RESPONSE TO COUNTERFORCE STRIKE (WITH DEFENSE)
SLIDE 75.
On this slide we show the impact of scalar defenses against an adversary who possesses only the orthodox
nuclear weapons and delivery systems, and makes a "first strike" by surprise against his opponent.
In this case, the attacked opponent has scalar EM defenses.
With just the midcourse and terminal scalar
EM howitzer defenses, almost all of the attacking missiles and re-entry vehicles
are destroyed.
If for some reason (such as to prevent triggering the sun and destroying the world inadvertently!) the attacked adversary does not wish to attack strategically with scalar
EM weapons, he may now launch a massive retaliatory strike on his opponent.
And if that opponent has no ABM defenses, he's just bought the farm.
What a funny coincidence! Long ago, we crazy Americans chose to put all our eggs in the offensive basket. That is, we thought the Soviets cannot dare to strike us because we will have enough
surviving missiles to penetrate any orthodox defense and destroy them in return. They
would also have the same "mutual assured destruction (MAD)" capability, of course!
The MAD concept was aptly
acronymmed -- it was an insane idea from its inception. That is, the Soviets
were not supposed to defend their cities and populace, and neither were we. That way, you see,
we could destroy their citizenry at will, and they could destroy ours at will. We deliberately agreed to that, thinking
-- in our insanity -- that the Soviets agreed also.
Of course the Soviets weren't playing the same
lunatic's game at all. They simply fed our own garbage back to us, and we importantly thought we were negotiating something. Unknown to us,
they were secretly building and deploying scalar EM defenses even then. Since we
didn't know of any other defense, we assumed the Soviets could not defend their
citizenry with ABMs any better than we could defend ours with ABMs. So we blithely scrapped our
ABMs.
The high government officials of the United States of America grossly violated our constitution and their sworn oaths of office.
Our constitution specifically charges the government of the United States to defend the
people of the United States. That means our officials are specifically charged
with defending our people. Yet they deliberately agreed not to do so, and they
deliberately sacrificed us in advance.
They committed treason of the highest kind, by deliberately surrendering us to total destruction
anytime the big balloon goes up.
The constitution doesn't charge the
government with surrendering our citizens to destruction under any
circumstances. It charges the government with defending us against
destruction.
Ronald Reagan is the first U.S. president in some time to see through the
MAD concept. At least he stands forthrightly for defense. It's just a shame that the government and scientific
leaders under him aren't aware of the Soviet scalar weapon developments, so they could brief him on these startling
developments.
Be sure you understand what the government leaders before Reagan have been saying. For years, our official policy has effectively
said to the Russians: "We will allow each side a token defense only. We deliberately will not defend ourselves, so that anytime you decide to strike us you can destroy us. In return, however, we do not think you will
want to strike us, for we believe that -- before we become ashes from
that strike -- we can get enough away at you, to destroy you as well. Of course we believe you are in the same sort of boat."
Then we said, "There! That's
settled! What a relief! nobody can strike anybody anymore. Now can we talk about partial
disarmament and on-site inspection?"
The Soviets just kept their astonished amusement to themselves and kept building scalar defenses (and scalar offenses as well !). Their deception plan called for imbedding the scalar EM weapons in ordinary systems when possible, and hiding the scalar
EM weapons tests in ordinary weapons tests when possible. Of course they had to be adamant in their opposition to on-site inspection; after all, even
Western scientists, if allowed on site with the dual-mode weapons, might
suspect something was different and possibly things were amiss.
The Soviet deception has worked like a charm. The U.S.
MADmen who created and implemented the MAD doctrine have succeeded in prejudicing two generations of academicians and elected U.S. leaders
against the need for effective defense. A vast wasteland of inane paper studies
-- learnedly dealing with ABM's, penetration tactics, leakage, force and counterforce, radar blackout, electronic warfare, etc. etc.
-- has been churned out by our military, industrial, and university "think tanks" to clog the minds, efforts, and literature
of our defense and governmental establishments.
Our homeland has no effective
ABM defense (and very little defense against aircraft or subsonic cruise missiles). Our field
army has no effective ABM defense (or air defense). Our naval forces have no effective
ABM defense (although they are better defended against air attack than the field army). Yet ballistic missiles -- and to some extent cruise missiles
-- have supposedly been our greatest threat for decades, followed closely by the secondary threat of massed aircraft attack.
A cynic might take the stand that, if our Defense Department hasn't been allowed to defend us (with
deployed weapon systems, not by "paper studies") against what we
ourselves have proclaimed is our biggest threat, then why is it called the Defense Department?
Why not call it the No-defense Department?
Understand, a great many fine, hard-working people in DoD have certainly tried to get adequate defenses developed and deployed. The sheer weight of the bureaucracy and its mind-numbing entanglements have prevented it.
But it's even worse. Our bureaucrats
-- both in government and in "big, organized science" -- have been so caught up in the
"Russians are really just ignorant peasants" syndrome and the "not-invented-here"
(NIH) syndrome that they've not recognized the greatest scientific and technical breakthrough in history. Such a breakthrough
-- far greater in importance that the nuclear bomb --
has been made, developed, and deployed by the Soviet Union, all in secrecy and behind the smokescreen of a masterful deception plan.
We've totally missed the most incredible "secret superweapons" development program of all times, and the worldwide testing of the weapons themselves.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki should serve as object lessons in the price of ignorance of such technological breakthroughs.
History does repeat itself. But this time it's not we Americans who got the great new superweapon first.