engineers no longer understand that Maxwell's theory—when embedded in a higher
topology algebra—permits a vast richness of additional EM systems and
behaviors, including full unified field theory operations. In the standard U(1) gauge symmetry
electrodynamics, all these higher symmetry functions and systems are excluded a priori. From our view, this is particularly sad since these arbitrary
reductions of Maxwell's theory arbitrarily excluded all EM systems far from
equilibrium in their exchange with the active vacuum. Hence almost all scientists and engineers believe it is against
the very laws of nature to propose an electrical power system that produces
more energy out—and more work in the load—than the energy input made by the
operator himself. This sad error has
resulted in (1) crippled electrical power systems that extract their output
energy from the vacuum but kill themselves faster than they power their loads,
(2) the giant pollution of the earth, (3) extraordinary energy costs, (4)
struggles and wars over oil and energy resources, and (5) the looming giant
economic collapse of the economies of many nations. Further, unless this latter facet is checked, it may also lead to
(6) the unleashing of all the weapons of mass destruction in the arsenals of
many nations, destroying all civilization and much of the biosphere.
McCREA
To be added.
MICHELSON, ALBERT ABRAHAM
German-born
American physicist who invented an interferometer (Michelson interferometer)
named after him. Michelson used his
interferometer in a renowned experiment designed to measure the velocity of the
earth through the ether, which would produce a shift in his interferometer
pattern. No such shift was observed,
which indicated the absence of an ether wind and was largely responsible for
the downfall of the concept of the material ether which had been assumed
previously.
Reference:
Albert A. Michelson and Edward Morley, "Influence of Motion of the Medium
on the Velocity of Light," American
Journal of Science, Vol. 31, 1886, p. 377-386; — "On the Relative
motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether," ibid., Vol. 34, 1887, p. 333-345.
MIND
From the medical view, with
thanks to Webster's Medical Desk
Dictionary, Merriam-Webster Inc., Springfield, Massachusetts, 1986: (1) The
element or complex of elements in an individual that feels, perceives, thinks,
wills, and especially reasons; (2) the conscious mental events and capabilities
in an organism, (3) the organized conscious and unconscious adaptive mental
activity of an organism.
See an extended discussion of mind under energy.
MIND-BODY COUPLING
To be added.
MIND-MATTER INTERACTION
The n-space interaction between
the time-like mind and its time-like operations and the 3-spatial physical body
and its 3-space operations. To first
order, we may treat these interactions in four dimensions.
MIND OPERATIONS
To be added.
MOTION
To be added.
MOTIONLESS ELECTROMAGNETIC GENERATOR
(MEG)
Transformer-like COP>1.0
electrical power generator invented by Bearden, Kenny, Hayes, Moore, and
Patrick which powers the transformer core with a permanent magnet, but
separates the curled magnetic vector potential A (the magnetic field B) from
the uncurled magnetic vector potential A, so that the magnetic field flux is
retained in the core while the A-potential is replenished outside the core and
adjacent to it.
The overunity mechanism is thus
provided by a version of the Aharonov-Bohm experiment, which proves that this
splitting of the A-potential does occur and that the uncurled A-potential will
interact energetically with electrons.
In short, by "splitting the potential" and potentializing two
paths to the same energy density as the original unsplit potential, the MEG
doubles the available potential energy available via the permanent magnet
dipole's broken 3-symmetry in the active vacuum. Both the curled A-potential (magnetic field) inside the core and
the uncurled A-potential outside the core interact simultaneously with the
output coils when pulsed. Thus the
output coils "doubly interact" instead of singly interacting. This "double-dipping" of available
energy flow allows permissible COP>1.0, since the system is far from equilibrium
with the active vacuum exchange.
Pulsing applies the Lenz law effect
to both the split potentials, further increasing the energy density of the two
interactions with the output coils. The
MEG nominally exhibits from COP = 1.7 to COP = 10, using two input coils.
See M.W. Evans, P.K. Anastasovski,
T.E. Bearden et al., "Classical Electrodynamics Without the Lorentz
Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum," Optik 111(6), 2000, p. 246-248; — "Inconsistencies of the
Maxwell-Heaviside Theory of Electrodynamics: The Aharonov-Bohm Effect," Journal of New Energy, 4(3), Winter
1999,p. 236-240; — "Vacuum Energy Flow and Poynting Theorem from Topology
and Gauge Theory," submitted to Physica
Scripta (in review); — "The Aharonov-Bohm Effect as the Basis of Electromagnetic
Energy Inherent in the Vacuum," submitted to Optik (in review), — "Explanation of the Motionless
Electromagnetic Generator with O(3) Electrodynamics, Foundations of Physics Letters, 2001 (in press). See also T.E. Bearden, "Energy from the
Active Vacuum: The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator," in M.W. Evans
(Ed.), Contemporary Optics and
Electrodynamics, Wiley, 2001, 3 vols. (in press), comprising a Special
Topic issue as vol. 114, I. Prigogine and S.A.
Rice (series eds), Advances in Chemical Physics, Wiley.
MULTICOLLECTION
Multiple collection of the same
energy flow, by rerouting the passed Poynting energy back around to the
collectors for another pass by them, with additional collection.
A common means of
"returning" the Poynting flow for additional collection is
retroreflection, as in phase conjugate reflection. Since a nominal energy
collection fraction on a single pass is only about 10-13, a great many re-passes of the same energy can be
returned. Work is done on the collector in each pass. One joule of energy can
actually perform many joules of work; this is a change to the usual statement
of the work-energy theorem, which assumes single pass, single collection only.
MULTIPASS RETROREFLECTION
Iteratively retroreflecting the
same Poynting energy flow, each time it impinges on and passes by an
intercepting collector, so that multiple passes of the same energy flow are
made onto and by the collector.
More and more of the passing
enormous energy is collected as more and more passes by are made. The collected
energy is then dissipated as work in the circuit or device. Such processing can
allow overunity EM circuits and devices.
MULTIPASSES
Multiple passes. See multipass retroreflection.
NANOTECHNOLOGY
The fabrication of devices with atomic or molecular
precision, to produce operating devices with minimum feature sizes less than
100 nanometers.
Often described as a marriage between chemistry and engineering. The self-assembling of the units is referred to as molecular manufacturing, and the devices are built one atom or molecule at a time with programmed nanoscopic arms. As occurred with the modern machine and technology age, the first requirement is to develop the tools that do the working, and the "tools that build the tools." That fundamental work is off the ground and running already.
Nanomanufacturing plants capable of manufacturing bulk materials or arbitrary structures with atomic precision are envisioned, with almost every atom being placed precisely as desired.
Nanotechnology may well produce the next great scientific revolution. As an example, nanobots have been visualized that will circulate in a human body's bloodstream and specifically attack cancer cells. Nanobots for cleaning up air and water pollution are possible. Food synthesis is envisioned since the technology provides the ability to combine molecules directly.
As with all technologies, the ethics lies in the hands of the system designer and the user. Increased technology always allows greater use for good and greater use for bad purposes. Because of the extraordinary "evil uses" that can be employed in the use of nanobots, Bill Joy, chief scientist of Sun Microsystems, recommends no further development of nanotechnology and no further research. He stated,"… we have the possibility not just of weapons of mass destruction but of knowledge-enable mass destruction… hugely amplified by the power of self-replication… we are on the cusp of the further protection of extreme evil…"
Joy's fears are well-founded. Already the union of artificial intelligence with self-replicating nanobots is foreseen. If that union is successful, one can foresee the unleashing of what can only be called "species" of self-replicating, smart nanobots bent on the mass destruction of humanity in various ways.
Also, contrast the nanobots to our discussion of even more advanced nanotechnology of causal system robots (CSRs) using functioning system of causal fields (sets of longitudinal EM waves and their dynamics, prior to having interacted with charged mass, and thence being systems that are functioning sets of spacetime curvatures). We have already survived one massive world-wide insertion of an armada of such CSRs—fortunately first generation systems and with no countermeasures, so they were easily detected and destroyed. We may not survive the next such insertion and attack, as the maturity of the CSRs increases.
Considering the usual focus of governments and human control systems, my prediction is that detrimental, self-replicating, smart nanobots for use in war, surprise strategic attack, and mass destruction of human targets is already on the early planning boards. The obvious war applications of nanotechnology will advance faster than the peaceful applications, behind a public screen of simpler benevolent developments. This is almost certain, since the lead time for maturing the nanotechnology is from 10 to 20 years. This long lead time rules out most private capital ventures of substantial magnitude. It results in the requirement for government funding, just as development of the atomic bomb was government funded. As a nanotechnology "arms race" begins and heats up, one will see the equivalent of new but hidden "Manhattan Projects" in specialized mass destruction weapons nanotechnology. Rather substantial funding of nanotechnology research and development by several nations is already a fact.
Unethical aspects aside, the potential for useful and benevolent purposes of nanotechnology is very great. The development in this new field is now beginning to escalate almost exponentially, year by year, funded primarily by governments and to a more limited extent by private companies.
Reference: David Cook, Jessica Voorhees, and Brian Valz, "Nanotechnology: The Coming Molecular Revolution," available on website http://nanotech.about.com.
NEGATIVE ABSORPTION OF THE MEDIUM
Excess emission from a medium, as
in the Letokhov work and in Bohren's experiment. The excess energy is received
from the vacuum interaction.
NEGATIVE RESISTOR
Any component or function or
process that freely receives energy from outside the system in unusable or
disordered form and outputs that energy in usable, ordered form inside the
system, where that is the net function performed.
We specifically do not include
"differential" negative resistors such as the tunnel diode,
thyristor, and magnetron which dissipate and disorder more energy from the
system, overall, than they order and furnish to the system in their negative
resistance regime.
NEGENTROPIC
Functioning to produce or involve
negentropy.
Reordering previously scattered
energy without requiring the operator or experimenter to input energy to do the
reordering work (an example is passive retroreflection of scattered EM energy).
NEGENTROPIC ENGINEERING
Expending a little bit of energy
to form a dipole or dipolarity, and then intercepting, collecting, and using
some of the enormous EM energy freely extracted by the dipole from the vacuum
indefinitely, without using any of the extracted EM energy to scatter the
charges in the dipole and destroy the dipole, thereby shutting of the vacuum's
furnishing of copious free energy.
NEWTONIAN 3RD LAW
For every action there is an
equal and opposite reaction.
This law should be extended and
restated something like this: "for every action there is an opposite and
equal reaction if the causative mechanism of the reaction is allowed to occur
and not first redirected away from its target." An example of a violation
of Newton's third law as usually stated, is provided by the emission of a phase
conjugate replica wave from a phase conjugate mirror material. No matter how
powerfully pumped, the PCM does not recoil. The reason is that the antiwave
cause of Newtonian third law recoil was intercepted by nonlinear multiwave
interaction before it could reach its target nuclei, and rediverted away from
the atom and on out of the material. Since the causative mechanism for
Newtonian recoil did not occur, the PCM did not recoil.
NEWTONIAN RECOIL
As used in the paper, refers to
Newton's third law reaction created as the recoil of the nucleus of an atom
which absorbs an incoming EM longitudinal wave, or emits one.
NEWTON'S THIRD LAW
For every action there is an
opposite and equal reaction.
In Maxwell's electrodynamics, Newton's
third law is missing. It is missing
because of the coarseness of the modeling which Maxwell was forced to use. Maxwell's seminal paper was read in 1864 and
published in 1865. At the time, neither
the electron nor the atom had been discovered, much less the nucleus of the
atom. A molecule was just a blob with
no structure. Electricity was
considered to be a thin material fluid, flowing through the wires much like
water through a pipe. In fact, Maxwell
actually wrote a material fluid flow theory, since hydrodynamics was developed
at the time.
So there was, at the time, no notion
of the Drude electron gas in a wire and the positively charged nuclei in the
atoms in the wire. So there was no
notion of two oppositely charged entities in the conductor, both reacting to
any EM field entering from space and interacting with the wire.
Further, Newton's third law had
always been used mystically without any known cause. It was experimentally established that the reaction occurred, but
scientists were forced to just assume its occurrence.
Consequently, Maxwell wrote
equations for the reaction of a unitary electric fluid in the conductors. He knew that the wire recoiled, but wrote no
equations containing the cause of Newton's third law reaction.
What really happens in the wire is
that both the Drude electrons rearrange their positioning vis a vis the
lattice, resulting in an apparent current.
The actual movement (drift velocity) of the electrons down the wire is
very slow, in a nominal case being a few inches per hour. The electrons, having spin, act as little
gyros so to speak, longitudinally restrained by the repulsion of the electrons
ahead. So the electrons precess
laterally, and spend most of their movement in lateral precession
movement. This alone proves that the
perturbing force is longitudinal, as indeed does Whittaker's decomposition of
the scalar potential into longitudinal EM waves. The gradient of the scalar potential (the E-field) is also such a
decomposition. But the electron
precession waves—which is what our instruments measure in the wire—are indeed
lateral waves, in general consonance with Faraday's notion that the force field
lines were physical and like taut strings.
Maxwell merely assumed Faraday's notion, to give us the transverse EM wave
in space. Consequently, the old
electrodynamics envisioned that fluid vibrations (ether vibrations) from space
had been intercepted by the wire to shake the electric fluid accordingly. And since that electric fluid obviously
shook laterally, that "proved" that the waves in spacetime were
lateral "plucked taut string" type waves. Actually it proved no such thing, because they were measuring
electron precession waves.
The positive nuclei usually have a
m/q ratio several hundred thousand times the m/q ratio of an equal charge of
electrons. Hence the massive nuclei
also react to the field interaction, and move very slightly in the opposite
sense from the electrons. That reaction
is ignored in Maxwell's general equations, though when the equations are applied,
they require that nuclei movement.
In short, the electrons precess and
the nuclei recoil oppositely, and that is the generation of Newton's third law
reaction.
When we excite a wire antenna with a
wave excitation, we produce both electron precession waves and nuclear recoil
waves in the nuclei. These two waves
are of equal energy, though the nuclei waves are very highly damped in
magnitude because of the high m/q ratio of the nuclei. Nonetheless, each of these
"lateral" waves slaps the vacuum potential with identical energy. So two
equal waves of spacetime curvature occur.
I can be seen that the net vacuum wave is actually a longitudinal EM
wave, composed of waves of vacuum (spacetime) energy rarefaction and
densification. Electrodynamicists, considering
the vacuum to be filled with a material ether, used the "effect" wave
in matter as the cause wave. Hence they
used a transverse EM wave in spacetime, when indeed the spacetime wave is and
always was a longitudinal EM wave, just as Tesla insisted.
Maxwell's equations are based
primarily on the interaction of field and single charge. Actually, the reaction is always between the
field and a dipole. Even when the field
interacts with an "isolated charge", there are clustering virtual
charges of opposite sign around the "isolated" charge so that the
"isolated charge" is actually a set of composite dipoles, where each
dipole consists of a virtual charge of opposite sign and a differential piece
of the isolated observable charge. So
the Newtonian third law reaction is also there with an isolated charge, but
occurs in the vacuum itself, resulting in vacuum polarization.
Nonetheless, the "transverse EM
wave in vacuum" notion is so embedded in electrodynamics that we seem to
be stuck with it. It means, however,
that the "field in space" used in electrodynamics must be regarded as
only a sort of "convenient transfer function" and not a real
transverse oscillation entity. This of
course accords with Feynman and Wheeler's pointing out that only the potential
for the EM wave exists in space, in case a charge is brought in to interact
with its gradients.
And needless to say, since the
vacuum is a big potential and only potentials and potential changes can exist
in it, then Whittaker's 1903 paper decomposing the scalar potential into
longitudinal EM waves is paramount and decisive. EM waves in the vacuum a priori must be longitudinal waves,
because they are only the changes to the vacuum potential. And that potential at each and every point,
changes and all, decomposes into longitudinal EM waves in 3-space with
convergent longitudinal EM waves incoming from the time domain.
NISBET
To be added.
NON-ABELIAN ELECTRODYNAMICS
To be added.
NONLINEAR MATERIAL
A substance whose optical
properties vary with the intensity of the light.
Most optical substances are very
weakly nonlinear, but a great deal of research has been exerted to find
materials with stronger nonlinearities. Also, a material which creates and
emits the fundamental and additional harmonic frequencies when illuminated with
a single frequency. Many nonlinear materials also weakly produce time-reversed
(phase conjugate) fundamentals and/or harmonics when illuminated with a
fundamental frequency. Such a nonlinear material that creates time reversed
waves (phase conjugate replica waves) is said to function as a phase conjugate mirror. The phase
conjugate replica reappears in space back along the path in space—even through
a highly distorting medium—where the input stimulus (signal wave) has traveled
or is traveling.
Thus the phase conjugate replica or
time-reversed wave normally backtracks its signal wave stimulus to the distant
source of that signal wave, even hundreds or thousands of miles away. This
"crawfishing" and "concentrating" characteristic is also
known as retroreflection. Note that
an ordinary EM wave diverges as a
function of the radius traveled away from its emission source, while a
time-reversed or phase conjugate replica wave will converge as a function of the radius traveled away from its emission
source (the mirror), if its stimulus signal wave was emitted from a distant
point source. Ideally, a phase conjugate mirror produces a single time-reversed
wave in addition to the input signal wave. By stressing (pumping) the mirror with the input of two additional opposing
waves (ideally orthogonal to the input or signal
wave), the phase conjugate replica wave output by the mirror is amplified,
and may contain up to all the energy in the pumping waves.
NON SEQUITUR
A conclusion or inference not
following from the original argument or premise.
NONEQUILIBRIUM THERMODYNAMICS
Colloquial term referring to the
new thermodynamics of self-organizing systems and structures in disequilibrium
with their environment.
Since the 1960s, there has emerged
in physics (and in thermodynamics!) a surprising new area: the physics of
far-from-equilibrium systems and the self-organization and large-scale ordering
of such systems. E.g., a single Bénard cell (a particular self-organizing
circulation structure in convection-type systems), may involve the coherent
behavior of some 1021 molecules, in a region of convection where one
would classically expect only randomness. These new physics and thermodynamics
interactions are surprisingly being found in a very wide variety of systems and
phenomena, including living systems and nonliving systems. The phenomena of
interest include dissipative systems in disequilibrium with their environment,
but with stability of their own systems and forms. Open systems in
disequilibrium with their environment can permissibly achieve COP>1.0, and
they can exhibit local negentropy. The physics and thermodynamics of such
systems is still rapidly developing. For a good overview, see Gregoire Nicolis,
"Physics of far-from-equilibrium systems and self-organization," in The New Physics, edited by Paul Davies,
Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 316-347. For a full technical
presentation, see G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine, Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems, Wiley, New York, 1977.
NONLINEAR MATERIAL
In physics, any substance whose
response to an external causative or influencing agent is not proportional to
the magnitude of the causative agent or influence.
NONLINEAR OPTICAL FUNCTIONING (NLO
FUNCTIONING)
Functioning in a manner
prescribed by nonlinear optics and quantum optics,
...particularly with respect to
time-reversal effects, use of phase conjugate mirrors, phase conjugate
reflection, and pumping for amplified phase conjugate reflection.
To quote Knight, "A phase
conjugate mixing device has remarkable optical properties: perfect
retroreflection, the complete cancellation of optical aberrations and
inhomogeneities in wavefronts, and the ability to reverse an optical beam and
return it to its source."
NONLINEAR PHASE CONJUGATE OPTICS
See phase conjugate optics.
NONLOCALIZATION
Producing or rendering an effect
or effect-producing agent at a distance, rather than at the immediate location
of the effector.
Extended throughout a large region
or system, or to a distant part of a large region or system, rather than being
confined to a small region of the large region or system.
NON-RIEMANNIAN (GEOMETRY)
Riemannian geometry is the
geometry of Riemannian manifolds;
i.e., manifolds having an
infinitesimal squared distance ds that is everywhere positive. A non-Riemannian
geometry violates this property. [A manifold is a topological space with
certain technical characteristics.]
NUCLEONS
Name
for the neutrons or the protons in a nucleus. In the nucleus, the neutrons and protons are continually changing
one into the other by exchange of the charge.
O(3) ELECTRODYNAMICS
To be added.
OPEN SYSTEM
A system that communicates with
its environment, and exchanges energy, matter, or both between system and
environment.
The system may be in equilibrium with that exchange, so that it effectively does not retain and utilize received environmental energy to power loads or accomplish external work. Note that it may in fact receive and store excess energy from the environment, or give up energy to the environment, and then remain in equilibrium under its new potential energy conditions. That is, the system may asymmetrical regauge itself but not utilize any of the regauging energy to accomplish external work. When potential is applied to an electromagnetic system, the system is similarly asymmetrical regauged and its potential energy is increased. However, if the system then destroys its source of regauging potential energy faster than it powers its load, it is said to symmetrically regauge itself when discharging its freely received excitation energy.
The
system may be far from equilibrium in its energetic exchange with its
environment, and if it asymmetrically discharges its freely received excitation
energy, it can exhibit COP>1.0. In
that case the system effectively retains and utilizes some of its freely
received environmental energy to power loads or accomplish external work, and
the operator himself does not have to furnish that part of the energy
dissipated as useful work.
OPTICAL
SWITCHING
Refers to switching of optical signals,
or switching using optical frequency switching techniques, components, and
circuits.
ORTHODOX TRANSISTORS
Ordinary transistors in use
today.
Such transistors will not perform
the Fogal semiconductor special functions.
ORTHOGONAL ROTATION
Simply speaking, a rotation from
one direction to a direction at right angles to it.
The Lorentz transform of special
relativity, e.g., is a formula for the rotation of an object and all its parts
away from its line of motion, as a function of the object's velocity, in a
direction toward the time axis. The speed c just represents a full orthogonal
turn, so that the intersection of the object with the observer 3-space, along
the original line of motion, is zero.
To the observer, the three
dimensional object (at speeds less than c) has become a two-dimensional plane
moving at speed c. In a space of more than 4 dimensions, the orthorotation may
be toward a higher spatial dimension rather than toward the time dimension. As
can be seen, such orthorotation is intimately connected with the transformation
of an electron or electron/positron pair into a photon, and vice versa.
Orthorotations are extremely important when one models the physics of mind and
matter interaction, and the physics of a living organisms including both its
mind and its physical body—as in psychoenergetics.
OSCILLATING QUANTUM WELL
A quantum well which is
oscillating in magnitude and sometimes in sign.
OVERPOTENTIAL
Essentially the overpotential (as
in an electrode in a solution) is a shift in the Fermi level necessary to allow
the electron in the electrode metal to have energies overlapping with vacant
acceptor levels in molecules adjacent to the electrode in the solution.
The overpotential effect appears at
small "double surfaces" of things in very close contact, particularly
in electrochemistry and in solid state physics. The overpotential enables
electron transfer, e.g., by tunneling. The overpotential increases with the log
of the reaction rate that occurs at the overpotential location.
For a small reaction rate, the
overpotential is small; but for a small increase in the overpotential there
occurs a dramatic increase of
reaction rate. Fogal has utilized the overpotential effect in his
semiconductor, to great advantage in accomplishing unusual charge blocking and
other special effects.
One of the world experts in the
theory and use of the overpotential is Dr. J. O'M. Bockris. E.g., for a short
overview pointing out the importance of the overpotential, see Bockris,
"Overpotential: a lacuna in scientific knowledge," Journal of Chemical Education, 48(6),
June 1971, p. 352-358 (a paper which Bockris graciously sent me some years
ago). Quoting from that reference, p. 355: "The formal definition of
overpotential is 'the change of potential of the electron-conducting phase when
reaction rate across its interface with the ion-conducting phase with which it
is in contact is changed from zero to a certain velocity.'" And again, p.
355: "...overpotential... in fact determines what fraction of the energy of
the self-functioning cell has to be wasted in making the cell work and deliver
energy at a certain power." For a more detailed and wider exposition of
the overpotential, its effects, and its uses, see J. O'M. Bockris and A. K. N.
Reddy, Modern Electrochemistry, Vol.
1 & 2, Plenum Press, 1970.
OVERUNITY COEFFICIENT OF PERFORMANCE
More energy out or work out of a
system than the operator or experimenter must himself or herself furnish and
input.
An open thermodynamic system far
from thermodynamic system is permitted to achieve such an overunity
performance, so any overunity electrodynamic system must be such. Well-known
nonelectromagnetic examples are solar cells, heat pumps, windmills, sails on
sailboats, waterwheels for powering watermills, a gliding bird in thermal updrafts,
etc. A well-known electromagnetic example is the common solar cell. The common
household heat pump has a theoretical COP limit of 8.22, and well-designed
units usually achieve some 4.0 or so, so long as the ambient environment does
not change too drastically from the design limits. As the environment changes
and cools down appreciably, however, most home heat pumps lose efficiency and
have to switch onto heating strips, which have a COP » 1.0.
Contrary to prevailing belief, it is
certainly possible to have EM systems which are also open thermodynamic
systems, far from equilibrium, and freely receiving excess energy
(asymmetrically regauging a potential) from an external source, to wit, their
violent virtual flux exchange between the vacuum and the system. All EM system
are already open systems in the
virtual particle flux exchange with vacuum; that is already well-known in
particle physics, even though the 130-year-old classical electrodynamics does
not even include the vacuum-mass exchange. The only question, then, is how to
establish an asymmetry in that vacuum-mass flux exchange. Here again, every
electrical charge and every dipole is already just such a broken symmetry in
the vacuum flux, as has been known in particle physics for four decades! It takes
on the average about 50 years, however, for vital discoveries in one discipline
to "cross fertilize" into another discipline. At any rate, the
symmetry of every electric power system, in the vacuum flux, is already broken
in its source dipole. This rigorously means that, if we simply avoid doing
something we are doing in our power systems to restore symmetry as a matter of
course, it is possible to utilize the free broken symmetry of the source dipole
to provide an overunity EM system.
In 1996 I showed that such overunity
EM systems are permitted and prescribed by Maxwell's theory, prior to the
arbitrary imposition of symmetrical
regauging of the Maxwell equations (i.e., the Lorentz condition). Violation of
the Lorentz condition (by asymmetrical self-regauging) is a necessary but not
sufficient condition for an overunity EM device. An asymmetric regauging will
certainly give us excess free energy in the system, and an excess force to use
that energy in translating against a load impedance to do work, if we design
the system properly to do just that.
To achieve overunity, in a circuit
one must prevent the (presently universal) re-imposition of the Lorentz
condition by the use of one-half the excess received energy to drive the return
electrons from the load back through the back emf of the source, killing the
gate and restoring symmetry, the Lorentz condition, and equilibrium between
vacuum flux and system. All our present EM systems are specifically designed to
drive those electrons back through the back emf and thus restore symmetry, deliberately asymmetrically
self-regauging a second time and deliberately
restoring the Lorentz condition, along with deliberately
killing the source dipole's asymmetry in the vacuum flux exchange.
PARADOX (LOGICAL)
A thing that is true, e.g., as
shown by experiment, but which violates one or more of the three Aristotelian
laws of logic.
Any logic algebra or system has a
topology. A paradox in one topology can often be resolved by increasing the
topology of the logic. All logical paradoxes in the 3-law Aristotelian logic
system are simply fourth-law logic cases in a logical superset, and—at least
hypothetically—the fourth law can be applied to resolve them. For a discussion
and proof of the 4th law correction to Aristotelian logic, see Appendix III:
"A Conditional Criterion for Identity, Leading to a Fourth Law of
Logic," in T.E. Bearden, AIDS:
Biological Warfare, Tesla Book Co., Chula Vista, California, 1988, p.
428-443. Logic has many aspects that often may shock our casual expectations:
For example, one of the most advanced axioms in mathematics is called the Axiom
of Choice. It is used in the proof of many advanced theorems. Using the Axiom
of Choice, it can be shown that it is possible to cut a ball into a finite
number of pieces, then reassemble the pieces into two balls of the same size,
with no air gaps between pieces! While this seemingly defies all common
physical sense (and I've not found anyone who has done it!), it is
mathematically correct. For a proof, see Thomas J. Jech, The Axiom of Choice, American Elsevier, New York, 1973, p. 3-6. For
a good perspective on Aristotelian logic, see Morris Kline, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty,
Oxford University Press, New York, 1980.
PARITY
Deals
with studying a system of sequence of events as if reflected in a mirror. A system has parity is it undergoes no
fundamental operational change if replaced with its mirror-reflected twin.
PARTIALLY TIME-REVERSED REGION
A region of space in which an
object experiences not only the ordinary forward flow of time, but an extra
induced backwards flow of time, usually a fraction of the time-forward time
stream.
One result may be to
"reduce" time-forward force fields, by a fraction. This is important
in bridges, where one must pass EM energy flow onto a follow-on load circuit,
but the return current in that circuit must be allowed to circulate back
through the load bridge itself, against the inducing back emf. By partially
time-reversing the region occupied by the back emf, that back emf is seen as a
smaller value by the return current being passed back up through the back emf.
The result is that current will circulate in the load loop, powered entirely by
the bridging of Poynting flow S = E´H onto the load circuit.
Another result of a partially
time-reversed region is that the law of attraction and repulsion of charges is
partially reversed. If the
time-reversal predominates in the region, as in a momentary time-reversal zone
in some electrolytes, then the law of attraction and repulsion of charges is
reversed. In that case like charges
attract and unlike charges repel. Two
positive H+ ions, e.g., may be drawn so tightly together that each enters the
edge of the strong force region of the other, forming a quasi-nucleus. Note that in each H+ ion the gluon forces
are almost dissolved and the quarks are nearly freed. Then as the time-reversal zone decays back to a normal
time-forward zone, the decay changes begin from inside out, resulting in the
flip of a quark to change one of the H+ ions to a neutron n. The n and the H+ ion draw together as the
preferred decay state, resulting in the formation of deuterium or a D+
ion. This and similar "time
reversal zone" reactions have been proposed by this researcher as the
mechanisms generating the anomalous deuterium, tritium, and alpha particles
(helium nuclei) in the "cold fusion" reactions. It is indeed a special type of low spatial
energy fusion, but a very high energy reaction since time-energy is involved as
the active ingredient, and time-energy has the same energy density as mass.
PARTICLE PHYSICS
The branch of physics using
accelerators to study high-energy particle collisions, to determine properties
of atomic nuclei and of the elementary particles themselves.
So far as I am aware, conventional
particle physicists do not consider time-energy interaction and time-reversal
zone novel nuclear interactions at all.
PATTERSON EFFECT
The intense multiscattering,
multipass, multicollection of Poynting energy density flow in an assemblage of
palladium-clad spherical bead capacitors, as the palladium adsorbs hydrogen
ions from the fluid in which the beads are immersed, and charges up as a
capacitor, thereby becoming an energy-flow generator, and nonlinearly
increasing the energy-flow as the charge of the capacitors increases.
The Patterson effect yields the
Patterson Power Cellâ , a validated overunity power system which has shown
COP>1200 in independent university testing. The Patterson effect is a
variation and adaptation of the well-known anti-Stokes emission effect, which
for three decades has been validated in physics journals to produce overunity
emission in certain intensely scattering active media.
PATTERSON POWER CELLÒ
Patented overunity power unit by
James Patterson, which has been independently validated to yield COP>1.0.
See James Patterson, "System
for Electrolysis of Liquid Electrolyte," U.S. Patent No. 5,372,688, issued
Dec. 13, 1994. Filed Dec. 2, 1993. 26 claims, 7 drawing sheets.
PAUTRIZEL, RAYMOND
Eminent French parasitologist who
worked with Antoine Priore, and who performed many definitive experiments
demonstrating the Priore healing effect.
PEGRAM'S
EXPERIMENT
Experiment which demonstrates a
relation between electric and magnetic fields in the vacuum which the
Maxwell-Heaviside theory does not prescribe.
Simultaneously, a coaxial
cylindrical condensor and solenoid are rotated. The rotation produces a magnetic field in the solenoid in the
axial direction and between the plates of the condensor. The condensor can be charged by shortening the
plates of the condensor. This indicates
a cross relation in the vacuum between electric and magnetic fields which does
not exist in the Maxwell-Heaviside theory.
Reference: G. B. Pegram, Physical Review, Vol. 10, 1917, p. 591.
PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE
Assertion that no machine can
indefinitely operate, since no closed system can input its output power back to
itself while powering a load because powering itself and its load violates the
equilibrium thermodynamics (i.e., the thermodynamics of a closed system).
The "defenders of the
underunity faith" use the statement that "there cannot be any such
thing as a perpetual motion machine" as an article of faith and iron
dogma. Usually they classify a so-called
"perpetuum mobile" as to which law of equilibrium thermodynamics it is thought to
violate.
For permissible Maxwellian overunity
systems, the entire "perpetual motion" conundrum is nonsensical,
since we are always speaking of an EM system far from thermodynamic equilibrium with its active vacuum environment. The equilibrium
thermodynamics assumed by the critics does not even apply to such systems, as
witness the Nobel Prize awarded to Prigogine in 1977 and the voluminous
literature on such open dissipative systems.
As an example, see Stanley W. Angrist,
"Perpetual Motion Machines," Scientific
American, vol. 218, Jan. 1968, p. 114-122.
Angrist gives a typical critique using classical equilibrium
thermodynamics. He calls permissible overunity systems (open
dissipative systems receiving excess energy from an external source) false perpetual motion machines
or fictitious perpetual motion machines. Also see Angrist's article, "Perpetual
Motion," Encyclopaedias Britannica,
Bicentennial Edition, Macropaedia Vol. 14, 1976, p. 102-105. Here he gives
a very good summary of the subject as ordinarily posed, with precise
definitions included for perpetual motion machines of the first, second, and
third kinds and for fictitious perpetual motion machines. Unfortunately his entire argument is
completely irrelevant to any study of permissible overunity machines, which he
already has labeled as "fictitious perpetual motion machines" and has
already admitted that they exist! The
substance of his entire argument is that systems in equilibrium cannot power
themselves. That is of course quite
true, but is a mere tautology and has no relation to an open system in
disequilibrium, which can power
itself and its load simultaneously, by the laws of physics and the laws of disequilibrium thermodynamics. So in fact Angrist, as do the skeptics who
continue to assail legitimate overunity EM system researchers as perpetual
motion nuts, establishes his own dummy strawman and demolishes it, while
ignoring—so to speak—the huge Statue of Liberty before him.
Now this is not to pick on Angrist! He appears to be a reasonable scientist,
carefully stating his thesis in a straightforward manner. His voice is quoted as a reasonable critical voice, and not like
the usual extremist critic who
engages in ad hominem attacks from the outset.
It merely shows that (1) the entire "perpetuum mobile"
prohibition does not even apply to overunity EM systems far from thermodynamic
equilibrium with the active vacuum, (2) the critics are either unwittingly or
deliberately using the wrong type of thermodynamics as the basis of their
entire argument, (3) the reasonable perpetual motion
critics—wittingly or unwittingly—simply set up an irrelevant strawman and
precede to knock it down, and (4) in fact the critics already admit to a
machine that will in fact run itself and power its load indefinitely or
perpetually unless something changes or breaks or fails, but then oddly label
it as a "fictitious" or "false" perpetual motion
machine! Meanwhile, in the universe
around us we universally observe things in violent and perpetual motion, having
continued so for some 15 billion years.
None of the atoms seem to be running down, nor do any of the
molecules. And they are open systems
brought out of equilibrium by absorption of energy, and decaying back into
equilibrium (or approaching it) by emission of excess energy.
The eerie point is that technical
publications such as Scientific American
and Encyclopaedia Britannica do not
seem to question the line of reasoning advanced by those knocking perpetual
motion, or even fully analyzed their argument.
What we really deal with in terms of skeptics in this area is either (1)
a reasonable, scientific skeptic such as Angrist (his listing of machines and
attempts for machines not in disequilibrium with their active environment to
run themselves is very good), or (2) an unreasonable person spouting dogma and
venom, who should simply go read some disequilibrium system thermodynamics and
learn etiquette.
Also, we strongly object to supercilious phrases invariably employed by harsh skeptics who insist we are looking for "something for nothing" or "a free lunch". No legitimate overunity energy researcher has ever considered such a thing. We freely admit that the excess energy is received from the active vacuum exchange, via a broken symmetry in that exchange. Should the farmer refuse to use a windmill or waterwheel because he's getting a "free lunch" for energy input? For those who so quickly hurl such condemnatory phrases, let me hold up a mirror and show them an analog of their position: The famed surgeon Alfred Velpeau wrote in 1839: "The abolishment of pain in surgery is the chimera. It is absurd to go on seeking it today. 'Knife' and 'pain' are two words in surgery that must forever be associated in the consciousness of the patient. To this compulsory combination we shall have to adjust ourselves." [Martin Gumpert, Trail-Blazers of Science, Funk and Wagnalls, New York, 1936, p. 232.]
The strident, dogmatic critics of
open overunity disequilibrium EM systems are stating an exact analogy to
Velpeau's statement. The scientific worth of their criticism is
precisely the scientific worth that eventually was shown for Velpeau's
pronouncement.
PHASE CONJUGATE
Of an entity: its time reversal.
For waves, often referred to as wavefront
reversal.
PHASE CONJUGATE MIRROR
A nonlinear material which, when
provided with an input wave, emits a phase conjugate replica (time reversed
replica) of that input wave.
The input wave is by practice called
the signal wave. The time-reversed
wave output is by practice called the phase
conjugate replica.
PHASE CONJUGATE OPTICS
That portion of nonlinear optics
dealing with multiwave mixing, formation of time-reversed waves, phase
conjugate reflection (PCR), phase conjugate mirrors (PCMs), pumping PCMs to
amplify their emitted PCRs, nonlinear interferometry, distortion correction,
self-targeting, laser tracking, adaptive optics, and so on.
PHASE CONJUGATE REPLICA (PCR)
Of a wave: the time-reversed
duplicate of the wave.
PHASE-CONJUGATING ACTION
In nonlinear optics, the process
or action of producing a time reversed replica of an input wave.
For a particle, producing its
antiparticle. For a cell, dedifferentiating it back to some previous form,
genetics and all.
PHASE CONJUGATION
In nonlinear optics, the novel
nonlinear mixing of waves which generate an output wave—called the phase
conjugate replica or time-reversed replica—that precisely retraces the path
previously taken by the input wave that stimulates the action.
The process or action of producing a
time-reversed wave. Phase conjugation can compensate for aberrations and
distortions in the input. Real time holography can also be produced by applying
the phase conjugation process.
PHASE-LOCKED HARMONIC SERIES
In Whittaker decomposition of the
scalar potential: The decomposition produces a set of bidirectional wavepairs,
as explained previously.
Each of these wavepairs has a given
frequency, starting from a fundamental. In other words, the other wavepairs are
harmonics of the fundamental wavepair. Further, these are regularly arranged in
a lattice, so that "timing" or "phasing" is rigidly locked
in place.
PHENOMENOLOGY
In physics, the philosophical and
experimental study of physical phenomena,
... as distinguished from ontology,
(which is the study of being).
PHOTON
In physics, the basic action
quantum.
Considered to be the basic quantum
of the EM field. Well, there's a little problem with that. The photon contains
energy and time, and so must also occupy a time interval. The notion of
forcefield rigorously contains mass as a component; yet mass is missing from
the concept of field as it is applied. The EM field is conceived as a spatial
entity only. It may spatially vary as a function of time, of course, but it
itself does not occupy time, at least conceptually. These considerations raise
some startling difficulties in the ready conclusion that the photon is the
fundamental quantum of EM field. If a "piece of the photon" is
missing from the field, how can the field be made of photons? How can one get
area out of a straight line? I simply pose this problem for the theorists and
the foundations physicists, pointing out that it has universally been
fashionable for physicists to ignore that the
photon carries not only a little increment of energy, but also a little
increment of time. My own work has been to look at the dimensional
difference between masstime and mass; i.e., between a mass that has just
absorbed a photon, and thus must consist of masstime (4-space), and just after
that masstime then re-emits the photon, reverting back to mass (3-space). From
this one can build, e.g., a mechanism that generates the actual flow of time
itself. It is in theory an engineerable mechanism.
PHYSICAL REALITY
To be added.
PING-PONG
To be added.
PINNA
The outer ear(s). Of particular interest to us are the tiny little folds in
the ear.
PINNA INFORMATION
Refers to hidden information
content of the field, or in the received signal.
Comes from the little folds in the
pinna (outer ear). For sound direction and distance sensing, the tiny pinna
folds of the outer ear use phase reflection information more than 40 dB below
the primary sound signal that strikes the eardrum. In EM signals, we are
referring to "hidden" or infolded information deep within a signal
from a distant target. In fact everything in the target contributes to the
signal emission from it, and all that information is riding "within"
the signal, in its deep "pinna" information. The Fogal chip can
outfold some of this pinna information, so that information can be recovered
from a signal which no other process heretofore could recover. For a dramatic
future use, as the Fogal semiconductors and equipment using them are developed,
there will emerge detecting units that can see highly detailed structure in the
human body, merely from processing the light reflected from the exterior of the
body. The details eventually will rival and even surpass that of magnetic
resonance imaging, and will be essentially noninvasive.
It is also true that hidden
"vacuum engines" can be transmitted back into the body, so that
"problems" or disorders can be directly corrected. As an introduction
to this type of area, where cellular disease "antiengines" can be
created in the body to directly reverse cells and their genetics, curing the
disease, see T.E. Bearden, "Vacuum Engines and Priore's Methodology: The
True Science of Energy-Medicine, Parts I and II." Explore!, 6(1), 1995, p. 66-76; 6(2), 1995, p. 50-62. A major book
on this subject will soon be published. For a presentation for the
nonspecialist, see T. E. Bearden, "Hidden Mechanism for Reversal of
Diseased Cells to a Previous Healthy State," Resonance, Newsletter of the Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest
Group, Mensa, No. 29, Nov. 1995, p. 11-15.
PINNA INFORMATION CONTENT
In electromagnetics, the hidden
inner Stoney-Whittaker-Ziolkowski infolded EM information inside the scalar
potential.
Since an EM wave can be represented
as two scalar potentials, then by infolding pinna information inside one or
both of the two potentials, it is infolded inside the carrier wave. Thus hidden
information can be and is carried by all EM radiation and all EM signals. The
Fogal semiconductor for the first time enables the outfolding and processing of
some of this information.
PINNA INFORMATION DETECTORS
Detectors based on use of the
Fogal semiconductor, which can outfold, process, and display some of the hidden
information inside the scalar potential and inside signal emissions from
distant objects.
PINNED ELECTRONS
Electrons held stationary by a
magnetic field, or other set of forces that react to "push them back into
their positions" whenever they try to move away.
PINNING
The act of restricting (by
restoring forces and fields) movement (particularly of electrons) due to a
disturbing magnetic field or other external force.
POLYHEDRON
A solid figure, especially with
more than six plane surfaces.
POSITRON
An
antielectron (time-reversed electron), possessing a positive charge. In Dirac's relativistic theory of the
electron, a positron may be regarded as an empty negative energy state in the
Dirac sea whose usual occupying electron has been removed.
POWER
The time rate at which work is
done (at which the form of energy is changed).
In electrical engineering, the term
"power" is erroneously also used to mean "energy".
PRIGOGINE, ILYA
Noted Belgian chemist and
Nobelist, and one of the pioneers of the thermodynamics of open systems far
from thermodynamic equilibrium.
Prigogine was awarded the 1977 Nobel
Prize for his work on the theory of dissipative structures in nonequilibrium
thermodynamics.
PRIORÉ, ANTOINE
Italian radar technician,
remaining in France after WW II, who discovered the use of novel waves from
plasmas emitted when normal EM waves were introduced, and who used this effect
to accomplish remarking healing in laboratory animals of terminal tumors,
infectious diseases such as trypanosomas, restore suppressed immune systems,
and heal atherosclerosis.
Prioré's beam was actually
longitudinal EM waves. The body when
irradiated by longitudinal EM waves adds a weaker phase conjugate replica, thus
converting LW nonlinear optical pumping from the 3-space domain to the time
domain. This time-reverses the
irradiated cells and all their components back to a previous physical state and
condition.
Such "time-domain" pumping
is used by the living body's cellular regeneration system to restore cellular
damage and heal the cells, within its limits.
Thus Prioré unwittingly uncovered a way to dramatically amplify the
body's own healing and regenerative powers.
POYNTING, JOHN HENRY
An English physicist who lived
from 1852-1914, whose contributions to electromagnetics included the energy
flow theory now known as Poynting flow.
He contributed the Poynting theorem,
which states that the rate of EM energy loss in a specific region of space is
equal to the sum of the dissipation rate (heat loss) flowing across the
boundary of the region. Concurrently with Oliver Heaviside, Poynting conceived
the notion that energy flowed through space, which previously had not appeared
in physics. Heaviside actually published first, but obscurely; Poynting
published in a prestigious journal, so the theory came to be known as
"Poynting theory." Poynting himself always gave credit to Heaviside
for being first. Also, the Heaviside version S = E´H + G was more extensive than Poynting's S = E´H. Heaviside was a recluse; years after his death, in his
little garret apartment some papers were discovered beneath the floorboard.
Therein Heaviside has used his G
term (a closed energy flow, or "trapped energy" term) to represent
gravitation, and had worked out a testable theory of electrogravitation. Modern
general relativity indeed considers that it is energy—particularly trapped
energy—that is responsible for generating gravitational field and gravitational
potential. Apparently nothing at all was done or has been done with Heaviside's
electrogravitational theory. See H. J. Josephs, "The Heaviside papers
found at Paignton in 1957," The
Institution of Electrical Engineers Monograph No. 319, Jan. 1959, p. 70-6.
POYNTING ENERGY
Loose term (not rigorous!) used
to describe the flow through space of Poynting energy density S = E´H. It actually
describes not the energy flow density per se, but that component of it that
would be intercepted by a unit point charge.
POYNTING ENERGY DENSITY FLOW
A more rigorous term used to
describe the flow through space of the Poynting energy density flow component S = E´H. that would be intercepted by a unit point charge.
POYNTING ENERGY FLOW
Loose term (not completely
rigorous) used to describe the flow of energy density S = E´H.
Rigorously, note that both E and H are "defined" only after their reaction with a unit
point static charge. Hence S is the resulting component of the
overall energy flow that interacts with the charges (with the circuit) and is
diverged into the circuit to power it.
It is not the entire energy
flow, which also includes a vast Heaviside nondiverged component that does not
strike the charge and interact with it, and hence does not interact with the
circuit but is just wasted.
POYNTING GENERATOR
Any dipole or potential
difference, which represents a broken symmetry in the vacuum's virtual particle
flux, and hence extracts virtual energy from that asymmetry, and gates it out
as a gushing energy flow in 3-space.
The component of that energy flow that would be intercepted and diverged
by a unit point charge is the Poynting energy flow S = E´H.
POYNTING VECTOR
The vector S, given as S = E´H, which is
used to represent the Poynting (intercepted and collected by a unit point
coulomb) energy density flow component.
In Heaviside's version, S = E´H + G, where G is an energy circulation flow term of
trapped energy flow.
PPCM
Pumped phase conjugate mirror.
A phase conjugate mirror material
which has introduced to it appositive or "pump" waves. In the phase
conjugating process, up to all the energy in the pump waves can be output as
the energy in the emitted phase conjugate replica wave. Thus the PPCM is an
amplifier, very similar to a triode.
PRIMARY IMAGE
The image or portion of an
overall image that is of most interest, and usually the sharpest in focus.
PROBABILISTICALLY
Of or determined by the laws of
probability.
Note particularly the somewhat
dichotomous use of "determined by—probability." The entire notion in
probability is that the overall result is not individually determined, but that
there are multiple outcomes of the experiment, each of which occurs with a
certain frequency out of a very large number of trials. If a single result
always occurs, that is said to be a deterministic change, not a probabilistic
change. Unfortunately if one pursues the definition of "probability"
in mathematics and logic, one eventually finds that it is dichotomous, as was
our definition of energy. Ultimately the foundations guys just threw up their
hands and said, "Oh, what the heck! Probability is probability, every fool
knows that!" The problem cannot be resolved in 3-la w Aristotelian logic;
it requires a higher topology logic.
PROBABILITY
The probability of a simple event
is the ratio of the number of times it occurs to the total number of trials
(for a large, essentially infinite number of trials).
Note that "trials"
constitute things that have occurred (are past). Probability has resisted
rigorous logical definition by Aristotelian logic; the reason is that it is an
expression of the fourth law, the identity of opposites. Probability is the
expression of the future (that which has not occurred) in terms of the past
(that which has occurred). Since we have been trained to conceive or think of
something as if it had just been perceived to occur, then this is the only way
we can conceive the future—as if it
were an "already occurred past" to us.
But with Aristotelian logic, the
future cannot be composed of a set
of pasts (the law of the excluded
middle prevents it!), and probability has no acceptable logical basis. With
four-law logic, the future can be modeled in
terms of—and even be identical to—the past, and probability has a logical
basis.
Consider throwing a die to land with one face up. Thinking of the event (as
if it has just occurred, in terms of the most recent past), one can conceive
six ways of looking at it. In other words, one can conceive of six "most
recent pasts." By the fourth law, the total "most recent past"
is identical to the "most immediate future," on the common
boundary. If one therefore collects all six "most recent
pasts," they turn into the most immediate future, by the fourth law of
logic. One may argue that only a single one of the events will actually occur.
Here one counters with the observation that, when it occurs, it is the past,
not the future, and then it has not been collected so as to move to the
boundary. One also points out that, with the hidden variable approach, in
theory it is possible to directly engineer those probabilities while the
Schrödinger wavefunction is still propagating and has not yet collapse to
constitute an "observation." I.e., it is possible to engineer
Wheeler's "pre-reality," and determine in advance just which of the
outcomes shall occur.
Now, if this type of equipment
eventually gets built and is small and portable, just think what one could do
in Las Vegas!
PRODUCT SET OF INTERNAL WAVES
Modulations of the internal
bidirectional wavepairs comprising a scalar potential.
This set was added in the mid-1980s
by Ziolkowski, to Whittaker's 1903 sum set. When a signal is
"infolded" inside the DC potential, it is modulated upon (multiples)
one or more of the internal biwave pairs. Ziolkowski's work is necessary to
deal with that; Stoney and Whittaker alone do not handle it.
PSYCHOENERGETICS
Russian branch of energetics
where extended electrodynamics is targeted upon the mind and its functions,
hence in the time-domain and employing time-polarized EM waves.
PSYCHOTRONICS
Czechoslovakian name for extended
electrodynamics effects on the living body.
PUMPED PHASE CONJUGATE MIRROR (PPCM)
A nonlinear material which:
(i) when provided with an input
wave, emits an amplified phase conjugate replica (time reversed replica) of
that wave, and
(ii) has additional opposing waves
as inputs, so that their energy is transformed into the amplified energy of the
time-reversed replica wave.
The word "mirror" is
misleading, in that the "mirror" may be just a highly nonlinear
material, or be an actual smooth metallic surface containing "hot
spots" by heating, etc. In any case, it is the nonlinearities such as the
hot spots that produce the phase conjugating action.
PUTHOFF, HAROLD
Noted physicist active in a
variety of fields and investigations including in psychoenergetics, extended
electrodynamics, energy from the vacuum, parapsychology, remote viewing,
psychokinesis, zero-point energy of the vacuum, and cosmology.
We have specifically mentioned his
important cosmological feedback principle.
QM VACUUM
The quantum mechanical vacuum,
which models the vacuum as an intense flux of virtual particles, each appearing
an disappearing in such extreme time intervals as to be unobservable
individually.
Violent fluctuations of extremely
short duration constantly occur in the QM vacuum flux. Various calculations
estimate the energy density (in mass units) as up to 1080-1090
grams per cubic centimeter, or even greater.
QUALITATIVELY
Determination based on
qualitative analysis, usually as contrasted to quantitative determinations.
QUANTIZED
i) Reduction of some observable
quantity to multiples of some small, indivisible unit, or,
ii) expressed in terms of quantum
theory.
QUANTUM
A single "particle" of
the quantity action.
The quantum is always composed of
two fundamental quantities (canonical variables), and it is the
"fissioning" of the action quantum into two pieces which results in
detection of one of the pieces. An indefinite "smear" of part of the
two pieces may be simultaneously detected by a linear detector, but never both
exactly (Heisenberg uncertainty principle). More recent work has shown that, in
a highly nonlinear situation, both canonical variables can be determined
simultaneously to any desired degree of accuracy, in which case the Heisenberg
uncertainty principle does not hold in its conventional form. This fundamental
change in what has been regarded as one of the "sacred laws" of
physics has not yet made it into most physics texts.
QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS
The theory of photons and electrically charged particles and their interactions.
The
use of the term "quantum" implies that the EM radiation's discrete
photon nature is significant, so that quantum theory must be employed.
QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
A quantum mechanical theory in
which "... a physical field is considered as a collection of particles and
forces, and observable properties of an interacting system are expressed as
finite quantities rather than state vectors."
[Dictionary of Science and Technology, ibid.] More simply (after
Davies, The New Physics, 1989):
"The theory that describes the quantum effects of a classical system of
fields defined on space-time and satisfying various partial differential
equations."
QUANTUM POTENTIAL
A special potential added to the
Schrödinger equation, by Bohm in his hidden variable theory of quantum
mechanics.
The quantum potential can move
instantaneously. In my book Gravitobiology,
I published a mechanism by means of which a quantum potential can be created.
(There may of course be other
QP-creating mechanisms). An iterative, mutually phase conjugating of EM signals
passed back and forth between two objects, or among many of them, is called self-targeting. Extreme self-targeting
can produce such a QP or partially produce one, particularly if a dense
"pumping" (optical sense) of the phase conjugate mirror objects
occurs. I am presently proposing the QP as a means of direct energy
amplification. I.e., if there is "instantaneous travel" between two
light-observed points, then to the instantaneous agent there is no length separation
or time separation between the points. This of course means that in effect the
objects now coexist "superposed" on each other in a multiply
connected space, at least with some fraction of "coupling".
Suppose the coupling fraction is
0.5, and 100 widely separate d nodes are so connected by a common QP. Then if
one puts in 1 joule per second of energy flow at a given node, there will
instantly and simultaneously appear at each of the other 99 nodes one-half
joule of energy per second flow. So I can gain quite a bit o f direct energy amplification in this
distributed system, and nothing can "shield" the distant nodes. Presently, other than possibly Gabriel
Kron's "open path", I have not found any other consideration of
"direct amplification of energy at a distance".
The implications of the quantum
potential—in everything from power sources to medicine to weaponry—are
staggering. Weapons based on just this
very QP, multiply connected space, and direct energy amplification appear to
have already been developed and are on site in three nations. A fourth either is just getting them or is
nearing their deployment.
QUATERNION
Expression comprised of the sum
of four terms, one of which is real and three of which contain imaginary units,
and that can be written as the sum of a scalar and a three-dimensional vector.
QUATERNION ALGEBRA
The algebra of quaternions and
their mathematical operations.
Quaternion algebra is of higher
topology than either vector algebra or tensor algebra. Maxwell's original equations are some 20
equations in 20 unknowns, in quaternion algebra. Heaviside and others reduced
the algebra to vector algebra and some four equations. The present vector equations taught in
university as "Maxwell's equations" are in fact Heaviside's
truncation of the Maxwell theory. Going
to tensor algebra electrodynamics cannot recover the full range of Maxwell's
quaternion theory.
As an example, what Tesla actually
did in his patented circuits cannot even be seen in vector or tensor
analysis. On the other hand, analysis
of his circuits by quaternion electrodynamics clearly reveals his startling
ability to shuttle the energy in the circuit at will. See T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear
Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41.
QUINTESSENCE
Literally, the "fifth
essence". In short, dark energy.
RADIONICS
To be added.
REACTIVE POWER
Electrical power, measured in
volts-amps-reactive (vars) that cannot do work as is.
For sinusoidal waveforms, the
formula for reactive power is given by I×V×sinq, where q is the phase angle between
the voltage and the current.
REAL, HIDDEN DYNAMICS
The dynamics of vacuum engines,
or of "internal energy" or "internal work" ongoing in a
system or volume of space.
REAL HIDDEN VECTORS
The "hidden" or
"infolded" real vector components,
e.g., of a vector zero summation
system.
A group of nonzero, finite vectors
which as a system sum to a net translation zero; i.e., which do not translate a
resisting mass or charge, but do "stress" it. Such a system therefore constitutes a stress
potential.
REAL POWER (ACTIVE POWER)
Power, measured in watts, that
can do work, including generating heat.
For sinusoidal waves, real power is
given by the formula I×V×cos q, where q is the phase angle between the voltage and the current.
REAL VECTORS
Vectors in three space, without
imaginary components.
REGAUGE, REGAUGING
Changing the scalar potential or
the vector potential, or both.
If one or both of the potentials
is/are changed so that a net force is created in the system, that is an
asymmetrical regauging.
If only one potential is changed, a
net force results and that is an asymmetrical regauging.
If both potentials are changed but
carefully selected so that the free force resulting from one change is equal
and opposite to the free force resulting from the other, that is a net
symmetrical regauging, often called a "Lorentz regauging".
RECTANGULAR TRANSFORMATION MATRIX
Standard mathematical physics.
REFLECTION
The rebound of light or other
energy from a surface.
A smooth surface (e.g., a mirror)
may produce a specular reflection. A rough surface (e.g., a sheet of paper)
produces a diffuse reflection. Actually, in reflection of light, the same light
does not rebound; instead, the light incident upon the mirror or surface is
absorbed, and new light is re-emitted by that surface. Further, considering
reflection from a dielectric, every interior part of the dielectric
participates in the reflection. All the internal information about the entire
object—everything!—is there in that reflected light, infolded as the hidden
"information content of the field" (Stoney-Whittaker-Ziolkowski
structuring inside the two scalar potentials comprising the reflected wave).
With the Fogal semiconductor, at least some of that hidden "pinna"
information in a sample detection of the reflected light can be outfolded and
displayed.
REFRACTION
The bending of light as it passes
from one medium to another.
It is the phenomenon that enables a
lens to focus light and that makes a stick appear to bend where it dips into
water.
REPULSION BEAM
A beam of energy directed at a
target, which when absorbed by the target will generate a force in and on that
target to push it away from the beam projector.
REPULSION-FORCE-GENERATING BEAMS
Beams of energy which "push
away" their targeted receivers, by inducing a force in the receiver
directed away from the source of the beam.
RETARDED WAVE
The electromagnetic wave that is
derived from the retarded fields, which in turn are derived from the retarded
potentials.
This means that the retarded wave at
a point or region of space has arrived there or exists there as the result of
the dynamics of charges and currents that existed at earlier times.
RETROREFLECTING
Precisely reversing the path of.
An example is a phase conjugate
reflection.
SACHS, MENDEL
Noted scientist who has completed
the work of Einstein and developed a unified field theory covering the universe
from the tiniest part to the entire conglomerate.
SACHS' UNIFIED FIELD THEORY
An extension and completion of
Einstein's work that includes the universe and its dynamics from the tiniest
part to the entire conglomerate, and includes quantum mechanics,
electromagnetics, gravitation, and the strong and weak forces.
SCALAR
Characterized by magnitude only.
SCALAR (QUANTITY)
In ordinary vector analysis, a
quantity completely characterized by magnitude only.
Actually, it contains magnitude and
time, because to exist it must steadily exist in time. So we take the smallest
increment of observer time we wish to consider, and that is the minimum
"length" of the time-tail that the scalar must occupy and have, i n
order to even be a "perceived or detected" thing. Before the
mathematician jumps in with a nice limiting process to take away the time-tail,
if you let that little time interval get too close to zero, then you get too
close to eliminating the observer himself, and the entire problem vanishes
including mathematics and physics and the observer as well.
One simply cannot demonstrate
something that does not exist in time—on paper, in one's mind, or otherwise! Be
careful of the term "spacelike " in physics! It hides a logical
nightmare. This was the very problem I uncovered in Aristotelian logic; the
little increments of time to have a "perceived A" or a
"perceived not-A" or to apply an "identity decision
criteria" to determine identity or nonidentity, had been left out for lo
these 2,000 or so years.
SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETICS
That electrodynamics that arises
from considering transverse EM waves, longitudinal EM waves, time-polarized EM
waves, electrogravitation, superluminal EM signals, interferometry, nonlinear
optical functions, time-as-energy, and the infolded electrodynamics inside all
usual EM fields, waves, and potentials.
SCALAR POTENTIAL
Usually considered synonymous
with the electric potential.
Here we have another "logical
nightmare."
Anyway, the conventional
"definition" of electric potential assumes one knows what a
"potential" is already, and goes something like this: "The
potential measured by the energy of a unit positive charge at a point,
expressed relative to an equipotential surface, generally the surface of the
earth, that has zero potential." [Dictionary
of Science and Technology, ibid., p. 722.]. Well, that is botched. It tells
or attempts to tell what the measurement
of a potential is, using a unit positive charge and a process. A potential
cannot be its own magnitude measurement, just as a man cannot be his own weight
measurement.
So what do we do? We have to tell
what the potential is. This is the problem
that so mystified and infuriated Oliver Heaviside, when he altered and
diminished Maxwell's equations to rid them of every potential that he could.
Heaviside stated that the potential was "mystical
and ought to be murdered from the theory." He tried to do just that,
and conditioned generations of electrodynamicists to believe that the potential
had no physical reality at all, but was only a mathematical convenience. Nahin
expresses Heaviside's view as follows: "In an 1893 letter to Oliver Lodge,
Heaviside said of his own work that it represented the 'real and true
"Maxwell" as Maxwell would have done it if he had not been humbugged
by his vector and scalar potentials.'" Paul Nahin, Oliver Heaviside: Sage in Solitude, IEEE Press, New York, 1988, p.
134, n. 37.
The concept of potential was
developed by Poisson, Green, and others from about 1813 to 1827. Three notions
involved in the development of the concept of the potential are: (i) there is
the collection or storage of energy in the system, via the collect ion or
storage of some entity therein, and this "potential energy" can be
released and dynamically used, (ii) the potential is a scalar function whose
spatial rate of change is a vector force, and (iii) the dynamics of the stored
energy is suspended by the "storage" or "collecting"
entity; in other words it is a sort of "suspended action" waiting to
be unleashed. It requires some
action—such as interception and divergence—to release the leashed energy.
We have to disagree with the second
notion, having already discussed the fact that no vector force exists unless
mass is present, since mass is a component of force. Here we have a residue of
the old "material ether" concept. For the third notion, we note that
the concept of a "virtual" particle or particle flux means that it
cannot become observable unless some interaction is imposed. So we may handle
the "third notion" requirement by assuming the potential to be
composed of hidden virtual particle flux, or hidden wave flux, in wave-to-wave interaction.
Physics basically tries to define
the electrical potential as energy per coulomb, or f = W/Q. That equation,
however, is actually not a definition at all, but rather is an algorithm for
calculating the magnitude of the excess energy collection/collecting upon a
coulomb of charge, when that coulomb is immersed in the potential f. It in fact is the reaction
cross section of the potential, not the potential entity itself. This now begins to give us a clue. Potential
is energy in some fashion. So the
entity f must have essentially the same definition as energy!
Potential energy, collected energy, stored energy, whatever it's energy first
and foremost.
Refer to our discussion of the 3-law
logical contradiction in the concept of energy. The same logical contradiction
must be present in the notion of the potential.
Just as we did for energy, we must
define the scalar potential f in two appositive ways: (i) in the wave view and (ii) in
the particle view. So we define potential (particle view) as any virtual particle
flux. We also define potential (wave view) as any hidden wave flux. Further, we
note that the energetic vacuum is composed of a virtual particle flux (particle
view) and so it is also a potential.
Since the virtual particle flux of the vacuum is extremely intense, the vacuum
potential is enormous in magnitude.
We shall also consider any other
potential to ultimately be a change to the vacuum potential. Originally, one
conceived of a potential occupying the "vacuum as an empty space."
Then general relativity made the vacuum into spacetime, geometrized it, and
made the geometry itself dynamic and operative—i.e., energetic. Okay! Then that
makes spacetime itself a potential.
We also firmly dispose of the
peculiar and deformed notion that the scalar potential of a point-source charge
(at any spatial point that the potential occupies) may be defined as the "work performed upon a unit charge by pushing
it in against the E-field of that
source charge, to that spatial point." This is an equation and not a
definition at all; instead, it is an algorithm for calculating the energy
density magnitude of the scalar potential. It is a fine algorithm, but it has
nothing at all to do with what the potential itself is. Again, a man cannot be defined as an algorithm for calculating
the magnitude of his height or his weight or his energy density!
Without further discussion, we also
somewhat extend the general relativity notion of spacetime as dynamic geometry,
as follows: In a special sense, spacetime º geometry º potential º "trapped " or collected/collecting energy. So
when we engineer the internal structure of the potential, we also engineer the
internal structure (subspace) of spacetime and spacetime geometry. Curvature of
spacetime, e.g., becomes simply a change in the energy density of the vacuum,
from the ambient value, and it can be internally structured so as to contain
"engines". When we apply the
hidden EM variable theory of the Stoney-Whittaker-Ziolkowski work, particularly
when we consider the phase conjugate pairing as it exists in spacetime before
interaction with charge, we are engineering and extending (i) electromagnetics,
(ii) quantum mechanics, (iii) general relativity, (iv) spacetime, (v) the
spacetime curvature concept, and (vi) spacetime geometry.
SCATTERING PROCESSES
Collision processes in which an
incident particle such as a photon, electron, or proton, of known energy or
direction or both, collides with another entity, and emerges from the collision
with a different energy or direction or both.
SCHRÖDINGER, ERWIN
Noted Austrian physicist and
Nobelist who discovered the wave equation named after him as the Schrödinger
equation, and performed other vital work in wave mechanics.
SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
In quantum mechanics: an equation
that describes the propagation of waves associated with subatomic particles, or
more generally, that describes the evolution over time of the quantum state of
a system.
SCHUMANN RESONANCES
The extremely low frequency (ELF)
resonant frequencies of the Earth-Ionospheric waveguide.
The first five Schumann resonances
calculated from a simple model are 10.6 Hz, 18.3 Hz, 25.8 Hz, 33.4 Hz, and 40.9
Hz. However, better models are
available and the frequencies vary from these simple model solutions. A better calculation gives the first four as
8, 14, 20, and 26 Hz nominally. The
measured Schumann resonance corresponding to the 8 Hz is about 7.75 Hz. This is very near the mechanical resonance
frequency of the human body, and also is evidenced in brain waves often
"locking" to this frequency in the natural environment.
See W. O. Schumann, Z. Naturforschung, Vol. 72, 1952, p.
149, 250. For detailed models and
discussion of the observations, see J. Galejs, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards, Vol. 69D, 1965, p. 1043.
SELF-ENERGY
In a quantum mechanical system,
the energy associated with the emission and absorption of virtual particles.
In a classical system, the energy
associated with the interaction among parts of the system itself.
SELF-ORGANIZATION
(After Davies, The New Physics, 1989): "Spontaneous emergence of order,
arising when certain parameters built in a system reach critical values."
Simpler put, it is the spontaneous
formation of patterns of localized order in a system which begins in a more
homogeneous state. In short, the system
moves from a simpler to a more complex state.
SELF-POTENTIAL (E.G., OF THE ELECTRON)
The potential created in and of
the charge
...(e.g., the electron) by its
virtual particle flux exchange with the vacuum.
Also, an asymmetry in the virtual
photon flux of the vacuum, caused by the interaction of the charge (e.g., the
electron) with the vacuum flux. From here, we note that the self-potential must
consist of real observable 3-space EM energy flow or flows from the electron,
because of the asymmetry. However, the
charge is not the primary source per se
of the energy flows that establish the self-potential, but instead is the
asymmetric gate in the vacuum flux that "gates out" the potential and
its energy flux. The asymmetry in the vacuum flux is the actual source.
Indeed, the energy is received by the charge in the form of converging
longitudinal EM energy waves from the complex plane (from the time
domain). The spin of the charges of the
dipole transduce the absorbed complex EM energy into real observable EM longitudinal
wave energy, and pour it out in all directions in 3-space. See my paper, "Giant Negentropy from
the Common Dipole," ibid. for
the mechanism for the charge also.
SELF, SENSE OF
To be added.
SELF-TARGETING
Between two entities, where each
acts partially or wholly as a phase conjugate mirror, self-targeting is the
iterative phase conjugation or "ping-ponging" and rapid convergence
of beams between the two PCMs.
It has a spectacular application in phase conjugate shooting from a
spaceborne laser against a rising hostile booster, even several thousand miles
distant. First a laser pulse is "bounced off" the distant target, and
the reflected pulse returns to the receiver in the laser platform. It carries
the movement-induced alteration of the distant target on the pulse it
reflected. The next emitted pulse is an amplified phase conjugate replica of
that received pulse, and it will backtrack to the same spot on the rising
booster, leading it a bit and converging moderately so that it meets that spot.
That spot begins to heat up, increasing its nonlinearity and making it act even
more as a PCM. So its reflected signal off the "hot spot" is also a
phase conjugate replica of the pulse that it received from the laser. That
reflected pulse now will moderately converge its reflected energy upon the
distant laser, increasing the return to the laser. The ping-pong continues, so
that the laser beam narrows sharply upon the distant hot spot, and the
reflected beam from the hotspot narrows sharply upon the distant laser. This
"iterative narrowing ping pong" locks the laser upon the distant
hotspot, even though the booster is moving. This process continues for the
necessary dwell time, until the beam melts through that spot and explodes the
hostile booster. The iterative phase conjugating reflection, or "ping
ponging" between the target spot and the laser, is called self-targeting.
S-FLOW
The Poynting energy density flow
S, where S º E´H + G.
E is the electric field, H is the magnetic field strength, and G is a trapped closed loop flow of
energy density.
The S-flow is not the total energy flow per se. Since the fields E and H and the closed
loop G are only defined in terms of
the intercepted, trapped or "collected" energy, then S-flow is always with respect to some assumed intercepting/collecting entity,
usually an assumed unit point charge.
SIGNAL WAVE
In nonlinear optics, the input
signal (wave) to a phase conjugate mirror (PCM), which stimulates the PCM to
emit a phase conjugate replica (PCR) wave in return.
SLEPIAN CURRENT
The vector jf , which in a current loop
represents the energy unit area per coulomb of flowing charge, per unit of
time, that is collected/collecting from the Poynting S-flow and dissipated in that current loop in its load s and
losses.
It does not include the enormous
amount of Heaviside nondiverged energy density flow that is flowing along the
outside of the circuit conductors, and that is not being collected and
therefore not being dissipated.
SLEPIAN FLOW
"Flow of collected-energy
density dissipation" in a current loop,
...and therefore to the vector jf in
the current loop, which represents the energy per unit area per coulomb of
flowing charge, per unit of time, that is being dissipated in that current loop
in its loads and losses.
It does not represent the enormous
amount of energy that is flowing along the circuit, that is not being
collected, not diverged, and therefore does not enter the circuit to be
dissipated from it.
SLEPIAN VECTOR
Refers to the vector jf in a current loop,
...which represents the energy
density per coulomb of flowing charge, per unit of time, that is being
dissipated in that current loop in its loads and losses.
It does not represent the enormous
amount of energy that is flowing along the circuit, but not being collected and
therefore not being dissipated. We accent that only intercepted and collected energy can be dissipated!
SOLID-STATE PARAMETRIC OSCILLATORS
A parametric oscillator circuit
employing solid state devices.
A parametric oscillator is a device
that oscillates by rhythmically changing a parameter (such as capacitance or
inductance, etc.).
Simple switching between differing
values of the parameter is often used to induced the periodic change of the
parameter.
SOLITON
A
wave pulse which propagates without changing its shape and without dispersion.
SOURCE DIPOLE
Any dipole, considered from the
viewpoint that EM energy continuously pours out of it.
There is no true "source"
as such in nature, since the energy is not created but only gated. In the case of the dipole and electrical
charge as sources of EM energy, fields, and potentials, we solved that vexing
problem in our "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole", ibid.
SPACETIME
The entity represented by the
"fused product" of space and time, to give "space ´ time".
Spacetime is also dynamic geometry,
in the general relativistic interpretation. We consider spacetime to be a
potential, and also geometry, and also vacuum, and also virtual particle flux,
and also hidden wave flux.
SPATIAL CLOUD
A cloud of something (such as electrons)
in a spatial region.
SPATIALLY
With reference to space and
spatial position.
SPECIAL RELATIVITY
Einstein's theory of inertial
frames in which, if two systems are moving uniformly in relation to each other,
one cannot determine anything about their motion except that it is relative.
Each of the two frames is said to be
"rotated" with respect to the other, but not accelerating. The velocity of light in space (the vacuum)
is constant, and is independent of the velocity of its source and the velocity
of an observer. All the laws of physics
are the same in all inertial frames of reference.
SPIN
The intrinsic angular momentum of
a particle, such as an electron, proton, neutron, photon, graviton etc.,
...even when at rest, as if it were
a top spinning about an axis, but had to spin 720 degrees before it turned
"full circle."
Spin is quantized, and is always
described as a half or whole spin, e.g., - 1, - 1/2, 0, 1/2, 1, etc. A spinning charged particle such as an
electron thus demonstrates a magnetic moment, due to the circulation of charge
in the spinning. In the nucleus of an atom, the spin of the nucleus is the
resultant of the spins of the nucleons (particles comprising the nucleus).
Spin of particles would appear to be
more like an "implosion" to "explosion" circulation; in
other words, it circulates in the time domain (complex plane) as well. It would
appear that the spin of a particle is the basic feature that integrates the
(disintegrated) flux energy of vacuum flux into observable charge. Apparently
all observable fields, matter, effects, etc. depend upon this basic mechanism
to zip together virtual entities and form observable phenomena.
SPIRAL GALAXY
Those galaxies having arms which
extend in the form of spirals.
About 70% of all galaxies are spiral
galaxies.
The interesting thing is that only
about 10% of the gravity necessary to hold the spiral arms together can be
accounted for by known gravitational sources.
This has led to the theorizing of dark (hidden) matter of exotic and
unknown form, which would be responsible for the excess gravity.
The present author has proposed that
the unaccounted enormous Heaviside component of the EM energy flow surrounding
every field/charge interaction and not entering into that interaction, accounts
for the missing source of the gravity.
See "Dark Matter or Dark Energy?", Journal of
New Energy, 4(4), Spring 2000, p. 4-11.
S-SOURCE
Source of Poynting energy density
flow.
Source of S = E´H flow. The primary
source is considered to always be an asymmetry in the virtual particle flux of
the vacuum. The S-flow rigorously is that component of the overall energy flow that
is intercepted by some system of interest—either present or assumed. That component of the overall energy flow
that is not intercepted by the system of interest, is referred to by this
author as the Heaviside energy flow or the dark energy flow associated with
every field/charge interaction.
STONEY To be added
To be added.
STONEY/WHITTAKER BIWAVE DECOMPOSITION
OF THE SCALAR POTENTIAL ACROSS THE DIPOLE
(i) a scalar potential (i.e., a
difference in potential) exists between the end charges of a dipole,
(ii) that potential (difference) can
be mathematically decomposed into a harmonic series of bidirectional EM wave
pairs, where each pair consists of an EM wave and its precisely superposed
time-reversed twin. Thus a dipole is a "source" or identically is a
set of hidden bidirectional waves (wave view).
STRING THEORY
A rather recent mathematical physics theory which replaces the zero-dimensional "point" used in previous physics with a one-dimensional object called a "string".
It
has been particularly effective in describing the gluon forces between two
colored particles in particle physics, and has since been extended to many
other areas. It is sometimes referred
to as the "theory of everything".
"STRING" WAVE
The transverse wave on a taut
string produced when the string is plucked.
The string wave itself stays on the
string and does not travel through the slapped external medium.
However, Faraday believed that EM
fields in vacuum consisted of "material lines of force" which behaved
like such taut material strings, without any physical endholders. He thought
that EM disturbances were simply the transverse disturbances of those
"lines of force". He profoundly affected Maxwell's thinking, so that
Maxwell accepted these physical lines of force. Consequently Maxwell assumed those same "transverse taut
string vibration waves" in his EM wave theory.
In eliminating the
"stringholders" for the assumed taut strings, Faraday and Maxwell
discarded the Newtonian third law half of electrodynamics! They discarded half
the energy and half the wave as well. Consequently today physics has no
causative mechanism for Newton's third law, because it threw out the EM mechanism
for it more than a century ago and never noticed it!
SU(2)´SU(2) SYMMETRY ELECTRODYNAMICS
To be added.
SUBSPACE
In vector mathematics: a subset
of a vector space which is closed under vector addition and scalar
multiplication operations.
In physics: Physics often uses the
term "space" to refer to spacetime. It also uses the term
"space" to refer to the dimensions of space, without the dimensions
of time. At any rate, the spatial portion of spacetime is represented
mathematically by some convenient number of dimensions. In the most usual
practice, Minkowski spacetime of 3 spatial dimensions and one time dimension is
utilized. In the Minkowski space, we now consider that "space" to be
a vacuum scalar potential. If we consider the internal Stoney-Whittaker-Ziolkowski
biwave pairs comprising that vacuum potential, we may transmit a signal
communication along one or more of these internal biwaves, without changing any
of the others. In that case, no overall potential gradient and overall
forcefield signal appears. That domain that is infolded "inside" the
scalar potential is said to be subspace. It may be modeled as a space of
n-dimensions, where those dimensions are compacted and not observable to an
external observer. Subspace gained great popularity from the Star Trek
television series, where the spaceships used "subspace
communications" to have signals propagate far faster than the speed of
light. Bill Fogal has been working with some success on what should be a
concrete realization of just this very "subspace communication
system", with infolded signals that move much faster than the speed of
light in vacuum.
SUPERCONDUCTIVITY
Property of some materials or metals whereby their resistance reduces to zero at very low temperatures.
These
materials also exhibit many additional properties that are anomalous when
compared to normal materials. Much
research effort has gone into the attempt to find materials which exhibit
superconductivity at higher temperatures, with the goal of reaching room
temperature superconductivity.
SUPERLUMINAL
In a manner or with a speed
faster than c, the speed of light in vacuum.
SUPERLUMINAL COMMUNICATION
The movement of signals faster
than the speed of light in vacuum,
...and the transmission and
reception of such signals and extraction of their transported information.
Longitudinal EM waves are not
limited to speed c; transverse EM waves are limited to speed c. The infolded electrodynamics inside all EM
fields, potentials, and waves consists of longitudinal EM phase conjugate wavepairs,
with their impressed electrodynamics.
Hence this "subspace" is a superhighway for such waves,
including for those moving at superluminal velocity. In essence this is a very special kind of "tunneling"
which we might refer to as subspace
tunneling. The limitation to light
speed rigorously applies to the modeled transverse EM waves which are a sort of
"bulk upheaval" waves similar to waves on the surface of the
ocean. As in the ocean wave analogy,
"pressure" waves underneath the ocean may travel very much faster
than the bulk upheaval waves on the surface.
When making longitudinal EM waves,
the process is imperfect and the resulting longitudinal EM waves will have a
transverse residue as well. The
resulting "transverse-noisy" LW is called an undistorted progressive wave. Undistorted progressive waves may move slower than the speed of
light or faster than the speed of light.
See W. A. Rodrigues Jr. and J.-Y. Lu, “On the existence of
undistorted progressive waves (UPWs) of arbitrary speeds 0 £ v
<¥
in nature,” Foundations of Physics,
27(3), 1997, p. 435-508. A slightly
corrected version is downloadable as hep-th/9606171 on the Los Alamos National
Laboratory web site, and includes corrections to the published version.
SUPERPOSE
To lay or place on, over, or
above something else, with the connotation of mixing.
SUPERPOSITION
The simple linear addition and
subtraction of two or more values, states, etc.
Superposition is one of the key
principles in field theories and in the concept of potentials.
SUPERSET
A large set referenced to a small
set, where the small set is included in the larger set.
The large set is said to be a superset of the small set. The small set
is said to be a subset of the larger
set.
SW (STONEY-WHITTAKER) STRUCTURES
The Stoney-Whittaker hidden
bidirectional EM wavepairs comprising the scalar potential, and structuring
(altering) of same.
We call this internal EM dynamics
inside every EM wave, field, and potential the "infolded"
electrodynamics. Russian weapon
scientists refer to it as the information
content of the field.
SYMMETRICAL REGAUGING
In electromagnetics, changing the
scalar potential to a different value, and simultaneously changing the vector
potential to a different value, with the two changes just precisely selected so
that the two extra forces (each created by one of the changes) are equal and
opposite—thus canceling with respect to translation and doing no net external
work.
We note that the two forces
themselves must be considered to be present and still working continuously in
opposition, increasing the stress upon the system regauged with excess energy,
or decreasing the stress upon the system regauged with less energy.
This presence of "equal and
opposite" excess forces from the symmetrical regauging is known as the Lorentz condition. The end result is
that the net force fields of the
regauged system remain the same, even though the stress of the system has been
altered by the regauging and the potential energy of the system has also been
changed. Since abstract vector mathematics contains no such thing as
"stress" in its background vector space, zero vector resultant system
of multiple nonzero vectors are most often simply discarded. Early electrodynamicists symmetrically regauged
Heaviside's two "Maxwell" equations (potential form) so as to easily
separate the variables. The net effect was to discard that set of the
Heaviside/Maxwell equations that prescribed and included open electrodynamic
systems that freely receive and collect energy from the external vacuum, and
also obtain a free excess force which then can permissibly utilize that excess
energy to translate and produce external work upon the system or externally
upon a load. In short, the symmetrical regauging discarded practical overunity
electrodynamic circuits and devices, which Maxwell's equations—even in their
Heaviside modified form—have always prescribed and permitted. Contrast to
asymmetrical regauging.
We specifically point out that the
two extra forces remain, as does their energy, and both may be dynamic as the
system is dynamic. Hence when one
regauges, one has changed the gravitational aspects of the system and also
curved the local spacetime. Further,
this ST curvature is internally structured and that structure is dynamic. Thus contrary to the assumptions of
electrodynamics, the regauged system is
not the same as the original system.
SYMMETRY
A theory or process possesses a
symmetry with respect to certain operations performed on it, if those applied
operations do not change the theory or process.
The
theory or process is then said to be "symmetric" with respect to
those operations. As an example, there
is no observable change in a circle when it is rotated or reflected in a
mirror. The circle is therefore said to
have rotational symmetry and reflection symmetry.
TANTALUM CAPACITOR
Electrolytic capacitor with a
tantalum or sintered-slug anode,
...such as solid tantalum,
tantalum-foil electrolytic, and tantalum-slug capacitors.
For the same capacitance, the weight
and volume of the tantalum capacitor are less than comparable aluminum
electrolytic capacitors. In other words, you can make the little son-of-a-gun
smaller, for a given capacitance and charge it must hold. When utilized in the Fogal fashion, the
tantalum capacitor also exhibits other properties that are still proprietary to
Fogal's semiconductor processes and to Bill Fogal.
TARGETED PINPOINTS
Refers to those separated points
which engage in self-targeting between themselves and some separated signal
energy source (as in Fogal's semiconductor).
The effect is to sharply narrow the
retroreflected source signal energy from the source onto the separated points
by means of the mutual ping-ponging. In this fashion much more energy density
from the source can be concentrated on the targeted pinpoints. In effect, phase
conjugate shooting is evoked.
TENSOR
A special mathematical entity
which is an element of a vector space such that it represents the tensor
product of vector spaces and their duals.
Much of modern physics and advanced
electromagnetics is expressed in tensor algebra theory.
TESLA, NIKOLA
Famous American emigré electrical
inventor and eccentric whose numerous inventions fueled much of the electrical
20th century.
Tesla produced the AC system,
including polyphase systems. From his experiments he knew that the EM wave in
vacuum was longitudinal, like sound waves. In spite of his great
accomplishments, his eccentricities and grandiose pronouncements did not endear
him to electrodynamicists! An example is his acrid comment: "...I showed that the universal medium
is a gaseous body in which only longitudinal pulses can be propagated,
involving alternating compressions and expansions similar to those produced by
sound waves in the air. Thus, a wireless transmitter does not emit Hertz waves
which are a myth, but sound waves in the ether, behaving in every respect like
those in the air, except that, owing to the great elastic force and extremely
small density of the medium, their speed is that of light." Another
major example is his statement: "The
Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do
not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the
most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has
ever been recorded in history."
Ironically, modern quantum mechanics
has almost proven Tesla right that "the universal medium is a gaseous
body." Today the modern QM vacuum is very much like a virtual particle
gas. And of course the discussions in this present annotated glossary show why
I personally am of the opinion that Tesla was also correct in his firm
disbelief that those Faraday-Maxwell "taut physical strings without
physical holders" filled the ether and provided transverse EM wave
oscillations. I also agree with him that the EM wave in vacuum is a
longitudinal wave, exactly like a sound wave. I believe that the transverse
gyroelectron precession waves that our instruments actually measure in the
conductor when it receives an incoming EM wave from the vacuum, proves that the
vacuum wave is indeed longitudinal—else it would seem we must discard the spin
of an electron and the theory of gyroscopes. Finally, one should see, e.g.,
Patrick Cornille, "Inhomogeneous Waves and Maxwell's Equations."
Chapter 4 in Essays on the Formal Aspects
of Electromagnetic Theory, Aklesh Lakhtakia, Ed., World Scientific, New
York, 1993. Cornille clearly shows that Maxwell's equations are directly
created by scalar potential interferometry. As he states, this means that EM
force field wave s are created by the interference of sound-type scalar
potential waves, or "sound creates light." This strongly supports
Tesla's original statement that EM waves in the vacuum are actually EM sound
waves, much like sound waves i n a gas.
TESLA'S MAGNIFYING TRANSMITTER (include
Jackson quote)
To be added.
THERMOACOUSTICS
The generation of sound waves by heat.
THERMOACOUSTIC ENGINE
Essentially a closed resonant chamber containing three heat exchangers and a working fluid—such as an inert gas—under pressure, and used with a transducer to provide power such as mechanical power.
One heat exchanger is the hot-side exchanger through which heat is injected, another is the cold-side exchanger in which a coolant is circulated, and the third is a passive device between the other two, and known as a regenerator or thermal capacitor. The heating and cooling changes the pressure in the fluid greatly, and the regenerator oscillates back and forth, taking energy from the fluid, then giving it back, and keeping the engine going. A pressure wave (shock wave) moves through the working fluid and produces a resonator effect. The end result is an engine with rapidly fluctuating pressure gradients and no moving parts. The pressure gradients are then tapped off to drive a piston, which drives a linear alternator producing electricity. In a typical application, a single piston with a surface area of 1.5 square inches, and with a travel of only one centimeter, operated at 500 Hz, will produce about 30 horsepower output.
Information on these engines can be found on the Fellows Research Group website at http://www.io.com/~frg, or E-mail to frg@io.com. Many thanks to Oscar L. Fellows, "Be Our Guest: Thermoacoustic Engines—Propulsion, Power for the 21st Century," Power Online, 1/24/2000.
THERMODYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM
Stable
state eventually reached by an isolated system. One may consider it a "balanced" or
"preferred" state.
Actually,
a totally isolated system could not change.
Any system is in a constant exchange with its vacuum environment, a
priori, and no such thing as a completely isolated system exists in
nature. Hence once excited, a system—to
reach equilibrium—must exchange with its environment and is not a truly
isolated system. But systems do
exchange with their environment in hidden forms, so we can just let the
original statement stand as is. Sloppy,
but okay so long as we recognize the limits.
TIME
To be added.
TIME-CHARGE
To be added.
TIME-CHARGING
To be added.
TIME-ENERGY
To be added.
TIME-EXCITATION
To be added.
TIME-FLOW MECHANISM
To be added.
TIME-POLARIZED ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE
An electromagnetic wave whose
vibrations occur in the time domain only.
The wave is theorized in quantum
field theory, or at least its time-polarized photon is theorized and called a
"scalar" photon. There seems
to be no Western method for detecting such waves, though they are predicted by
theory.
TIME-POLARIZED (SCALAR) PHOTON
A photon whose vibrations occur
in the time domain only, also known as a "scalar" photon.
TIME-FORWARD WAVE
A normal wave moving in forward
time. Otherwise known as the retarded
wave.
The external observer comfortably
sees its forward progress as expected.
TIME REVERSAL
The process of forming the phase
conjugate
...(e.g., of a wave or particle or
entity or process or vacuum engine.).
We accent that time-reversing a single object or single group of objects is not the same thing as
"travel into the past" so popularized by science fiction. For time
travel to the past, the entire universe and everything in it except the
traveler, would have to be time-reversed. That would not seem possible by any
stretch of the imagination today! On the other hand, time-reversal of a single
thing such as a particle or a wave—or even a group of things such as a group of
particles or waves—is not only feasible but is readily achievable. A positron
is a time-reversed electron, e.g. Becker showed that laughably weak DC
electrical trickle currents (picoamperes) across otherwise intractable bone
fractures could engender healing of the bone fractures. In investigating the
effect, he showed that entire cells—specifically in that case, the red blood
cells—were time-reversed (dedifferentiated) and then fast-forwarded
(redifferentiated) into new kinds of cells, genetics
and all.
In France in the 1960s and early
1970s, the Priore team showed in laboratory animals that this mechanism (which
they nor anyone else understood they were unwittingly evoking) could be used to
dramatically reverse and quickly cure terminal tumors, infectious diseases,
arteriosclerosis, and suppressed immune systems. The same approach, if
redeveloped, could stop and totally wipe out the emerging major new pandemic of
hepatitis C, which nothing will touch at present and which will surpass AIDS
infections after the turn of the century. The approach could totally reverse
AIDS and eliminate all HIV infection, because it could simply time-reverse
HIV-infected cells back to normal cells, genetics and all. In other words, it
could readily and cheaply and quickly eliminate AIDS from the face of the
earth. Further, the disease could be eliminated whenever a patient tested
positive for HIV infection; there would be no need to wait for debilitation to
set in. For coverage in detail, see T. E. Bearden, "Vacuum Engines and
Priore's Methodology: The True Science of Energy-Medicine. Parts I and
II." Explore!, 6(1), 1995, p.
66-76; 6(2), 1995, p. 50-62.
TIME-REVERSAL ZONE
A region of space in which a
component of the overall time flow runs backwards, and hence the fundamental
mechanism generating the flow of a mass through time is reversed.
Such zones are theorized as
temporarily occurring in cold fusion, particularly once the palladium lattice
is loaded with hydrogen or deuterium ions.
Such a temporary region in the electrolyte is an excited state, and the
other ions will move to nullify it and cause its decay. During its existence, ions in it experience
a reversal of the law of attraction and repulsion of charges. In the TRZ, like charges attract and unlike
charges repel. Thus suddenly the low
spatial energy transmutation of elements in cold fusion experiments can be
explained (they have been validated in some 600 successful experiments, in
various laboratories in various nations, by excellent scientists). E.g., two H+ ions may attract, and so
closely that each enters the edge of the strong force region of the other,
forming a quasi-nucleus. Then as the
TRZ decays, the preferred energetic change is from inside out. In other words, the gluon forces have been
partially nullified and the quarks in the nucleons are almost freed. Hence the favored energetic decay from the
excited state of the TRZ is by quark flipping, where one H+ ion in the
quasi-nucleus changes into a neutron.
The quasi-nucleus becomes a quasi-nucleus of deuterium, and will tighten
into deuterium as the TRZ induced action vanishes. This is the way the excess deuterium is formed in the cold fusion
experiments. Two deuterium D+ ions may
also form a quasi-nucleus of (D+)(D+) particularly where the electrolyte is
loaded with deuterium to start with. In
that case, as the TRZ decays, the quasi-nucleus just tightens into a helium 4
nucleus or alpha particle, accounting for the excess alpha particles
formed. And so on.
The concept of the TRZ thus is
consistent with hundreds of successful experiments, and introduces a completely
new type of nuclear reactions to physics, at low spatial energy where
transmutations such as occur are not presently thought to be possible. We point out that these are extremely high
energy reactions when the time-energy interaction is considered, since time has
an energy density equal to mass.
Time-energy is some c2 times as dense as is spatial energy
used by particle physicists in their interactions. By transposing some of the time-energy into spatial energy as the
TRZ decays, the new "low energy nuclear reactions" actually involve
the necessary degree of "high energy" required for the interactions.
TIME-REVERSED WAVE
A phase conjugate reflected wave,
which is a wave moving in reversed time.
Since the external observer
"sees" in forward time only, he sees the wave as traveling in the
opposite direction as its generatrix wave front is moving.
TOPOLOGICAL
Invariant under transformation by
continuous mappings,
...or related to the properties of
geometric shapes and figures that remain invariant under transformation by
continuous mappings.
TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTY
Those
properties of a geometrical space that are unchanged by continuous distortion
of the space.
TOPOLOGY
Mathematics of the properties of
geometric configurations invariant under transformation by continuous mappings.
In short, the mathematics of the
large-scale structure of curved spaces.
TOROIDAL COIL
A coil of wire curved around into toroidal form.
Contrast to the standard solenoidal
coil form.
TOROIDAL TRANSFORMER
A transformer comprised of
toroidal coils instead of solenoidal coils.
TRANSFORMATION MATRIX
A matrix (rectangular array of
algebraic or numerical quantities) for replacement of the variables in an
algebraic expression by their values in terms of another set of variables.
Used, e.g., in solving equations
involving Hamiltonians.
TRANSVERSE
Wave movement perpendicular to
the wave's primary direction of principal propagation, as in the movement of a
taut rope in a wavelike motion traveling down the rope.
(As opposed to longitudinal).
TRANSVERSE EM WAVE IN THE VACUUM
The completely erroneous notion
that EM disturbances in the vacuum are composed of transverse "string
waves."
Faraday, e.g., believed that the EM
field in the vacuum consisted of his "lines of force" as material
taut strings—erroneously without the necessary holders to put the tension
forces on the strings. He thought that when there was an EM disturbance, it was
a "plucking" or transverse vibration of these "taut
strings." Maxwell also believed in Faraday's material lines of force, and
set out to capture them in his electrodynamic theory. He did so by simply
assuming the lines (tubes) of force and their transverse "string
wave" vibration. This is equivalent to assuming that the electromagnetic
vacuum itself is composed of material taut strings, and that additional EM
fields are just additional taut material strings.
TRANSVERSE FIELD COMPONENT
The modeled component of the
electromagnetic field (as in a moving EM wave in vacuum) that is oriented at
right angles to the line of motion.
TRANSVERSE WAVE
A wave where the medium is
undergoing repetitive lateral translations, as a lateral wave in a taut string.
The EM wave is vacuum is erroneously
modeled as a transverse "string wave," as a relic from Faraday's
original belief that EM fields existed in the (assumed) material ether as
physical taut strings. He thus believed that EM disturbances were the
disturbances of "pluckings" of these taut strings. Maxwell accepted
Faraday's physical lines of force and constructed his electrodynamics mode to
specifically include the material ether, the physical "taut strings"
lines of force notion, and Faraday's "string waves" as the electromagnetic
vibrations in the ether. This discards half the energy, half the phenomena,
half the wave, and Newton's third law causative EM mechanism.
TUNNELING
In quantum mechanics, a
phenomenon where a particle penetrates and crosses a small region where the
opposing potential is greater than the particle's available energy.
The phenomenon is thought to be
impossible according to classical physics, but occurs nonetheless. Further, the speed of transit through the
"tunneling" separation can be superluminal. Tunneling of music between
two points has been measured to occur at more than four times the speed of
light.
A more extended type of tunneling is
the travel of longitudinal EM waves infolded inside the normal EM potentials,
fields, and waves. Indeed, this is a
more fundamental electrodynamics, and it can be shown that interferometry of
this "internal" electrodynamics creates the external electrodynamics
by a form of longitudinal EM wave interferometry. E.g., see M.W. Evans, P.K. Anastasovski, T.E. Bearden et al.,
"On Whittaker's Representation of the Electromagnetic Entity in Vacuo,
Part V: The Production of Transverse Fields and Energy by Scalar
Interferometry," Journal of New
Energy, 4(3), Special Issue, Winter 1999, p. 76-78.
UNCONSCIOUS MIND
To be added.
UNIFIED FIELD THEORY (ENGINEERABLE)
A unified theory of the four
forces of physics—the electromagnetic, gravitational, strong, and weak forces
—that is not just an intellectual model but which is also engineerable on the
laboratory bench and in actual physical systems using higher symmetry O(3)
electrodynamics.
That's a mouth-filling phrase (yes,
we sometimes write awkward phrases unintentionally; it's amazing how reasonable
such things sound when you're laboring along at 3:00 a.m. and bleary-eyed as a
wet toadstool!)
UNIFIED FIELD THEORY OF MIND AND
MATTER
To be added.
UNITARITY
Principle that all
probabilities sum to unity.
UNITARY QE
Fixed or unit charge q of the
electron.
This notion is held only because the
q is not decomposed into its component elements, but treated as if it were an
indivisible unit. That is in error! The mass of a fundamental particle at rest
is quantized, and the massless charge (self-potential) of the particle is
discretized as a function of the background potential (virtual particle flux
density) in which it is embedded or to which it is exposed. In our view the
definition of a charge q is q º mqfq. The electrical charge should be taken to be
the massless fq component. The
definition of charge qe of an electron is rigorously given by the
identity qe º mefe. The electrical charge of the electron should
be taken to be the massless fe component.
If a charge (say, an electron) is
placed in an additional potential f1, then the total
massless charge of the electron (i.e., its virtual vacuum flux exchange with
mass me) is (fe+f1). As can be seen, the massless charge of the electron (its
virtual flux activity) has now changed. The electron is then said to be collecting and to have collected
excess energy (which may be either positive or negative, depending upon the
sign of f1.). Further, either
fe or f1 or both can be internally and deterministically dimensioned (structured in
Stoney-Whittaker-Ziolkowski fashion). When its massless charge (its own
potential fe) is so
dimensioned, then the dimensioned electron is said to contain or transport a vacuum engine.
VACUUM ENGINE
Particle view: Deterministic
internal pattern or template deliberately created in the virtual flux of a
scalar potential.
It can also be created in, and
transported by, the two scalar potentials that comprise a static or dynamic
force field, or a moving EM wave in the vacuum. It can also be created in the
local vacuum, in which case it has a "charge-up" creation time and a
"discharge time," exhibiting a sort of "time constant" very
much like a capacitor charging and discharging. In the wave view, the vacuum
engine is a deterministic internal pattern or template deliberately created in
the Stoney-Whittaker-Ziolkowski internal biwaves and wave products comprising
the scalar potential. Again, it can be implanted in the vacuum or in an EM
signal as a carrier. The self-energy (scalar potential) portion of any electric
charge or magnetic charge can also be a "carrier" that is conditioned
(dimensioned) with a vacuum
potential. The process or act of conditioning any of the carriers with vacuum
engines is called dimensioning that
carrier. Russian energetics refers to the vacuum engines of a dimensioned
carrier as the information content of the
field.
VACUUM FLUX EXCHANGE
The virtual particle interaction
between the active vacuum and a charged particle.
The charged particle is an asymmetry
in this flux exchange interaction, and extracts and gates some of the vacuum
energy as a Poynting S-flow. In
turn, this S-flow transports and creates in space the E field and the scalar potential f associated with the charged
particle. An electrically charged particle is thus a little Poynting energy
generator, a source of potential, and a source of E-field. It is a little electrical dynamo, a little free energy
generator. It is already an open system in disequilibrium with its
environment—the fierce vacuum flux. Its self-energy (potential) and its
"fields," plus its Poynting energy flow, are the result of its
asymmetry in the vacuum flux exchange.
VACUUM'S VIRTUAL PARTICLE FLUX
In the particle viewpoint, the
quantum mechanical vacuum identically is a virtual particle flux.
Present physics, however, is prone
to refer to the vacuum as (an implied emptiness) containing a virtual particle
flux. Energy, vacuum, spacetime, virtual particle flux, and dynamic geometry
are all synonyms.
VECTOR
In mathematics, an entity
completely characterized by a magnitude and a direction.
VECTOR POTENTIAL
In electrical engineering:
"Potential postulated in electromagnetic field theory."
Space differentiation (curl) of the vector potential yields the
field. Magnetic vector potential is due to electric currents, while electric
vector potential is assumed to be due to a flow of magnetic charges." [Chambers Science and Technology Dictionary,
Peter M. B. Walker (Ed.), Chambers Cambridge, 1988, p. 947.
Note that the foregoing is not yet a
definition, saying only that it is a postulated potential, then giving some
characteristics. Informally, in my view the vector potential is just sort of an
ordinary scalar potential, every point of which is in motion in something like
a swirling fashion. The magnetic vector potential A is most common. There doesn't seem to really be a definition of A; the equation B = Ñ´A is usually
(erroneously!) said to "define" the A. So we are left with the
question A º ????, since no equation is a
definition of anything.
Electrodynamicists have no
difficulty in calculating the direction and magnitude of A, and in using it, but so far as I can find there is still no real
definition. As an ad hoc definition I consider the A-potential to be identically a virtual photon flux of vacuum that
is moving as an ensemble along the direction of the A-vector. Inputs for a more rigorous definition of the form A º (x) would be
most welcome!
At any rate, the A is known to be quite real and an
independent "field" of nature, because when the curl operator is
removed from operating on A, the B-field is zeroed but the curl-free A-field can still remain and interfere with the fields of charged
particles and magnetic poles to cause real effects in physical systems,
including at a distance. This latter is known as the Aharonov-Bohm effect.
VECTOR FIELD
In ordinary theory, the assigning
of a magnitude and a direction (that is, a vector) to each point in a region of
space.
The entire set of vectors and their
spatial points is called a vector field.
VECTOR ZERO
See discussion under zero vector.
VIRTUAL ANTIPHOTONS
An antiphoton that spontaneously
appears and disappears, so swiftly that it cannot be individually observed.
VIRTUAL PARTICLE
A fleeting quantum particle that
spontaneously appears and disappears, so swiftly that it cannot be individually
observed, so that it exists only temporarily.
The virtual particle does not
satisfy the usual relation between energy, momentum, and mass because it is
underneath the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The virtual particle can have any amount of energy momentarily,
so long as the product of its energy and the time interval of its existence is
less than the uncertainty principle's minimum magnitude.
Nonetheless, the interactions of
large numbers of virtual particles with a mass or charge can combine to
generate real observable effects. In quantum field theory, all forces of nature
are caused by the interaction of the forced mass entity with virtual particles.
Interaction of a mass with virtual photons, e.g., is projected to cause all
mechanical and electromagnetic forces.
VIRTUAL PARTICLE FLUX EXCHANGE
Interaction with or exchange of,
a flux of virtual particles.
Interaction of a mass with virtual
particles most often consists of the mass absorbing the virtual particles and
re-emitting them.
VIRTUAL PHOTON FLUX (VPF)
A flux of virtual photons.
(Hey, how's that for a tautology!) First, see definition and discussion under flux. For electromagnetics, the vacuum
can often be modeled as a flux of virtual photons. One gets the virtual charges
also, since the photon is considered to also consist of a positron-electron
pair. That is, the photon is continually separating into a positron-electron
pair, which then annihilate each other to form additional photon(s), etc.
VIRTUAL PHOTON FLUX EXCHANGE
The mutual exchange of virtual
photons, as between the vacuum and a charged mass, or between two colliding
masses.
The emitted photons from one mass
are absorbed in the other mass and re-radiated.
VIRTUAL PHOTON FLUX OF VACUUM
The vacuum identically is a flux
of virtual particles.
For most electromagnetic cases, it
can just be modeled as identically a flux of virtual photons.
VIRTUAL PHOTONS
Photons which spontaneously
appear and disappear in the vacuum so quickly that they cannot be individually
observed.
VIRTUAL POSITRONS
Positive electrons (positrons)
which spontaneously appear and disappear in the vacuum so quickly that they
cannot be individually observed.
WHITTAKER, E. T.
Well-known mathematical
physicist, who dramatically extended Stoney's earlier work of 1897-8 and
authored two papers in 1903 and 1904 giving the basic theory of scalar
electromagnetics (Russian energetics, not including the quantum potential
portion).
The 1903 paper is E.T. Whittaker, “On
the Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics,” Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903,
p. 333-355.
The 1904 paper is E.T. Whittaker, “On
an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field Due to Electrons by Means of Two
Scalar Potential Functions,” Proc. Lond.
Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p. 367-372. The paper was published in 1904 and orally delivered in 1903.
WHITTAKER'S DECOMPOSITION OF THE
SCALAR POTENTIAL
Decomposition of the scalar
potential into a harmonic set of bidirectional longitudinal EM phase conjugate
wavepairs.
In his paper “On the
Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics,” Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p. 333-355, Whittaker showed that the scalar
EM potential can be decomposed into a harmonic series of bidirectional EM
wavepairs. In each pair, one wave is the phase conjugate of the other, and
exists in the time domain. However,
this phase conjugate wave has been considered as having been detected by
intercepting charge as a 3-space EM wave travelling in a reversed
direction. Hence from a detectable
viewpoint, the Whittaker decomposition yields bidirectional longitudinal EM
waves in 3-space, as has been pointed out by several electrodynamicists (e.g.,
Barrett).
However, the present author
considered the difference between the phase conjugate wave as it exists prior
to interaction with the assumed intercepting unit point charge, and the
detected 3-space wave after the detecting charge is assumed. By applying the Whittaker decomposition and
also considering the nature of the EM wave in spacetime prior to interception by a unit point charge, this led to the
discovery of a new and more primary 4-symmetry in EM energy flow, once
3-symmetry is broken, that exists automatically between the time domain
(complex plane) and 3-space.
Thus because a dipole (or a charge
treated as a set of composite dipoles) breaks 3-symmetry (as is well-known in
particle physics), the more general 4-symmetry results automatically when the
nature of the potential between the ends of the dipole(s) is considered. This yields the fundamental mechanism by
which EM energy is extracted from the vacuum (from the complex plane or the
time domain) and output in 3-space from a "source charge" or a
"source dipole". In short, it
yields the giant negentropy mechanism when the unaccounted Heaviside energy
flow component from a charge or dipole is considered as well as the intercepted
tiny Poynting energy flow component.
See T. E. Bearden, "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole", Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer
2000, p. 11-23; also on http://www. cheniere.org.
In his second paper, “On
an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field Due to Electrons by Means of Two
Scalar Potential Functions,” Proc. Lond.
Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p. 367-372, Whittaker showed that the interference of two such scalar
potentials can and does create all the field energy, patterns, and functions of
classical electromagnetics.
Whittaker's second paper initiated
what today is loosely referred to as superpotential
theory. For an excellent overview discussion of
superpotentials and related things, see Melba Phillips, “Classical
Electrodynamics,” in Principles of
Electrodynamics and Relativity, Vol. IV of Encyclopedia of Physics, edited
by S. Flugge, Springer-Verlag, 1962.
WORK
The changing of the form of
energy.
WORK, EXTERNAL
The changing of the form of the
external energy of a body or system.
WORK, INTERNAL
The changing of the form of the
internal energy of a body or system.
WORK-ENERGY THEOREM
To be added.
ZERO POINT ENERGY
The minimum energy of a system
due to its quantum fluctuations, resulting from its incessant virtual particle
activity.
Quantum mechanically, no system of interest (including even spacetime
itself) can have zero energy.
The zero-point energy of the vacuum
is the lowest energy vacuum state, with fluctuations taken into account. Even
at low energies, quantum fluctuations continually arise, and result in an
incessant, extremely rapid, and violent "jittering" of the energy
momentarily present. The minimum energy due to these quantum fluctuations is
called the zero-point energy.
ZERO VECTOR
(1) A vector having no length (no
magnitude) or specific direction.
(2) Absence of any or all finite
vectors.
(3) Resultant of a system of
multiple, finite vectors whose vector sum has no specific direction.
Note that the second definition
differs drastically from the first. That is, we cannot say that a vector
resultant zero has no infolded magnitude, if we consider its components, all of
whom have magnitude. See the discussion under "zero." In vector
analysis, the zero vector axiom states that any vector v plus a zero vector is
equal to a zero vector plus v. Note that, being an axiom, this is not proven,
but just assumed. We very much disagree with that blanket axiom; it reduces
vector analysis to a highly special single case, where all zero vector systems
are to be considered equal, and totally "inactive." In the real world
that need not be true at all. There are an infinite number of different zero
vector resultant systems, and so zero vectors may differ, if their infolded
component "substructure" is considered. In the real world, things
that are vectors very often have energy. The energy is infolded and hidden, so
that it represents not only a local curvature of spacetime, but also a
structured, deterministic set (a template)
of curvatures of local spacetime. Therefore this zero vector system is actually
a vacuum engine. Any mass system
placed in such a potential, will be acted upon in its parts by that local
vacuum engine. Further, the zero vector resultant system is a
"potential," since it does contain "collected internal
energy." This potential is obviously an artificial potential, since it is
deterministically structured internally.
So between zero vector resultant
systems, the "infolded, hidden energies" differ dramatically in
(i) total infolded and trapped
(collected) energy,
(ii) specific internal action
patterns (templates),
(iii) general relativistic effects,
and
(iv) type of vacuum engine.
Accordingly, the actions the zero-vector system induces in an exposed mass may
be designed in advanced. This is vacuum engineering. This is spacetime
engineering.
The problem is the vector algebra itself. In the abstract
algebra, a "vector space" is regarded as an inert thing, where the
only actants are the overall net nonzero vectors, and there is no interaction
between an overt vector and a covert set o f vectors. The vector space is not
allowed to have an internal realm, stress, hidden engines, or to interact with
the vectors representing the physical system. Consequently, for over a century
electrodynamicists—thinking primarily of translation—have routinely discarded
such "zero vector systems" as if they represented the total absence
of any finite vector. This they do, in
the unsuitable assumptions of the vector algebra. This they do not do, in
the real world.
The common practice in electrical
physics of replacing a zero-summed system of nonzero vectors with a vector zero
of "complete absence of vectors" is incomplete, and such did not
exist in Maxwell's original quaternion
theory. This present practice should be changed; it has reduced the topology of
electromagnetics far too much, and gutted the most important parts of the
theory insofar as an extended electromagnetics is concerned. The vector zero
should be replaced with a special organized vector zero system and a scalar
potential. The interactions of the "hidden" vectors should be
incorporated. By failing to do this, physics excludes the ability to engineer
electrogravitation, spacetime, the virtual state, local general relativity,
free energy, effects at a distance, and the probabilities of the states
propagated by the Schrödinger equation. It also excludes unification of all
forces.
In the new view, a zero vector may
be a system of nonzero vectors that vectorially sum or multiply to zero for
translation purposes, but the components may still exist "inside" and
dynamically function inside the zero-resultant envelope. This substructure can
act on nonlinear or resonant systems. Any or all components may be time
varying, or none of them may be. The zero vector system may thus be a dynamic
vacuum engine. In addition, such a vector zero system is considered to be also
a scalar stress potential, whose magnitude is equal to the sum of the absolute
values of the perpendicular components. In addition, a separate type of stress
potential may be included for the magnitude of the absolute values of the swirl
components (torques). Other associated potentials may be included for the
system, particularly if the system is in multiple dimensions, if it consists of
more than one type of virtual particle flux, if several fluxes intercommute,
etc. Such a system can also be designed and created to deterministically
interact with and on the life force itself, the mind, thought, and personality,
but that is beyond the scope of this discussion.
ZERO-VECTOR-SUMMATION SURFACE
A surface or assumed spatial
surface in which vectors under consideration interact to sum to a vector zero
resultant.
ZERO-VECTOR-SUMMATION SYSTEMS
Zero summations of real, nonzero
vectors, so that the real vectors are still present but do not cause
translation of exposed mass or charges.
With respect to observing/detecting
process that depend upon charge translation, the vectors are said to be hidden
and infolded—i.e., with respect to detection by translation. See discussion
under zero vector.
ZIOLKOWSKI, RICHARD
To
be added.